Critical Theory for our varsities


by Azly Rahman

The recent announcement by the Ministry of Higher Education to reconstruct the ideology and modus operandi of our public universities interest me. It seems to provide a good declaration for the nation to embark upon this long walk to academic freedom; for the removal of acts, administrators, apparatuses, and activities that are anathema to the meaning of a university.

The announcement seems to promise a better sense of leadership and scholarship as a response to criticisms on the waning and weakening of purpose of the Malaysian public university.

But how do we reconstruct the consciousness of our higher education institution, so that its body politics can create a holistic sense of beingness — a Ying Yang of intellectual longevity? How do we remove the structures that are caging the mind and soul of the university? What do we need to do to create this “apex” university in perhaps a hundred years to come?

“First things first,” as the Management “feel-good guru” Stephen Covey would say. “Think lateral,” as the global corporate marketer of thinking skills Edward deBono will advise.

Critical Theory of society

Our developmentalist ideology needs a critical analysis. This ideology has become a shibboleth in itself and one we are trapped in, and one that has driven our nation to the brink of political, economic, social, and cultural chaos on the eve of our 50th. Year of Merdeka. Our Independence needs a radical critique.

If we can step outside of this ideology of race-based, hypermodernised system of evolution of a corporate-nation-state and put this worldview in a crystal ball, we will be able to see something different. We will be able to see a world of alternatives to the one that is falling apart. But what do we need to critique this ideology we are trapped in?

A critical theory of society – that’s what we need in this post-half-a-century of the nation’s independence. We need a new paradigm of looking at ideology and how to deconstruct it.

What is a critical theory of society? Where do we begin to germinate the seed of this kind of education?

Many of our university leaders still cannot and will not understand the difference between the concept of hegemony and totalitarianism as opposed to education and liberation. To them, it is a place to exercise total control of the mind, body and the soul.

Critical thinking, which is supposed to be made to permeate all disciplines, all curriculum, all written and spoken discourse is flushed down the drain of academia, replaced with the structures of mental oppression, making human beings merely cogs in the wheels of Kapital as these replacements serve the weakening and failing corporatist Malaysian nation-state. Whether an university is run via a “faculty” or “college” system, is not the matter.

What is key is the manner critical discourse is made to permeate all the disciplines and into the minds of the faculty and the students. What is important is to celebrate critical thinking and to honor radical minds that can help construct, deconstruct, and reconstruct society so that any government that no longer serves the needs of the people and the environment can be replaced by the work of the thinking university. Nothing lasts forever but perhaps, the Earth and Sky.

What is the value of this mode of thinking?

Critical thinking will help in the process of removing the structures that are shackling the nation; structures that are making us unable to clearly see the issue of race, class, ethnicity, political-economy, controlling interests, and ideological domination in a newer light. These structures will continue to help facilitate the role of the universities as instrumentally-relevant institutions useful to the survival of the deteriorating Asian-Despotic corporate-nation state.

Structures of a vulture-culture

These structures are built with clear awareness of their usefulness; true to what the French thinker Louis Althusser called “ideological state apparatuses”. In mission statements of our public universities, absent is “critical thinking” as one of the skills to be infused into students and as an educational/pedagogical process to create a thinking citizenry. We do not see a conscious effort to promote the skills of critical thinking about society, to teach students to name the oppressive strictures in it, and to make radical changes to impact progressive and peaceful well-beings of citizens. In these mission statements, there is no declaration of the need to respect and encourage the free flow of ideas however radical they are — in the name of academic freedom and the allegiance to truth through scientific inquiry, rather that allegiance to state-designed totalitarianism through all levels of indoctrination and the monitoring and molding of student thinking.

Our universities have become a “conveyor” belt to produce one-dimensional human beings who will help ease the way for young-hooliganistic leaders who are claiming a continuation of neo-colonialism as their “birthright” – leaders who are beginning to employ even rougher, rowdier, more brutal “mat-rempitized” brigades (the grandchildren of Merdeka/Independence) to achieve their goals, as the Black nationalist Malcolm X would say, by whatever means necessary.

Human capital re-evolution?

What a waste of human resource and human talent, what a subtle form of oppression – for those ruled, reproduced, and be made to repeat and regurgitate what the Official and Packaged Knowledge System tells their brain to respond to. When during interviews graduates cannot string together a good sentence in English let alone provide a synthesised/integrative analysis of what they have learned, we have got a problem with what goes on in the classrooms and the nature and culture of critical thinking we have cultivated. Continue to keep the emerging middle class passive and docile in their thinking – this will be good for total control so that this nation and its generations will be lobotomised of its critical sensibility.

But there is still hope for our nation. Like Albert Camus would say of Sisyphus, we will continue to roll the rock up on the hill and at least imagine ourselves happy.

  1. #1 by LittleBird on Sunday, 9 September 2007 - 12:50 pm

    And about the appointment of non bumi deputy VC – so is it official that VC post is always reserved for bumis only?

  2. #2 by toniXe on Sunday, 9 September 2007 - 3:14 pm

    we all know the real problem. the educational wheel was invented some Cambridges Oxfords hundreds of years ago !
    anything else is of course hypocritical or as you have always said time and time again, a sandiwara of the lowest calibre , an F grade in the world of entertainment

  3. #3 by k1980 on Sunday, 9 September 2007 - 4:22 pm

    Why is this not reported in the mainstream media?
    09 Sept 2 cedera parah ditembak polis di Batu Buruk
    Dua cedera parah ditembak peluru hidup oleh polis manakala berpuluh-puluh cedera dalam pertempuran antara orang ramai dan polis di Batu Buruk petang dan malam semalam.

    Dua yang terkena peluru hidup polis itu masih dalam wad pembedahan Hospital Kuala Terengganu.

    Kecederaan berlaku di pihak orang awam dan juga polis manakala berbelas-belas telah ditahan sehingga kini termasuklah wartawan TVPAS.

  4. #4 by badak on Sunday, 9 September 2007 - 6:01 pm

    What bull shit,No politics in local varsities,Go to any local univarsities and you can see ,PUTRI AND PUTRA UMNO openly recruiting members with the help of the Education department,

    But let the opposition try that , Even girls are being bitten up by this UMNO thugs,Which happen not long ago ,Did the powers that be take action,A BIG NOOO ,Because they link to the opposition camp,or were they

  5. #5 by digard on Sunday, 9 September 2007 - 6:39 pm

    “we will continue to roll the rock up on the hill and at least imagine ourselves happy”

    Ohmygawd, yes. But we don’t need the latter. That’s the stuff dreams of BN are made of.

    I cite from the famous dialogue of Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault of 1971 on Human Nature
    “… A fundamental element of human nature is the need for creative work, for creative inquiry, for free creation without the arbitrary limiting facts of institutions. Then of course it will follow that a decent society should maximise the possibilities for this fundamental human characteristic to be realised. [Chomsky] …
    But I think that the political power is also exerted by a few other institutions which seem to have nothing in common with the political power, which seem to be independent but which actually aren’t. We all know that university and the whole educational system that is supposed to distribute knowledge; we know that the educational system maintains the power in the hands of a certain social class and exclude the other social class from this power. [Foucault] …”

    This is what we experience, here in Malaysia as well, in 2007. And we cement this division, all of us. It has nothing to do with race. We have long handed over all autonomy of teaching and learning to the classes of bureaucrats of the calibre of MoE, MoHE, LAN. The Chinese maybe even more than the Malays. Everyone is like a terrified rabbit staring at the snake. We want and acclaim a new blueprint for more autonomy, we expect great educational outcomes from an institution with LAN accreditation, and recently are foolishly taken in by some idea mooted in those lofty regions on an ‘apex’ university to be set up. The dog is happy with a slightly loosened-up leash.
    We remain a vertical society, and Hofstede, in his ‘Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind’ attests us a gold medal: Malaysia is the world leader in the realm of populace trusting the powers that be. So we hope and pray and trust. And we are happy, Azly Rahman, aren’t we?
    We applaud their latest plans of “creating” 100.000 PhD holders (The Star, August 28). While some of us might feel 2nd class for their kids being largely excluded, they still look up to a rather questionable undertaking. And in the end these might as well vote for this government if only it “created” a PhD-holder from their kid.

    No government on this globe is stupid enough to slash the leashes on which it holds and directs education. Even in the developed world, the population and the students had to fight for the little bit of autonomy they enjoy today. Therefore we, all, everyone, the registered and unregistered voters, the voters and non-voters, should rather look to regain some autonomy for our lives. We ought to create our own little circles of critical thinking. Waiting for the government, MoE, MoHE, to prop up an approved version, is behaving like that terrified rabbit. Has it been swallowed by now? I think, yes.

  6. #6 by karaoke singer on Monday, 10 September 2007 - 12:22 am

    May be the voluntary separation scheme ( VSS ) could be applied to this situation. The public is the one who voted the cabinet in. Now the cabinet is thinking about VSS. The public should determines who gets the VSS and not the cabinet. Without the public, where will the cabinet be today ? The public is the boss. Not the cabinet. 50 donkey years have gone. The public should VSS the ones who screwed up the education system. Money belongs to the public. The public is the one who should control the money. Therefore those who are screwing up the money and making things go bad to worse should be VSSed.

  7. #7 by pulau_sibu on Monday, 10 September 2007 - 12:30 am

    The minister for Higher Education, I suggest you to assemble a group of Malaysian professors at the top foreign universities, and invite them to discuss and provide suggestions. The problems can be fixed from outside but not from inside.

  8. #8 by Jeffrey on Monday, 10 September 2007 - 1:30 am

    Agreed, the recent announcement on the National Higher Education Action Plan 2007-2010 is positive. How can it not be – especially when compares with the state of higher education an public universities now – against the proposals of identifying apex universities with highest quality of academics, management, teaching, research and autonomy being given priority, a pooling of up to 100,000 PhD holders in 15 years in specific disciplines with student intake not based on race alone but an infusion of an element of meritocracy within quotas reflective of our ethnic diversity with 20% opened to international students, hence a wider use of English?

    Let’s however be realistic. These are but mere first tentative steps to undo some of the grosser past mistakes on education.

    They do not, by any stretch, tantamount to a celebration of “critical thinking” and honouring “radical minds” that can help construct, deconstruct, and reconstruct society as Dr Azly Rahman pinned his hopes on so buoyantly..….

    Neither is a critical mind amongst students desired by our powers to be or a “critical theory of society, embraced.

    For examples, are lecturers and students in apex universities allowed, in their ‘critical minds’, to acknowledge the truth that Suqiu demands in 1999 were not extremist for going against Article 153 of the Federal Constitution on the rights of bumiputras and that these demands were in fact consistent with constitutional prescriptions and the social contract? Or that May 13 was not instigated by DAP and Opposition but UMNO’s own politicians?

    This action plan is a mere response of “Malaysia Boleh” hubris and pride : after touting Malaysia as an international centre of academic excellence, something has to be done in the face of repetitive downgrading of Malaysian public universities by the likes of Shanghai JiaoTung University and The Times Higher Education Supplement (THES) etc

    But is mere hubris and pride sufficient to see it through? Is there the requisite political will without which all high principles on education will remain what they are – mere aspirations?

    The BN’s politics is ethnic based and UMNO promotes the NEP and Islamisation. How are these reconcilable with precepts of meritocracy, autonomy and wider use of English underpinning apex universities?

    Besides can public universities that are “apex” source good intake from secondary schools in which the principles of meritocracy, autonomy and wider use of English are not applied (since primary schools)???

    Could the education system, presently in dire straits, be deconstructed and substituted by a more enlightened paradigm when the government itself responsible for implementing such a vision undergoes no deconstruction of its race and religion based policies contrary to the precepts of such apex universities???

    I stand corrected if I were wrong but I very much doubt that there is sufficient political will. Many of us will still continue to roll the rock up on the hill but cannot imagine ourselves happy.

  9. #9 by undergrad2 on Monday, 10 September 2007 - 2:17 am

    “When ….graduates cannot string together a good sentence in English … we have got a problem.. ” Azly Rahman

    It means they cannot string together a sentence. Could it be the fault of the string or the person trying to string it??

  10. #10 by Godfather on Monday, 10 September 2007 - 4:14 am

    Why can’t these clowns understand that only meritocracy can save our higher institutions of learning ? Meritocracy in the pure sense, and not in the manner that Mahathir and his successor have defined. And certainly not with the games that UMNO has tried to play through their own definitions and statistics.

  11. #11 by greatstuff on Monday, 10 September 2007 - 7:44 am

    An excellent article by Azly Rahman, who has hit the nail squarely on the head as to what need to be done to start to produce the opposite of the “robots” that have been manufactured so far. A huge task therefore lies ahead, not an impossible task but it will take at least a decade to start to show results.

  12. #12 by RealWorld on Monday, 10 September 2007 - 9:34 am

    “Why can’t these clowns understand that only meritocracy can save our higher institutions of learning ?” – Godfather

    Dude, we are living in a democracy. It is the rakyat who decides.

  13. #13 by undergrad2 on Monday, 10 September 2007 - 10:29 am

    “Dude, we are living in a democracy. It is the rakyat who decides.”

    The rakyat does not decide but their representatives do. There is a huge difference.

  14. #14 by W.O or Wilson on Monday, 10 September 2007 - 11:08 am

    Hmmm…great to see someone else reads Chomsky and Focault here.

  15. #15 by k1980 on Monday, 10 September 2007 - 1:42 pm

    Welcome to NEPLand: American, Israeli flags can be burnt, but never ever burn umno’s flags or you will be shot
    http://www.utusan.com.my/utusan/content.asp?y=2007&dt=0910&pub=Utusan_Malaysia&sec=Politik&pg=po_01.htm

  16. #16 by RealWorld on Monday, 10 September 2007 - 2:37 pm

    “The rakyat does not decide but their representatives do. There is a huge difference.” – undergrad2

    It is the rakyat who vote in the leaders of their choice. 91% mandate, remember? :)

  17. #17 by pwcheng on Monday, 10 September 2007 - 3:20 pm

    undergrad2 Says:
    September 10th, 2007 at 02: 17.04

    When ….graduates cannot string together a good sentence in English … we have got a problem.. ” Azly Rahman

    It means they cannot string together a sentence. Could it be the fault of the string or the person trying to string it??

    Good question, but let me tell you with conviction that they will blame the string and not the person. This is from my personal experience with them when my son wanted to apply for a loan from the JPA for his final year of studies for an IT degree in Australia. They conveniently made IT as a non critical subject for overseas study loan and the reason is because there are too many graduates (and you know who are those graduates) in IT who are jobless. Hence having this after thought reason will effectively cut you off from for the loan because it became a policy and hence non-appealable.

    Whether this is UMNO’s policy or due to some high handedness of some racialist government servants is still a mystery to me but the end result is damaging but do they really care if there is brain drain.

  18. #18 by sotong on Monday, 10 September 2007 - 4:45 pm

    A great example of a Corporate-Nation-State is Singapore….they went through lots of pain and stick to their long term plan.

    We have lost the education battle and made numerous and critical mistakes in building a cohesive, fair, modern and progressive nation…..it would take decades to recover from this mess.

  19. #19 by k1980 on Monday, 10 September 2007 - 6:15 pm

    Mirror, mirror on the wall, who is the fairest of ’em all?
    A. Snow White
    B. Snow White’s stepmother
    C. Dollah Badawi
    D. Elizabeth Taylor

    Answer: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2007/8/20/nation/18642941&sec=nation

  20. #20 by 4th_wife on Tuesday, 11 September 2007 - 12:12 am

    By any measure I have no confident in Malaysia’s education system. I don’t believe a country can have a successful education system with just having talk and no real action being done knowing well that the corruption is on the rise and leaders are only paying lip service.

  21. #21 by Jeffrey on Tuesday, 11 September 2007 - 10:54 am

    When ….graduates cannot string together a good sentence in English … we have got a problem.. ” – Azly Rahman

    They thought that by marginalising English and promoting BM, they would give a edge to those to whom BM is first language little knowing that it would handicap them severely and benefit others who have become trilingual, a definite advantage in this Globalised environment. Is it a case of Poetric justice/karma – of good intentions beget good results and unmeritorious motives beget bad results?

  22. #22 by undergrad2 on Tuesday, 11 September 2007 - 10:07 pm

    Or could it be that they were not given the proper string so they could string a sentence together?

You must be logged in to post a comment.