I have today received a complaint from a parent of a prefect in Maktab Sultan Abu Bakar (formerly English College) in Johor Bahru expressing the strongest objection to any attempt to make “songkok” part of the compulsory uniform of school prefects and students in the school.
He said his son, who is in Form Five, has been a school prefect in Maktab Sultan Abu Bakar since he was in Form Two and had always been an exemplary student, as well has won praise from many teachers for his exemplary conduct and commitment to his duties and studies. He is also a member of the ExCo of the Prefectorial Board.
The parent wrote:
“Recently, in the beginning of this year, there was an instruction from the school, which I believe came from the teacher advisor to the Prefectorial Board, that Prefects have to start wearing the Songkok as part of the official uniform. At first, the instruction was that it would only be required during ‘official functions’ like school assemblies and during interschool events or major events like sports day and speech day. However, this has now been revised to include daily prefectorial duties.
“There are reasons to believe that the practice of getting Prefects to wear the Songkok, is a prelude to getting ALL the students of the school to eventually follow suit.
“My son, after conferring with me, has decided that he will NOT wear the Songkok. He is willing to resign from the Prefectorial Board if forced to wear the Songkok.”
The parent expresses grave regret at the utter lack of sensitivity of the school authorities on this issue, stating in considerable detail his objections – as “the songkok is an emblem of the Malay identity” and “non-Malays should not be forced to don attire which does not reflect their identity”.
I put up the parent’s letter on my blog and in a matter of less than eight hours there had been over 80 responses – demonstrating the strong feelings evoked by another addition to a catalogue of insensitivities recently shown by those in power or in authority in government to the legitimate rights and sensitivities of diverse races, religions and cultures in a plural society – aggravating racial and religious polarization instead of forging greater unity and understanding among the different races, religions and cultures in the country.
What has happened to the former English College, which has produced many prominent Malaysians, including former Deputy Prime Minister and elder ASEAN statesman, Tun Musa Hitam – who has been described as “the best Prime Minister Malaysia never had”?
It is very sad that the 50th Merdeka anniversary had been marked by an unprecedented display of insensitivity to the diverse races, religions and cultures in Malaysia to the extent that the true meaning of the Merdeka “social contract” had been distorted and overturned.
Some of these examples of insensitivity during the 50th Merdeka anniversary are:
• Declaration that Malaysia is an Islamic state;
• The keris-wielding by Umno Youth leader and Education Minister, Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein;
• Demolition of Hindu temple on the eve of Deepavali;
• Holding of the Umno General Assembly on Deepavali itself;
• Public excoriation of the Indian news vendors as if they were at fault for Deepavali being an annual press holiday, resulting in no newspapers the next day to cover the Umno Presidential speech of Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi;
• Call by extremist UMNO MPs in Parliament for the removal of the “cross” and Christian symbols in mission schools’;
• The ban on the use of “Allah” by Christian and Sikh religions; and
• The revocation of approval for building the 108-ft Mazu statue in Kudat, which will be the tallest Mazu statue in the world and would also be a tourist revenue-earner for Kudat, Sabah and Malaysia.
Recently, the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi called on moderates to take the centre stage and not to allow extremist elements to occupy it to raise sensitive religious and racial issues detrimental to nation-building in plural Malaysia.
Abdullah should maintain the 50-year status quo where the racial, religious and cultural sensitivities of all communities in plural Malaysia are given proper regard and respect and send out clear directives to the Education Minister to nip in the bud all insensitive and divisive tendencies in all educational institutions like the retrogressive proposal to make the songkok part of official uniform for school prefects and students in Maktab Sultan Abu Bakar, Johor Baru.
(Media Conference Statement at DAP PJ Hqrs on Friday, 11th January 2008)

#1 by kanthanboy on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 2:31 am
“You poor Christians. First they took away your rights to use Allah, now they take your right away to portray Jesus in any pictorial form because it offends the Muslims, as Jesus is also one of their prophets.†Tickler
—————————————————————-
In John 15:18 Jesus told his disciples: “If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first.â€
#2 by limkamput on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 2:53 am
What else is new? Has it ever occurred to us that the Songkok issue may be purposely created in a long series of racism, parochialism and bigotry being perpetrated by UMNO? Look, the raison d’etre of UMNO is to create exclusivity using the sentiment of the Malays. Our fight is not with the Malay over their culture, religion, heritage or economic wellbeing. To do so would lose our focus and play right into their hand. Our fight is with UMNO. We must relentlessly tell the whole big wide world that:
UMNO is racist
UMNO is corrupt
UMNO is bigot
UMNO is chauvinist
UMNO is hypocrite
UMNO is incompetent
UMNO is archaic
And sadly, the victims of UNMO are ALL MALAYSIANS, including the Malays. UMNO has held sway for too long. They think the whole world owes them a living. They think they can go around telling everybody to shut up, not to complain about marginalisation, racism, unfairness, cronyism and incompetence. But I say it is time to strip UMNO naked. Tell everybody, tell the whole world who and what UMNO is and has been. UNMO has no moral decency left to talk about any damn thing anymore. UNMO should shut up.
#3 by Evenmind on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 4:18 am
Songkok issues has been around for decades now, soon(slowly but surely) they would force the whole nation to wear it, but special treatment would only be still only given to the soiled puteras only , imagine all the chinese and indian wearing songkok and looking admirably at the soiled puteras and saying , we live and contribute equally (if not more) in the nation buliding, we ‘re now forced to dress like them , but still treated like $hit , we ‘re all would the laughing stock for the rest of the world.
This crap government has to be rid off, our dignity is at stake.
#4 by pky103 on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 5:19 am
What’s next BN?
Make non-Malay females wear tudungs as well?
#5 by waterfrontcoolie on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 7:22 am
A society that bends on rituals and sybolism or tokenism will collapse. This had happened throughout history. It lives on thin air. It has no purpose. Once this symbolism is lost or has no meaning, the society will Kaput. And this is the way we are heading!! With a ‘flat world’ , other nations are positioning whatever advantages their nations can mobilize for future gains and we keep on churning out controversies to waste away the nation’s energy and time. Is there a clause in the International Court of Justice where national economic plunders can be considered as a crime?. I think someone who can advocate such clause should do so.
Maybe the WEST would not advocate this, since ALL such plunders are kept in the banks of the Western world. Just look at what happen in Africa!! Of course, one of our guys loved to support such causes in the past, and I believe we have continued to do so. Why? at least they have got partners in such ventures. So unless we can all do something in the coming GE; we have to pray for the Almighty to save us.
#6 by Tickler on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 7:42 am
Make non-Malay females wear tudungs as well? -pky103
Itu cerita lama lah. they do that in the police force since the new IGP was appointed.
#7 by Tickler on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 7:46 am
Maybe the WEST would not advocate this, since ALL such plunders are kept in the banks of the Western world.- waterfrontcoolie
Not necessarily so. I wonder how much of the much lauded FDI in m`sia is on account of the same.
#8 by Tickler on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 7:49 am
In John 15:18 Jesus told his disciples: “If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first.†– kanthanboy
All very nice, but passivity is what has brought it to this level. The only thing I find pleasing about it is that M`sian public itself is responsible for it.
#9 by Standup on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 9:52 am
My son is also in the same school and a prefect. The minute I heard of this ruling I was furious. I will not ask my son to step down as it will only be a solution for the school authorities. We should stand up and ask the school to draft out an official letter with the school letter head stating the new ruling and the concequences if it is not follow. From there on I will know what to do with the letter.
I hope there are parents who reads this and we should be one in this issue.
#10 by daniel on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 10:50 am
My alma mater Sekolah Sri Perhentian, Pontian changed it’s school crest replacing many of the Malay words with Jawi during the reign of a slew of Haji/Hajjah principals. Many non-malays now no longer see it as a premier school.
Most of us who did reasonably well were posted to EC study for the HSC. EC was then the convergence for all the best students from all over Johor. Sad to say, it no longer is.
#11 by borrring on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 11:06 am
“How does one hide one’s butt??” DarkHorse
Be creative. If you’re wearing jeans/pants, make sure the shirt that you’re wearing is long so it covers the butt, and Baby Tees are a No No. If all fails, wear baju kurung.
#12 by Leo on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 2:37 pm
I urge those who read this msg to earnestly pray each day and night that opposition will win the next GE.
Do not underestimate the power of Prayer…
#13 by cheeran70 on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 2:48 pm
There is no difference between taliban regime and badawi regime. At least the former openly declared the dictatorial rulings , unlike this guy whom we have to regard as PM who goes into hiding behind his officers and implementing the iron curtain rules in a very decisive and cunning manner. Islam is suppose to be a peaceful religion but what I am seeing is subtle and overzealous implementation of rules and concepts under the banner of islam. I was born in the 60′s and as I grew up, I became close with many religions of the world such as christianity, buddhism, bahai, shintoism, hinduism and taoism but only one religion kept me far from it – ISLAM. Once I wanted to buy a Quran Holy Book, but I was told, only a muslim can touch the Quran. This kind of narrow interpretation of a religion brings no good to any society. Religion must be open and sincere and should not be forced by any means, subtly or radically. The goal of religion is to bind us to God or the Creator or whatever one may call it. But, in this country the goal of certain religion is to bind us towards the corrupt politicians and their dirty tricks. HE is GOD who BLESSES those who are WEAK and HUMBLE, and not TAKING ADVANTAGE of THEM. God Bless.
#14 by BNseedell on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 2:49 pm
Can wearing songkok be exempted if my religion and culture disallowed me to do so?
We have seen people using religion to excuse themselves from doing this and that. Such as, if my religion disallowed me to eat pork then you can’t sell pork-related food to me. Right? If my religion prohibits me to wear red clothings during a funeral ceremony then you can’t demand me to wear one in a similar occasion. This is democracy and the rights of human. Right?
By wearing songkok in an educational institution, does it going to help in promoting racial harmony and improve the quality of our education standards? You can’t force someone to do something that is against his religion, culture and custom. Right?
Why pick on songkok after picking the “Allah” issue? Are these signs of CHANGE??
Malaysia Boleh. Now Maktab Sultan Abu Bakar pun Boleh!!
#15 by csl on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 4:09 pm
After these thousands of words that complaining, please forgive me if I’m too dumb to understand our Malaysian mentality. Why we can accept the western dressing culture, including tie, tube, even a g string from top to bottom, from external to internal, but can’t accept our own official dress code, the same dress code when go to see Sultan during receiving the datoship? What’s wrong with a songkok? It is just as same as the base ball cap, the army helmet, the police cap and etc. If you refuse to accept because due to the culture belongs to the Malays, then you should also reject the western one. For me, the songkok looks smarter than a base ball cap or tennis cap. Neat.
Please don’t think that the songkok have anything to do with the religion. As far as I know, only a Haji, wear a cap or something like that on their head. Ordinary muslim cannot wear a haji cap. It represents certain level in the religion.
Finally, just ask yourselves, after so long of firing, what the cause of making you so angry and dislike the songkok? But I can tell you, your sub conscious is full of hate, discriminate, envy and other negative thinking. If you wanna argue, please tell me why you allow yourself wear jeans, your wife wear g-string, your daughter wear tube, your son wear those funny thing from japan? Why not ban them all and restricted to only your own traditional dressing code? I think your children rather wear songkok in stead of put a cheong sam on.
#16 by Jeffrey on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 5:15 pm
What we accept (whether Western or Japanese dressing) is not the issue : what we are forced to accept (songkok), that we have not accepted as yet on our own volition, and why we should be so forced to acept something that we have not accepted yet, is the issue.
#17 by Kanasaikia on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 6:49 pm
Ok, everyone! I’m a prefect in EC currently & I would like to tell you all this that this songkok wearing thing didn’t just come out recently. It has already been there for nearly 30 years & for vetaran like us (currently in upper 6), wearing green songkok is a tradition. I have wirte about this in my blog. The current situation is due to miscommunication between school & prefect & also lack of history knowledge about prefectorial board of EC by the juniors
#18 by HB Lim on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 7:28 pm
If you don’t force people to wear the songkok, wearing it may just become a fashion even amongst the non-Malays. Force them to wear it and you are inviting rebuke and objection to that head gear which should be in the first place not objectionable at all. The point is that we should not force cultural or religious practices on others. Let there be full liberty so far as those things are concerned. Let us not be arrogant and be holier than thou.
It is a direct result of social conditioning – you associate the songkok with Malayness, then you associate Malayness with UMNO, then you associate UMNO with bigotry and corruption and all kinds of political sins, and finally you come around to associate the songkok with the same thing. Not very fair to the neutrality of the songkok but that is a fact in Malaysia. And this conditioning is started by them in the first place. Sad for the songkok and sadder still for Malayness and anything Malay, which is rich culturally and which all Malaysians of all racial origins should be proud of. I should be proud of wearing the songkok and the baju Melayu, I happen to think that the baju Melayu and the samping are very unique and gorgeous, but I cannot pull myself to wear the costumes of someone who has been arrogant to me and insisting that I am a lower class citizen compared to him. And that he is holier than me. Now you see who is the one who instilled this abhorrence to wearing anything Malay.
#19 by pulau_sibu on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 7:54 pm
I think manay chinese love to put on the batik.
But according to Indonesians, batik is not Malaysian culture. It is part of Indonesian culture. Now we found that boleh has nothing but all stolen from Indonesia
#20 by DarkHorse on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 9:54 pm
Should the Taiwanese be seen as having stolen the cheongsam from the Chinese?
#21 by DarkHorse on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 10:04 pm
“What we accept (whether Western or Japanese dressing) is not the issue : what we are forced to accept (songkok), that we have not accepted as yet on our own volition, and why we should be so forced to acept something that we have not accepted yet, is the issue.” Jeffrey
Chinese reaction to the wearing of the Malay headgear so far has glossed over the fact that the Malays are not forcing them to put on the Malay headgear (which is what ‘songkok’ is all about and not a religious symbol) but some over zealous and misguided government officials who seem to have acted on their own initiative.
Many Malays would want the ‘Malayness’ to be confined to them. It is what differentiates them from the rest. Can you imagine the Jews asking non-Jews to put on the kippa?
#22 by Loh on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 10:10 pm
///Finally, just ask yourselves, after so long of firing, what the cause of making you so angry and dislike the songkok? But I can tell you, your sub conscious is full of hate, discriminate, envy and other negative thinking.///– csl
Quite an interesting thought! How does it come about?
#23 by whc on Saturday, 12 January 2008 - 11:03 pm
this people thought to be malaysian is to be melayu or muslim.terible,just can’t differentiate that.
#24 by dranony on Sunday, 13 January 2008 - 12:05 am
kanasaikia,
i have reliable information that you have only been a Prefect at EC for only SIX(6) months!
That _hardly_ qualifies yourself to be a “veteran†(btw it is not “vetaranâ€) of the Prefectorial Board.
It is plainly evident from the initial post by EC Parent that his son has been a prefect much longer than you have, and this issue had NEVER been raised in ALL the entire time that the son had been a prefect.
So PLEASE Do NOT mislead everyone here into thinking that wearing of the songkok had been ongoing for the past thirty years.
If you wish to wear the songkok, whether by choice, or out of fear of reprimand or intimidation by school authorities, it is entirely up to you.
But we should not FORCE anyone to wear the songkok if they choose not to.
A student from that same school, tells me of yet another serious incident, which occured some time ago:
During the school’s Co-Curriculum Day in 2007, a Doa session was held at the start of the events. ALL students were required to raise their hands in prayer as Muslims do, whether they were Muslim or not!
Those who felt uneasy to comply as they were not Muslims, were punished by the teacher! I wonder, were you one of those who DID comply?
I have been told that about thirty non-Muslim students (chinese and indian) were eventually punished. Why don’t you ask those who were punished and report here whether this is true?
#25 by Kanasaikia on Sunday, 13 January 2008 - 12:26 am
Well! Y i say i’m vetaran becoz i study in dis school for nearly 7 years eventhought i’m not a prefect be4 det but I noe well in dis abt songkok stuff ( i hv a lot of fren wic is prefect) n becoz dis this songkok thing started 2 vanish in my form 4 years ( wic is wen det prefect get himself in 2 de prefectorial board. Det time he is form 2) det is y he didn’t noe abt de songkok matter. If u dun believe dis songkok thing reli existed be4 he came, u can ask ppl of my batch or be4. I swear dey will tell u de same answer as i said. Since i’m in dis sch for so long, is it consider misleading? Or u wan me to get u some old time pic or bring u in2 our museum to look thru de album den only u believe?
As for the songkok thing, i have already explain in my blog, u can go n hv a read abt it & if u wana noe wad a person i’m, plz go thru my blog posts. I’m not those who will side anyone ezily.
For de co-co day matter, i don’t know about it coz I didn’t participate in it. Btw, i muz thx u 4 telling me det such things existed n i will like to noe more on de incident.
#26 by smeagroo on Sunday, 13 January 2008 - 1:14 am
And if what some u guys said is true ie performing doa and non-muslims are forced to do if not they will be punished, i hope these studetns are MAN enough with balls between their legs to lodge a POLICE REPORT!
EVeryone can talk based on hearsay and until and unless these students who have suffered silently can come out in the open (if they are 30 of them, it is good enough) to bring these Little Napoleans down to their knees.
#27 by Kanasaikia on Sunday, 13 January 2008 - 1:17 am
yeah! i agree wif u smeagroo! i will seek clarification by dis monday. I wana c wad is goin on laz year.
#28 by limkamput on Sunday, 13 January 2008 - 2:41 am
Many Malays would want the ‘Malayness’ to be confined to them. It is what differentiates them from the rest. Can you imagine the Jews asking non-Jews to put on the kippa? darkhorse
How do you know this? On whose behalf are you talking about? If other people say the same thing, you would probably say it is an opinion and not a fact. But please look at yourself.
#29 by DarkHorse on Sunday, 13 January 2008 - 8:18 am
Yes Sir. I’m now looking at myself like you suggest. But what am I supposed to look for, Sir?
#30 by shortie kiasu on Sunday, 13 January 2008 - 1:09 pm
Teaching professions in Malaysia: teachers, headmasters, principals… are not infiltrated by the religious lunatics. Whether the schools or colleges is co-ed or not, it is immaterial to these lunatics and fanatics. They are one tracked mind and they see only tunnel-vision.
So the pupils & students churned out by these lunatics and fanatics cannot not be better off; can only be worse off.
In time to come, the Malaysian society will be flooded with such characters. One can guess the type of future in the country without much difficulties.
We need a strong opposition or an alternative government to bring “Change” – the key words now being thrown around in the current Primaries of the American Presidential election!
#31 by daniel on Sunday, 13 January 2008 - 1:50 pm
I was a prefect in EC during the mid-seventies. The songkok was NOT part of the prefects’ uniform. So what or whose tradition were we talking about?
#32 by taikohtai on Sunday, 13 January 2008 - 3:19 pm
Since the gomen is so keen to start ‘Malay-ing’ the country, perhaps all Malaysians should all start wearing not only the songkok but also sarong, tudung, purdah, baju kembaya etc to work, jalan jalan etc.
Try it instead of the western suits – the traditional dress do have practical values in this hot weather of Malaysia!
Imagine LKS and all DAP MPs start wearing sarongs and songkoks plus batik attire etc in Parliament to highlight the Bangsa Malaysia culture!!
Bet once the gomen realises that if some of their policies are adopted lock, stock and barrel, it can become a national joke, hopefully they can be a bit more considerate.
#33 by Kanasaikia on Sunday, 13 January 2008 - 6:44 pm
Hey senior daniel! I would like to correct 1 thing that you had mention, is that I didn’t mention this thing is around for over 30 years which will put this thing to your era but i said nearly 30 years which mean this thing started to exist around the late 70′s or early 80′s. If you wana clarrify this matter you can come back to EC & visit the school’s museum. There got photos that can prove it.
Btw, i’m glad to meet some EC people here ^^
#34 by csl on Monday, 14 January 2008 - 1:26 pm
quote Loh :Quite an interesting thought! How does it come about?
I think you can print out these commends and consult a psychologist. So you will know without any doubt. I can’t tell you anything, as I already know what is the outcome. I forgot also to mention, some are more LKS than LKS. I can’t tell them how they should think or do things. I can only choose to participate or quit. Let the natural rules to complete the karma. If you don’t wanna pull back your words after certain time, better do research 1st before anything. Just like those who complaining about Pak Lah for bringing the country backward by encouraging for plantation and related research at the beginning. Now they should slap their mouth when they see what had bring our currency up while most Asia countries currency dropped recently. (please try to understand the point in stead of arguing on the word).
#35 by csl on Monday, 14 January 2008 - 1:32 pm
If my son studying there and chosen to be a prefect, I’ll ask him to wear the songkok if needed. It is better to learn how to play with the rules in stead of against the rules when you are not powerful enough to create the rules. If don’t understand, please find a CEO level person to ask or buy some strategy book to read.
#36 by dranony on Monday, 14 January 2008 - 3:00 pm
csl says: “If my son studying there and chosen to be a prefect, I’ll ask him to wear the songkok if needed.”
csl, what if your daughter is asked to wear the tudung if she wants to be a prefect? will you also go along?
csl , what if the school requires him to raise his hands in “doa” as muslims do, when the doa is being conducted? will you also ask him to go along?
btw, has kanasaikia enquired whether he has confirmed the incident during Ko-Ko day 2007 in EC?
please DO report here of your enquiries, kanasaikia. thanks.
#37 by hotsync on Monday, 14 January 2008 - 8:10 pm
Somebody somewhere will/is making big BUCK$$! Selling songkok to school….another item to buy in school to be included as package prefect.
#38 by AllaQood on Wednesday, 16 January 2008 - 12:03 am
Kanasaikia, for God’s sake, don’t use this kind of English to express yourself. I have great difficulty in reading your comments. I wonder if your type of English is originated from EC? Don’t kill the English language in this way. I am a senior citizen who enjoys reading bloggers’ comments in YB Lim’s Blog but write proper English, please. My children are reading all the comments posted here and I don’t want to pick up your BAB English.
Once again, DON”T POLUTE or CORRUPT the ENGLISH LANGUAGE …. Don’t bring disgrace to EC…..