Does Malaysia really need High Speed Rail?

Liew Chin Tong
15 Dec 2015

MP SPEAKS At the China High Speed Railway Symposium, China’s public relation event to lobby for the KL-Singapore High Speed Rail (HSR) project, Land Public Transport Commission (Spad) chairperson Syed Hamid Albar said that some 14 companies have been invited to present their views and ideas to Malaysia and Singapore for the development of the HSR.

At each Parliamentary sitting since June 2013, I have asked the government to reveal the feasibility studies for KL-Singapore High Speed Rail.

In the recent Parliamentary sitting, I told Minister in Prime Minister’s Department Nancy Shukri during the debate on Prime Minister’s Department’s budget, that the government must not enter into the High Speed Rail project without revealing the feasibility studies and without a national debate on the nation’s priorities.

Pakatan Harapan stated our objection to the HSR in the Alternative Budget for 2016 as the government fails to demostrate that the HSR is a national priority and there is no feasibility study detailing its financial viability.

The national priority should be to expand railways to cater for both freight and passengers.

Spending huge sums on the passenger – only HSR may not generate sufficient returns on investment, which eventually would lead to government bailouts, as seen in HSR in some countries.

Expansion of railway, on the contrary, would allow for more industries to use railway instead of highways for the transport of goods, which would reduce the need to build roads, reduce traffic congestions, and reduce the carbon footprint.

I urge Spad and the cannibalised Transport Ministry to release the feasability study report of the HSR and to initiate a national debate on whether to build the HSR.

It is unfortunate that the Transport Ministry has no role to play in public transport. It is about time that the Transport Ministry be given the task to plan the long-term and overall transport arrangements which must include the management of and investments in public transport.

LIEW CHIN TONG is DAP national political education director and Kluang MP.

  1. #1 by Bigjoe on Wednesday, 16 December 2015 - 1:24 pm

    Need? No. Can it use one? Yes. Is it viable without subsidy in the short run? No. Medium term? Maybe. Long Term? Also just maybe.

  2. #2 by quigonbond on Saturday, 19 December 2015 - 1:22 am

    Whether we should have HSR or otherwise depends on who you talk to. Those in Klang Valley who already own property will appreciate it the most. Those who are employed will also appreciate it. That’s because offices will shift from high cost Spore to manageable cost KL. KL is likely the net winner. Johor may not like it because it’ll likely be bypassed by Spore business if they can open offices in KL. Those who already cannot afford property in KL will hate it because prices are likely to escalate.

    It should purely be a cost-benefit driven decision that benefits the most of people in Klang Valley, and there should be a transparent process and corruption and cronyism should play zero part in who gets awarded.

You must be logged in to post a comment.