The hell refugees go through for freedom

by Syerleena Abdul Rashid
The Malaysian Insider
15 May 2015

Imagine this.

You are forced to leave your country, your home and everything you grew up with. As much as you would wish you could stay, you simply cannot.
The country you grew up in and the government entrusted to protect its citizens are unable to.

In some cases, it is the government itself that prosecutes its very own citizens because of some deeply rooted destructive bigotry or some horrifically oppressive regulation created by traditional warlords.

You’re forced to leave behind relatives apart from your intermediate family but of course, that is usually debatable.

If you’re well off, you can afford to escape with your loved ones; if not, you’re forced to leave them behind and pray that somehow you can return someday to rescue them.

You end up paying your “journey to freedom” with your life savings to someone who promised to take you to some far off land that can ensure economic prosperity, security and above all – a better life.

But as soon as you board that boat, you find yourself in a situation so sinister, all you want to do is escape.

You find yourself living amongst hundreds of others who share similar experiences like you, onboard a ship and stripped away of all human rights.

You end up living on a boat for the next several months in very cramped conditions, given very little food and water.

You see men, women and children abused, in ways, first world countries can never understand or dread to even imagine.

In between bouts of sea sickness and slumber, you find yourself wondering if this is what hell is like.

By definition, a refugee is a person who has fled their home country because of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, or political opinion; refugees are also recognised as being a member of a persecuted social category of persons.

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) recognises the Rohingya as refugees, which grants them a special status far different than illegal migrants.

Unfortunately, Malaysia does not recognise such status and as a result, the Rohingya refugees in Malaysia are treated as criminals and subjected to additional oppression.

At present Malaysia has about 150,000 refugees and asylum seekers with more than 45,000 are Rohingya.

The actual numbers are predicted to be much higher as there are still a significant amount of undocumented refugees.

According to UNCHR, in between January to March this year, approximately 25,000 Bangladeshis and Rohingya Muslims have smuggled their way across the seas and these numbers have doubled increased significantly over the past years.

In a recent report, Malaysian Deputy Home Minister Datuk Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jaafar had the audacity to say, “We have been very nice to the people who broke into our border. We have treated them humanely but they cannot be flooding our shores like this.”

Wan Junaidi clearly doesn’t understand the humanitarian crisis that has the whole world wagging its finger at Malaysia. Such a statement shows how callous, detached and uncaring some of our ministers can be.

People tend to confuse refugees with migrants and unlike the latter, refugees do not enjoy an sort of protection from their home countries.
Refugees have simply lost all protection and sending them back home is simply too dangerous.

Sending them home is similar to sentencing them to death.

Ministers like Wan Junaidi make it difficult for Malaysia to recognize the significance of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and just how important it is for human beings to simply care for one another.

Fact is we have an international crisis where our country is a part of this.

It is no longer their issue but our problem. The Malaysian government can no longer afford to close an eye and must provide a healthier way of how we treat refugees and asylum seekers. – May 15, 2015.

  1. #1 by pulau_sibu on Sunday, 17 May 2015 - 6:28 am

    i am surprised that muslim countries refused to save the muslims, even treated them like dogs

  2. #2 by Sallang on Sunday, 17 May 2015 - 7:04 am

    On humanitarian grounds, we should land them, provide them food,medical attention and shelter, temporarily.
    However, the UNHCR should take quick action to stop these at source country, and find solutions to send these people back home, safely.
    Are these countries being ruled by warlords?
    Are these activities of trafficking being operated by crony syndicates?
    Myanmar is how many times bigger in land mass than our peninsula?
    Surely there is enough land for agriculture to feed everybody. Geographically, this is fertile country, with no natural disasters, except for floods due to heavy rainfall throughout the year.Tourism industry would provide them job opportunities. What has the government of Myanmar been doing? Religious persecution? Buddhism don’t practice that. Was there a history of vengeance in the Rakhine State? Can Madam Aun San Su Chi enlighten us on this?
    Looks like we need Wiki-leaks, in case Mdm Aun is not allowed to have fb or blog or twitter account.
    Watching how Cambodia can recover from after “The Killing Fields”,
    Myanmar must change and stop this nonsense.

  3. #3 by Noble House on Monday, 18 May 2015 - 3:00 am

    The world does not owe us a living and certainly it did not expect refugee’s to travel half way around the world to find a safe haven with the most generous welfare system. Before we jump into any conclusion, do take a walk around Pudu Raya during the weekends, and then spend a couple of days in Sabah for a mirror image in photoshop of what lies ahead for Malaysia.

  4. #4 by pulau_sibu on Monday, 18 May 2015 - 10:09 am

    buddists do not kill a mosquito or an ant. burma is a buddist country. how do they answer the question of discriminating muslims and send them to hell?

  5. #5 by megaman on Monday, 18 May 2015 - 5:08 pm

    Some clarifications to pulau_sibu.

    Burma is NOT a Buddhist country. It is being ruled by a military junta that forcefully ejected a previous democratic government and until today have put under house arrest for decades Au Sang Suu Kyi (the rightfully elected leader of that government).

    Do not confused between the religion of the majority in Burma / Myanmar which is Buddhism against what the so-called government in Myanmar practices.

    I have as much respect for the Myanmar government as I would have for the North Korean government which is practically zero.

  6. #6 by megaman on Monday, 18 May 2015 - 5:13 pm

    Sorry, I need to provide some corrections to my post as well.
    My bad.
    Aung San Suu Kyi is no longer under house arrest.

    The country is no longer officially ruled by a military junta.
    However, the military junta still holds a large influence over the Myanmar government.

You must be logged in to post a comment.