PM Says One Thing, Ministers Say Another!

By Kee Thuan Chye
10th July 2013

How ridiculous it is that the prime minister says one thing and his home minister says the opposite. Last year, Najib Razak announced that the Government would repeal the Sedition Act and replace it with the National Harmony Act, but now Zahid Hamidi says the Cabinet has decided to only “amend and review some aspects of the Act, not to abolish it”!

Another minister, S. Subramaniam, is neither here nor there about it when asked about the matter. He takes the typical noncommittal MIC approach by saying that the idea of repealing the Act was a “suggestion” by Najib. “He has to bring it back to the Cabinet and state his suggestions,” Subramaniam says.

Only a suggestion? Subramaniam was a member of the Cabinet when Najib announced the repeal in July 2012 and yet he says it was only Najib’s suggestion? Is it because he dare not tell the truth?

Meanwhile, Tourism Minister Nazri Aziz contradicts Zahid and confirms that the Cabinet did indeed agree to repeal the Sedition Act last year. He even says the Attorney-General’s Chambers is looking into framing the replacement law. Unlike Subramaniam, he is unequivocal about it.

“It’s a public commitment made by the prime minister. I don’t see why any minister would go against it,” he adds.

It was indeed a public commitment. Najib’s announcement of the repeal of the Act and its replacement with the National Harmony Act was reported extensively in the media, and political observers – me included – commented on it. We certainly didn’t imagine it.

Surely, Najib would have made the announcement only if he had got the agreement of his Cabinet. If not, his action would have been highly irresponsible. So, what gives?

Nazri showed charity to his fellow Cabinet member when he was asked by reporters about Subramaniam’s comment. Nazri replied, “It was made last year, maybe he doesn’t remember. Maybe it’s (because of) so many cabinet meetings.”

Oh? Really? But the matter was publicly announced, so how could any Cabinet member fail to remember? A case of Alzheimer’s affecting the health minister? Or selective remembering a la Mahathir Mohamad?

As for Zahid, why would he contradict Najib? Is he trying to undermine the latter as the build-up begins for the Umno general assembly in November when elections will take place and Najib could be challenged for his leadership of the party? Is Zahid also working overtime to try and retain his vice-presidency in the party, knowing that the position will be hotly contested?

He says he doesn’t want the Sedition Act abolished because people can start questioning the four taboo issues – the special position of the Malays, the sovereignty of the Malay rulers, the position of Malay as the national language, and the position of Islam as the religion of the federation.

That sounds like the thing to say to impress the Umno delegates who will be voting in November. Let us also not forget that a by-election is coming up on July 24 for the Kuala Besut state seat in Terengganu. Harping on Malay issues could well score points for the incumbent Umno.

But Zahid disingenuously chooses to ignore that these four issues are already protected under the Federal Constitution. Article 181, for example, guarantees the sovereignty, rights, powers and jurisdictions of each Malay ruler within their respective states. Other Articles take care of the other three.

In any case, there should be no harm in questioning these issues if we are to be a true, healthy and mature democracy. Placing a ban on it has only deprived Malaysians their constitutional right to freedom of speech. Besides, what can questioning do? Bring about the removal of these guarantees? Who is going to sanction it? Who would dare to? It’s not going to happen even in the distant future.

The real reason the Government would want to retain the Sedition Act – and Zahid should really be honest about this – is to use it to silent political dissent. And this has been proven in practice over the decades. Only last month, it was again selectively used to prosecute six people – Opposition politicians, activists and student leaders – while pro-Government individuals who made seditious statements got away scot-free.

Really, Zahid doesn’t serve the Government cause well to speak as he does. And Subramaniam doesn’t inspire confidence among the public for his gutless deportment. Both of them can’t seem to get their facts right, and they sow confusion with their befuddling statements. What kind of ministers do we have? It reflects badly on Najib for selecting ministers like these.

Speaking of Najib, why has he said nothing since in response to Zahid’s statement? He may be overseas now, but the least he could do is make a statement to clear the confusion. Unless, of course, he is considering flip-flopping on the idea. Especially now that the general election is over and he doesn’t need to win votes.

Is that the reason why the A-G’s Chambers is taking so long to come out with a draft of the replacement National Harmony Act? After a year and still nothing to show? Is this going to be yet another government janji yang tidak ditepati (promise unfulfilled)?

* Kee Thuan Chye is the author of the bestselling book No More Bullshit, Please, We’re All Malaysians, and the latest volume, Ask for No Bullshit, Get Some More!

  1. #1 by lee tai king (previously dagen) on Thursday, 11 July 2013 - 8:45 am

    Wait wait wait.
    Its. Its.
    Yes its superman.
    Hold a second.
    Its batman.
    Oh people look, ironman.
    Its iron… wtf … a trial balloon.
    Not again!

  2. #2 by Bigjoe on Thursday, 11 July 2013 - 8:47 am

    People have to remember Zahid, who was banished for a while because he sided with Anwar in early Reformasi, resurgent in UMNO is largely because of Najib. It is said he even got his deputy minister post in Badawi’s cabinet because of Najib. No one who is not close to PM is made a Defense Minister and he oversaw unprecendented defense spending (with unprecedented level of allegation of corruption) under Najib’s first tenure.

    Zahid is not going against Najib. At the very least he does it because he think its what Najib wants.

  3. #3 by yhsiew on Thursday, 11 July 2013 - 9:05 am

    Zahid should serve the rakyat and not his own selfish interest of pleasing the Umno delegates in order to get a top post in Umno in the November party election.

  4. #4 by Winston on Thursday, 11 July 2013 - 9:54 am

    The single most important thread that runs through the whole federal government is that it doesn’t give a damn what Malaysians think what it does or says!
    Nobody can do anything about it!
    It’s actions cannot get anymore brazen!

  5. #5 by sheriff singh on Thursday, 11 July 2013 - 10:03 am

    Sedih, Sedih, Sedih.

    The Sedition Act is causing so much confusion and splits in the half-past-six cabinet. The ministers appear to have been inflicted with some kind of ‘brain disease’ possibly contracted from the cow minister that they now have failing memories.

    Maybe they should re-read the cabinet minutes or review the PM’s public statements to refresh their memories provided of course their brains still have some memory cells. If not, we might soon see some ‘physical activities’ when the ministers next meet or when opposition MPs like Rafizi irritate them a bit.

    Let us hope and pray the deranged members do not spread the disease to their colleagues at the coming party elections and cause a cattle stampede and PWTC comes tumbling down. On second thoughts, it might be a good thing.

  6. #6 by sheriff singh on Thursday, 11 July 2013 - 10:17 am

    ” .. PM Says One Thing, Ministers Say Another! … ”

    After the tsunami, everyone is suffering from some kind of trauma or phobia. Is there a cure ?

    Maybe someone should check what food and drinks they serve at Cabinet meetings.

    If Ministers cannot agree and stand by their boss, they should do the honourable thing – Resign! But since they do not have any honour, they could do the next best thing – Shut Up!, Smile like an idiot (one minister is expert at it already) and enjoy the gravy.

  7. #7 by bennylohstocks on Thursday, 11 July 2013 - 11:17 am

  8. #8 by sheriff singh on Thursday, 11 July 2013 - 12:16 pm

    I thought they all said: ‘I LOVE PM’.

You must be logged in to post a comment.