6 reasons for high-level special investigations squad to break “blue wall of silence” of MACC officers to pinpoint TBH’s killers

The James Foong Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) into the death of Teoh Beng Hock (TBH) that “TBH was driven to commit suicide by the aggressive, relentless, oppressive and unscrupulous interrogation by certain officers of the MACC”(Para 119) is not acceptable as it is mere speculation and not backed up by evidence.

There are however six reasons from the RCI report why a high-level special investigation squad should be formed to break the conspiracy of “blue wall of silence” (RCI Report) of Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officers to pinpoint and to bring to book Beng Hock’s killers.

1.The TBH RCI was most scathing in its indictment of the character and testimony of the MACC officers especially from Selangor at the RCI. Apart from two brave and truthful souls from Selangor MACC, i.e. Azeem Hafeez Jamaluddin and Azlan (Para 176), the TBH RCI virtually dismissed the rest as a pack of liars led by Hishamuddin Hashim (HH), the “mastermind” of the massive and unjustified operation which resulted in TBH’s death.

This is what the TBH RCI has to say about Hishammuddin, the “mastermind”:

In Para 337, the TBH RCI said: “That HH and others under his command lied in this inquiry is borne home by the testimonies of Azeem and Azian, the two MACC offices who were courageous enough to testify that attempts were made to get them to say that HH was not directly involved in the operation and that it was Hairul Ilham who was in charge”.

In fact, the TBH RCI report is fertile source for the formulation of multiple perjury charges against Hishamuddin and other MACC officers in giving false testimony at the RCI – a judicial proceeding under the definition of Penal Code Section 193 which provides for the maximum sentence of seven years jail and fine on conviction.

With all MACC Selangor officers led by Hishammuddin dismissed as “a pack of liars” (apart from Azeem and Azian), this would mean that they had lied all the way from the initial police investigations into TBH’s death, the TBH inquest and the TBH RCI about what happened to TBH in MACC on the fateful days of July 15/16, 2009.

As the police had been lied to in police criminal investigations into TBH’s death, this means that all the police statements given by Hishammuddin and the MACC Selangor officers (except for Azeem and Azian) about what happened to TBH in his three interrogations in MACC from 6 pm on 15th July to 3.30 am on 16th July were untrue, worthless and must be rejected – justifying a re-opening of police investigations into TBH’s death.

2. The TBH RCI reported that apart from the three interrogations from 6pm on 15th to 3.30 am on 16th July, there was a hitherto unknown “Fourth Interrogation” of TBH between 3.30 am and 7 am on the 16th “that broke the camel’s back, so to speak, that propelled TBH to commit suicide” (Para 166).

Para 229 said: “By the time, the fourth or final stage of the interrogation was over, TBH would have been almost a mental and physical wreck.”

Police investigations into TBH’s death never knew about this “Fourth Interrogation” between 3.30 am to 7 am on 16th July – a second lead from the TBH RCI report on why police should re-open investigations. In fact, it should also investigate whether there was a “fifth” interrogation between 7 am to 11 am – depending on the time of TBH’s death.

3. Hishammuddin was the “mastermind” in the host of criminalities and breaches of the law in the massive operation resulting in TBH’s death. Though deputy director of MACC Selangor at the time in charge of investigations and intelligence-gathering, Hishammuddin “appeared to have absolute authority to investigate anyone whom he suspected to be involved in any corrupt practice in the state without even informing or obtaining the consent of his superiors in the in the MACC headquarters in Putrajaya (HQ) or his superior on the ground, the director of Selangor of MACC.” (Para 23).

Hishammuddin blatantly abused his powers when he launched the massive 33-officer operation which resulted in TBH’s death “solely on a mere belief and without supporting facts” (Para 184) based on a “mere” telephone call (Para 188).

These are revelations which would justify police re-opening investigations into TBH’s death to find out who gave Hishammuddin the sense of immunity and impunity for breaking laws and committing crimes, going over the head of his superior in Selangor and in national headquarters resulting in TBH’s death?

4. As pointed out by Marcus van Geyzel in his article “A sham that deceived Malaysia” in loyarburok.com:

“The MACC official line is that Teoh’s body was only found at about 1.35 pm on July 16. But the evidence presented at the RCI TBH showed that MACC officers namely, Azhar, Amin, Fauzi Shadollah had already been speaking about Teoh’s death before or about 1.00 pm! How could MACC Klang officers at the MACC Klang office be talking about a death in another office miles away even before Teoh’s body was found?

“The answer lies here. Amin in particular said that at about 12.45 pm, he overhead a group of officers at the MACC Klang office talking about Teoh’s death. He said that the information about Teoh’s death came from a MACC Klang officer who was at the MACC Selangor office on the morning of July 16 and returned to the MACC Klang office that morning. Zulkefly is as described. By 7 am, he already knew that Teoh fell from the window and died.

“Why did the MACC hide the fact they knew of Teoh’s death by 7 am? The Commission failed to appreciate and deal with this crucial area that nails the MACC coffin of its suicide story.”

5. A few days after TBH’s tragic death on 16th July 2009, a “black blog” appeared which accused DAP of TBH’s murder to distract public attention from the real cause of TBH’s death – raising the suspicion that the “black blog” was the work of people responsible for killing him.

Furthermore, the “black blog” had the finger prints of MACC or MACC officers as it contained documents related to TBH investigations which were only in the possession of MACC.

6. The RCI ignored the bulk of TBH’s suicide risk assessment in the psychiatric report submitted by Australian Paul Edward Mullen – the emeritus professor of forensic psychiatry from the Monash University engaged by the Bar Council. Mullen found more factors pointing to TBH not having committed suicide than otherwise.

For the above six reasons, justice for Beng Hock demands that there should be a re-opening of inquiry into Beng Hock’s killers by a high-level special investigations squad.

(Speech at the DAP 45th anniversary dinner organised by Sri Delima DAP Branch at Penang Hang Chiang School Hall on Saturday, 30th July 2011)

  1. #1 by tak tahan on Sunday, 31 July 2011 - 8:53 am

    Why no action taken by IGP?Waiting order from the highest authority?


  2. #2 by monsterball on Sunday, 31 July 2011 - 10:45 am

    IGP is waiting for Najib’s orders through Home Minster.
    Najib needs to consult his advisers what to do.
    His advisers with so call…different special talents will focus how to win votes and never admit any wrongs…and begin their search for the right ways how to fool Malaysians.
    Under Najib…there is no quick and simple solutions or answers.

  3. #3 by HARAPAN MALAYSIA on Sunday, 31 July 2011 - 10:59 am

    Sesuatu Seseorang ..”Must be held Responsible For..” kerana beliau dibawa masuk pegawai MACC..bukan datang sendiri..atas sesuatu tuduhan..!

  4. #4 by Jeffrey on Sunday, 31 July 2011 - 11:01 am

    They are not interested in 6 or 600 reasons why the real truth of TBH’s death should be further investigated and unravelled.

    What is more inportant are the real reasons why the truth must not be publicly known: if these were present, there will never be the political will to find the truth and pin the responsbility, lacking which, there also cannot exist “a high level investigation squad” to break “blue wall of silence” of MACC. From where the members of this high level investigation squad will be drawn? Also from PDRM & MACC under the same Code of “blue wall of silence” – coming to same problem: where is the independence of investigators? Think they are FBI’s Behavioral Analysis Unit (BAU) part of the FBI National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime???

    We sooner trust a team of private inverstigators headed by Bar council chairman!

  5. #5 by dagen on Sunday, 31 July 2011 - 11:22 am

    The first rule of management, its jibby jib who must be responsible for all of these.

  6. #6 by boh-liao on Sunday, 31 July 2011 - 12:10 pm

    Nothing will change 1 under d current UmnoB/BN gomen, IGP, AG, judges
    政府说谎, 做了那么多违背公理的事情, 人民不信赖没有公信力的政府
    Just keep dis case alive n revisit it AFTER PR has marched into Putrajaya
    Concentrate on convincing voters 2 vote 4 PR in GE13, now is d time!

  7. #7 by Cinapek on Sunday, 31 July 2011 - 12:28 pm

    Soon after TBH’s body was discovered, at the first press release made by MACC the senior MACC officer claimed that TBH was released at 3.30am but asked to stay back at the office. This was an attempt to avoid responsibility for TBH’s death implying that MACC had released TBH but he stayed back on his own accord and decided to commit suicide.

    Now that the RCI had concluded that there was a fourth interrogation from 3.30 to 7.00am of that fateful morning, then clearly this senior MACC officer had also lied and the motive is all too evident. Someone directly involved in the interrogation had either lied to this senior officer in order for him to release that false press statement or this senior officer was also involved in the cover up.

    The police should revisit this lie.

  8. #8 by k1980 on Sunday, 31 July 2011 - 12:37 pm

    I recommend that Jibby reads the following book- “Character Makeover: 40 Days with a Life Coach to Create the Best You”. Hopefully he will turn over a new leaf and possess the eight character traits essential to living a purpose-filled life: humility, confidence, courage, self-control, patience, contentment, generosity, and perseverance. (Fat hopes)


  9. #9 by ktteokt on Sunday, 31 July 2011 - 2:11 pm

    For the 13th GE campaign, PR component parties need not spend so much money printing banners and buntings for their individual candidates. All they need to do is just print TBH’s photo on each and every banner and bunting and hang them all over Malaysia! That itself is sufficient PUBLICITY!

  10. #10 by good coolie on Sunday, 31 July 2011 - 7:58 pm

    ktteokt is right! Put Brother Teoh in the forefront during the election period. If PKR win, they should definitely start afresh
    the investigation.

You must be logged in to post a comment.