By Choong Pui Yee and Farish Noor
MALAYSIA’S RULING Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition won two-thirds of the seats in the 16 April 2011 state elections in Sarawak. Supported by the presence of Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, the BN victory means it retained its majority in the East Malaysian state with 55 seats and was able to form the state government again. Despite the victory in this staunchly pro-BN state, which has always been perceived as the BN’s ‘fixed deposit’, the ruling coalition has suffered a significant drop in ethnic Chinese voter support.
The opposition parties acting in alliance as Pakatan Rakyat (PR) made inroads, eating into the BN’s support base. The Democratic Action Party (DAP) won 12 out of the 15 seats it contested, doubling its share of seats in Sarawak since the 2006 state elections. Another opposition party, the People’s Justice Party (PKR) won three seats, including a rural seat at Ba’Kelalan, while the Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party (PAS) did not win a single seat. The inroads made by the opposition alliance were mainly due to the work of the DAP. One unexpected result was the toppling of George Chan, the state’s deputy chief minister from the Sarawak United People’s Party (SUPP). His defeat by a political newcomer, Ling Sie Kiong, strongly manifests the intensity of Chinese voter sentiment against the BN.
Building up the Momentum
Prior to polling day, campaigning from both the BN and PR were equally heated, drawing large crowds. Apart from the traditional speeches by political leaders, local Chinese singers were roped in from BN to attract the Chinese voter crowd. Complimentary 1Malaysia T-shirts and goodie bags were given to those who attended the BN campaigns.
The opposition DAP created a hornbill mascot named ‘Ubah’ (Change) to align with their campaign tagline, ‘Vote for Change’ against the BN’s ‘Vote for Transformation’. Criticising Sarawak Chief Minister Taib Mahmud’s record of government and the recent impounding of Malay-language Bibles were among the tactics used as the opposition worked up the sentiments of the locals especially in the urban areas. As Christians make up almost half the population of Sarawak, harping on religious issues such as the Malay Bibles and the ‘Allah’ controversy painted the BN government as neglecting Christian minority concerns. The crowds that cheered the opposition at their rallies gave the impression of unprecedented support by Sarawak standards.
Results and Implications
While the opposition parties, notably the DAP, did manage to attract large crowds,the fact remains that the BN still managed to retain its two-thirds majority to form the government. The BN’s share of the popular vote, however, dropped from 62 to 55 percent.
The results of the Sarawak state elections highlighted the shift of Chinese votes to the DAP, paving the way for the party to have a stronger voice in Sarawak. Even though the opposition coalition is lagging behind in terms of funding, machinery and political veterans in Sarawak, they won the support of the Chinese electorate. Compounding the changing political climate is the sway of the Dayak voters towards the opposition. This is also unprecedented. Thus, Sarawak can no longer be seen as the electoral ‘fixed deposit’ of the BN that can ensure unchallenged support.
The Sarawak state electoral result illustrates the disenchantment of the ethnic Chinese community with the incumbent government. Many opposition supporters had traveled to Sarawak from Peninsular Malaysia to assist the campaigns and extend donations. The fact that a major share of the Sarawak Chinese votes had gone to the opposition suggests that Chinese political sentiment in Sarawak is largely hostile to the BN – as in Peninsular Malaysia.
Soon after the elections, DAP veteran leader Lim Kit Siang offered a merger with the Sarawak National Party (SNAP). The proposal is designed to penetrate the Malay-Melanau and Dayak-Iban seats in Sarawak. This is indeed a strategic move if it succeeds. It may even pave the way for DAP to penetrate the rural seats, leading to stronger competition with the BN in the next general election.
Greater Polarisation
One consequent of the recent elections is the hardening of ethnic differences and growing racial polarisation. The Malaysian Chinese community will be seen and labeled as pro-opposition, consciously or subconsciously, by the BN. Soon after the state elections, the weekend edition of Utusan Malaysia, an UMNO mouthpiece, bluntly called on the Sarawak government to ignore the Chinese community and limit its representation in the state cabinet. Certainly, such a call will not be welcomed by the Malaysian Chinese community and one can only foresee deeper communal politics across both West and East Malaysia.
Yet at the same time, the DAP has yet to transcend its own image as a Chinese-led and dominated party lacking support from Malaysian Malay and Indian voters. This is the Achilles’ heel of the DAP. This weakness will continue to be exploited by its political opponents to paint it as a party that is based on Chinese chauvinism. There will thus be no end to the active exploitation of racial polemics and polarisation. Such communal politics is thus not likely to change in the near future.
Choong Pui Yee is a Research Analyst and Farish Noor is a Senior Fellow at the S.Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.
#1 by limkamput on Saturday, 7 May 2011 - 7:44 am
Please bearing in mind, Chinese are not ipso facto anti BN and pro opposition. They voted opposition because they are more aware of the baloneys that are going on in the government. Similarly, the Malays and other bumi voted for BN are not simply pro BN or anti opposition. The majority simply do not know what is going on in the country, having being kept ignorant and dependent for years. Please don’t accentuate the idea that DAP is a chauvinistic party. DAP is NOT, it is a label constantly and persistently being instilled on Malaysians by other racist parties. One more thing, DAP has more Indian support than MIC. Communal politics is what BN what us to believe. Fighting for equality and equal citizenship is not communal or racist in nature. Where are you two coming from to write rubbish like this?
#2 by Loh on Saturday, 7 May 2011 - 4:05 pm
///Yet at the same time, the DAP has yet to transcend its own image as a Chinese-led and dominated party lacking support from Malaysian Malay and Indian voters. This is the Achilles’ heel of the DAP. This weakness will continue to be exploited by its political opponents to paint it as a party that is based on Chinese chauvinism. There will thus be no end to the active exploitation of racial polemics and polarisation. Such communal politics is thus not likely to change in the near future.///
DAP fights racism and Mamakthir has said that only racist fights racism, as if racism is a virtue to be preserved.
Malaysia is the most politicized country with membership to political parties amounted to more than a quarter of its population. It would appears that of the adults more than half of them are members of a political party. Communists in China number 25 million out of a population of 1,300 million, or 2%. But there are 3 million UMNO members among 15 million Malays, or 6 million adults. The three million UMNO members are not there to tell UMNO leaders how to conduct a policy for the good of the nation. They are at the party meeting at the lowest organization level to demand what are the benefits that can avail to them. UMNO is able to retain the interest of UMNO members to party meetings because it has the resources to make the members feel that their attendance is worthwhile, like all buffet parties maybe with some cash to take away. MCA and MIC follow the molds of UMNO. Such level of political participation is clearly unhealthy. In fact the organization and election mechanism of UMNO, MCA and MIC hardly produce the best candidates to serve as the servants to the nation.
DAP fails to measure up to UMNO in terms of party organization. Labour party in United Kingdom has less than 400,000 members out of 60 million population. United Kingdom has no problems finding capable persons to carry out good governance in the country.
Only when the citizens realize that they have a right to good governance would they choose the representatives for long term good rather than for immediate gains. In time when institutionalized corruption ceases to be the norm, with a change in government in Putrajaya, UMNO-MCA-MIC type of political structure would become obsolete when there is no easy money to sustain members’ immediate interest.
#3 by tak tahan on Saturday, 7 May 2011 - 4:43 pm
Well said and reasoning-limkamput n Loh