When RPK says “I have been reliably informed”, it implies the likelihood of him having the informant ready on the standby, though hidden for now, to testify, when the time, place, occasion and forum is right for disclosure without jeopardizing the witness’s safety.

The gauntlet he throws at the government – is I have this: do you want him to come out, subject to the right conditions, to tell the truth? If the government prevaricates, dithers or maintains in-elegant silence without giving an appropriate response, the most negative and adverse inference will be drawn against it for not wanting to know the truth. Either way susah lah!

I am not even surprised he may have a copy of the alleged military intelligence report.

The part of an undisclosed Ruler being privy suggests that RPK is giving a veiled warning that if the situation is escalated by a C4 being used against him, the matter will not end there and that there is a Ruler out there who will pursue the matter.

The wonder of it, assuming the information is accurate and reliable, there could be such a fourth person hidden from view witnessing the proceedings of the other three, unknown to them, and that witness to a crime, until now not known to exist, keeping silent all this while and recently disclosing it to RPK.

PKR’s de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim invited Barisan Nasional members of parliament to defect to his Pakatan Rakyat to “save Malaysia” on 20th June at the Shah Alam Stadium June.

But since when have BN members wanted to “save Malaysia”???

Yet his veiled message – and one that never fails to convince – is actually – you better save yourself!!!!!!!!!!

Thats the point PKR vice-president and Sabah PKR deputy chief Dr Jeffrey Kitingan makes to all opportunists within the BN camp still prevaricating – that the Sabah Progressive Party (Sapp) has made the right move!

Especially Gerakan MCA & MIC members – think – how long more the coalition in which they are part of could sustain judging from tectonic March 8th shift in Rakyat’s support, the factionalism and internal dissension within in its immediate aftermath and things falling apart with all the sewage spilling out, especially in light of RPK’s revelations making the whole continuance of BN concept morally untenable?

UMNO, the back bone of BN, is in throes of power struggle : from where do you think RPK gets his leads, information and possibly evidence to make those allegations and exposure if it were not from there by power brokers ambitious to displace the top two?

But of course they have forgotten that by their actions of undermining the top they have also undermined the BN idea itself in which they part of making it no more a morally viable proposition, so eventually there is actually no where to ascend to.

Right now the BN titanic that is taking more and more waters is hit by another RPK rogue wave.

It must be within their calculations of self interest and political survival that for those who jump early, there are still places in the life boats and alternative PR vessel parking nearby instead of icy shark infested waters if and when that ship finally sinks and there are no more places!

Unless of course they think it can still bale water out and will not sink : they have to weigh and make that decision.

The Star report of 23rd June on “Cops top probe RPK’s claims” refers.

According to report:

1. Police to call on RPK to invetigate;

2. AG Chambers “has lodged a police report against RPK over the Statutory Declaration.

Nothing wrong with 1. something not quite right about 2 here. :)

The normal way would be for police to investigate allegations such as those made by RPK, submit findings of investigations to AG Chambers which will decide whether there is a basis to charge those implicated by allegations and investigated, a prosecutorial discretion that ought to be discharged – in public eyes – impartially.

As it happened before police investigations have commenced much less completed for AG chambers to make a determination, the latter have already jumped the gun and lodged police report against RPK on grounds that this allegations are highly defamatory.

This would be undermining its own future course of action when exercising prosecutorial discretion if it should turn out to be not to charge…

For the lay public would say, of course that would be an expected result since it has already prejudged the allegations as not having merits based on its act of lodging a police report against RPK even before police investigations have commenced much less completed to present to it the results of the investigations!

Latest news from Parliament – by LimKamPut: “Sdr Lim has been given leave to adjourn the House under Standing Order 18 (1) to discuss RPK’s SD that a vip and 2 others witnessed Mongolian model Altantuya Shaariibuu being blown up”.

Where do you get that – is it true?

If so, in extraordinary times, one should take the gamble, stand in face of and “piss” at the wind!

The key is the Speaker – where he stands, which is something worth the gamble. :)

YB Kit leverage on this : (1) RPK sources are from disaffected BN quarters/trojan horses with hidden agenda of which you could tap to get the emergency motion on RPK’s SD heard – and may be even carried depending how motion is worded (2) counter action to enforce party “whip” to garner BN’s majority to stop the motion can be neutralised by arguments of conflicts of interest.

Malaysiakini : “Veteran DAP leader and Ipoh Timur MP Lim Kit Siang submitted an emergency motion to the Speaker on blogger Raja Petra Raja Kamaruddin’s latest allegations concerning the Altantunya Shaariibuu murder”. [Full report to follow]. Keep your fingers crossed!

I don’t think I need to explain further the ordinary grammatical meaning of what Lim Kam Put said, which was “given leave (ie permission”) to adjourn the House under Standing Order 18 (1) to discuss RPK’s SD”.

language of themalaysianinsider.com has changed ? It might have misreported about LKS being “given leave” (ie permission) to adjourn the House under Standing Order 18 (1) to discuss RPK’s SD”.

From what I read from LKS latest thread, he has not yet being given leave but has merely served notice for an adjournment of Parliament under S.O. 18 (1) to tomorrow, so Godfather may be right that tomorrow only the Speaker would still have to rule on whether the mater raised is a fit and proper subject for parliamentary debate based on criteria of “urgency, specific and of public interest”.

It depends on the Speaker – he is the key – but assuming he rules against LKS’s motion, the question after is whether the rightness or error of his ruling may also be contested and put to a vote that will test the majority principle in lieu of using Sharir’s motion on govt’s measures to ameliorate the price hike.

In any case, besides the advantage of testing majority (if that could be done), LKS’s bringing it up in Parliament in presence of media/public observers would hopefully raise public profile of RPK’s allegations that our Mainstream Media has mostly – and cowardly -not done their professional duty of reporting importanty news.