Call on Attorney-General to state whether he would prosecute anyone for alleging that the emergency was declared because Muhyiddin had lost the majority in Parliament


(Tatal ke bawah untuk kenyataan versi BM)

According to the de facto Minister, Takiyuddin Hassan yesterday, it would be a criminal offence under Emergency (Essential Powers) (No. 2) Ordinance 2021 for anyone to allege that the Prime Minister, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin had an emergency declared because he had lost majority in Parliament and would be liable to be fined up to RM100,000, jailed up to three years or both.

Is this the law of the land although the issue has to be decided by the Courts and not by the de facto Law Minister.

In any event, in view of the statement by the de facto Law Minister, the Attorney-General Tan Sri Idris Harun should make his position clear, whether he would prosecute any person under the Emergency Ordinance for alleging that the proclamation of emergency was made because Muhyiddin had lost his majority in Parliament.

I had asked yesterday, among other things, whether and when the Emergency (Essential Powers) (No. 2) Ordinance 2021 was presented to the Cabinet for approval and why the Cabinet did not suggest that before the Ordinance was gazetted, that there should be a period of public feedback from interested organisations and individuals?

Answers to these questions are awaited.

(Media Statement by DAP MP for Iskandar Puteri Lim Kit Siang in Kuala Lumpur on Saturday, 13th March 2021)

=========================

Seruan kepada Peguam Negara untuk menyatakan sama ada beliau akan mendakwa sesiapa yang mengatakan darurat diisytiharkan kerana Muhyiddin telah hilang majoriti di Parlimen

Menurut Menteri Undang-undang, Takiyuddin Hassan semalam, menjadi satu kesalahan di bawah Ordinan Darurat (Kuasa-kuasa Perlu) (No. 2) 2021 untuk sesiapa mendakwa yang Perdana Menteri, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin mendapatkan pengisytiharan darurat kerana beliau telah hilang majoriti di Dewan Rakyat dan mereka bakal berhadapan dengan denda sehingga RM100,000, penjara sehingga tiga tahun, atau kedua-duanya sekali.

Adakah perkara ini undang-undang dalam negara sedangkan perkara ini masih perlu diputuskan oleh mahkamah dan bukannya diputuskan oleh Menteri Undang-undang.

Apa-apa pun, dengan kenyataan Menteri Undang-undang ini, Peguam Negara perlu memberikan penjelasan mengenai pendirian beliau, sama ada beliau akan membawa pendakwaan kepada sesiapa di bawah Ordinan Darurat kerana menuduh pengisytiharan darurat didapatkan kerana Muhyiddin telah hilang majoriti di Parlimen.

Saya telah menanyakan semalam, bersama dengan beberapa perkara lagi, sama ada Ordinan Darurat (Kuasa-kuasa Perlu) (No. 2) 2021 telah dibentangkan kepada Kabinet untuk diluluskan dan mengapakah Kabinet tidak mencadangkan supaya pindaan dibuat sebelum Ordinan ini diwartakan, dan perlu untuk ada tempoh maklum balas awam dari pihak dan individu yang berminat.

Jawapan kepada persoalan-persoalan ini dinantikan.

(Kenyataan media Ahli Parlimen DAP Iskandar Puteri Lim Kit Siang di Kuala Lumpur pada hari Sabtu 13 Mac 2021)

  1. No comments yet.

You must be logged in to post a comment.