No Honour among 1MDB thieves

October 26, 2018 was the day when former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak came in from the cold to brave nasty questions about the 1MDB scandal which he had been avoiding for more than five years since the 13th General Election when he accepted the invitation of Al Jazeera for an interview with its 101 East programme.

But it proved to the day when Najib was “hung up to dry” for on this day, the Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Adel Ahmad Al-Jubeir met the Prime Minister, Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad to deny that Najib Razak’s infamous RM2.6 billion in his personal bank account had come from Riyadh.

There is the idiom of honour among thieves, but it would appear that there is no honor among 1MDB thieves.

This is the season of questions, questions and more questions for Najib on the 1MDB scandal, and I will limit myself to three questions today:

First Question:

Why had Najib taken over five years, and only after he was toppled from power in the 14th General Election on May 9, 2018 to answer questions about the infamous RM2.6 billion “donation” in his personal banking account, when as far back as July 2016 and June 2017, the United States kleptocratic litigation on 1MDB had traced in great detail the origin of the RM2.6 billion “donation” to 1MDB funds?

If Najib was innocent of 1MDB corruption, abuse of power and money-laundering, why hadn’t he launched a full and comprehensive investigation to establish his innocence when he was the Prime Minister?

Second Question

This is the first time that Malaysians are told that the infamous 22-carat US$23,7 million pink diamond necklace linked to Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor was a gift from a prince of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Prince Sheikh Mansour, the brother of Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed, and not from fugitive financier Low Taek Jho, or Jho Low.

Furthermore, Najib said for the first time that Rosmah never received the 22-carat pink diamond necklace.

Why did’n’t Najib say so when I asked this particular question a number of times since June 2017?

Is the 22-carat pink diamond necklace still missing and is there going to be an Interpol manhunt for it – as the tale of the 22-carat pink diamond necklace should be an interesting one.

The updated and expanded US Department of Justice (DOJ) kleptocratic litigation on 1MDB devoted a special section to Jho Low’s purchase of the 22-carat pink diamond necklace for Rosmah Mansor from 1MDB funds – covering in great detail in 16 paragraphs covering four pages.

It further set out in great detail the “purchase of 27 assorted gold necklaces” for the wife of “MO1” – which the former Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Abdul Rahman Dahlan, had publicly admitted was none other than Najib, and who added that only an idiot would not know that “MOI” was Najib!

It is indeed astounding what hubris can do to a person!

Why did Najib wait for more than a year, and after he had been toppled from power and could not sweep the 1MDB scandal under a carpet, to reveal that his wife never received the 22-carat pink diamond necklace?

Third. Question:

Najib said in his interview with Al Jazeera that investigators should not stop at Jho Low, but should probe others who were allegedly involved in stealing from 1Malaysian Development Bhd.

He said all the culprits must be investigated to find out where the money had gone.

“Fine… let them do their work but don’t just stop at Jho Low. Get others who are involved as well because there are other international figures who probably are involved. They must also be investigated.

“We want to know where the money flowed to. And who really benefited from the whole 1MDB issue. I would like to know, too”.

Is Najib finally admitting to the existence of a monstrous 1MDB corruption and money-laundering school which rightlyl gave Malaysia the infamy and ignominy of being regarded worldwide as a global kleptocracy?

Mahathir had asked Najib to lodge police reports against persons whom Najib believed were responsible for the 1MDB scandal. Would Najib do so>

I had asked Najib several times to reveal the number of occasions and details of when, where and under what circumstances he had meetings with Jho Low since the 13th General Election, and what he had done to bring Jho Low back to Malaysia to co-operate with 1MDB investigations, instead of being a international fugitive from justice.

Will Najib respond?

(Media Statement by DAP MP for Iskandar Puteri Lim Kit Siang in Kuala Lumpur on Saturday, 27th October 2018)

  1. #1 by Bigjoe on Saturday, 27 October 2018 - 9:45 am

    It boggles the mind Najib is actually conducting a public campaign to defend himself as it only get worst each time because nothing he says is actually true merely argument. Take for example his statement he has proof but the fact is the documents he has are not proof but rather argument of his case. He and his lawyer argue that paying IPIC was “in the interest of the country” and did not benefit personally when digging himself out of a hole he dug is personal interest.

    What is being played out is soap opera, little or no substance but underneath it all are serious issues.

    The disintegration of UMNO looks very likely – part of UMNO will join Bersatu and part will join PAS. How is PH going to decide the leadership of PH once Bersatu gets bigger and how the 3 different Malay or Malay-based parties going to work together? How is PH going to decide how to deal with PAS and the religo-political agenda in this country once its PH Vs. PAS?

You must be logged in to post a comment.