No reason why a competent, efficient and professional police force could not re-unite Indira Gandhi with her nine-year-old daughter Prasana Diksa three days after the Federal Court judgement


Long-suffering mother Indira Gandhi has made a most heart-rending plea that she only wants to see and hold her daughter, Prasana Diksa, who was taken from her nine years ago when she was only nine months old when her ex-husband Muhammad Riduan Abdullah unilaterally converted Prasana to Islam.

Indira has said that she wants to put aside the issue of religion as her concern as a mother was to ensure her wellbeing.

There is no reason why a competent, efficient and professional police force could not re-unite Indira with her nine-year-old daughter three days after the Federal Court judgment, and the Inspector-General of Police, Tan Sri Mohamad Fuzi Harun would have a lot of explaining to do when Parliament reconvenes in March in five weeks’ time if the Police is unable to respect and enforce the judgment of the highest court of the land.

The question asked by Indira yesterday is being asked by all Malaysians”: “My ex-husband is not a terrorist, why is it so hard to find him?”

Let all Malaysians and organisations commit themselves to uphold the rule of law as the basic tenet of the Malaysian Constitution and a fundamental principle of Malaysian nation-building to ensure that Malaysia as a multi-racial, multi-religious, multi-lingual and multi-cultural nation can become a showcase to the world of peace, unity, harmony and success in a plural society.

(Media Statement in Gelang Patah on Thursday, 1st February 2018)

  1. #1 by Bigjoe on Friday, 2 February 2018 - 3:24 am

    Everything the Islamic authorities, jurisprudence and enforcement does in this case, justify Zionists action in Palestine and Burmese extremist in Rakhine.

  2. #2 by good coolie on Friday, 2 February 2018 - 9:35 pm

    The Federal Court decision is laudable, but what of all the inaccuracies that preceded that decision in the Court of Appeal? If judges can deliver preposterous decisions because they feel bound by their personal religious convictions, the courts will not be a bulwark against religious extremism. Even lay people could see the injustices that Indira suffered all this while.

    That smug ex-IGP takes the cake. He can thumb his nose at the civil courts without a tinge of fear. That was sedition on his part!

  3. #3 by good coolie on Thursday, 8 February 2018 - 12:43 pm

    The quick brown frog jumped out of the slowly heating pot.

You must be logged in to post a comment.