Russia Denies Role in Downing of Airliner

New York Times
JULY 18, 2014

GRABOVO, Ukraine — As rescue teams slowly converged on the grisly scene of Thursday’s downing of a Malaysia Airlines jet, the Russian defense ministry sharply denied any involvement in the missile strike that Ukrainian officials said ripped the Boeing 777 from the sky and many began openly questioning why the airline had chosen to fly a civilian aircraft over a combat zone.

The crash site was still unsecured by midday Friday, raising questions about who controlled the flight data recorder, cockpit voice recorder and other onboard devices that will help determine exactly how the crash occurred. Rebel spokesmen said they had recovered most of the devices, but it was unclear when and to whom they would turn them over for investigation.

Russian officials were adamant that they had nothing to do with the disaster, continuing to point fingers at the Ukrainian government and military. “In view of various types of speculation concerning operations of the Russian armed forces in the areas bordering Ukraine, we affirm that the anti-aircraft means of the Russian armed forces did not operate in that region on July 17,” the defense ministry said in a statement posted on its website.

After a Malaysia Airlines jet crashed in Ukraine on Thursday, several amateur videos were posted online.

The statement also said that its air force was not flying within Russia in the areas bordering Donetsk on Thursday.

Officials in the United States confirmed late Thursday that Flight 17, with 298 people aboard, had been shot down over Grabovo, Ukraine, by what they described as a Russian-made antiaircraft missile. Fighting in eastern Ukraine between the Ukrainian military and pro-Russian separatists has been marked by the successful use of missiles against aircraft at higher and higher altitudes. The downing on Thursday of Flight 17, struck at 33,000 feet, was the first at cruising altitude for modern commercial jets, however.

The Russian defense statement noted that units of the Ukrainian Army possessed the BUK M1 air defense missile launchers that officials said was most likely responsible for bringing the jetliner down. Much of the speculation surrounding the crash has focused on that system, particularly since the pro-Russian separatist forces in eastern Ukraine bragged on social media in late June that they had taken possession of a BUK system after capturing a Ukrainian military base.

The crash remained the subject of intense debate in the small Ukrainian town of Grabovo, as residents tried to come to grips with what had unfolded in the fields where they work, just yards from their homes.

Two villagers said quietly that they had seen the flash of a rocket in the sky around the time the plane went down. Victor, who said he was too afraid to give his last name, said that he had been in his garden at the time and that he had seen “the light coming from a rocket.”

He said it had come from the direction of Snizhne, a city where the Ukrainians have been bombing rebel positions frequently for more than a week. “It was a rocket, I’m sure of it,” he said.

The other villager, Sergei, 15, who also did not want to give his last name, said he had been swimming in a nearby river when he saw what appeared to be a rocket being launched into the sky. He said he then jumped out of the water, hopped on his motorbike and sped home.
Continue reading the main story

As a cloudy dawn came, the full horror of the field was on display. Small white pieces of cloth dotted the grassy farmland, marking the spots of bodies.

Four rebels in fatigues were wandering through the ruins, looking through people’s belongings and riffling through guidebooks and bags.

When asked who was responsible for the crash, they looked incredulous and said that it had of course been the Ukrainian military.

“This wasn’t ours,” said a rebel who identified himself only as Alexei, standing looking at an overhead bin in the grass with a rifle over his shoulder. “Why would we do this? We’re not animals.”

The smell of flesh hung heavily near a broken hulk of metal on the road where a body lay splayed. A foot with part of a leg was lying on the road.

The plane appeared to have broken apart at a great height as pieces were scattered across several miles of agricultural fields. The two wings lay akimbo, as if pushed forward on impact. The plane was full of fuel when it crashed and the fire near the engine was fierce, turning the twisted metal remains into molten pools that had hardened by morning.

“This is direct provocation of the E.U. and the U.S.,” said a rebel, Alexander Nikolaevich, who was walking along the road near the scene. “You see our weapons,” he said pointing to his aging gun. “We started to win the war and the fascists did this to stop us.”

When asked if the fight would continue, he said, “a little bit.”

In Malaysia, the heavily Muslim nation in Southeast Asia mourned on a holy Ramadan Friday, shocked at the sudden loss of a second Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777-200. Many began openly wondering why the plane was flying over a conflict in eastern Ukraine where increasingly powerful surface-to-air missiles were being used.

In a statement delivered before dawn in Kuala Lumpur , Prime Minister Najib Razak of Malaysia pointedly noted that the International Civil Aviation Organization had declared the airspace safe and that the International Air Transport Association had not restricted travel there. “We must — and we will — find out precisely what happened to this flight,” he said.

Peppered with questions about the aircraft’s route during a news conference late on Thursday afternoon at a Kuala Lumpur airport hotel, Liow Tiong Lai, Malaysia’s transport minister, said repeatedly that the aircraft had been following a safe route that Malaysia Airlines had used for many years and that was still used by most Asian airlines and by many European airlines, including on the day of the crash. “During that period of time, there are also many other aircraft using the same route,” he said.

European and Ukrainian air traffic controllers had continued to route civil flights over the contested area even as the fighting worsened — and even as flights directed by Russian air traffic controllers had apparently started to avoid it.

Ukrainian intelligence has pointed to a fighter named Igor Bezler, the militia leader in the eastern town of Gorlovka, saying in an intercepted phone call that his men had “shot down a plane” on Thursday. Several assassinations are believed to have happened under Mr. Bezler’s watch soon after his forces took Gorlovka, and he took responsibility for killing a number of Ukrainian militiamen in the town of Volnovakha some weeks ago.

According to Russian Internet sources, he was born in 1965 in Crimea, and studied in Russia. He served in the Russian military but moved back to Ukraine in 2003, where he began to work as the head of security for a factory in Gorlovka. Biographies also note that he had worked in a company that performed burial services but was fired in 2012. He has been wanted by the Ukrainian authorities since April 2014.

Mr. Bezler’s nom de guerre is Bes, which in Russian sounds like the first syllable of his last name, but also means demon. There are rumors that Mr. Bezler does not get along with other militia leaders, and that he has had street battles with the Vostok Battalion, though rebels have dismissed those allegations.

In a slickly produced video called “Heroes of Novorossii,” the name of the self-declared insurgent region, Mr. Bezler was shown wearing a light blue beret. He had blue eyes and a long mustache. In a recent interview with the Russian news agency RIA Novosti, he claimed to be holding 14 Ukrainian soldiers hostage and said that the Ukrainian military had fallen apart, “much like the condition of the Russian military in the early 1990s.”

In the interview, Mr. Bezler said he was a Russian passport holder but had a residency permit in Ukraine. He said he sang the national anthem of the Soviet Union every morning, and usually went to bed around 10:30 p.m. He confirmed that he had worked as head of security for the Gorlovka factory, and claimed that he was fired from the burial services company over a fight with the local mayor who he said was demanding bribes.

Peter Marosszeky, a longtime aircraft engineer and former senior executive at Qantas, PanAm and American Airlines who advised Boeing on the development of the 777 aircraft, said in a telephone interview that the 777-200 had an extremely long range and would have enough fuel to divert around a dangerous area during a 12-hour flight if the pilots chose to do so. But he said that airlines have typically not worried until now about surface-to-air missiles reaching planes at cruising altitude, because only a very large missile with a lot of fuel could ascend such a distance.

Mr. Marosszeky expressed skepticism that militiamen could readily fire such a large missile without training as well as cooperation from whoever owned or manufactured the missile. “You’ve got to have special codes and so forth to operate these things,” he said.

While international experts put the blame on whoever fired the missile, questions about why commercial air traffic was continuing in the area — and about when air traffic should be stopped over similar areas of fighting in the future — could prove difficult to answer. The investigation into the loss of Flight 17 is laden with potential disputes over sovereignty.

Mark A. Dombroff, a partner focusing on the aviation industry at McKenna Long & Aldridge, a national law firm in the United States, said that legal precedents indicated that if a plane is downed by military action, the lead country in the investigation is the one over whose territory the plane was shot down. That appears to be Ukraine in this case — but the rebels in eastern Ukraine, where the plane crashed, do not recognize the leadership in Kiev and may try to claim the lead role in the investigation.
Continue reading the main story Continue reading the main story

“One of the most complicated factors is getting investigators on the ground in hostile territory,” Mr. Dombroff said.

Ukraine or the rebels — or both — could decide to transfer leadership of the crash investigation either to the country of registry of the aircraft, which would be Malaysia, or to the country of manufacture for the aircraft, which would be the United States, where the Boeing 777 was made.

Alexander Borodai, the prime minister of the self-declared Donetsk People’s Republic, the main separatist organization, said the group was setting up a committee to investigate the crash, the news agency Interfax reported. Russian government officials continued to emphasize the official line Friday that the investigation was under Ukrainian jurisdiction.

Leading a crash investigation is in some ways a formality for developing countries, as most of the world’s investigators with crash experience tend to come from countries that manufacture aircraft and certify their airworthiness. Russia’s proximity to the crash site, close ties to the rebels and extensive aviation experience means that it could try to play a sizable advisory role, particularly if the rebels follow through on reported plans to locate the flight data recorders and send them to Moscow.

The crash is another setback for Malaysia Airlines, which has already been struggling to recover from the loss of Flight 370, which vanished on March 8 during a red-eye flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing.

The enduring mystery over Flight 370 has already severely hurt demand for Malaysia Airlines tickets, forcing the airline to offer budget carrier prices even though it bears the costs of a full-service airline.

The financial penalty on Malaysia Airlines was clear on Friday morning when two planes, one from Cathay Pacific and one from Malaysia Airlines, left Hong Kong International Airport five minutes apart, both bound for Kuala Lumpur. The Cathay Pacific was sold out in every class of service, and was so overbooked that the airline took the unusual step of calling at least one passenger at home the night before the flight and telling him that he had been involuntarily bounced to the flight operated by Malaysia Airlines, for which Cathay Pacific has a shared marketing code.

By contrast, the Malaysia Airlines flight was at least one-third empty. The bulk of the passengers appeared to have come from two separate companies that were holding meetings in Kuala Lumpur and had bought blocks of tickets for their employees to get there at discounted prices.

Both Korean Air Lines and Asiana Airlines have confirmed that they have not flown planes through Ukrainian airspace since March 3.

“We detoured our flight because of political instability there,” said Lee Hyo-min, a spokeswoman at Asiana, which had been flying a cargo plane through Ukrainian airspace once a week from Brussels to Incheon, South Korea, until that point.

Korean Air Lines had been sending 42 passenger and cargo flights per month through Ukrainian airspace, but those flights had been rerouted, beginning on March 3, company officials said.

Civilian jetliners have been shot down on a few previous occasions, including by the United States. The U.S.S. Vincennes used a pair of surface-to-air missiles in 1988 to destroy Iran Air Flight 655, killing 290 people, when the ship’s radar operators mistakenly concluded that the plane was descending toward them in a possible attack. A later review found that the jetliner was ascending at the time. It had been following a flight path that Iranian F-14 fighter jets had used in the preceding days to approach the American vessel, before veering away when warned by radio.

In 1983, a Russian Air Force fighter jet downed a Korean Air Lines flight that was traveling from New York City to Seoul by way of Anchorage, after the plane wandered off course.

Chinese fighters shot down a Cathay Pacific airliner in 1954 off the coast of Hainan Island, southern China, in an incident that had its roots in a civil war. China’s explanation at the time was that it had feared the Cathay Pacific plane might actually be a military aircraft belonging to the nationalists on Taiwan, who had lost the civil war in mainland China but remained technically at war.

Keith Bradsher reported from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, and Sabrina Tavernise reported from Grabovo, Ukraine. Reporting was contributed by Christopher Buckley in Kuala Lumpur, Neil MacFarquhar in Moscow and Choe Sang-Hun in Seoul, South Korea.

  1. #1 by Noble House on Saturday, 19 July 2014 - 3:55 am

    Malaysians will be watching closely as to how the newly minted Transport Minister plans on dealing with this tragedy and brings justice to the country and the families of those who perished on board MH17. Let’s see if he is any better (or worst) than Hishammuddin did. Judging from his first press conference today and the lame answers to incessant questions from both local and foreign media beyond that of a prepared statement, is both disappointing and unsatisfactory.

    As we share our grief with those who lost their loved ones, let us, perhaps, also take a moment of silence and ask ourselves why so many of such unfortunate events happened to the country lately. The law of retribution? I hope not, when innocent ones are paying for the price!

  2. #2 by Jeffrey on Saturday, 19 July 2014 - 6:57 am

    The US will use the downing of MH17 as a means to galvanise international support to resist Putin/Russian’s geopolitical designs to re-activate Russian hegemony in former Soviet states through Ukraine domino. Obama will exploit this disaster to force American European allies esp Germany to choose between their relationship with Washington and their relationship with Moscow. US wil play policeman. The Western investigators coming into accident site will open the way to gather intelligence and dilute separatists/ control.

  3. #3 by Jeffrey on Saturday, 19 July 2014 - 7:12 am

    At our end, though a pawn in bigger US vs Russia chess game, MH17 will enable us to play ‘victim’ garner sympathy/support and help make international community forget incompetencies of MH370 loss. We’re better position now to play victim and avert blame. Can always explain nothing wrong in flying over war zone – MH17 1000 ft above restricted air space. On the point about saving fuel cos due to being financial strapped? Well SIA’s SQ351 (B777) and Air India AI113 (B787) were about 25 km from MH17 when it was blown off skies. We were plain unlucky – this could have been the rich SIA! Other airlines earlier avoiding Ukraine? The US did it as early April. South Korea and many who took precautions were American allies- and Ukraine’s conflict is basically an American versus Russian power chess game!

  4. #4 by yhsiew on Saturday, 19 July 2014 - 7:18 am

    Some said Ukraine deliberately allowed MH17 to fly in the dangerous air zone so that when the plane was shot down, the whole world would be against Russia and the separatists and Ukraine will not be fighting the war alone.

  5. #5 by Jeffrey on Saturday, 19 July 2014 - 7:25 am

    Wow want a creative conspirarcy theory. Why not expand it to Ukraine doing this on American CIA advice since they also believe the diabolical US hijacked MH370 to Diego Garcia to take out sensitive cargo before sending the plan off into Southeren Ocean? On the lighter side, any re-brand of MAS (when it delists & goes private) should avert the number 7– common to MH370 and now MH 17 downed on 17 of July – unlucky to it

    k? But
    On lighter side, any re-brand of MAS (when it delists & goes private) should avert the number 7– common to MH370 and now MH 17 downed on 17 of July – unlucky to it !

  6. #6 by Jeffrey on Saturday, 19 July 2014 - 8:45 am

    [Correction: SIA just denied it used Ukraine airspace – sorry]. MH17 tragedy and labeling its downing “a crime” is definitely convenient way for US to delegitimize Separatists’ 90% ballot vote under banner of democracy to join Russia. Especially so when Putin’s blaming Ukraine’s govt resuming military campaign against separatists is pathetic. How can Russia supply such sophisticated missiles that could hit a plane 33,000 feet high at that speed to novices? EU getting much trade benefits with Russia and their business lobbies are against US’s proposed sanctions. UK’s Cameron whilst urging independent investigation, refrained from ascribing blame on Russia benefiting £ from its crude oil and gas, investment banking ( tax haven for Russian billionaires), and Germany’s Mersel resoundingly quiet. Eyes now on Netherland’s PM Mark Rutte. Its 192 Dutch lives versus Russian oil and gas imports for energy needs & how to mitigate high trade deficit with Russia. So US pretty much alone in her sanctions campaign against Russia and needed this MH17 to gavanise her European allies.

  7. #7 by Jeffrey on Saturday, 19 July 2014 - 9:10 am

    SIA’s facebook posting – ‘customers to note SIA flights not using Ukraine airspace’- is also curious: (1) why face book posting? (2) when not using Ukraine airspace is in present tense and does not directly contradict/rebut earlier reports (SQ351 flying 25 km from MH17)?

  8. #8 by winstony on Saturday, 19 July 2014 - 9:38 am

    Ah, this brings to mind the infamous Cold War incident concerning the U2 spy plane.
    The US was using this plane to fly over Russia for a long time during the Cold War to gather information about their adversary.
    And thumping their noses at them at the same time!!
    They have been doing so with impunity because this plane could fly at very high altitude which rockets at that time could not touch.
    But on 1st May 1960, it was shot down and the pilot was captured.
    It was one hell of a shock and embarrassment to the US.
    They have never for one second thought that the Soviet Union would have a weapon that could down their plane.
    This should be an object lesson that one should err on the side of caution and never assume anything especially when lives are concerned.

You must be logged in to post a comment.