Families frustrated over delayed MH370 tracking data, question its authenticity

by Muzliza Mustafa
The Malaysian Insider
May 28, 2014

The families of MH370 passengers have reacted with scepticism to raw tracking data released by the global satellite company Inmarsat yesterday on the missing jetliner, saying the fact that the data was not in its original format has raised suspicions that it may have been edited and manipulated.

Lokman Mustafa, whose sister was on board the plane, said although he appreciated Inmarsat’s move to publish the data, he could not help wondering why the British satellite company decided to publish it with an explanation and analysis instead of raw computer pages.

“The satellite company has extracted crucial lines from the logs and published it with an explanation and analysis. In addition, they have not published the raw computer pages and this raises the question ‘why not?’

“Surely the authorities know that all our hopes are pinned on the data,” he said, adding that delay in releasing the data has also caused resentment among families.

“With this release, crowdsourcing with the aim of narrowing down the search region can now be carried out by various individuals.

“Hopefully, the announcement that flight MH370 ended in the southern Indian Ocean can now be validated (or invalidated) by a wider group of technical experts working voluntarily to solve one of the biggest mysteries in commercial aviation history,” he said.

Malaysia’s Department of Civil Aviation and Inmarsat yesterday released the data used to determine the path of the lost plane following mounting calls from passengers’ relatives for greater transparency.

The data communications log comprises 14 pieces of data from seven “handshakes,” or pairs of numbers, between the aircraft and the satellite, Inmarsat said last week. One number is time information, the other is frequency.

Sarah Bajc, partner of passenger Philip Wood voiced scepticism over the released data, saying instead of releasing it in its original format, “they” chose to “manage” what was released.

“There should have been a file version including the ‘logfile’ data in data form, not in pdf form; it’s a little tweak to make people work harder needlessly,” she said.

Although the data itself is meaningless to her and the average person who may not be able to interpret a log file, Sarah said it is not something hard to crack for industry experts.

She also questioned the delay in releasing the data more than two months after the plane vanished on March 8.

“The report is anti-climactic. Our original request for the data was over two months ago. We were trying help in the investigation. A few other family members and I had solicited input from some reputable experts in the industry who were willing to take a crack at cross-validating the formulas, assumptions and analysis,” she said.

She said the release of Inmarsat data was only one of the things that the families had asked from the government and those involved in the investigation.

“This was one of dozens of things we asked for, and it was only partially given.” she added.

Inmarsat used a wave phenomenon to analyse the seven pings its satellites picked up to determine the route of MH370.

The findings led Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak to conclude on March 24 that the Boeing 777 crashed thousands of miles away in the southern Indian Ocean, killing all on board.

The pings, automatically transmitted every hour from the aircraft after the rest of its communications systems had stopped, indicated it continued flying for hours after it disappeared from its flight path from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing.

From the time the signals took to reach the satellite and the angle of elevation, Inmarsat was able to provide two arcs, one north and one south that the aircraft could have taken.

Britain’s Air Accidents Investigation Branch was also involved in the analysis. – May 28, 2014.

  1. #1 by pulama on Thursday, 29 May 2014 - 6:28 am

    Remember those pings which were heard in waters off Australia? Nobody knows what they were.

    ///The pings will be omitted from data set to be released about the missing flight, because it is feared they were not emitted by the Malaysia Airlines plane.
    “The recordings of the detections will not be released at this point in time,” said a statement from the Joint Agency Coordination Centre (JACC), which is looking for the jumbo jet. “We continue to pursue this lead to either discount or confirm the area of the detections as the final resting place of MH370.”
    It is not yet known what generated the pings, which were picked by a US military search party last month. At the time, the search team insisted there could be no other explanation than that they came from MH370.///

    MH370 Relatives Told Pings Heard off Australian Coast ‘Didn’t Come From Missing Malaysia Airlines Plane’, International Business Times, By Dominic Gover | IB Times – Tue, May 20, 2014.

  2. #2 by pulama on Thursday, 29 May 2014 - 8:09 am

    latest news . .

    ///(CNN) — The four acoustic pings at the center of the search for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 for the past seven weeks are no longer believed to have come from the plane’s black boxes, a U.S. Navy official told CNN.
    The acknowledgment came Wednesday as searchers wrapped up the first phase of their effort, having scanned 329 square miles of southern Indian Ocean floor without finding any wreckage from the Boeing 777-200.
    Authorities now almost universally believe the pings did not come from the onboard data or cockpit voice recorders, but instead came from some other man-made source unrelated to the jetliner that disappeared on March 8, according to Michael Dean, the Navy’s deputy director of ocean engineering. . ///

    Navy official: Pings not thought to be from Flight 370’s black boxes, By Rene Marsh and Mike M. Ahlers, CNN, May 28, 2014 — Updated 2328 GMT (0728 HKT)

  3. #3 by Justice Ipsofacto on Thursday, 29 May 2014 - 9:08 am

    The mother of all question is this: How sure are you Mr Defence Minister that our radar had actually tracked the westerly diversion of the aircraft?

You must be logged in to post a comment.