May 13 was not a racial riot

– Stephen Ng
The Malaysian Insider
September 01, 2013

Tourism and Culture Minister Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz said that it is “a historical fact that the riot was sparked by Chinese, (like the fact) that Nazis killed thousands of Jews during the Second World War”. I beg to differ.

When May 13 broke out, I was a young five-year-old boy living in a New Village. My father was away working either in Kelantan or Pahang. My sisters and I were the only ones who stayed with my mother in Jinjang Selatan. Although we were supposed to have moved to a new home in Taman Kepong, the family decided to stay put.

As a boy, I was listening in to every conversation that took place between my mother and other relatives and friends. There were horror stories of Malays killing the Chinese, and Chinese killing the Malays. But a phone conversation between my mother and my father that has never escaped my attention was that everything was peaceful in the East Coast.

My Father said that the Chinese and the Malays were having breakfast together. There was no riot in the East Coast. It was business as usual for them. Muthusamy, Ali and Ah Chong were still friends, when things went awry in Selangor. Why is that so, Datuk Seri Nazri?

Racial riots? No way!

My answer is simple: May 13 was NOT a racial riot. It was the work of a few politicians who capitalised on sentiments of the day.

Although there were obvious bad vibes between the races, mainly perpetuated by politicians, citizens of the newly-minted country, who had already learnt to accept each other, were beginning to enjoy being fellow Malaysians.

In Kelantan and other parts of the country, or should I say, where PAS was in control, people were able to live more harmoniously since the day of Prophet Muhammad!

Who then caused the May 13 riots? I only found the answer very much later when I started reading the book by Dr Kua Kia Soong, May 13, and made my own observations in the past six years.

Let me briefly share my thoughts.

May 13 is the work of politicians who lost the 1969 general election. The opposition had tied with the Alliance for control of the Selangor state legislature, a large setback in the polls for the Alliance. The big difference now is that Selangor is totally under Pakatan rule for the good of the people.

Several factors had created the tension. The then Menteri Besar of Selangor, Haron Idris was discontented with the results of the election. At the same time, another camp was discontented with Tunku Abdul Rahman, our beloved Bapa Malaysia.

At that point in time, Dr Mahahtir Mohamed had been sacked after his book, The Malay Dilemma, was banned. Tunku had warned that Mahathir was a big troublemaker, and Umno would be making a big mistake if it was to take him back into its fold.

In his book, Dr Mahathir was able to create a sense of insecurity amongst the Malays and later to control their minds. This was a necessity for a non-Malay, like Mahathir to later become the country’s leader.

Knowing that his own kind is generally not accepted even amongst the Malays, till today, he would not admit that his father was from Kerala in India.

Seizing the opportunity to force the Tunku to step down, Dr Mahathir, Abdul Razak Hussein and Haron Idris were the key players in Umno politics.

To reach that state of Emergency, they had to lash it out on the economically stronger community – the Chinese, and in particular, the DAP, accusing the DAP as a provocateur. Why only the DAP and not the MCA, as both were also Chinese? The present MCA does not even come close to the MCA of those days, when it was still popular with the New Villages.

It clearly shows this was not a racial riot, but the political manipulation by a few. In my opinion, everything was lumped into one big blame on the DAP because they won big. This is the same modus operandi used by Umno Baru till today, except that this time around, it is not only the DAP, but Pakatan taking over the state of Selangor.

As much as there were rascals in Umno during Tunku’s time, there were sure enough the communists and gangsters who were trying to seize the opportunity of turning Malaysia into a communist country. One of my late uncles was taken in by the police not because he was a DAP activist but because he was young and the police took him and others for detention to keep them from causing problems.

Were the Chinese also represented by the Communists? Or, was every Chinese a Communist? The answer is, No!

One of my uncles was, in fact, a Special Branch officer who was tracking down the communists, but he has since migrated to Australia for his own safety. Communism was never a race issue but an ideology that was prevalent in the people of those days.

Tanda Putera or New Village

So, whether it is Tanda Putera or New Village, Malaysians should realise that if we continue to buy into the political manipulation of a few, we would be heading for another disaster.

This is what I want Nazri to learn, that in order to stay in power, politicians need to play on race or religious cards.

They should strengthen their positions as people well-respected by people of all races. I am glad that in our midst there are two good examples that I have seen – Nurul Izzah Anwar and Hannah Yeoh, two young ladies who have gained much credence over the years. May they lead Malaysia into a new era!- September 1, 2013.

  1. #1 by sheriff singh on Sunday, 1 September 2013 - 11:54 pm

    I is for Insecurity.

  2. #2 by lee tai king (previously dagen) on Monday, 2 September 2013 - 9:09 am

    Nazri the cowboy is shooting from his hip. Yes, again. Of course the town was empty. And so his gunshots had sounded extra loud and they echoed about town for quite a few seconds longer than usual. Terrifying? Nah. Hardly. You see. Just as surely as he would fire from his hip, the bullets having no defined targets to land will somehow find their way back to his foot; and for the good of everyone I certainly hope, to his ballz and his head too. Yes. Home bullets. Home. Now go.

    Anyway, the cowboy had a picture of himself seated next to chairman mao taken recently. Bet he was profoundly overwhelmed by the MAN – by his personality, character, determination and sheer power. Quite obviously, those layers of wax could not hide anything at all. Neither could the frozen posture. For the MAN of wax breaths. And given the close physical proximity between the two during the photoshoot I am sure the cowboy could have felt chairman mao. And in a moment of panic, he gibbered that by now famous line: “… only a few individuals (i.e. chinese) …” were responsible for sparking the riot of may 13.

    …. taiking, attempting to take the cowboy’s words in the correct perspective.

  3. #3 by negarawan on Monday, 2 September 2013 - 4:14 pm

    I would recommend reading the memoirs of LKY in which he recounted how the then UMNO secretary-general Jaafar Albar and Razak instigated 1964 racial riots in Singapore and used Utusan Melayu to incite the Malays against the Chinese and to remove LKY from office.

    The British high commission in KL reported:
    “The riots had a political rather than religious origin. Communal tension has been sharpened during the past few months by a propaganda campaign (conducted primarily by the leading Malay newspaper, Utusan Melayu) accusing the PAP government in Singapore of unfair treatment of Malays there. Utusan Melayu often acts as the mouthpiece of UMNO, and in particular of its extremist secretary-general Syed Jaafar Alba. The loss of the Malay seats in the Singapore Legislative Assembly last September to the PAP rankled, and UMNO resentment was increased by the PAP intervention in the Malayan general election in April (unsuccessful though it was), and by the PAP’s continuing efforts to set up a grassroots organisation in all the main Malayan towns.”

    The New Zealand Dept of External Affairs concluded:
    “The fact remains that UMNO (and ultimately UMNO’s leaders) must bear the main burden of responsibility for the recent outbreak by virtue of their recourse to the excitation of Malay racial sentiment. It appears to us that Razak and other UMNO leaders did not act soon enough to curb the excesses of extremists like Jaafar Albar and we were left in even more disturbing doubt by the reaction of the federal government to the riots.”

    In 1966, after the separation, Albar and the Utusan agreed to apologise in court through their lawyers and pay for all costs.

    This schlok of a film by Shuhaimi Baba is no doubt another propaganda by UMNO to throw bad light on the opposition leaders and the Chinese community, and is just the same old dirty and incendiary tactics used by UMNO since the 60′s. UMNO will not find any respect from all right-thinking Malaysians.

  4. #4 by TheWrathOfGrapes on Monday, 2 September 2013 - 4:15 pm

    /// Tourism and Culture Minister Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz said that it is “a historical fact that the riot was sparked by Chinese, (like the fact) that Nazis killed thousands of Jews during the Second World War” ///

    Thousands of Jews killed by the Nazis? Try 6 million, plus or minus thousands.

    With “facts” like thess, who needs lies, fabrications and fiction from Nazi Aziz?

  5. #5 by ENDANGERED HORNBILL on Monday, 2 September 2013 - 5:17 pm

    Good try, Nazri, for pushing your spin on Tanda Putera (TP).

    Why don’t you say like what common sense would tell you that TP is pure fictionalised garbage for politicians clutching at their last straws? Any idiot should recognise that.

    Some people are real idiots.
    Others try hard to be idiots.

    I don’t know where you stand, Nazri.

  6. #6 by worldpress on Monday, 2 September 2013 - 8:54 pm

    Maybe a story created by bapa Malaysia enemy overthrow baba malaysia

You must be logged in to post a comment.