BY CLARA CHOOI
The Malaysian Insider
May 21, 2013
KUALA LUMPUR, May 21 — Bersih 2.0’s “People’s Tribunal” may not have any legal standing but will serve as a “moral force” to publicly expose electoral fraud, said Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan when defending the polls watchdog’s final attempt at proving wrongdoing in the May 5 polls.
The renowned civil rights activist told The Malaysian Insider that Bersih 2.0 will soldier on with its plan to set up the tribunal which, she said, should be announced in two or three weeks’ time, despite earning condemnation from polls regulator Election Commission (EC).
“It is true that it is not set up under any law or statute. That is why it is called the People’s Tribunal,” she said.
“It will be an evidence-gathering tribunal and what we have is the moral force to prove what we have said before about fraud. That is its main aim — to gather evidence,” she added.
On May 6, a day after the tumultuous 13th general election, Bersih 2.0 announced its plan to set up the tribunal to look into the hundreds of reports of alleged cheating that took place during the polls.
The coalition of over 80 non-governmental organisations insisted that the polls results had favoured the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) largely because of these irregularities, and said it would not recognise the outcome until it had verified all allegations of fraud.
In the polls, BN continued its half-a-century unbroken rule and emerged victors yet again despite winning with a significantly smaller seat majority in the 222-seat Parliament.
It is true that it is not set up under any law or statute. That is why it is called the People’s Tribunal. — Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan
The ruling pact snapped up 133 seats this time to Pakatan Rakyat’s (PR) 89, failing yet again to recapture the coveted two-thirds parliamentary majority that it first lost in the 2008 general election.
PR refused to accept its losses, however, pointing to the fact that it had won the overall popular vote by scoring 51 per cent of votes cast, while BN only took 48 per cent — an outcome reminiscent of the 1969 polls when the ruling pact first lost the popular vote.
The federal opposition pact of PR has since confirmed plans to file election petitions to challenge the results in 27 federal seats where BN had won with marginal majorities, allegedly due to electoral fraud.
PKR strategy director Rafizi Ramli has also said that the same complaints will be brought before Bersih 2.0’s “People’s Tribunal” where, he said, PR’s evidence was likely to be treated with more seriousness than in any court of law.
Ambiga told The Malaysian Insider that the tribunal will be presided over by a five-member panel, which will include individuals of repute and who will not be members of any political parties or even from Bersih 2.0 itself.
She said the panel will likely come up with a set timeframe to conduct its probe, apart from deciding on appropriate terms of reference before commencing any hearing.
“We will then expect some sort of recommendations or findings to be made. This will be presented to all the relevant authorities, including human rights bodies like Suhakam,” she said.
“For Bersih… our role is just to facilitate the setting up of the tribunal. Further to that, we will not get involved. It must be completely independent,” she added.
Ambiga also explained that the setting up of the tribunal was taking longer than originally planned due to the complexity of its scope of investigation, as well as the selection of its panel members.
“We originally wanted to have it done by June but it looks impossible at this point. We should announce the panel within two or three weeks’ time.
“But as to when the panel will begin their hearings, that would be entirely up to the members to decide,” she said.
Despite widespread protests against its handling of the 13th general election, the EC has insisted that it had conducted the polls fairly and successfully, citing the higher turnout of voters at a whopping 84 per cent as evidence of voters’ confidence in the Malaysian electoral system.
“We have conducted a successful polls, there was an 85 per cent turnout… we have good job as you can see from the turnout,” EC deputy chairman Datuk Wan Ahmad Wan Omar said last week.
PR has been organising mammoth rallies across the country to prove voter dissatisfaction against the polls, which PR de facto chief Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has insisted had been stolen from his pact.
#1 by Jeffrey on Tuesday, 21 May 2013 - 9:37 am
This is an interesting idea. TDM started the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalise War (KLFCW) in 2007 which set up the Kuala Lumpur War Crime Tribunal before which Bush & Blair were “tried” in absentia and found “guilty”!
This “Peoples Tribunal” is likely set up under the aegis of NGO Bersih that has got the international profile & recognition. Ambiga said that though bereft of legal standing it will serve as a “moral force” to publicly expose electoral fraud. Credibility therefore depends on who sits as judges. They must be politically non partisan and have some legal background. The problem is that there will be no 2 sides of the story cos the opposite side accused of electoral fraud won’t dignify the tribunal with attendance or response. The setting up of such a tribunal is also to indirectly insinuate neither the Election Commission nor Courts could adjudicate the allegations of electoral fraud impartially. Rafizi Ramli said that “the same complaints will be brought before Bersih 2.0’s “People’s Tribunal” where, he said, PR’s evidence was likely to be treated with more seriousness than in any court of law.”
#2 by sheriff singh on Tuesday, 21 May 2013 - 10:43 am
Now that Paul Low is ‘inside’, will he be able to detect any fraudulent things and do something about it?
#3 by ENDANGERED HORNBILL on Tuesday, 21 May 2013 - 3:03 pm
Ambiga, we are all waiting for this “people’s Tribunal” to take off – the sooner, the better.
We want some closure and some clear evidence that BN pulled the carpet under EC’s feet or that EC pulled the carpet themselves.
Malaysians must know if this BN government is legal or immorally, illegally constituted. Thieves have no rights and legal title to their possessions.
#4 by ENDANGERED HORNBILL on Tuesday, 21 May 2013 - 3:05 pm
If there is no evidence forthcoming, then we should cease and desist and wait it out till GE 14.
#5 by Noble House on Wednesday, 22 May 2013 - 2:19 am
QUOTE: “We have conducted a successful polls, there was an 85 per cent turnout… we have good job as you can see from the turnout,” EC deputy chairman Datuk Wan Ahmad Wan Omar said – UNQUOTE.
Hello, Mr Deputy Chairman! The massive turnout of voters was NOT because the EC did a good job. On the contrary, it was to prevent your ingenious plan in manipulating with the electoral roll from having the cumulative effect on the results. The EC should be ashamed for this lopsided election filled with so many irregularities for which you have no answer. Please resign!
#6 by drngsc on Wednesday, 22 May 2013 - 9:19 am
Datuk Ambiga is correct.
MALAYSIA IS AT THE CROSS ROADS.
For the first time, we have a minority government who refuses to listen to the voices of the majority, but decides to impose minority views on the majority.
What BN does not want is NOT what the people want. BN is in the minority here. The people want a Tribunal to hear what happened. We all voted, but what happened. I will certainly hope that this peoples’ tribunal will hear BN grouses against PR too ( if any ).
Let us all co-operate with this peoples’ tribunal, so that we can all know what happened on the 5th of May, during the day, and during the night.
How did Malaysia returned a minority government for the first time. Enough of rumours. Let us have the facts.
#7 by HJ Angus on Wednesday, 22 May 2013 - 11:00 am
In order to compete globally, we NEED to become a BETTER NATION.
This is how we can do it.
http://www.malaysiawatch4.blogspot.com/2013/05/malaysiakini-and-becoming-better-nation.html