Do not underestimate Malaysians, says Ambiga

Hafiz Yatim | May 19, 2012

The Bersih 3.0 rally may be three weeks old, but for the organisers co-chairperson Ambiga Sreenevasan it is still not too late to pay tribute to Malaysians for coming out in strength to show support.

Asked by Malaysiakini what had she learnt from the rally, Ambiga’s quick response was do not underestimate Malaysians.

She said Bersih is not about herself, in reality it is a ground-up movement.

“It is not mine, it’s not Pak Samad Said’s. We did not pay for them to come, and in fact they paid on their own for the T-shirts and transport. Some designed them on their own. The people have taken ownership of Bersih.

“It just captured the imagination of the people. What I have learnt from Bersih 3.0 is that do not underestimate Malaysians. It was a far bigger crowd than we had anticipated and we have to learn to be better prepared.

“I have also learnt that the authorities can actually go berserk. I am still reeling from the extent of the violence and this is a government which is looking liberal and yet they do this.

“My fear is to what extent they are prepared to go to curb dissent. I’m a bit disquieted about that,” she said.

Ambiga said the incident had deepened her faith in Malaysians, standing together in solidarity purely in support of each other is a wonderful thing.

In not taking credit for what had happened, the former Bar Council chairperson said Bersih had awakened and sparked off something positive in the people.

bersih 3 rally 180512 04″We are not looking for differences but looking at unity for a common purpose (clean and fair elections). This is hard to fight back.

“They cannot fight this, and they should not fight as this is powerful stuff,” she warned, though elections may be boring stuff for some.

Mind you, Ambiga said, the rally did not taken place only in Malaysia but in 80 other places worldwide, too, including people putting up the Bersih flag at the base camp of Mt Everest, and at Mount Kinabalu.

Eye on what comes first

She said Bersih’s immediate task is not to organise Bersih 4.0 but to gather all those hurt at the rally to compile a report.

“I know people are pushing for another rally but we have unfinished business – violence in relation to the people, apart from voter education. We must bring justice to the people who were hurt,” he said.

On the number hurt, she said the reports are being compiled and non-governmental organisation like Lawyers for Liberty and Suaram had recently sent a report that around a 100 had been injured to the Malaysia Human Rights Council (Suhakam).

abdul aziz spr ec chairman 300509″We are hoping that Suhakam will hold an inquiry into police brutality. We owe it to the public for the facts to come out and let them out,” she said.

Besides this, Ambiga said Bersih 3.0 is also pressing on with its efforts to seek the resignation of the Election Commission members.

The Bersih co-chairperson said she cannot understand the slow response to allegations that EC chairperson, Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof (right) and his deputy Wan Ahmad Wan Omar are Umno members.

Why EC should step down

“It is clear that we should know either they were or were not members and surely Umno should know. The response should’ve been immediate. Why is there such a fudging of the issue. There should be clarity whether they are members or not. There’s no two ways about it, if they are members of a political party they cannot be EC chair and deputy,” she said.

She said the July 9, Bersih 2.0 rally had seen the successful setting up of a parliamentary select committee (PSC) where many civil society groups have been calling for the liberalisation of certain legislation, and it is a good step for the government.

“But we have not seen the PSC report, and we do not think the recommendations cover Bersih 2.0’s eight demands. Hence, we do not think the PSC has achieved its purpose.”

On her views on several quarters, including former Kuala Lumpur CID chief Mat Zain Ibrahim, calling for a tribunal against Abdul Aziz and Wan Ahmad, she said Bersih would not go as that far as that, all they want is for the two to leave and not only they but the rest of the EC members, too.

“The reason we are asking for their resignation is because the public has lost confidence in them but over and above all that is they are members of Umno They should resign,” she said, adding they also want international observers for the 13th general election.

However, she commended the government for withdrawing the amendment to the Election Offences Amendment Bill.

Demands left hanging

On how many of Bersih’s demands had been met since the PSC was set up, Ambiga said out of eight only one and that, too, not completely – the indelible ink.

pulau ketam village head election 310711 indelible ink 02She said that indelible ink use had been gazetted but Bersih is still in the dark over how it would be applied whether the finger will be dipped in ink or only applied to it.

“As to the calls of free and fair media as pledged, I do not know how the press is going to transform overnight from being partisan to non-partisan.

“There is still the problem of the postal voters and this is being dealt with by Tindak Malaysia.

“In reality not many of our demands have been met,” she said. She also referred to the issue of overseas voters, she could not understand why it cannot be implemented.

She noted that Indonesia has enfranchised its citizens abroad but not Malaysia.

When questioned, they shoot back who asked you to leave the country, Ambiga said, adding what they should do is make it worthwhile for them to return home.

“They really need a lesson on winning the hearts of the people,” she said.

Ambiga disagreed with the notion that the Bersih protest represented a minority group as alleged by Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak.

“Look, even if 10,000 people took a stand you have to listen. Are you saying because we are a minority our push for clean and fair elections is not legitimate.

“Look at our background, Malaysians had been brought up in fear and they stood up in Bersih 2.0.

“Bersih 3.0 is even bigger. The premier (says) he has a silent majority and I would say we also have a silent majority which did not come out just as theirs.

“These are really silly arguments. The very fact 250,000 came up, it is certainly something they should pay attention to and if they don’t they would end up making a silly mistake,” she said.

The interview was jointly conducted by Hafiz Yatim, Hazlan Zakaria, Lee Way Loon and Abdul Rahim Sabri.

  1. #1 by yhsiew on Sunday, 20 May 2012 - 8:38 am

    ///It was a far bigger crowd than we had anticipated…///

    Thanks to the new media. Exposure to online overseas news and cyber blogs have made Malaysians more knowledgeable and mature and more aware of their Constitutional rights and entitlements.

  2. #2 by k1980 on Sunday, 20 May 2012 - 9:12 am

    Jibby may dress himself up as Bugs Bunny and stalk Ambiga by staring through her windows

  3. #3 by Jeffrey on Sunday, 20 May 2012 - 10:47 am

    Yes no one should “underestimate” Malaysians. No one foresaw size of Bersih 3.0. It is a ground-up movement, multiracial, with a large cross section of urban middle class, more importantly the young and even women folks. The idea of free and clean elections that has come is not something even the mighty BN could fight – even Najib said “we don’t want to win by unfair means”. However saying is one thing doing another. For too long the ruling BN coalition has been claiming moral legitimacy of its electoral mandate until Bersih challenged (publicly and with street protests) this claim with specifics of electoral irregularities which until today, even after PSC report, BN is unable to rebut (Ambiga says, only 1 (the indelible ink) out of 8 Bersih’s demands has been met and even that, too, not completely). Has the engagement reached an impasse? BN has problem : (i) if it implements substantial no. of demands, it may lose next GE, and losing (to my mind, is not an option to BN (ii) there may not be enough time by next GE to implement all, even if it wants to (iii) either way, any electoral victory by BN without Bersih’s demands being perceived met could mean the victory is without the moral legitimacy of accurate representation of people’s will. That’s inherently the BN’s dilemma.

  4. #4 by Jeffrey on Sunday, 20 May 2012 - 11:06 am

    In the premises of the gridlock stated in preceding post (currently under moderation) the BN’s strategy is to exploit the violence that had ensued from Bersih 3.0 by blaming it on Bersih being hijacked by Anwar/PKR’s penchant for street reformasi protest as means of political change (instead of ballot box) – and present it to Malaysians the question, whether they want political change by ballot box or street protests? BN could not answer the 1st basic question – how to rely on ballot box to arbiter mandate if it were rigged as Bersih claims?- so it has no option but to try discredit Bersih by saying its hijacked by PR’s politicians as events after 3 pm on 28th April evinced.

  5. #5 by Jeffrey on Sunday, 20 May 2012 - 11:10 am

    To an extent, the BN is successful (never mind who engineered the unhappy ending of Bersih 3 and who provided the excuse) as even the respected London-based Economist has taken the view that Anwar had some explaining to do”. He’s keeping very quiet since then. Ambiga has to think long & hard before even mooting Bersih 4, especially many pro establishment groups/supporters are now wearing red to define any politicl contestation outside the ballot box will be red versus yellow as in the country up North. The worse thing Ambiga could do to detract Bersih’s credit so far of being people up movement based on principles higher than mere partisan politics/contestation is to join Anwar’s PKR the moment GE is announced, as she’d be accused in the ensuing political campaigning of using an NGO platform of Bersih to advance opposition PR politics, which will end up negating the gathering force of Bersih’s claim that the other side has rigged electoral procedures to win elections thus far.

  6. #6 by lee wee tak_ on Sunday, 20 May 2012 - 8:45 pm

    it is not the urban population that I am worried about but those in rural areas whose information flow are restricted and those who refuse to assess, think and happy to continue to be fleeced that I am worried about

    god, I hope I am very wrong

You must be logged in to post a comment.