Malaysia GE13 an urban, not Chinese swing, say analysts


By Boo Su-LynThe Malaysian Insider
May 07, 2013

KUALA LUMPUR, May 7 — The outcome of Election 2013 was not simply the result of a “Chinese tsunami” as Datuk Seri Najib Razak has claimed but a major swing in the urban and middle-class electorate that saw Malaysia’s urban-rural rift widen, analysts have said.

In their preliminary reading of the vote trend, analysts noted that despite the increase in Chinese support for Pakatan Rakyat (PR), the political tsunami had also swept with it “large numbers of the Malays”, many among them forming part of the country’s middle- to upper-class voters.

“They received Malay middle-class support, especially in urban areas,” political analyst Datuk Dr Shamsul Amri Baharuddin told The Malaysian Insider, referring to PR.

“So the DAP majority increased because of disgruntled Malay young voters’ support… in conclusion, to label racial polarisation is too easy. Two other factors operate simultaneously with race: class (rich-poor, middle class) and spatial (urban and rural),” said the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) founding director of Institute of Ethnic Studies (KITA).

Shamsul Amri said the DAP majority increased because of disgruntled Malay young voters’ support.Although Najib’s Barisan Nasional (BN) retained federal power in the country’s tightest election in history, the coalition lost major cities and towns from George Town to Ipoh, Kuala Lumpur, Seremban, Malacca and big towns in Johor.

BN failed to win Selangor and Penang — two of the most industrialised states in Malaysia — although it retook Kedah, the mostly-rural rice-bowl state.

The DAP decimated the MCA in Election 2013, with party stalwart Lim Kit Siang defeating Johor BN chief Datuk Abdul Ghani Othman by a whopping 14,762 votes in the Gelang Patah federal seat, besides sweeping Kulai, Kluang and Bakri in Johor.

MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek said the BN component party would not take up any government post after winning only seven parliamentary seats, less than half of the 15 federal seats it won in Election 2008.

BN chairman Datuk Seri Najib Razak said late Sunday night that the newly-elected BN government would embark on national reconciliation efforts to unite Malaysians, after what he termed as the “Chinese tsunami” of the 13th general election that BN won with a smaller majority than Election 2008.

Political analyst Dr Lim Teck Ghee, however, pointed out that PR won more than half of the popular vote, showing that the coalition had received support from “large numbers of Malay and other non-Chinese voters”.

“The results in Selangor, which has the highest percentage of urban population, as well as in the other west coast states, certainly showed this urban middle-class trend,” Lim told The Malaysian Insider.

“Large numbers of Malays form part of this middle class, perhaps as many as non-Malays,” he observed.

The Centre for Policy Initiative (CPI) director said the vote against BN appeared largely because this segment of the electorate was better informed and less influenced by the mainstream and BN-friendly print media.

Wong said young voters who wanted change backed PR across ethnic lines.He said middle-class voters are generally more concerned about corruption, good governance and cost of living issues, and are less affected by the demonisation of the opposition and BN’s alleged play on racial and religious sentiments.

Political analyst Wong Chin Huat said young voters who wanted change backed PR across ethnic lines.

“Pakatan says let’s try something new — you can move away from racial categories. So you’re talking about questions of values,” Wong told The Malaysian Insider.

“Young voters who are much more confident and who want to embrace a changing world will be for Pakatan,” said the Monash University lecturer.

Veteran newsman Datuk A. Kadir Jasin observed that the 13-party BN coalition not only drew fewer seats in the 222-member Dewan Rakyat and 12 state assemblies in yesterday’s general election compared to 2008, but also lost the popular vote for the first time since polls in 1969.

“Is it not possible that this is not a Chinese tsunami or racial chauvinism but a Malaysian tsunami that is centred on the aspiration and new reality, especially among young voters?” the man who had been group editor-in-chief of the public-listed News Strait Times Press during the Mahathir administration wrote in his blog yesterday.

There were about 2.5 million first-time voters out of 13.3 million eligible voters in Election 2013 that saw an 84.84 per cent voter turnout, the highest in Malaysian history.

BN, which had campaigned on maintaining security and peace, lost an additional seven federal seats and 71 state seats to PR in yesterday’s polls. BN and PR won 133 and 89 federal seats, as well as 275 and 230 state seats respectively.

For federal seats, BN polled 5,237,699 votes to the Pakatan Rakyat parties’ combined 5,623,984 ballots. The three-party pact of PKR, PAS and the DAP also surpassed BN in state seats, pulling in 4,879,699 votes to the 13-member coalition’s 4,513,997 ballots.

Print Friendly

  1. #1 by sheriff singh on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 - 9:45 am

    I walked about KL and PJ to do some shopping before I fly off and what did I see?

    Traders plying their normal trade and people going about with their normal chores, all happy and smiling. No tensions or fears but peace, unity and harmony.

    80% of the Klang Valley in KL and in Selangor state is now under Pakatan rule but everything is normal and peaceful here.

    This debunks BN incessant warnings that there will be chaos and breakdowns if Pakatan were to gain power. No, the people here were not taken in by the BN’s lies and were brave enough to vote Pakatan. It is truly ‘1Malaysia’ (to borrow BN’s slogan) here. No worries mates.

  2. #2 by Bigjoe on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 - 9:49 am

    UMNO including Najib first instinct to paint what happened as racist and of course PR denies it. The simple reason is that Najib and pretty-much the rest of UMNO/BN can’t get their head around their long term problem BUT they have a very good short-term game.

    Truth is PR don’t have a short-term winning game even if it now has a viable long term game. The truth is without a short-term game, PR risk self-implosion. No long term game plan holds up without a short-term one..

    What it means is that what we have seen is INDECISION 2013..With Najib at the helm and Mahathir still alive, nothing is going to change. More of the same for the next few years..

  3. #3 by worldpress on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 - 1:14 pm

    Those voters swing were trying to saving Malaysia from corrupted politicians before the country declare bankrupt.

    Those voted for corrupted politicians were shorted citizens, they don’t care about Malaysia bankrupt or not, they can be bought by little money less than 2 thousand per year. they don’t really love or care about Malaysia future…they interest only small gain of less than 2 thousands

  4. #4 by worldpress on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 - 1:18 pm

    We should salute to those voters swing trying to save Malaysia from corrupted politicians before the country declare bankrupt and criminals.

    Those voted for corrupted politicians were shorted citizens, they don’t care about Malaysia bankrupt or not, they can be bought by little money less than 2 thousand per year. they don’t really love or care about Malaysia future…they interest only small gain of less than 2 thousands..these citizens only interest personal gain not the country future

  5. #5 by tuahpekkong on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 - 6:13 pm

    Ethic Chinese voters only comprised about 28% of the total number of registered voters. Nationwide, the percentage of voters who voted against BN came to about 52.6% of the popular votes. Assuming the same turn out rate among the various races and that 75% of Chinese voters supported the Opposition. Chinese votes thus constituted only about 21% of the anti BN votes. Just tell me who were the remaining 31.6% pro Opposition voters? Without the support of the various races in Selangor, PR would not be able to secure 44 of the 56 state seats contested. I believe that states like Penang, Perak, Selangor, Negeri Sembilan and Johor, once fallen into PR hands, BN would have no chance to wrest them back again. Instead of blaming the Chinese, why not do some soul searching as to why BN failed to appeal to the Chinese.

  6. #6 by waterfrontcoolie on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 - 3:45 pm

    It is obvious that the “elected-PM” did not how to count or worse still bent on distorting facts! With over 52% of the voters voting against BN, Chinese constituted only 26%, and if you subtract 90% of those who work overseas, than the real figure is only 84.84% of 20% 0f 13.3 million or 2.25 million. 52% of the total voter present would be 5.867 million; meaning 3.617 million non-Chinese voted against BN!!!!!

  7. #7 by on cheng on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 - 8:50 pm

    Why, they never say Kelantan Malay don’t support bn, that they no grateful? Kelantan under PAS more than 15 years !
    or that Selangor Malay support pkr, been ungrateful?
    Don’t insult the Chinese been misled by anyone !!
    it is an urban tsunami !!

You must be logged in to post a comment.