Ahmad Ismail’s 3-year Umno suspension – “water off a duck’s back”


The Umno Supreme Council’s three-year suspension of Umno Bukit Bendera Umno division chairman Datuk Ahmad Ismail of his Umno membership for his provocative, inflammatory and racist reference of the Malaysian Chinese as “penumpang” is too little, too late and too ineffective.

For Ahmad, the Umno Supreme Council decision is just like “water off a duck’s back”.

All these three attributes of the Umno Supreme Council decision being “too little, too late, too ineffective” were instantly evident from the immediate press conference held by Ahmad after the Umno Supreme Council decision yesterday, viz:

• Firstly, Ahmad remained defiant and unremorseful for his provocative, inflammatory and racist statement maintaining that he would not apologise although he accepted the Umno Supreme Council’s decision on him;

• Secondly, Ahmad declared that his “suspension” would not stop him from being active in the party, albeit unofficially, as he cannot hold posts defined in the party constitution, adding: “If my division is smart enough and creates a new post, such as division advisor, I can still be advisor.”

• Thirdly, he announced immediate plan to tour the country and explain to Umno divisions about the matter, and declared: “I promise one thing – I will make a comeback to Umno.”

• Fourthly, Ahmad’s defiance and total lack of remorse is not just individual bravado but clearly had powerful UMNO backing as indicated by the fact that he held his immediate press conference at the Umno headquarters at PWTC, Kuala Lumpur which was attended by the Umno Secretary-General Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Mansor.

• Fifthly, Tengku Adnan’s presence at Ahmad’s press conference after being suspended as Umno for three years is most extraordinary and telling, for it could only mean that Ahmad has official Umno support or blessing for his interpretation that despite his three-year suspension, he could be appointed as “advisor” for Umno divisions with full liberty to go on a nation-wide tour to meet Umno divisions to justify his refusal to apologise for his provocative, inflammatory and racist reference of Malaysian Chinese as “penumpang”and do not deserve equal rights and to drum up UMNO support for his stand.

• Sixthly, the conspicuous failure of the Umno Supreme Council to take disciplinary action against the 13 Penang Umno division leaders who had supported and egged on Ahmad in his inflammatory, provocative and racist rants and acts in the past two weeks.

UMNO Youth leader Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein said Barisan Nasional component parties should take appropriate action against their respective members if they go against party lines and raise sensitive issues.

He said the Umno decision to suspend Ahmad should also mean Barisan component parties show consistency by taking action against their own members when they stoked ill-feelings among the people.
This is the Star report:

Hishammuddin referred to an earlier incident involving Gerakan, where its Youth vice-chief S. Paranjothy created unpleasantness last year when he had reportedly said on the Internet that the Indian community were treated like fourth-class citizens.

“Hishammuddin said he called for Umno to break off ties with Gerakan due to the statement at the time.

“He added that acting Gerakan president Tan Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon had asked him to not push for action to be taken against Paranjothy because of the impending general election in March.

“Now when the same situation has happened (in Ahmad’s case), the concerned party should see Umno’s decision as a sign that when we criticise someone, what comes around will come around,” he told reporters after an Umno supreme council meeting.

Hishammuddin should state whether he would agree that disciplinary action should first be taken against him for his various keris-wielding episodes at Umno Youth Generla Assemblies, in utter disregard of the sensitivities of Malaysia’s plural society and which UMNO and Barisan Nasional leaders have admitted was a major factor for the thrashing Barisan Nasional suffered in the March 8 “political tsunami”?

Print Friendly

  1. #1 by riversandlakes on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 6:39 pm

    Kerismuddin is irrelevant. Umno is irrelevant.

    DSAI ’08!

  2. #2 by yhsiew on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 6:40 pm

    Non-UMNO BN and UMNO are strange bedfellows, why not MCA and Gerakan leave BN instead of wasting their time in BN?

  3. #3 by AsalUsuLMalaysiaHacked on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 7:00 pm

    yhsiew Says:

    Today at 18: 40.26 (15 minutes ago)
    Non-UMNO BN and UMNO are strange bedfellows, why not MCA and Gerakan leave BN instead of wasting their time in BN?
    ***************

    They had their filthy hands filled with dirts already. Its do or die methods, theres no retreat for them. Tolate, and the show must go on.

  4. #4 by butul on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 7:01 pm

    Today, I’ll join as many political parties as possible. Tomorrow I will keep on uttering racist statements. For each statement, one political party will suspend me for three years. That’s it. No need to apply any law or police action. Ok kah?

    After 3 years this racist Ahmad will be restored his umno membership without any repentance. RACIST UMNO!!

  5. #5 by Loh on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 7:06 pm

    Ahmad Ismail thought that he was just following the lead of Hishamuddin when he made the offending statements and to him if all those who demonstrated their heroism during the UMNO GA need not apologize, he might be spared. He was certainly emboldened when TDM criticized Najib for apologizing for Ahmad’s action.

    The 13 Penang UMNO Division Chiefs supported Ahmad Ismail, and they must have done so thinking that Ahmad was correct based on the action of UMNO in dealing with non-Malays in the country. Ahmad said that non-Malays should not have equal rights and that status quo should remain. He claimed that he did not make any mistake, and that must be his thinking based on his observation of government policies and action as well as his participation in UMNO policy making. The other 13 Division Chiefs agreed with him on the factual situation in the country that non-Malays were not treated equally by the government though PM AAB claims that all Malaysians are equal. The way Ahmad Ismail justified government policies hurt the Chinese community, and he was wrong to have done it. It is more so that his grandfather came from India, and his grandfather was not a Malay who had earlier migrated to India and later returned to Malaya. He is just like TDM whose father was Indian, and it was said that in his application for admission to university for his medical degree, he had listed himself as Indian for race. That was before the 1957 Malaya constitution that provided the loophole. Ahmad Ismail should have been quietly enjoying his position as Malays than to cause racial problems in the country. He would have had to join Hindraf had his grandfather not converted to Islam.

    It was not necessary for Hishamuddin to put foot in his mouth when Ahmad Ismail is suspended. BN at the meeting held a day earlier in which Hishamuddun was not qualified to attend must have discussed the issue about actions against people who went against the law, including the keris display by Hishamuddin. They had agreed that UMNO alone would deal with Ahmad Ismail, and so Hishamuddin and others who raised racial issues before the March 08 election are spared the stick. Hishamuddin’s comment about Gerakan party member was uncalled for. It shows that Hishmuddin wanted to avenge the treatment rendered on Ahmad Ismail. What is left unsaid was his disagreement at suspending Ahmad. Was he telling TDM that he was out for sale, in case the action to dethrone AAB was completed? It must be recalled that he together with Rafidah Aziz were the first to stop TDM announcing his resignation in 2001. AAB should have known well that this man could not be trusted. But dull as AAB is, he can’t differentiate between right and wrong, and it would be too much to ask him to assess human character.

    TDM said that he was trying hard to balance the interests of groups of people while he was in power. If he had upheld the rule of law, and had allowed issues to be discussed openly rather than using the divide and rule tactic to balance power blocs, the country would have attained true democracy, equality and justice. There would not be talk about race when all parties have equal and fair treatment. Ahmad Ismail would find no advantage in making those remarks, and the approach to government administration would be the choice of candidates at general election. Of course TDM was never interested in the welfare of the people. Had he the interest of the nation at heart he would not have advanced the ideas that Malays would have preferred not to have independence achieved by Tunku to granting non-Malays citizenship, and attributed it to the sentiment of Malay professionals.

  6. #6 by AhPek on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 7:27 pm

    One moment,Tengku Adnan,the secretary general of UMNO is seating next to Sleepy Head as he meted out ‘punishment’ for Ahmad Ismail and the next moment Adnan is seated next to Ahmad Ismail at an immediate press conference at PWTC called by AI after receiving his sentence.Adnan was clapping and rooting for AI as he (AI) deviantly said he had done nothing wrong and he is going to go round the country to all the divisions to tell his side of the story.THIS IS OBVIOUSLY AN OPEN REBELLION with the secretary general’s full blessing. Why Mr. Prime Minister,no action ah?

  7. #7 by AhPek on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 7:30 pm

    correction: ‘ADnan was clapping……………………………………..as he (AI) defiantly ………………………………………………………….his side of the story.’.

  8. #8 by AsalUsuLMalaysiaHacked on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 7:31 pm

    Loh Says:

    “It shows that Hishmuddin wanted to avenge the treatment rendered on Ahmad Ismail. What is left unsaid was his disagreement at suspending Ahmad. Was he telling TDM that he was out for sale, in case the action to dethrone AAB was completed?”

    When the power sharing are lesser, being govern bodies is where the money is are no more sufficient, and berserk takes over role play. This are cronies of pirates today.

  9. #9 by just a moment on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 7:35 pm

    zak_hammaad Says:

    Today at 16: 39.49 (2 hours ago)
    I am not here to make friends (I have plenty of friends in the real world). I am here to shake your slumber conscience to question the type of personalities and policies (lack of) you think you are supporting.
    ================================================

    Oops sorry Zak, Silly me. Of course you are not here to make friends. Judging from the many differences you experience in this blog. You must be busy replting to everyone. You must be hellav of thick skin indeed.I don’t need you to shake my conscience. If I need I will ask, meanwhile Go shake Yours! I rather talk to my dog.
    Wheather you have friends or not, is none of my business.
    Thanks for your concern about what kind of personality or policies we choose, so long as its not your kind, we are happy, you just cannot understand simple English, do you?

    Zak:
    I also want answers to my questions on the Pakatan’s marriage of convenience that will inevitably end in divorce. Do you have a viable alternative other than than Anwar or a vision that is a hodge-podge of secular nationalism?
    ===============================================

    If you first learn how to ask politely, Im sure you’ll get an answers. If you are not getting it, something must be wrong with your question, don;t you think so?

    Yes, we do have alternative, Only the blind,deaf, mute, dumb people like you still don’t get it.

    I hope these will clarify things up for now?
    Cheers – Non PKR Zak

  10. #10 by just a moment on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 7:38 pm

    Oops, sorry, Zak line 3: “busy replying”

  11. #11 by aiD_kamikuP on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 8:21 pm

    It is all a farcical SANDIWARA.

    What else can you expect from an organisation too snooty to recognise any of its fault, too stiff make any changes for the better and too drowsy wallowing in its filth to even understand the implications of its actions.

    To borrow the current catch-phrase in US politics – ‘You can put all the lipstick in the world on the Sus scrofa scrofa, it is still a Sus scrofa scrofa’.

  12. #12 by One4All4One on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 8:37 pm

    No one supporting the ideals of PR should ask that the ISA be used on anybody. They have categorically asked that the Act be abolished, so don’t contradict yourselves. Else you will be making a fool and mockery of yourself. Period.

  13. #13 by flyer168 on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 9:51 pm

    Dear YB LKS,

    Very well said.

    Must it take all the BN component parties, the police reports, the Bloggers & the rayaat’s anger & protest for PM, DPM & supreme council leaders to come to this “Lethargic” decision to “Finally” suspended the UMNO Divisional Chief, only for three years ? With all his perks & privileges intact ? – after disgracing his UMNO party and Malaysia Nationally, Regionally & Internationally.

    He is an Insult & a Traitor to UMNO, BN, Malaysia & its “Anak Bangsa Malaysia”.

    For refusing to “Apologise nor Repent” for his misdeeds, he should be banished from soceity for a long, long time.

    He must be brought to book by the “Court of Law” with all the Police reports against him.

    There cannot be “Double Standards”.

    Yes, let us see if PM, DPM, UMNO, AG, etc will follow through to “Walk their Talk”.

  14. #14 by lopez on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 9:51 pm

    Have we view the possibilities with respect to “conflict of interest ” from decision makers on the case.
    how can a member of a club be the referee where his club is being challenge in a debacle.

    on the other hand the club has made their internal decision lets hear what on the mind of the P.I.C. for the nation.

  15. #15 by zak_hammaad on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 10:23 pm

    * cheng on Says:

    >> Dont know why you blame it all on Anwar, as any rational people can see, the blame is with TDM who started the racial card game back in 1987

    It’s always interesting to read such comments. Why don’t you give examples of HOW TDM “the racial card game back in 1987″ and then maybe we can discuss :^)

    * just a moment Says:

    >> Of course you are not here to make friends. Judging from the many differences you experience in this blog.

    I am neither here to seek approval or a pat on the back from fellow commentators. Blogs by their nature are wrought with difference of opinions and myriad of info.

    p.s. It doesn’t matter how ‘politely’ I ask questions, getting answers from Pakatan is like getting blood from a stone! Pakatan has no substance and no soul for substantive answers and concrete information.

  16. #16 by gofortruth on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 10:38 pm

    Please don’t lose sight of the big picture – BN is in deep trouble, especially UMNO. The cheeky way out is resorting to 68′ and 88′ method by arousing Malay sendiments against the Chinese ie manage by fear. Ahmad is the front runner this time but you can easily smell Mahathir all over the place.

    See how subtle he is putting his foot in again -
    http://m.themalaysianinsider.com/articles.php?id=8866-dr-m-blames-pak-lah-for-rising-racism-among-malays

    Malays from PAS & PKR should counter his argument and make sure Malaysians of all races and religions are not fooled.

  17. #17 by pjboy on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 11:22 pm

    Sounds more like a 3 years fully paid leave to me. Can imagine…

    Datuk AI to PM: “I have done my job. I want my reward.”

    PM to Datuk AI: “Sure. Tomorrow we announce your ‘suspension’ for 3 years. But you know lah, not really a suspension. Just to please the people we have done something. We can’t drag this any longer. It would have been 6 years for you if the plot worked.”

  18. #18 by gofortruth on Thursday, 11 September 2008 - 11:25 pm

    Malaysia can no longer afford to play race based politics, the country is facing very stiff global competition.We must unite Malaysians of all races & religions together to become a single competitive force. Look at our currency today 1Sing dollar = 2.4 ringgit (In 1970′s you could use them interchangeably!)!!! Our income per capita is 4 or 5 times LESS than Singapore!!!
    Malaysia must change quick to catch up!

    France has been one stubborn country against the English language but yet in view of fast global development, they are willing to make amend today. Their education ministry is proposing for school to give additional English lessons after normal school hours (NOT THE SUPER STUPID WAY BY CHANGING SCIENCE & MATHS SUBJECTS INTO ENGLISH) and provide further intensive English proficiency courses during the Winter & Summer holidays. I’m sure Malaysia is not that stubborn to change.

    Yes, together we can catch up! All the best to all Malaysians!!!

  19. #19 by m.hwang on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 12:11 am

    ‘zak_hammaad Says:

    Yesterday at 22: 23.30
    * cheng on Says:

    >> Dont know why you blame it all on Anwar, as any rational people can see, the blame is with TDM who started the racial card game back in 1987

    It’s always interesting to read such comments. Why don’t you give examples of HOW TDM “the racial card game back in 1987? and then maybe we can discuss :^)’

    Why go so far back? Just read his last few blogs at chedet.com

  20. #20 by imranj78 on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 12:58 am

    LKS,
    Yes I definitely agree that Datuk Ahmad has gone overboard this time and he deserves the punishment meeted to him. But before you too go overboard about him, maybe you should be more concerned with your own backyard.

    At least UMNO has taken the rather quick decision to punish Ahmad. What is PKR, DAP and PAS (PR) doing about their members and leaders who were present at the Bar Council forum?? The only lame item I’ve heard so far is the issuance of a show cause letter.. and that happened after about a month! That must be even more `lame’ compared to the 3 year suspension meeted to Datuk Ahmad don’t you think so? Why is DAP not pushing your PKR and PAS partners to punish their members?? Or is DAP too scared to speak out against their partners?

  21. #21 by ReformMalaysia on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 5:08 am

    It is just another ‘SANDIWARA’.

    UMNO Supreme council’s meeting deciding on Ahmad’s case should be attended by observers from BN component parties to ensure that it is not just ‘sandiwara’ , ransparency and actual stand of UMNO on this case.

  22. #22 by ReformMalaysia on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 5:12 am

    opps..typing error….

    UMNO Supreme council’s meeting deciding on Ahmad’s case should be attended by observers from BN component parties to ensure that it is not just ’sandiwara’ , its transparency and actual stand of UMNO on this case.

  23. #23 by lopez on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 6:23 am

    Some people still attracted by the decoy, it is donkey in disguise of a horse and it not a thoroughbred too but a rojak and it has lead the herd for 20 over years.

    meee heee or heeeee ho

    your choice

    why is every body assuming that the nkp club is the de facto authority for the nation,,,hey it only a club decision , we need the association decision….it is his club business what they had in store for him. What is in store for the association is the question and still left unanswered…the m see hair is seen again confused and assumed to speak for all by literally accepting a decision made privately of their master’s gang. It is another classic admission to all the tuanan syndrome of the bee end regime.

    So far botak dont know what to say, it appears there will be tendencies where conflight of interest will prevail in whatever decision he has in his pea brain. He is also a member of that club which houses many loud mouth like this one and so far all are scot free and pristine condition.

    lets see if others can embrace change

  24. #24 by just a moment on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 7:02 am

    zak_hammaad Says:
    I am neither here to seek approval or a pat on the back from fellow commentators. Blogs by their nature are wrought with difference of opinions and myriad of info.
    ================================================

    Bravo Gusto Zak, there you go, its alright except ur opinion at times are incomprehensible? Like any brainstorming session we need someone like you to play the Devil’s Advocate role? You’re perfect for this role, keep it up.

    Zak:
    p.s. It doesn’t matter how ‘politely’ I ask questions, getting answers from Pakatan is like getting blood from a stone! Pakatan has no substance and no soul for substantive answers and concrete information.
    ================================================

    Assuming you are right, as usual No substance and no soul here,
    Why are you still here? Surely you are a very confuse person, aren’t you?

  25. #25 by Bigjoe on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 9:10 am

    Ahmad Ismail punishment is purely public symbolism not real of course. So how do one turn public symbolism into something real i.e., hypocrisy back to the hypocrite?

    Answer: By drumming the beat of that public symbol. At least publicly non-bumis is declared entitled to equal rights and the drumming of this point cannot be let off. In order we need a broad long term anti-Ahmad Ismail campaign. Keep drumming equal rights for everyone and eventually it will happen. So everyone especially Hindraf should as part of their cause keep drumming the message ‘don let Ahmad Ismail dream come true’.

  26. #26 by cheng on on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 9:39 am

    If a riot does break out due to Ah Mad’s words, then this Ah Mad should be given 2 years’ jail and 2 strokes of the cane or a 50% discount if he “pohon maaf” !

  27. #27 by lakshy on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 9:46 am

    Ha ha ha ha ha! What a joke! What a farce!

    I think the whole name calling thing was a non-issue. I have been called names for decades, but has it made me any less a man or a citizen?

    Why are you guys so weak that statements made by a nobody like Ahmad Ismail can affect you? Does the fact that Ahmad Ismail call you a non-citizen, make you a non-citizen? His statements can only affect you if you allow it to affect you. And by allowing it to, you have made him larger and more famous. He will one day come back as CM of Penang. It will no longer be a Gerakan CM. He will be the hero.

    His sentence? I think its a real joke. It’s like the “lesser” citizens are asking their big brother to discipline Ahmad Ismail for his words.

    Its like a sibling running to Mummy to ask mummy to punish Koko for what Koko said. Sounds familiar? Since everyone waited for that to happen, That only means you are lesser citizens! Kapish?

    And you allowed it to happen to you.

  28. #28 by cheng on on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 9:55 am

    All should forgive n forget about this Ah Mad, if his lawyer can prove he is….. INSANE !

  29. #29 by Loyal Malaysian on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 9:56 am

    This is precisely the type of action that had put me off the ruling coalition over the years.
    A set of privileged and elitist rules for the UMNOputras.
    The worst is that they have the police and judiciary in their pocket and can get away with murder, figuratively speaking – or is it otherwise now as well.
    And so, as with many who voted the PR on March 8th and have moral misgivings with regards 916, I’m praying Anwar will manage to pull it off and show those goons the door.
    Then , the new Malaysia that many of us are hoping for shall dawn.

  30. #30 by baochingtian on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 12:29 pm

    just watched malaysiakini TV “This is what Ahmad said..” What’s the relevance of telling early education by Chinese from British? It is racist remarks when speaking in front of his kumpulan only. If he didn’t mean it, he should have spoken in front of multiracial crowd.

  31. #31 by Godfather on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 12:30 pm

    Zak the Mamakthir brown-noser:

    Look at yourself in the mirror, foreigner. Look who’s making innuendoes and childish comments. Don’t be like your hero mamakthir who steadfastedly refuses to acknowledge the errors of his ways.

  32. #32 by walao on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 12:41 pm

    I can’t stop laughing everytimes I remembered how Najib appologised and yet this big mouth Ahmad refused to do so. Clearly a slap on BN leaders’ face. Chinese proverb says ” if you cannot handle family issue, how can you handle country issue??”

  33. #33 by The_Dude on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 5:26 pm

    If you are in a corporate environment and you perform a misconduct, the misconduct can either be classified as a major or minor misconduct. If it’s a major misconduct, the fella just gonna get terminated or dismissed. But if it’s a minor misconduct, most probably the fella will get a warning and a suspension from work. So in this case, seems like causing unnecessary racial tension that can lead to bloody chaos is a minor offence since the fella only got suspended. So is the message here that it’s ok to cause racial issues ??? How much longer are the gutless “so-called-Chinese-representatives” in BN gonna stand this? Shame on them… I’m glad I did not repeat the same mistake of voting from them again last Aug.

  34. #34 by boilingmad on Friday, 12 September 2008 - 9:22 pm

    Did you all not read RPK’s “The real May 13-Part 1″? Ahmad …, whatever his name, is probably the instigator for May 13, the 2nd. That’s why ISA is not used on him, otherwise he would let the cat out of the bag. Umno is hoping his remarks will incite racial riots similar to May 13 of 69 and fall into their trap. So, we should be careful NOT to react violently. Let us use our ‘anger’ in the next election and wipe Umno from the face of this earth.

Comments are closed.