by M. Bakri Musa
What strikes me on this latest Raja Petra saga is that the public officials involved were all Malays. Their behaviors besmirch the good name of my race and culture. Contrary to their conviction and assertion, they are not the defenders of Malay honor; they are the desecrators of Malay honor.
Charging Raja Petra Kamarudin as well as author Syed Akbar Ali under the Sedition Act for what they had posted on the Internet is less a crude attempt at intimidating bloggers but more a sinister shadow play (wayang kulit) with many hidden hands each trying to make its puppets move in a particular way in order to convey its threatening message. It is also a blatant abuse of the criminal justice system.
While the government may wish it to be otherwise, this crass manipulation of prosecutorial power would not make citizens refrain from using this new medium, nor will it infringe on its freedom. The Internet is now well beyond the control of any authority, least of all a corrupt and incompetent Third World government.
More significantly, this latest spectacle reflects two unsavory and destructive traits that are fast becoming the norm among our leaders and public servants.
One is their small mindedness and the other, their contemptible habit of misusing government assets for personal gains. The first attribute is closely associated with incompetence; the second, corruption. This pairing is lethal; it will destroy our society very quickly.
There is one other observation which while abundantly clear, is rarely stated openly. As the leadership and public service in Malaysia are increasingly under Malay control, these two odious traits (corruption and incompetence) are now viewed as an integral part of the Malay persona and culture. This is what makes me angry, as it should every Malaysian, Malays especially.
Small Minds At Work
First were the UMNO Youth members who lodged the police report. You can bet that they are all either on the public payroll or dependent upon government dole and contracts. If only they had a better comprehension of the English language, they would agree with millions of Raja Petra readers that there was nothing seditious in the said article.
Similarly, the police officers who raided Raja Petra’s home and grabbed his laptop never bothered to question those UMNO Youth leaders what was so seditious about the article. If the police had posed this most elementary preliminary inquiry, they would more than likely discover that those UMNO blokes had not read the piece, or if they did, they did not understand a word of it.
These police officers were not low-level sergeant types but ASPs and DSPs. They, like UMNO Youth members and many of the present generation of “educated” Malays, are English illiterate, thanks to our abominable UMNO-inspired education system.
As for the prosecutors and other lawyers in the Attorney General’s office who signed on to proceed with the case, as well as the presiding judge, well, that is what happens when you “massage” the scores of the Bar examinations.
If only the police had told those UMNO Youth members to grow up, or if the prosecutors and others in the Attorney-General’s office had exercised their independent judgment that Raja Petra was no threat to public security, the nation would have been spared this spectacle. More importantly, those police officers could then focus on solving the numerous unsolved murders, while our prosecutors could go after corrupt officials. There is no shortage of both.
As for the judge, if only she had exercised a modicum of diligence and read the allegedly seditious article, she would have thrown the case out. If she had any sense of judgment, she would have dispensed with the bail and released Raja Petra on his own recognizance. Did she really believe that he would flee?
That judge obviously did not have the courage of her colleague, High Court Judge Hishamuddin Yunus. In May 2001, this brave judge ordered the release of two ISA detainees on a writ of habeas corpus application when it was shown that the police officers were cavalier in carrying out their duties. The judge went on and fearlessly declared that Parliament should review and either scrap or amend the ISA so as to reduce its potential for abuse.
I did not expect the judge in Raja Petra’s case to lift her judicial robe and look beyond her bench, as one Judge Syed Aidid Abdullah did. Enough that she would do it like Judge Hishamudin, in the course of her deliberation and written judgment.
Syed Aidid was the judge who in 1996 wrote a letter to the Attorney-General alleging specific instances of corruption, abuse of power, and judicial misconduct among his colleagues on the bench. The Attorney-General of the time dismissed it as surat layang (poison pen letter), which reflected more on his competence and integrity. Syed Aidid was forced to resign; perhaps that was the lesson.
No wonder none of the senior public officials involved in Raja Petra’s case paused to reflect on their actions, or do anything other than what they have been instructed to do. They all dutifully carried out what was asked of them, robot-like, without thinking.
In a commentary after his release, Raja Petra wrote of his decision to let his wife post bail. He was initially determined to stay in jail until his trial to expose the rot in the system. What made him change his mind were the words of his jailors.
Of all the public servants, those jailors were the only ones who went beyond their prescribed duties and used their brains. They convinced Raja Petra that he would be more useful to our nation by being outside of prison than inside.
They were also concerned about his safety as well as that of the other prisoners. In their wisdom, the officials had detained Raja Petra in the same prison where the accused murderers of Altantuya were held. Again, wisdom and common sense elude our public officials!
It is ironic that of all our public officials, only the jailors were capable of independent judgment. One would have thought that this would be second nature for those in “higher” positions.
Abuse of Public Property
Malaysia-Today had posted many more damaging and yes, even seditious and libelous commentaries involving personalities more powerful than Najib Razak, yet the authorities had not responded in like manner.
There was the earlier “visit” by the police after Raja Petra made highly uncomplimentary comments on the Yang Di Pertuan Besar of Negri Sembilan. It was just a “visit” with the usual routine seizure of Raja Petra’s computer. Well, at least one of the police officer’s home now has a computer!
Malaysia-Today did not spare Prime Minister Abdullah either, with its series on UN’s “Iraq Oil For Food” corruption scandal. Then there was the highly damaging series on the “world’s richest unemployed” (to borrow Lim Kit Siang’s inimitable phrase), the Khairy Chronicles, and the equally damning expose on the “double Muhammad,” the former Mentri Besar of Selangor who was caught at an Australian airport with millions in cash in his back pocket. In none of these instances did the police react.
If Najib felt that he was being libeled, he should have hired his own lawyers and bear his own legal fees. Instead, the criminal justice system was being abused for this dirty job, for free at least to Najib.
Sadly, treating expensive government resources as their personal assets is fast becoming a pattern among our leaders, from using the fleet of luxurious corporate jets for their political campaigns, to “privatizing” choice government-linked companies to “sell” to their cronies and families.
There are many hidden hands and concealed causes in this latest convoluted shadow play. They would all be instantly exposed if only someone would flip the light switch on. Thus the fury provoked by Raja Petra’s initial lighting of a small candle. Rest assured that this man has his hands right on the main light switch. Keep reading!
Individuals like Raja Petra, as well as Judge Hishamuddin Yunus, Syed Aidid and Raja Petra’s jailors, rekindle my faith. We have eagles in our midst, but it is difficult for them to soar surrounded as they are by turkeys. To put it in a local metaphor, it is hard for a kucing belang to show its stripes when surrounded by kucing kurap (scruffy cats).
We have to get rid of these kucing kurap so our kucing belang could do their work in getting rid of the rats infesting our society. We cannot remain silent as that would only encourage these kucing kurap.
I join others in denouncing this brute behavior of the Abdullah administration. Raja Petra suffered with dignity while detained under the ISA. This latest clumsy act will not in the least dint this patriot’s resolve to bringing greater freedom to Malaysia.
To Raja Petra Kamarudin, Judge Hishamuddin Yunus, Syed Aidid, and all the kucing belang in our midst, I salute you! Hunt down ‘dem rats!

#1 by caishen on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 - 9:27 am
Additional:
Umnokurap name-calling???? What , the Rembau kid has no more ideas????? Project Khinzir Raksasa???No problem for non-bumis.They will remember PKR as long as they exist!!One vote from me if tomorrow there’s a by-election.
Maybe the Umnokurap must comes another project. Project Kucing Kurap-PKK ????Project Bela Babi (PBB)
#2 by Swordsman on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 - 9:37 am
I wish to share a real-life incident which amplifies Bakri Musa’s view that UMNO, NEP and the corrupted civil service are “desecrators” of the Malay Honour.
I have a relative who runs his own small business in a small town. Being located to nearby kampongs, he naturally has a lot of Malay friends amongst the kampong folks
One fine morning, one of his Malay friends Abu turned up at his shop early at 8am. “Bila Dr.Wong klinik akan buka?” asked Abu.
“Pukul 8.30am” replied by relative Ah Lee. “Anak saya sakit teruk, mesti jumpa doctor sekarang” Abu said in desperation.
“Kalau emergency case, awak boleh pergi jumpa Dr.Rahman, klinik dia dekat masjid buka pukul 8am.” Ah Lee advised.
“Tak boleh, ini nyawa anak saya. Dr.Rahman dari local university, kita mana tahu dia benar-benar pass exam atau university tambah markah bagi dia pass. Kalau saya memilik jumpa Dr.Rahman sekarang atau tunggu sampai Dr.Wong buka klinik pada pukul 8.30am, saya mahu tunngu Dr.Wong” exclaimed Abu.
This episode clearly demonstrates that when it comes to a life and death matter, the Malays have a clear picture of what the Govt and NEP had done to their community.
I do not know Dr Rahman, but he may well be a very good doctor, as good as any who had graduated strictly on merit. But because he is a Malay, he is “grouped” together with the rest who graduated because of NEP and not on merit, and he is therefore “viewed” as not that competent rightly or wrongly by his own community. Such perceptions by the public would definitely stifle Dr.Rahman’s progress not only in terms of his practice as a business, but also in terms of advancement in his professional career. NEP may have given Dr Rahman the opportunity of a medical education, but it “desecrated” his honour as a qualified doctor standing on his own right and merit.
#3 by wanredone on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 - 9:59 am
…..As for the prosecutors and other lawyers in the Attorney General’s office who signed on to proceed with the case, as well as the presiding judge, well, that is what happens when you “massage” the scores of the Bar examinations………..
M. Bakri, what do expect from these officers court of law…..THEY ARE MALAYS….they are product of NEP and their qualifications up to SPM only.
#4 by Anak_Penang on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 - 11:13 am
Guys, i feel that the news published in Malaysiakini is a bit biased, no longer play an independent role. Do you have the same feeling like me ?
sonofpenang
blogspot
#5 by Toyol on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 - 11:45 am
UMNO is giving Malays a real bad name. Their modus operandi of using the race card has drawn blanks. Still when bankrupt of ideas, they draw the same card again…like a broken record. Still born minds never learn, never progress. If the Malays leave their destiny in the hands of UMNO, they will be doomed in the era of open economy and globalisation.
#6 by lakilompat on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 - 12:14 pm
“they draw the same card again”
Among the Malaysian there are more than 55,000 idiots who went for vote every 4 yrs but did the wrong things to make the vote unaccountable for. Some were intimidated by the May 13, 1969 racial riots. Hence, it is still relevant for UMNO to play racial cards as long as Malays are in parliaments.
#7 by lakilompat on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 - 12:19 pm
Malaysian politics after Tun Dr. Mahathir has become a filthy mess where sex, liar and accusation are norms.
Chua Soi Lek will contest for MCA president, and he said. “I will continue with my life and serve the party and the country.” He’s a pure liar, retiring from all party & exco post, but now bidding his time to come back again. What a shame? rich man have thick skin.
#8 by wag-the-dog on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 - 1:48 pm
Einstein’s letter makes view of religion relatively clear.
Visit http://www.wagthedog-malaysia.blogspot.com for details.
#9 by gundam on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 - 2:02 pm
i love malaysia, i love malays, chinese, indian and all the human beings. but im feeling sad for the malays, the only way to help them is by doing away with the NEP and special rights coz those are only beneficial to some rich-malays and have been abused, taken for granted. no one is born special, everyone has to work hard for their survival, this is universal truth. malays are not less capable than any other races. therefore, they don’t need any special help. we are all equal as human beings, no matter where you live in this world. race and religion issues are outdated. it is time for us to go back to the very ultimate reason for our existence. as long as there’s unjust, this country will embroil in endless disputes. why can’t we work together hand in hand for the common interest of everyone?
#10 by mohammadharrisjalil on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 - 2:10 pm
to mr toyol
”UMNO is giving Malays a real bad name”
I AGREE WITH YOU 10000000%
#11 by seage on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 - 2:37 pm
The universal rule of “Survivor of the fittest” has to set in. The irony of the NEP is that it advocates the supremacy of the malays but if it is lifted, there will be malays that can’t cope with the abolishment of such priviledge, thus showing that the race is not so supreme after all. However, the doing away of the NEP will set the survivor instinct in the malays to come into play. With the survivor of the fittest rule in place, Malaysia will see so many malays realising their potential to the fullest. They are after all the majority in Malaysia. Only when these malays that have survived the race will emerge as world class lawyers, doctors, scientists, architect, you name it. Then all Malaysians can held their head up high and so proudly say that they are Anak Malaysia!
#12 by Cinapek on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 - 3:34 pm
Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.
This is the underlying problem. And the root cause is the NEP. The NEP provided the well connected Malays the crutch they needed to rise to power instead of developing their competency. And once these people, who has gained power through competency but by dubious means, ascends to power, they will be prone to corruption because that was their objective to gain power in the first place anyway.
But along the way, the Chinese and Indians also were corrupted by the process. They learned how to work within the corrupted system and with the corrupted Malays and profit from them.
Throw away the NEP and once we have Malays who rise to power through their own capabilities and competence, there will be no need for corruption. There will also be pure competition and checks and balance that will ensure the ugly heads of corruption and incompetency stays down.
#13 by bentoh on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 - 4:03 pm
Dear Uncle Kit,
Rumor has it the DAP state assemblywoman of Jelapang cum deputy speaker of Perak may jump ship to BN…
and Malaysiakini’s report shows that she neither confirmed nor denied it… citing her unhappiness towards state excos…
I wish the DAP has enough wisdom to deal with the problems…
#14 by a-malaysian on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 - 4:51 pm
bentoh,
Looks like its going to happen, if it is in the news. ( If you read Jeff Ooi’s blog, the hint is that Perak may fall back to bn ) What can we say, some elected reps are more interested in themselves rather than the public who elected them in.
As for bn reps to cross over, mine thinking is that it will not happen. Yes, they are talking about it just to get the attention of sleepy pm to give them more, that is pure bargaining.
Why I say that it is not going to happen. Lets look at the voting for the speaker and deputy speakers in parliament. I understand that the voting is secret. If AI said that there are at least 30 mps ready to cross over, he should arrange for the 30 mps to at least vote for the DAP deputy speaker to show that its for real.
The best is that they can form their own coaliation within Sabah and Sarawak parties and fight from there. They can act as the third force to bargain more for the states.
The new dawn is slowly and surely turning gloomy.
GE 13 – No matter what, we must ensure that umno bn do not regain the power like they had for the past fifty years.
#15 by undergrad2 on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 - 6:41 pm
Sadly what Swordsman highlighted is true not only of doctors but lawyers and engineers and of the other professions.
In the market place, it is still a question of supply and demand.
#16 by boh-liao on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 - 6:57 pm
Why is it only now that Ungku Aziz, a towering Malay, said that there was no social contract between the founding fathers of our nation? Did he just discover this fact?
#17 by Loh on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 - 7:12 pm
///There is one other observation which while abundantly clear, is rarely stated openly. As the leadership and public service in Malaysia are increasingly under Malay control, these two odious traits (corruption and incompetence) are now viewed as an integral part of the Malay persona and culture. This is what makes me angry, as it should every Malaysian, Malays especially.///
Well said. The so-called social contract to Ungku Aziz was a figment of the imagination of politicians, but thought otherwise by TDM.
TDM considered the special provision in the constitution, Article 153, was a Quid pro quo for granting citizenships to a million non-Malays in 1957. Of the 7 million populations in 1957, there were some 3.2 million non-Malays in the country, and one million non-Malays who were granted citizenships must have been persons born outside Malaysia before 1957. Fifty years after independence, the percentage of the people who directly benefited from the citizenship has dwindled, and for a fair contract, the provision of the special privilege should likewise be depreciated. Indeed, Article 153 was subject to review after 15 years, but the clause on review has since been removed. When the review was juxtaposed with the reduction in the surviving number of beneficiaries, then that provision should have been removed after 45 years in 2002 when the surviving members would have all retired.
The late Tun Dr Ismail opined that Malays would willingly forgo Article 153 when the need was no longer required. He considered the Alliance partners magnanimous in allowing readily that special provision to help the Malay race. His observation would support the statement of Ungku Aziz that the so-called social contract did not exist. The British would not have granted independence to Malaya if the three major races could not work together. Indeed all three races were equal before the British as British subjects. The non-Malays readily accepted and respect the royal households in Independent Malaya, but the commoners of all races are equal before the royalties. Indeed, in all countries only the royal households are above the commoners, and no commoners can claim to obtain a higher status compared to other just because they are ethnologically the same as the royal households. Hence the claim of Ketuanan Melayu because the Sultans are Malays is illogical.
It is easy to understand a person’s honour, or by association the sense of achievement of somebody closely associated by blood relationship. One feels proud of the achievement of somebody else when that success is difficult to attain, at least to the beholder. For that the achievement must be attained honourably. For example, the Chinese felt proud that CN Yang and CT Lee were awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1957, because there were the first Chinese to attain that status. It showed that Chinese scientists were on par with foreign physicists. Had Yang and Lee been awarded the Prize on ‘affirmative consideration’, the sense of pride would be lost.
#18 by limkamput on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 - 9:18 pm
undergrad2 and swordsman,
I guess no problem, the government can continue producing lots of doctors, engineers and lawyers. They can work in government, GLCs, universities and crony companies – dishing out contracts but know not what the contracts are all about, provide medical services in government hospitals which only treat foreign workers, make decisions on projects base on recommendations of “con”-sultants, lecturing in universities making our bright young men and women half blind because most of the lecturers under the fast track programme are themselves blind, running GLCs which essentially are monopolies with government support, protection or no need to face competition. Sure they can continue producing wannabe engineers, doctors and lawyers (sorry, the term wannabe lawyer not directed at Undergrad2).
#19 by rainmankl on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 - 10:27 pm
hai Swordsman
Actually years ago ( about 15 years ) ,while chit-chatting with my best friend , he said that when he goes to a govn hospital and after they gave him the pills,he would throw it away.
I was very very surprised and have no idea why ’cause I have never been to a govn hospital as far as I can remember.
My friend said he does not trust the doctor.
He said the doctors at the govn hosp do not behave like one, they were flirting\chit-chatting with the nurses like having fun and with long and untidy jangut ( sorry if I offended anyone).
Imagine that was so long ago and I bet it is getting worse with
only one race monopolising it.
Private hosp doctor always have a serious look even if they smile
There was a article written by a doctor and he got so fed-up
with our local system that he migrated.
I remember that he said while he was in Univ. he had a malay friend. This malay friend told him that he had actually apply to do some other courses but the govn just gave him a place to study medicine in a local Univ and so he had no choice even though he
was not interest to be a doctor.
Other races had to fight dogs and cats ( not raining dogs and cats)
to get a place in local Univ , and it was handed on a golden palate
to his friend.
To me , the cream of the best students will only get to study medicine because of the dedication required and possibly it’s life and death kind of thing.Just the scienctific
name of medicine would freak out normal person.
Now we know why we do not trust certain doctors.
#20 by subject on Wednesday, 14 May 2008 - 12:03 am
They are wasting resident money without feel ashamed. Especially those involved in the Mongolian murdered case…..
Get rid of those UMNO babi in parliment with more talented leaders.
#21 by undergrad2 on Wednesday, 14 May 2008 - 5:40 am
“Why is it only now that Ungku Aziz, a towering Malay, said that there was no social contract between the founding fathers of our nation? Did he just discover this fact?”
You’d have to wait for the Royal Professor to explain what he meant. His field is economics and not political science and/or constitutional history. He is out of his turf here!
#22 by setiawan on Wednesday, 14 May 2008 - 8:35 am
“To Raja Petra Kamarudin, Judge Hishamuddin Yunus, Syed Aidid, and all the kucing belang in our midst, I salute you! Hunt down ‘dem rats!”
To which I say, “Yes Lord of heaven, grant them the resolve and strength to hunt them gutter rats.”
#23 by limkamput on Wednesday, 14 May 2008 - 9:58 am
Undergrad2, so are you saying only political science or constitutional historians or lawyers can talk about social contracts or politics. We have many medical doctors who were very “successful” politicians, i.e. playing politics to gain power but not really serving people.
#24 by One4All4One on Friday, 16 May 2008 - 11:39 pm
It takes a child to tell the crowd that the king is not wearing anything..as in the story by Hans Christian Andersen (1837), where the emperor was made to believe that he is wearing the most exquisite clothes by some thieves…..
Just as in the case of the so-called Social Contract among the founding fathers of Malaysia..Pak Ungku would be remembered as the kid who said what’s true.
Politicians are mostly opportunists and are just like chameleons..changing colours and stripes whenever it suits them. But of cos there are true politicians in their midst, who are a rarity.
Some academicians, especially those half-baked ones (unlike Pak Ungku who is a true blue gentleman for all i can see all these years), and writers, also half-baked ones, were trying their ‘luck’ to influence the mostly naive masses to believe that their community is losing grounds to be ‘tuan’ in their own country.
Well, what a shame! To say that others are undermining their ‘ketuanan’ is just akin to doubting their own stature in society. When NO ONE is saying anything or doubting their protected status in Malaysia.
Losing in the 12GE does not in any way leads any ethnic group to lose their identity in the country. So, why make a fuss of it, if not just to drum up emotions and hope for support out of pity or they have some ulterior motives?
Stand up and be counted..win or lose. We are no less malaysians whether winning or losing. Just accept the results with dignity and you would be respected by friends or foes.
#25 by One4All4One on Friday, 16 May 2008 - 11:58 pm
The recent meetings attended by some NGOs to come up with resolutions after resolutions could be seen as an attempt by them to pit the malays against their non-malay friends.
What a scandalous affair it was! The call for the return of ketuanan to them is a desperate act to hoodwink their own people. This is because there was no taking away of any ketuanan in the very first place.
As for the call to protect Islam, it is just as contradictory because no one is questioning the sanctity of Islam as a Universal Religion. No one is politicising the religion except those who seem like defending the religion, although they claim that no politicians are involved in the meetings. Obviously it is a ‘politically driven’ agenda.
And someone seems to be taking on the role of ‘powers-that-be’ by issuing an ultimatum to some other party to do this or that by a certain date, when he is only representing an NGO. Wonder who is behind them.