Today is the 116th anniversary of the birthday of the first Prime Minister of Malaysia Tunku Abdul Rahman.
Thirty-six years ago, on 8th February 1983, on the occasion of his 80th birthday, Tunku issued the clear public message that plural Malaysia should not be turned into an Islamic State.
Four days later, on 12th February 1983, on the occasion of his 61st birthday, the third Prime Minister, Tun Hussein Onn publicly supported Tunku’s call.
In fact, Tunku told Parliament on May 1, 1958: “I would like to make it clear that this country is not an Islamic state as it is generally understood; we merely provided that Islam shall be the official religion of the state.”
It is most appropriate to remember this history when we watched the MCA President Datuk Seri Wee Ka Siong turning and twisting in his histrionics to justify something the founding fathers of MCA, whether Tun Tan Cheng Lock or Tun Tan Siew Sin would never have approved – political co-operation with PAS under the leadership of Datuk Seri Hadi Awang who is reviving Islamic State rhetoric and espousing the most toxic and vicious brand of politics of lies, hate, fear, race and religion to sow suspicion, distrust and hatred among the races and religions in Malaysia.
Wee need not reply to the question whether he is aware that he would have lost his deposit in Ayer Hitam parliamentary seat in the 14th General Election under the PAS President Hadi Awang’s dictum that Muslims must vote for Muslim candidates for all Malaysians know the answer.
DAP had never denied that we had worked with PAS in the Barisan Alternative in 1999-2001 and Pakatan Rakyat from 2008-2015, but DAP’s co-operation with PAS was based on principles and not opportunism or expediency.
DAP leaders believe that Malaysia should be an international showcase of inter-religious and inter-civilisational dialogue, tolerance and understanding instead of being an example of a “clash of civilisations”.
To achieve this, Malaysians must engage with a Political Islam that recognises Malaysia as a plural society and believes that Malaysia’s greatness comes from the leveraging of the assets and best qualities from the diverse races, religions, languages and civilisations which meet in confluence in Malaysia, building tolerance, trust and confidence among the races and religions and not sow suspicion, distrust, fear and hatred among the races and religions.
DAP leaders were prepared to pay a heavy price for achieve this national goal, including being defeated in the 10th General Election in 1999 when Karpal Singh and I were defeated in the Jelutong and Bukit Bendera parliamentary seats respectively when the voters succumbed to the Gerakan/MCA propaganda against Barisan Alternative with the politics of lies and fear that a vote for DAP was a vote for PAS and an Islamic state, and that if I was elected, the Chinese could not eat pork, take alcohol, go to temples, beautiful women cannot find jobs and that there would be a chopping of hands and feet.
The Barisan Alternative would not have been formed if PAS was not prepared to respect the opposition of DAP, Parti Keadilan and PRM to an Islamic
State, focusing instead on the common objectives of restoring justice, freedom, democracy and good governance in Malaysia.
After the 1999 General Election however, PAS leaders disregarded the opposition of the other component parties of Barisan Alternative to an Islamic State.
The issue confronting Barisan Alternative was whether the PAS leaders were prepared to abide by the BA consensus and respect the DAP’s opposition to an Islamic State in a multi-racial and multi-religious Malaysia was not compatible with parliamentary democracy, power-sharing in a plural society, human rights and individual freedoms, women’s rights and social tolerance.
DAP had no hesitation to break our co-operation with PAS in 2001 when PAS reneged on the common Alternative Front manifesto “Towards a Just Malaysia”.
When the second DAP-PAS co-operation occurred with the formation of Pakatan Rakyat on 1st April 2008 after the “political tsunami” of the 2008 General Election, it was based on a joint commitment “to uphold the rights and interests of all Malaysians, regardless of religion or race, as enshrined in the Constitution”.
But Hadi’s insistence to raise the Islamic State issue caused a crisis in Pakatan Rakyat, which was saved from dissolution after a late-night meeting of Pakatan Rakyat leaders on Sept. 28, 2011, resulting in a joint statement by the leaders of the three parties in Pakatan Rakyat reaffirming their resolve to continue giving priority to the Pakatan Rakyat common policy framework and consensus.
This PR common policy framework and consensus excluded Islamic State and hudud as Pakatan Rakyat agenda and there was the clear understanding that any policy change in Pakatan Rakyat would need the agreement of all three component parties.
Before the 13th General Election, DAP rebuffed PAS overture for Hadi Awang to replace Anwar Ibrahim as Prime Minister-designate of Pakatan Rakyat.
After the 13th General Election, the Islamic State and hudud issues re-surfaced and Pakatan Rakyat faced its demise in 2015 when Hadi persisted with the goal of implementing hudud in violation of Pakatan Rakyat’s common policy framework.
Now Hadi condemns DAP as an “enemy of Islam”. But during the Teluk Intan by-election in May 2014, Hadi was full of praise for DAP and recalled that it was DAP which defended PAS when the Kelantan government fell in 1978.
Although Barisan Nasional was working with PAS then, Barisan Nasional did nothing to help them.
Hadi said in the Teluk Intan by-election: “Only DAP defended us that time and we are grateful to them.”
At that time, PAS followed the true teachings of Islam and was a strong opponent of corruption and abuses of power – but subsequently, Hadi took PAS through a major transformation by giving former Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak, support for turning Malaysia into a global kleptocracy!
DAP is always a “friend of Islam” which is moderate and tolerant which will make Malaysia a world top-class nation and not an extremist and intolerant Islam which divide Malaysians and will destroy the Malaysian Dream.
I had wondered why Hadi has suddenly attacked DAP as an “enemy of Islam”.
The reason is quite obvious – to divert public attention from Hadi’s withdrawal of his legal suit against Clare Brown, editor of Sarawak Report and an out-of-court settlement which allowed the original Sarawak Report on Najib giving RM90 million to PAS to remain online and unretracted!
This bring us to the question why MCA is co-operating with PAS when Hadi is reviving the Islamic State rhetoric and espousing the most vicious and toxic politics of lies, hate, fear, race and religion to divide Malaysians in post-14th General Election Malaysia?
(Media Statement by DAP MP for Iskandar Puteri Lim Kit Siang in Gelang Patah on Friday, 8th February 2019)
#1 by Bigjoe on Friday, 8 February 2019 - 8:23 pm
At one time, PAS did not even think and talk of DAP. It was not mentioned at all. At that time the great enemy was UMNO and occasionally MCA would be mentioned. Today suddenly the great evil UMNO is now PAS partner, actually a branch, while MCA is included in the partnership or rarely mentioned at all.
DAP, due to its revival, suddenly is the great enemy instead. It makes no sense, completely illogical but Hadi’s PAS can spread hate and slander based on it. Its hypocrisy and its malicious. If non-Muslim can equally make no sense and spread hate and prejudice, Hadi would have called them the devil and evil incarnate
#2 by good coolie on Wednesday, 13 February 2019 - 12:48 pm
I say man, what’s this about PAS taking money from UMNO? I can’t believe that religious people like PAS can be corrupt even if they have special dispensation. I am sure Pakatan has been cooking things up with that Sarawak Report woman.
#3 by Bigjoe on Sunday, 17 February 2019 - 3:54 am
Hadi Awang just lied again. He said his second meeting with Mahathir was over administrative matters not political but Mahathir said otherwise Hadi Awang promising not to support UMNO in Semenyih supposedly even signing something to its effect.
Why is Hadi lying and he does it without blinking not scandalous?