Can the prime minister survive?

– Greg Lopez
The Malaysian Insider
30 July 2015

The president of Umno is always the prime minister of Malaysia. It is Umno who decides who becomes the prime minister. Leadership crisis in Umno always has serious implications to national leadership and Malaysia.

The leadership crisis within Umno occurs almost every decade. The outcomes of these leadership crises are balanced as the context is important in determining the survival of the incumbent.

The first leadership crisis happened almost as soon as Umno was established.

Leaders from Umno’s Islamic Department left in 1951 to form the Pan Malaysian Islamic Party of Tanah Melayu, now known as the Pan Malaysian Islamic Party or PAS.

Then, this group argued for the centralisation of Islamic affairs, something that the then leaders of Umno were not prepared to do. The incumbent was not challenged directly and survived.

The second leadership crisis was the resignation of Dato Onn Jaafar (father of Malaysia’s third prime minister and grandfather to Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein, a potential future prime minister), the prime mover behind the formation of Umno and its first president.

He resigned as president when his attempts to promote greater inter-racial cooperation to gain independence from the British were opposed by certain key leaders in Umno.

Tunku Abdul Rahman stepped in and led Umno to greater heights albeit with the principle of Umno as first among equals. The incumbent was not challenged directly but chose to resign.

The third leadership crisis was the “palace coup” within Umno. A poor showing by Umno in the 1969 general election led to a pogrom against Malaysian Chinese as segments of the Malay community vented their anger at the Chinese minority in selected locations.

The numbers are disputed but at least some 6,000 Chinese homes and business were destroyed and 184 were killed. Tun Abdul Razak (the father of the current prime minister) took over as prime minister replacing the liberal Tunku Abdul Rahman.

A new “more assertive” Malay leadership group replaced the old “more accommodating” one. This “new leadership” included Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, Tun Musa Hitam and Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, launched the New Economic Policy (NEP) – an extensive affirmative action policy which covered all aspects of the Malaysian economy and society – aimed at reducing socioeconomic disparity between the ethnic Chinese minority and the Malay majority on the Peninsula as well as the indigenous communities of Sabah and Sarawak collectively termed Bumiputera (“sons of the soil”). The incumbent was forcefully removed.

The fourth leadership crisis came about when a rival faction – led by Razaleigh and Musa – almost succeeded in toppling then incumbent president of Umno and prime minister, Dr Mahathir in the 1988 party elections.

Dr Mahathir then purged the leadership of the government and party of his challengers which included more than half the Cabinet members (including Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, Malaysia’s fifth prime minister. Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, Datuk Seri Najib Razak and Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin sided with Dr Mahathir).

In the post-election tussle, the High Court declared Umno an “unlawful society” following irregularities in the party elections that Dr Mahathir had just won narrowly. Dr Mahathir then founded a new party called Umno Baru (New Umno) with all the institutional resources of the old Umno.

The purged members would form a new political party called Semangat 46 in 1989. In 1990, at the 8th general election, for the first time in Malaysian history, two formal opposition coalitions would be formed to take on the BN.

Members of Semangat 46 disbanded in 1996 to return to Umno. But the idea of opposition parties collaborating with dissidents from the ruling party and receiving strong support from the electorate was now a reality. The incumbent was challenged directly and survived.

In 1998, Dr Mahathir had his deputy, and heir apparent Anwar put on trial for sodomy and corruption creating the fifth leadership crisis. This action, together with other social, economic and political development would polarise Malaysian society further between supporters of Umno and supporters of Anwar.

It would also give birth to the Reformasi movement that would catalyse the engagement of large swaths of Malaysians in politics for the first time. Although short lived, once again, opposition parties would collaborate through Barisan Alternatif.

This collaboration between civil society, opposition parties, dissidents from Umno and ordinary Malaysians would lay the groundwork for Umno’s greatest challenge a decade later. The incumbent pre-empted a direct challenge and survived.

Dr Mahathir resigned on October 31, 2003. There were growing signs that Umno – let alone vast segments of Malays and Malaysians – were not happy with Dr Mahathir. He accepted this signal and paved the way for his deputy, Abdullah to take took over, thus averting a leadership crisis and revitalising Umno’s fortunes. The incumbent averted a direct challenge by resigning.

Abdullah performed well in the 2004 general election. Umno alone had 109 out of 219 parliamentary, just one seat shy of being able to govern in their own right.
Abdullah’s popularity and Umno’s and the ruling coalition’s might did not go towards greater societal outcomes, as perceived by Malaysians. Instead corruption at the highest levels, rising religious and racial tensions, and other issues (such as crime, rising cost of living, etc.) began to erode Badawi’s support from the electorate.

Also, after the 2004 elections, Anwar’s conviction for sodomy was surprisingly overturned in attempts to mend fences. However, upon his release from prison, Anwar launched a political campaign that saw the opposition coalition registering its best ever performance.

At one point, he claimed that he had the numbers to form government in 2008. After Abdullah’s dismal showing at GE12, he accepted the signals coming from Umno and society. The incumbent averted a direct challenge by resigning.

At GE13 in 2013, Anwar’s coalition secured the majority popular votes but was unable to secure government due to systemic gerrymandering and what now appears to be widespread fraud.

Umno’s current and sixth major leadership crisis – where prime minister Najib has sacked deputy prime minister, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin – is likely to be its last.

A key issue appears to be the inability of Najib to “listen, hear, read or see” the signals.

Despite spending more than RM58 billion (US$15 billion), with the support of an electoral system designed to keep the ruling party in power against an opposition that various administrations have hounded since independence, and against an opposition leader that Umno had sought to destroy for more than decade, 51% of the electorate voted against Najib. He was unable to listen, hear, read or see this signal coming from the people.

More importantly, he is also unable to listen, hear, read or see the signals coming from within Umno. This could be fatal. Powerful segments within Umno are genuinely concerned that Prime Minister Najib is condemning Umno to oblivion.

The alleged scandals linked to the current Umno president and Malaysia’s current prime minister are simply too many and too large to ignore. That may be the primary reason why the prime minister is unwilling to go.

The opposition, the people, or segments of Umno are no match for the office of the Malaysian prime minister. The Prime Minister’s Office is simply too powerful for any one group to challenge on its own. However, when united, it is a different story altogether.

The doors within Umno also appear to be closing down for a direct challenge against the incumbent. This means the challenge will be taken outside the Umno general assembly. This could be potentially disastrous for Malaysia.

What will the incumbent do?

Watch this space. The best is yet to come. –, July 30, 2015.

* Greg Lopez is research fellow at Executive Education Centre, Murdoch University, Perth.

  1. #1 by yhsiew on Thursday, 30 July 2015 - 11:22 pm

    The Prime Minister survived this time around as he managed to sack Gani before Gani charged him. The “charge sheet” which was drafted appeared on Sarawak Report.

  2. #2 by boh-liao on Thursday, 30 July 2015 - 11:53 pm

    Of cos lar, no need 2 say 1 what, SURE can survive
    Now protected by d largest cabinet, 40 thieves
    Truly a classic case of ABSOLUTE power corrupts
    Boldly practised timely intervention 2 remove kaki identified 2 b a threat 2 his survival
    No wonder now all kinds of news abt d boss of BNM – anytime got sign of betrayal, ZAP, removed or replaced b cos of serious personal health issue (d best excuse) or dropped dead

  3. #3 by boh-liao on Thursday, 30 July 2015 - 11:54 pm

    Of cos lar, no need 2 say 1 what, SURE can survive
    Now protected by d largest cabinet, 40 thieves
    Truly a cl@ssic case of ABSOLUTE power corrupts
    Boldly practised timely intervention 2 remove kaki identified 2 b a threat 2 his survival
    No wonder now all kinds of news abt d boss of BNM – anytime got sign of betrayal, ZAP, removed or replaced b cos of serious personal health issue (d best excuse) or dropped dead

  4. #4 by yhsiew on Friday, 31 July 2015 - 12:32 am

    Rafizi: This is a serious charge

    Commenting on the matter, PKR vice-president Rafizi Ramli, who has seen the draft charge sheet, said it carries a most serious charge against the prime minister. Several people, such as PKR legal bureau chief Latheefa Koya and Lawyers for Liberty’s Michelle Yesudas, have already tweeted the document which first appeared on Sarawak Report.

  5. #5 by worldpress on Friday, 31 July 2015 - 1:52 am

    Can you hear the our country land is crying? Why are you all after over 50 years still could not free him (country land) from corrupted leaders admin his land?
    Do you hear he is crying! crying and sad many years you all let him down no courage to change free him from those corrupted he don’t like shame him (our country land)

You must be logged in to post a comment.