Economist
Jul 25th 2015 | KUALA LUMPUR
Soldiering on – Malaysia’s prime minister battles claims of corruption
WHATEVER the truth of them, the accusations levelled against Najib Razak, Malaysia’s prime minister, have astonished a country that some had thought inured to scandal. In early July the Wall Street Journal reported that it had seen documents produced by government investigators suggesting that nearly $700m from companies linked to a troubled state-backed investment fund had been paid into what they believed to be Mr Najib’s personal bank accounts. With worries about an oil-dependent economy, the controversy is the last thing Malaysia needs.
The allegation is that the money was received shortly before the general election in 2013, in which a coalition dominated by Mr Najib’s party, the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) scraped home, despite narrowly losing the popular vote. The prime minister helped launch the fund, known as 1MDB, in 2009 and chairs its board of advisers. It has acquired land and power plants, yet has struggled to service debts of around $11 billion. The firm’s affairs were already the subject of official investigations, but until this month no one had claimed to have evidence that the prime minister himself had received any money.
Mr Najib has vigorously denied wrongdoing, including ever having used public money for personal gain. He called the allegations “political sabotage” and blamed Mahathir Mohamad, a nonagenarian UMNO grandee who was prime minister from 1981-2003, for waging a campaign against him. For months Dr Mahathir has been calling for Mr Najib’s resignation, warning that under him, UMNO — which has ruled Malaysia since independence in 1957 — may lose an election due by 2018.
The opposition has demanded that the prime minister step down until a special task force, now investigating the allegations, has finished its work. Campaigners known in the past for organising big protest rallies against Malaysia’s heavily gerrymandered electoral system are thinking of calling for fresh demonstrations against the prime minister. But Mr Najib says he is not budging. Outwardly at least he appears still to have his party’s support. A government agency has warned Malaysians against discussing the allegations on social media and has started blocking an indefatigable British website, the Sarawak Report, which has written a lot about 1MDB. Police say they are conducting an inquiry which may uncover the source of the Wall Street Journal’s report.
A boon for Mr Najib is the paucity of obvious substitutes within UMNO. One possibility is Muhyiddin Yassin, a deputy prime minister who had been tipped for the top job when it fell vacant in 2009. Another replacement might be Hishammuddin Hussein, the defence minister and Mr Najib’s cousin (who for now appears loyal). But neither man seems any more likely than Mr Najib to find the vim required to rejuvenate UMNO, which has grown quarrelsome and complacent after six decades in power — and which, in stemming its ebbing popularity, has taken to exploiting old fears among ethnic Malays that their prospects are threatened by Malaysia’s Chinese and Indian minorities.
As for the opposition, it is in disarray. Since its leader, Anwar Ibrahim, was imprisoned on a dubious sodomy charge earlier this year, the opposition coalition has been torn apart by tensions between the DAP, an ethnic-Chinese party, and PAS, a Malay Muslim one, over the latter’s efforts to enforce strict sharia punishments in Kelantan state in the north. Some in PAS now look minded to mend fences with their old foes in the ruling party. Hadi Awang, PAS’s leader, has argued that Islam requires that the Wall Street Journal should produce four witnesses to support its reporting.
All this has distracted attention from Malaysia’s pressing economic problems. Hobbled by low oil prices and slowing Asian economies, the value of the ringgit has sunk to a 16-year low against the dollar. Meanwhile, politicians of all stripes have scrambled to deny that race played a role in scuffles this month in Kuala Lumpur, when a mob of mostly Malay youths confronted the largely ethnic-Chinese employees of an electronics mall — all sparked, apparently, by an instance of shoplifting.
Even if Mr Najib is cleared of wrongdoing, the brouhaha is sapping his standing among ordinary Malaysians. It was already hurt by the recent imposition of a disliked value-added tax. If his popularity keeps sliding, it is difficult to imagine UMNO sticking by him until the next general election. The end of Ramadan, which concluded in Malaysia on July 17th and during which Muslim politicians are supposed to avoid unseemly squabbles, may bring fresh attacks from dissident factions. But Mr Najib is rumoured to be mulling a cabinet reshuffle, presumably to silence critics there. If he can blast through this crisis his opponents may well wonder what, if anything, will bring him down.
#1 by MooMoo on Saturday, 25 July 2015 - 2:08 pm
Najib is able to “roll on” simply because he has the fervent support from his powerful “downstream” supporters.
#2 by Justice Ipsofacto on Saturday, 25 July 2015 - 6:58 pm
When you fight corruption, corruption would fight back.
This is what we are witnessing at the moment.
And jib has the whole umno gang fighting with him (or alongside him, if you like) and not for him.
All of them, like jib, knew well (1) that the end of umno is inevitable and immiment and; (2) that their days beyond the end will be unbearable and might even be spent behind prison walls.
In short, like jib, they too are fighting for their own skins.
#3 by worldpress on Saturday, 25 July 2015 - 7:18 pm
Without supporter, just an ordinary man in the street
#4 by boh-liao on Saturday, 25 July 2015 - 7:30 pm
Remember d Watergate SCANDAL?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_scandal
Dis is our big fat 1MDBgate SCANDAL
Very similar, cover up, money trail, etc
Did Nixon get The Washington Post suspended?
#5 by sco on Sunday, 26 July 2015 - 11:30 pm
I have written on Mahatir’s blog with relation to the WSJ article and the fact that Najib and his legal team can do absolutely nothing in terms of legal action against the WSJ.
The reason being, the WSJ is an American publication owned by Rupert Murdoch.
News Corp would very much enjoy taking the Malaysian government to court. It would open the doors for many enlightening articles to be written ‘about’ Malaysia.
C4 anybody?
1MDB?
MACC deaths in custody?
ISIS cells operating out of Malaysia?
Corrupt allocation of Government Contracts?
Malaysian Racial discrimination (Bumiputra entitlements)
….The list of dirt that the WSJ could publish on a daily basis about Malaysia would be endless. It would cause investors to ‘flock’ to Malaysia as a beacon of light wouldn’t it?.. (please excuse my sarcasm)
So I ask Najib, please try and sue the WSJ. Try your best….. or better go back and sit in your little corner of the world and keep quiet. Or use your own state controlled Communist tools to publish what you want to the public.
Malaysia has had enough.. enough is enough… Step down
#6 by boh-liao on Monday, 27 July 2015 - 1:13 am
UNtouchables here
Look back at >50 years of history
Full of misdeeds, including murders, corrupt cases, $ politics, blatant use of $$ 2 buy votes, etc
ANY1 (d REAL culprits) punished, found guilty?
Huff n puff – what happened? House remained solid, Untouchable
GO figure it out
Dis is Y, elegant silence
NO bother 2 say a simple YES or NO when asked simple, clear questions
Like GOT big fat $$$ left in your personal bank account or not?
A strange scenario, by any decent, accountable standard
A corrupt head of state was exposed
D organisation n individuals dat exposed it were declared 2 DEstabilise d nation
Huh? Apa itu? Truly amazing