The BN Government should close down MAS

By Koon Yew Yin

The long term MAS price chart shows that it has dropped from Rm 2.10 in 2007 to 18 sens today. As a long term serious investor, I have had a closer look at the cheap share price. Why is it selling at 18 sen or less than one fifth of its par value?

My intention in writing this piece is to help the BN Government decide to put in the final nail and to bury MAS so as to save tax payers’ money. Obviously the Government did not pay enough attention to my previous articles “Why MAS share price is on cheap sale?” and “Why MAS Is Still Flying” which I published about a year ago. It will be relevant to include some of the points I mentioned in my previous article in this new one.

The latest 1st quarter 2014 ending March shows that MAS lost Rm 443 million. In 2013, 2012 and 2011 the company lost Rm 1,168 million, Rm 433 million, and Rm 2,424 million respectively. It is beyond logic as to why the Government wants to continue to use tax payers money to support MAS?

As usual, there are the incorrigibly optimistic cheerleaders for the airline who are unable to see the writing on the wall. These ‘experts’ – including the fat cat management of MAS – are still touting that the company is in recovery mode and will soon be returning to profitability.

The market however sees the prospects for the airline differently. During the past few days the airline share has been trading around 18 sen level. This is about the lowest share price that the airline share has recorded during the past many years. Without the support of government-linked funds and left to market forces alone, the share price of MAS will definitely drop to a single digit figure.

Should the government continue to bail out MAS?

With the most recent losses, the total losses of MAS is now more than $4 billion. In any normal business, any company incurring large and sustained losses would have closed down or gone into bankruptcy. This has not happened to MAS yet but I think the time is right – in fact, long overdue – for the government to withdraw the open cheque book extended to MAS.

When planning the future of MAS, it is important that the government avoids not only the past mistakes but also takes a rational approach based on economic fundamentals. One line of simplistic thinking is that there is a bright and profitable future for MAS since the number of air travelers continues to increase by about 5-7 percent per year.

But if you look at the history of airline industry profitability, this is not the case for airlines worldwide. The fact is the airline industry requires huge capital and produces poor returns on capital employed. Hence, year after year, many airlines produce poor profit margins or outright losses.

Why is it that an industry with year-on-year rises in sales cannot generate good returns to shareholders?

It all comes down to the economic structure of the industry. One of the forces that limit profitability is the intensity of the rivalry between the leading airlines. There is over-supply leading to pressure on prices. This is exacerbated by a high degree of freedom for new competitors to enter the industries.

If, say, an airline route between two destinations is found to be reasonably profitable it is not long before new entrants move in or current airlines simply move their planes to this profitable route.

It is truly an industry governed by the principle of “survival of the fittest” and there is no doubt that Air Asia is much fitter than MAS.

The next logical question to ask is why doesn’t the Malaysian government allow MAS to fold up or go under?

There are two main reasons: Firstly, the perennial optimism of managers and shareholders. “Just one more chunk of money will see us break through into profitability as we rout the opposition!” seems to be the credo of these parties based on their self interest and not national interest.

Secondly, there is government interference because of the Bumiputra factor. The BN government refuses to let MAS go because of the NEP and the fear that the retrenched employees who are mainly Malay will kick up a fuss or change their support from the BN to the Pakatan. Some may say that the government’s policy makes sense politically but it is poor economics.

Close down MAS without further interference or delay is the only way forward in the national interest especially since the permanent stain left by MH 370.

  1. #1 by Bigjoe on Tuesday, 3 June 2014 - 9:16 pm

    If you look at the performance of every ASEAN national carrier, the best have only basically not lose money, their performance flat in the last few years despite the fact the region have experienced phenomenal growth. Even SIA is in the same boat.

    What it really means is there is no real growth of market for national carrier, at best they can garner their market share of premium customers who want full service. For Malaysia, the market for premium customers is highly limited because we are not a global business hub and not a high-end tourist destination. In such a situation, the key driver for MAS is cost control and cost cut. It must shrink cost in line with revenue, not grow revenue to meet cost because it has little control over it.

    Unless Najib manage to turn us into a global business hub, which is impossible with the likes of Perkasa around, then MAS only choice is shrink, at this stage, likely too small to be viable.

  2. #2 by Godfather on Tuesday, 3 June 2014 - 9:52 pm

    Closing down MAS is not an option. No government will put over 20,000 people out of work, especially if 90 pct of those belong to the “Tuan” race.

    The right thing to do is to let the airline go bankrunionists thell the assets to a new company called MAS II. Hire back 50 pct of the people who really matter based on meritocracy. The other 50 pct of unionists and lobbyists can join ISMA and Perkasa.

    However, the sad fact is that this isn’t going to happen. They will offer a sweetheart deal to Syed Mokhtar to see if he

  3. #3 by Jeffrey on Tuesday, 3 June 2014 - 11:56 pm

    Many feeder businesses owned by political cronies depend on business patronage/support of GLCs : if one shrinks or closes down a GLC patron like MAS, whats going to happen to these crony businesses?

  4. #4 by boh-liao on Wednesday, 4 June 2014 - 12:11 am

    Hoi, pendatang, don’t U DARE 2 ask d Perkosa-UmnoB/BN gomen 2 close down MAS

    U NO know meh, so many Perkosa-UmnoB kaki making obscene amt of eazi $$$ fr biz n logistics activities linked 2 MAS

    Pls lah, DON’T disturb d parasitic ecosystem, just let d Perkosa-UmnoB/BN gomen continue 2 FUND MAS lah

  5. #5 by Justice Ipsofacto on Wednesday, 4 June 2014 - 9:06 am

    Remember? Jib said recently that MAS will be bailed out. In fact he said something like: “The government will not save MAS.” There no worries people. MAS can go on losing money.

    Hey wait a minute. Just in case some of you got confused, jib always meant the opposite of what he said. So announcements like no petrol hike will lead to petrol hike. No utility rates increase means utility rates will increase. The days of government knows best are over just means that the days of government knows best will continue forever.

    So when he said mas will not be saved, he is actually making plans to bail out mas. That is MY guess anyway.

  6. #6 by longshotisme on Wednesday, 4 June 2014 - 11:18 am

    I have heard of one foreign country which loses US1mil. each day and is still being funded by its government til today. The concept of a “bail-out” doesn’t apply as long as the government coffers has the funds and the expertise to turn it around. Right now even though MAS is a “going concern”, it will soon be insolvent if it continues bleeding without a rescue plan in sight. To make matters worse, our govt. can ill-afford being a spendhrift with our present economic state. Politics and business is a powerful explosive mix. Whatever outcome will be painful for us if MAS is to stay afloat, face-
    saving aside.

  7. #7 by boh-liao on Thursday, 5 June 2014 - 11:14 am

    Do MAS staff get annual FREE or highly subsidised flights on MAS?
    Any 1 care 2 share d details?

  8. #8 by good coolie on Saturday, 7 June 2014 - 3:28 pm

    Then pertinent questions are WHEN the next bailout of MAS will take place, and under WHAT GUISE it will take place.

You must be logged in to post a comment.