GST: killing the golden goose

– Liew Chin Tong
MP for Kluang
The Malaysian Insider
October 25, 2013

The proposed goods and services tax (GST) will tax those who can’t afford to be taxed, i.e. 60% of Malaysians who are eligible for BR1M. These are the people who will soon be taxed by the regressive tax, together with the rest of us who live and stay in this country.

I would like to drop the Orwellian double speak so prevalently employed by many GST apologists who are trying to mask the real issue. I will share my views plainly here.

Flawed arguments

Some argue that the government has to be cruel to be kind. Hence, BN would have us believe that the fuel hike subsidy rationalisation is needed to balance the government’s expenditure and ensure its good financial standing.

In theory, this sounds legit. However, look closer and you will find many flaws in the argument. For one, this argument does not take into account the adverse effects on the man on the street. It also demonstrates an incomplete understanding of how the economy grows or declines.

What is the real reason for the Barisan Nasional government to implement the GST? This tax has hung like a sword of Damocles over our heads since Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s era in 2005.

GST apologists’ main argument is that it is the most effective form of taxation. What does “most effective” mean? Simply put, it means that the government can obtain more tax revenue from our pockets.

Another pro-GST argument is that since 140 odd countries have implemented it, Malaysia should follow suit . However, you do not find BN supporters rushing to follow in the footsteps of other countries’ democratisation processes. For example, most countries in the world set the voting age at around 18, so why do we not adopt the “follow the majority” argument in this instance?

GST widens inequality

In the past decade, particularly after the 2008 global financial crisis, the global economy has become acutely concerned about income inequality – the gap between the haves and the have nots.

Scholars and thinkers the world over have acknowledged the negative effect that GST has on the income gap.

Assume my income is RM10,000 and I spend RM1,000 and I’m charged a 5% GST or RM50 for the goods and services I consume. RM1,000 is just 1/10 of my supposed RM10,000 income. Imagine a person earns RM1,000 per month and spend all his income to consume goods and services and pays a similar 5% GST. RM50 to a person who earns RM10,000 and to a person who earns RM1,000 carries an absolutely different meaning. The lower income person will suffer more.

The BN apologists also argue that GST is fair, since it taxes everyone in a country where the majority do not pay tax. A belated consolation to the minority taxpaying group who have been contributing to the national coffers, if you will.

However, 60% of Malaysians are eligible for the BR1M financial aid, meaning to say 60% of Malaysian families earn less than RM3,000 a month. They are already struggling to make ends meet. They do not pay taxes because they are below the tax-paying threshold.

Of course there are those who evade paying tax, I believe that we have adequate laws to deal with this, if the enforcement is done properly.

The middle income group will suffer too

Some advocates for GST said, the daily necessities of the poor are not subject to GST. I would like to ask them, who are the poor? If 60% of Malaysians need BR1M money, that means 60% of the country’s families are struggling. If what the 60% need are exempted from GST, might as well we keep to the old system as there is no GST system that exempts 60% of people and still remains worthwhile to run.

How do we differentiate between daily necessities for poor people and for normal people? Are we not degrading the quality of life of those trapped in the middle income group through their consumption of GST-exempted products meant for the poor?

One other argument is that by introducing GST, we can reduce sales tax and eventually, income tax.

While we recognise that Malaysia’s tax system does no favours to the middle income bracket who earn between RM5,000 and RM10,000, the cure is not the introduction of GST. This unfortunate fact of high tax for middle income bracket should be rectified by tax adjustments to reduce the burden of the middle income families, shifting the focus to the super-rich.

Malaysia’s GST is not like in the UK, Australia and other developed nations where top income tax rate were 50% and above before the introduction of the GST. For them, tax cuts were the natural course of action after the introduction of GST.

There is little room to manoeuvre for a tax cut with the Malaysian income tax rate which is not that high by comparison.

Killing the golden goose

BN ministers have said that the GST is a necessary evil to balance the accounts and to reduce deficit and debts. To most of us, such a statement means that the only “balance” it seems to bring is to allow the powers-that-be to continue to squander the nation’s wealth – business as usual.

The crux of the matter is this: killing the golden goose. Here’s what I mean by “golden goose”- our economy is no longer as export-reliant as it once heavily was. While previously, our biggest trading partner was the US, in the past three years the growth of our economy has heavily depended on domestic consumption.

Apart from the government’s expenditure, domestic consumption comprises the money spent by ordinary citizens, mostly via debt. Hence, the rakyat who spend money are the “golden geese”.

Malaysia’s household debt is the second highest in all of Asia. Should the bubble burst, we will have many casualties.

I would like to reiterate that arguably, GST by nature is designed to tax those who cannot afford to be taxed in the first place. The 60% of citizens who are eligible for BR1M aid will now be taxed by GST, shrinking the domestic consumer market – i.e. the disposable income that could have been spent buying goods is now taken away by tax.

In this scenario, imposing GST at this stage will be akin to killing the golden goose. It would not be far fetched to imagine the worst case scenario of GST not as the feared monster of inflation, but the falling demand that precedes a recession.

  1. #1 by sotong on Saturday, 26 October 2013 - 11:03 am

    The great party is over.

    GST is revenue raising tool essential to support excessive and irresponsible government expenditure, with oil depleting or alternative source of energy found.

    With high national debt and continuing budget deficit, now future generations would have to clean it up and pay the bills.

  2. #2 by Bigjoe on Saturday, 26 October 2013 - 11:07 am

    Actually the GST is going to be very timely. 4 years from now, falling commodity and energy prices will mean GST will largely mean flat prices. But growth slows and income and job prospect will take a hit.

    Najib’s only escape will be to turn to religion – that means to Perkasa and the crazies. Taib will be more powerful than Najib and Sarawakians and Sabahan will suffer greatly as the fundamental rides are destroyed even as they pour money they can’t afford into Borneo.

  3. #3 by lee tai king (previously dagen) on Saturday, 26 October 2013 - 1:19 pm

    We are all phaaaaarked!

  4. #4 by gofortruth on Saturday, 26 October 2013 - 3:28 pm

    People sent spaceman we also sent ours. People got GST we sure must have also, correct? Typical BN bulldozer mentality except this GST is to rob ordinary poor people in the country because they are the people who will feel the pinch.

  5. #5 by atclee on Saturday, 26 October 2013 - 3:53 pm

    Well the cat is out of the bag and GST is pegged at 6% so it seems. Consider this, Company A sells a Product to Company B to resell to the consumer.

    Let’s say Company A sells the product to B at RM100. With 6% GST the product now cost RM106 to Company B.

    Now, before it reaches Company B the product will have to be transported and will incur an additional RM10 transport fee. With 6% GST included for transport charges, the transport charges now cost RM10.60.

    In total the product will now cost RM116.60 with 6% GST included to reach Company B instead of RM110 without 6% GST.

    Like any normal business entity Company B will now mark up the product before reselling the product to the consumer. Since the product reached Company B at a cost of RM116.60 and Company B needs to make a 30% profit (to cover business expenses, salaries and to make a small profit). The product will now cost RM116.60 + RM35 = RM151.60

    Now before selling to the consumer he is now required to add another 6% GST. The product will now cost RM160.70 with 6% GST as compared to RM143.00 without 6% GST.

    Through this transaction with 6% GST the government will be collecting a total of RM17.70 worth of taxes.

    I’m sure when anyone do the math here, the government claims that its only 6% but in reality consumers are paying around 12.4% more for the same product.

    This will not only cause inflation in 2015, it will cause super-inflation.

    As a Malaysian, whether one is wealthy, middle income or poor this causes a grave concern to all!

    I also wonder where the reported current 2% inflation figures were obtained from???

  6. #6 by dawsheng on Saturday, 26 October 2013 - 9:19 pm

    We all will be too poor to fight BN by 2016 and will become cheaper better faster modern day slaves by 2017.

  7. #7 by Noble House on Sunday, 27 October 2013 - 6:36 am

    If Najib can passed himself off as Finance Minister, I can very well be the next Pontiff of the Vatican.

You must be logged in to post a comment.