Is the dissemination of racist lies, poison and incitement, regardless of the harm to Malaysian nation-building, the surest way to high votes and influence in the upcoming UMNO party elections?


There has recently been an unprecedented outpouring of racist lies, poison and incitement in Umno media and social media, whether facebook, twitter or blog, raising the question:

Is the dissemination of racist lines, poison and incitement, regardless of the harm to Malaysian nation-building, the surest way to high votes and influence in the upcoming UMNO party elections?

Two days ago, the UMNO official newspaper, Utusan Malaysia carried a report quoting a former Umno deputy minister, Dr. Mohd Fuad Zarkashi making the accusation that the DAP’s criticism of the film “Tanda Putera” “samata-mata ingin menyembunyi kebiadapan Penasihat DAP, Lim Kit Siang yang bertindak kencing di depan rumah Menteri Besar Selangor ketika peristiwa 13 Mei 1969”. (Utusan Malaysia 7.9.13 p.13)

How can the former Umno deputy minister say, and Utusan Malaysia publish, such dastardly falsehood, when this is a most irresponsible and downright lie?

I was never in Kuala Lumpur at any time during the May 13, 1969 racial riots, and the director of Tanda Putera, Datin Paduka Shuhaimi Baba had claimed that the fabricated urination incident in her film was her “creative licence” in her fictitious account of the May 13, 1969 racial riots!

This is not an isolated instance, as there had been a recent spate of malicious lies and falsehoods in UMNO media and social media, like the blog post of former Information Minister Zainuddin Maidin last Tuesday (3rd September 2013), accusing me of having “sowed the seeds of death” in causing the May 13, 1969 riots.

I have instructed my lawyers to institute legal proceedings against Zainuddin, Fuad and Utusan Malaysa to clear my name from these defamatory falsehoods but the question Malaysians and even UMNO delegates, divisional and branch leaders must ask is whether they will allow the dissemination of racist lies, poison and incitement to sacrifice the higher national interests of Malaysian nation-building in the belief that this is the surest way to high votes and influence in the upcoming UMNO party elections!

I have said many a time that I was never in Kuala Lumpur during the May 13, 1969 racial riots in Kuala Lumpur but facts and truth do not seem to matter to Umno leaders and propagandists who are bent on spreading the lie that I had provoked the May 13, 1969 racial riots not only through my fictitious role in the street processions in Kuala Lumpur on May 11, 12 and 13, 1969 in Kuala Lumpur but even for urinating on the flagpole in the Mentri Besar’s residence.

Six circumstances why I could not have provoked the May 13, 1969 riots

There are at least six circumstances to show that I could not have provoked the May 13, 1969 riots.

Firstly, I had not contested in any of the Kuala Lumpur or Selangor seats in the 1969 general elections as I had contested in the Bandar Melaka parliamentary seat.

Secondly, I was never in Kuala Lumpur after the May 10, 1969 general elections and on May 13, 1969, I was in Kota Kinabalu campaigning for the independent parliamentary candidate as polling in Sabah for the 1969 general elections was to be after the Peninsular elections on May 10, 1969.

Thirdly, I would not have dared to return to Kuala Lumpur from Sabah if I had caused the May 13, 1969 riots by shouting anti-Malay slogans in victory processions in the streets of Kuala Lumpur and even urinating at the flagpole of the Selangor Mentri Besar’s residence.

Fourthly, I would have been charged and prosecuted for causing the May 13, 1969 riots if I had been guilty of shouting anti-Malay slogans in victory processions in the streets of Kuala Lumpur and urinating at the flagpole of the Selangor Mentri Besar’s residence, if a person could get away alive or unhurt with such a heinous and provocative act!

Fifthly, I would not have called for a Royal Commission of Inquiry into the May 13, 1969 racial riots to ascertain the causes and the culprits down the decades for 44 years, from 1969 to now.

Sixthly, I would never have written a letter to the Prime Minister, Tunku Abdul Rahman from the Muar Detention Centre on 5th August 1969, expressing my “anxieties for the future of Malaysia” and making a three-point proposal for the forging of national unity in the wake of the May 13, 1969 racial riots.

As I said in my letter to Tunku:

“From the very outset of the May 13 disturbances, the DAP had offered its help to restore peace and harmony.

“I myself, on 17th May, had occasion to make a similar offer and pledge on behalf of my party at a press conference in Singapore, on the eve of my return to Malaysian capital from Sabah and arrest.”

My three-point proposal was:

  1. The immediate convening of Parliament (a) for an affirmation and pledge by all MPs to the concept and ideal of racial tolerance, understanding and multi-racialism; and (b) to restore the people’s confidence in the democratic process and deny the M.C.P. from making political capital from the disturbances.

  2. The establishment of a Royal Commission of inquiry into the causes of the May 13 disturbances, and to apprehend and punish the culprits; and

  3. The establishment of an all-party, all-races Royal Commission of Enquiry to probe into the entire gamut of racial problems in Malaysia, with a view to seek long-term solutions.

We should learn the lessons from the tragedy of the May 13, 1969 so that Malaysia can be a more united, successful and prosperous nation and not to distort history and the tragic events of 44 years ago for petty political advantages as in securing high votes and greater influence in the upcoming UMNO party elections.

  1. #1 by cemerlang on Monday, 9 September 2013 - 3:27 pm

    Promise of power, stoop as low as can get, anything, everything

  2. #2 by Bigjoe on Monday, 9 September 2013 - 4:16 pm

    The issue is not whether they lied or how dastardly the lies but rather as Sdr. Lim pointed out, whether the lies and the immorality is of any use.. Clearly they enjoy it, some of them relishes in it, but the truth is it insults their constituent, panders towards their weakness to fool them and then cheat them.

    Such a thing is an illusion and predicated on UMNO/BN ability to FUND that illusion, this country to keep the constituent delusional and in fantasy. The truth is UMNO’s GM is part fantasy and dreaming and hence its why it can work and they indulge in it. Its also why they need to cut subsidies and implement GST so as to fund this fantasy..

    That really is – these lies about cutting subsidies and implementing GST at the bottom line.. The opposition should focus on these and not really care for the lies or how dastardly it is. The reply should be if DAP stop criticizing Tanda Putera, will they give back subsidies and stop implementing GST?

  3. #3 by Godfather on Monday, 9 September 2013 - 4:31 pm

    The short answer is “YES!”. They will use this because the average UMNO delegate will believe just about anything when they are told that their race and religion are under siege.

    You think the likes of Tengku Razaleigh, Saifuddin, and other so-called “moderates” will speak out against lies and falsehoods being rained on Malaysians ? Nah, they will suddenly lose their voices when the assembly is in session.

  4. #4 by Di Shi Jiu on Monday, 9 September 2013 - 8:11 pm

    Absolutely shameless of Utusan to print a clear falsehood related to 513.

    Lies and falsehoods seem to be the forte of Utusan.

    I would demand a retraction printed on the front page in large font and that retraction kept on the front page for a month.

  5. #6 by tuahpekkong on Monday, 9 September 2013 - 9:32 pm

    Saudara Lim, since the DAP won’t stoop so low as to accuse the U Must Not Object chief of urinating in front of your residence, instituting legal proceedings against those who have made malicious accusations against you is the right thing to do to clear your reputation. We know who were behind the May 13 racial riots. UMNO will never agree to the establishment of a RCI because once the facts have been established, it will not be able to use the incident again to frighten off the Malays. These irresponsible people don’t care about the national interest. The trappings of power outweigh everything else.

  6. #7 by sheriff singh on Tuesday, 10 September 2013 - 12:58 am

    Let us not forget one of the greatest divisive issue affecting us now with no resolution is sight – Muslim v non-Muslims, with the many outstanding, unresolved issues, and the imposition of the will of a few on the general populace.

  7. #8 by Noble House on Tuesday, 10 September 2013 - 4:06 am

    The answer is a big YES! They cannot survive without these prescriptions from the Doctor in the house!

  8. #9 by BiancaL on Tuesday, 10 September 2013 - 10:09 am

    Fortunately, YB Lim KS have all the documents & facts to prove his innocence. Evidences are so important as our country adopt the finger-pointing policies whether one is guilty or not. Worst still, all these false accusations that is in the main media will cause the public to believe it is true. afterall, how can we beat the lies told by the govt time and again.

You must be logged in to post a comment.