Muhammad, a consistent protector of minority rights

— Moh Yasir Alimi
The Malaysian Insider
Feb 05, 2012

FEB 5 — During this month of the Islamic calendar, Muslims are celebrating the birth of the Prophet Muhammad. Muhammad was born in the sixth century in the middle of a culture of ignorance, when people fought because of their tribal affiliations and religious beliefs and women were treated like camels.

Amid such a poor condition for humanity, Muhammad came to teach humanity, tolerance, humility, equality, justice and compassion. He always emphasised consciousness of God and the divinity of human life as the gate of enlightenment, so that human beings would not enslaved by their own ego and bodily impulses.

Karen Armstrong describes Muhammad as a respectful and compassionate man who lived a decent life. She argues that although Islam has often been described in the West as violent and inherently intolerant, Muhammad taught tolerance and compassion toward other religions to all of his followers.

Tolerance is the foundation and the measure of Islamic faith. The faith of a Muslim is as much as his tolerance toward other.

Unfortunately, while most Muslims conform to the spirit of his message, others distort his teachings. Now, we see religion is used as reason to incite violence and intolerance.

Accordingly, in this celebration, it is time to comprehend the tolerant teaching of the Prophet in order to better understand one another in this global community of humanity. Muhammad’s life is about tolerance, tolerance and tolerance.

He showed tolerance and mercy to children, the weak, non-Muslims and religious minorities. One legacy on tolerance is the Constitution of Madina.

The first article of the constitution stated that all the inhabitants of Medina, regardless of religion, race and ancestry were “one nation”. Muslims and non-Muslims should live in harmony, respect and protect each other.

An attack on one religion and tribe was regarded to be an attack on the integrity of Madina.

In Madina, the Prophet exemplified tolerance with himself and he strictly forbade any mistreatment of people of other faiths. He said: “Whoever kills a person who has a truce with the Muslims will never smell the fragrance of Paradise.”

He also said: “Beware! Whoever is cruel and hard on a non-Muslim minority, or curtails their rights, or burdens them with more than they can bear, or takes anything from them against their free will; I will complain against the person on the Day of Judgment.” He added: “Who hurts a non-Muslim minority is like hurting me”.

The Prophet modelled a new society based on tolerance and religious freedom. Every faith was free to practice their beliefs freely without any hindrances. Their religious rights and places of worship should be respected.

Abdulsalam, an Islamic scholar concerned about religious tolerance, presented four examples of the Prophets’ tolerance. First, “the Jews in Medina at the time of the Prophet had their own school of learning, named Bait-ul-Midras, where they would recite the Torah, worship and educate themselves.”

Second, in many letters he sent to his emissaries, the Prophet repeatedly emphasised that religious institutions should not be harmed. Here is an example of the letter dated 628 to the religious leaders of Saint Catherine on Mount Sinai who sought his protection:

“This is a message from Muhammad ibn Abdullah, as a covenant to those who adopt Christianity, near and far, we are with them. Verily I, the servants, the helpers, and my followers defend them, because Christians are my citizens; and by God! I hold out against anything that displeases them.

No compulsion is to be on them. Neither are their judges to be removed from their jobs nor their monks from their monasteries.

No one is to destroy a house of their religion, to damage it, or to carry anything from it to the Muslims’ houses. Should anyone take any of these, he would spoil God’s covenant and disobey His Prophet. Verily, they are my allies and have my secure charter against all that they hate.

No one is to force them to travel or to oblige them to fight. The Muslims are to fight for them. If a female Christian is married to a Muslim, it is not to take place without her approval. She is not to be prevented from visiting her church to pray.

Their churches are declared to be protected. They are neither to be prevented from repairing them nor the sacredness of their covenants. No one of the nation [Muslims] is to disobey the covenant till the Last Day.”

Third, Abdulsalam also told an interesting story about when the Prophet received a delegation of 60 Christians from Yemen, at his mosque. “When the time for their prayer came, they faced the direction of east and prayed. The Prophet ordered that they be left in their state and not harmed.”

Fourth, the Prophet also exemplified cooperation with people of different faiths in political context. For example, he selected a non-Muslim, Amr bin Umaiyah, as an ambassador to be sent to Ethiopia.

These are only some examples of the Prophet’s tolerance towards other faiths popular in scholarly research about the prophet’s life, but increasingly less popular in Islamic world.

Every human being has the freedom to choose his religion and the state should protect that right and the right to worship in accordance to his religion.

Religion should not be forced upon individual, and the entire life of the Prophet is a vivid demonstration of the principle of the Koran, which promotes tolerance and sets the guideline for the Muslims’ interaction with people of different faiths. “There is no compulsion in religion”

Tolerance is an important measure of good conduct and righteousness. The Prophet said: “Those who suppress their anger, and forgive other people — assuredly, God loves those who do good.” The Prophet added: “The believers with the most perfect faith are those with the most perfect conduct and manners.”

The Prophet Muhammad dedicated his entire life to liberate human beings from oppression, ignorance and greed. Even when he almost passed away, his last advice was, “Treat your women well, and do not oppress your servants.”

Often fuelled by misconceptions about the Prophet, the world thus needs a deeper and objective understanding of the Prophet — his tolerance, gentleness, his love of animals, his concern for the weak and oppressed, justice, compassion and mercy. This understanding is an important step for world peace and human freedom.

“The Prophet taught us that forbearance is greater than revenge; forgiveness more lofty than punishment; and compassion more effective than austerity. Above all, he taught us mercy. And in these difficult times, we are all in need of more mercy in the world,” Amjad Tarsin wrote in his call for celebration of the mercy and honest reflection in Islamic world.

Finally, within the spirits and love to the Prophet, let’s nurture our conscience with the principles of love and mercy he shows during his entire life. Religious minorities and their places of worship should be protected and the elites should not make statements that provoke persecution of minorities.

None should be hurt because of religious belief. As Jalaluddin Rumi said, “Listen with ears of tolerance! See through the eyes of compassion! Speak with the language of love!” — The Jakarta Post

  1. #1 by boh-liao on Monday, 6 February 2012 - 1:51 am

    1M’sia, a great PARADOX!
    A Muslim-majority nation, ruled by UmnoB kakis supposed 2 b Muslims who pray many times a day n perform Hajj multiple times, n a civil service predominantly Muslims

    With such religious piousness, 1 would EXPECT dis nation 2 b super duper CLEAN (NOT CORRUPT), honest, fair, etc (everything good)
    REALLY? Reality: 1M’sia is 1 of d MOST CORRUPT, sex-obsessed nations, with scandal-tainted leaders n msm SPREADING lies, racist remarks on a daily basis
    Just compare n contrast dis Muslim-majority nation with d nonMuslim nation down South

  2. #2 by monsterball on Monday, 6 February 2012 - 3:48 am

    Prophet Mohammed is no doubt the greatest reformer ..uniting the Arabs with the words of Allah…now spread all over the world.
    He never encourage anyone to steal from fellow countrymen….rob or murder..innocent and helpless people.
    He never encourage people to tell lies and bully anyone.
    UMNO b politicians shame their religion to the extreme.
    For all Malaysians true Muslims..have a Happy Holy celebration…in honour of the Prophet’s Birthday…and strange enough….Malaysian Chinese are celebrating will Malaysian Indians on Thaipusam….one event lapping another.
    Year 2012 is a sign to unite all Malaysians and that will not be from present government…for always divide and govern …which is totally against the Islamic religion.

  3. #3 by Jeffrey on Monday, 6 February 2012 - 9:03 am

    According minorities’ rights must arise from condition of one’s having a sense of compassion for humanity in general and respect and fair play for all people, and not just one group/sub sect of people distinguished by class, race, religion or creed. It is also a belief that we are all interdependent; each depends on the well-being of the other and the whole and thus it is right we treat others as we wish others to treat us. Only then we make a commitment to respect life and dignity, individuality and
    diversity, so that every person is treated humanely, without
    exception. This is called ethics.

  4. #4 by Jeffrey on Monday, 6 February 2012 - 9:19 am

    To be sure, nearly all religions and certainly Islam teaches ethics. This is the importance of religions because they teach ethics and if followed by believers their lives and all around will go better. There is however an important caveat: for that to happen etics must be “internalized”, which comes from not just what religion teaches but also the believers capacity to reflect and to weigh a particular conduct (before engaging) on how to balance their self interests against legitimate entitlement of others. Hence religion teaches best when it is embraced voluntarily from bottom upwards and not imposed top down (for political purposes) from elites to the masses. The danger is that many would just embrace religiosity and piety to make others and peers believe they are so in order to reap social rewards of respect and status. Having not gone through the internalizing of ethics process the teaching of religion become lost.

  5. #5 by Jeffrey on Monday, 6 February 2012 - 9:25 am

    This explains why in many “secular” societies, ethics, and religious teachings are sometimes better absorbed and internalized by those who are believers of their respective religions. This is because there is no compulsion from top and anyway around. Religious faith and observance is a private than public affair. Of course in such a secular society where State is hands off & neutral on any particular religion the opportunity to develop an ethical approach is not a monopoly of the religious: many atheists could learn and internalize ethics and develop its sense. Whilst religion certainly promotes ethics, it does not necessarily mean the consciousness of it is absorbed and internalised by followers when or if they were more concerned with rituals and appearance of piety than the principles espoused by the Religion itself. The latter appears easier to happen in secular society where religion is embraced voluntarily from bottom up but more difficult when it is imposed top down in societies where it is part of the political order.

You must be logged in to post a comment.