Saiful saw Najib before he made police report against Anwar. So the complaint against Anwar was not a personal matter for Saiful. The decision was influenced directly or indirectly by the UMNO deputy president who spent time discussing it before Saiful made the police report.

Saiful told the doctor who examined him at Hospital Pusrawi that he suffered from tenemus, which resulted from insertion of plastic implement into his anus. The doctor found no sign that would suggest that Saiful was in pain. Whether Saiful had or had not sodomy experience in his life, at the time of examination the doctor did not certify that he had been sodomized. Indeed even if he had been using plastic instrument on himself as he claimed, the doctor could not confirm that the work of the plastic left an impact for him to claim that he was sodomized.

It was clear that Saiful went to Pusrawi not to seek medical treatment. He was there to establish a record which could be used in court in the event that he could convince, when the police needed no urging, the authority to have his days in court. So the medical report was intended for public knowledge in the first place. It is odd that the Ministry of Health would treat that as confidential document like genuine patients.

PM AAB has kept his elegant silence when PI Bala made his SD, and amended SD within 24 hours. The contents are relevant to a case where a life was lost and the body was disposed off using military grade weapon. That case involved the security in the control of weapons, the justice to the accused who did not have the conflict of interest or hatred to be motivated to end the life of the Mongolian beauty, and quite obviously the person(s) who would benefit from the murder are still at large. Rape cases are happening frequently in the country but the prime minister appears to be more concerned about a man whose his anus was said to be impaled. Was the justice of the rape victims less important because they did not go to see the Deputy Prime Minister before making their police reports?

Sodomy is a crime for both parties of consenting adults. It is impossible for not interested parties to believe that an able body 23 years old could be forced to comply, to be raped by a 60 year old person. If evidence on sodomy could even be planted, both parties would be declared guilty since rape charge cannot stick. Was the meeting with DPM an insurance that the report would end up only as a police case to character-assassinate Anwar, and to place restrictions on him as a police suspect?

It is said when one takes an oath, his statement is the truth, otherwise he would be punished by God in the after life. So Saiful challenged Anwar to take an oath. An oath by Anwar does not completely clear his name in the public when Saiful gets away with his accusations. Would Saiful face God eventually? Yes, but he has a life time ahead of him to commit other sins.

PM AAB is hopeless. He accepts readily a man’s words when they are against his adversary, and expresses doubt about statements made by well intentioned citizens for national interest when his cronies are involved. How could the Immigration department lose the records of Atlantuja entry into the country? Clearly, the accused persons had not the influence to make the records disappear! Yet the AG ruled out the possibility of other persons involved when the accused persons charged in the murder case could not provide answers to the motive of the murder.