The hydra-headed monster of the Perak crisis has claimed another victim with the 5-minute finding (and not judgment) of Court of Appeal shot-gun session declaring Zambry lawful Perak Mentri Besar.
All who packed into the Court of Appeal in the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya to hear its judgment in the Nizar vs Zambry appeal could not believe that the whole shot-gun session was over in five minutes of delivery, not of a judgment, but findings of the Court of Appeal.
There was no reasoned grounds of judgment but mere findings of the Court of Appeal in an unanimous decision, i.e. 3 – 0.
As Professor Shad Faruqui had presciently written in his weekly newspaper column, the Perak crisis has become “a hydra-headed monster that cannot be eliminated by ding-dong judicial decisions”, and today, the hydra-headed monster has claimed another victim with the five-minute finding (not judgment) of the Court of Appeal shot-gun session declaring Datuk Zambry Abdul Kadir as the lawful Perak Mentri Besar.
The Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak told the Singapore press that Barisan Nasional suffered from a public relations problem in not giving proper explanation of the Perak political and constitutional crisis and allowing the Pakatan Rakyat to distort and poison the minds of Malaysians.
Najib cannot be more wrong. The Barisan Nasional’s problem in Perak is not a “PR” problem but something more basic and fundamental – that the unethical, undemocratic, illegal and unconstitutional power grab he orchestrated in early February went against all canons of ethics and propriety as well as violates accepted democratic and constitutional principles.
Najib cannot win in the court of public opinion even with the 3-0 Court of Appeal judgment. All it means is that the restoration of national and international confidence in the independence, impartiality and integrity of the judiciary is still a long distance away.
For Najib’s own good in the next general election, he should be bold enough to admit that he had committed a colossal error of judgment in orchestrating the illegal power grab in Perak and agree to dissolve the Perak State Assembly to return the mandate to the people in a Perak state general election for Perakians to elect the government of their choice.

#1 by sulaimanc on Friday, 22 May 2009 - 10:57 pm
I feel sad and pity for the 3 judges who failed their “spiritual” test. May Allah have Mercy on their souls.
#2 by wanderer on Friday, 22 May 2009 - 11:11 pm
Once again, the Malaysian taxpayers are made suckers, forced to support the kangaroo courts in the country… for the benefit of UMNO scumbags!
Having our hard earned money paying these corrupted judges is one thing….having to face the embarassing questioning asked by foreigners is hard to accept…. only thick skinned UMNO goons are capable of evading the truth with all their twists and turns…lying is in their second nature.
#3 by distantmalay on Friday, 22 May 2009 - 11:19 pm
the court awarded bush the presidency.
look how unpopular and despised he is today..
#4 by milduser on Friday, 22 May 2009 - 11:23 pm
It was a quickie, nonetheless. [deleted]
Ha, got a strike: the CAPTCHA I reload before I submit this comment – triplets hearing. What a “coincidence”!
#5 by ekompute on Friday, 22 May 2009 - 11:35 pm
Najib may have won the battle, but I am sure he will lost the war, if PR plays it right. Harp on the independence of the judiciary in the next election and this incident will surely be an Achille’s heel for the BN.
#6 by medan on Saturday, 23 May 2009 - 12:35 am
Who knows? Maybe 3 or 4 BN reps might soon be called to heaven giving PKR chance of by-elections to get back the majority.
#7 by sightseeing on Saturday, 23 May 2009 - 12:54 am
The case will move on to the Federal Court however Nizar and Pakatan should not expect the court to overturn the 5 minute finding of the Court of Appeal. But one thing is sure; Paul Augustine will be one of the Federal Court judges to hear the appeal. You will hear lots of “irrelevant, irrelevant, irrelevant……………………………irrelevant.
#8 by kerishamuddinitis on Saturday, 23 May 2009 - 4:37 am
chengho, time to heal the wound? what bloody wound are you refering to? you are far too morally stunted to see that there is a cancerous tumour in malaysia today…and that cancer is Born Nincompoops. and the only way to get rid of a cancer is to cut it off, chop the putrefying flesh off.
come GE 13, the people of malaysia will chop this cancer off. I look forward to that occasion when I can cast my ONE vote as one small nick amongst millions of nicks to cut the bloody cancer off.
[deleted]
#9 by monsterball on Saturday, 23 May 2009 - 4:59 am
5 minutes judgment….ignoring hours of waiting.
Can’t the judges give more lengthy explanation?
Can the judges understand our suspicions?
Sure they do. Quick verdict,….talk less…safer.
kerisshamuddintis….chengho have one screw loose…in the brain.
#10 by monsterball on Saturday, 23 May 2009 - 5:48 am
hhhhhhhmmmm..5 minutes judgment made.
Poor fellas…waited for hours for 5 minutes….case close.
Judges must be praised for such fast and speedy work done.
I hope all the hundreds of thousands of cases pending for judgments .be thrown off… or sentence passed…case close too.
I have been call as a witness with 4 postponements…dragging me to court for 1 year..doing nothing…wasting my time…and if I do not appear…as if..not co-operating with the government…I can be arrested!!
That’s how much respect I get as a witness.
#11 by Observer 2 on Saturday, 23 May 2009 - 6:40 am
If Najib is serious in negotiating with PR, the only win win solution is to force the three frogs to vacate their seats and call for a snap by election.
#12 by lopez on Saturday, 23 May 2009 - 7:42 am
enuchs ,,,,….and in commanding positions…huh…in the millenium age of rockets , lasers, solar power, cellular phones, GM foods and maybe even flying saucers….
as usual their allegiance is measured by assurances that no harm comes to them and they will be reunited when kingdom comes.
now it is really 4 fore…hoooolan
are we moving forward ,,,,ehhhh which way is the forward direction?
#13 by pangwl88 on Saturday, 23 May 2009 - 8:54 am
IF YOU GOONS SITTING IN THOSE PARLIAMENTARY SEAT HIGH UP THERE CANNOT DECIDE WHO SHOULD BE MB OR WHAT SO EVER.
LET THE RAKYAT DECIDE. WE PAY YOUR SALARIES.
THIS IS THE ONLY “DEMOCRATIC” COUNTRY WHERE THE PM IS CHOSEN AND NOT ELECTED.
WHERE IN OUR CONSTITUTION STATES THAT THE PM IS TO BE CHOSEN AND NOT ELECTED?????
SOMEONE PLS ENLIGHTEN ME.
#14 by boh-liao on Saturday, 23 May 2009 - 9:35 am
This is once in a lifetime magic carpet
that a judge or civil servant dies for
to prove their taat setia
and to fly, fly higher and higher
big fat position, pay, allowance
semua kow tim for life, yeah
#15 by ctc537 on Saturday, 23 May 2009 - 11:40 am
Let BN win the court battle. It’s blessing in disguise.
#16 by taiking on Saturday, 23 May 2009 - 1:42 pm
See didnt najib declared the high court decision as merely a problem that can “be solved”.
This is an important case of wide and far reaching public and constitutional impact. Judges throughout the world would be writing thesis on similar cases to explain and if that is not possible, at least to justify the stand they have taken in the final decision.
Wow just 5 minutes huh?
Umno and najib are digging deeper into their own graves. As if 6 ft was not enough. But that is typical of them. They have not learned the lesson of losing in 308. Could anyone have imagine gerakan, mca and mic being wiped out almost completely? The same fate now awaits umno and najib. But of course najib will fall sooner. As of now he is already a goner!
#17 by ktteokt on Saturday, 23 May 2009 - 2:33 pm
Let BN win the battle, they will lose the war later! Victory may be shortlived.
#18 by wesuffer on Saturday, 23 May 2009 - 3:52 pm
BN using shit idea again.
1st time they send one assemblyman defected to pkr afterthat they took 3 assembly man from pakatan.
this time, they allow highcourt declared nizar is rightful MB afterthat use court of appeal to changed final decision.
erm…so now they dont contest in penanti. afterthat what will happen ? beware Pakatan
#19 by ekans on Saturday, 23 May 2009 - 7:00 pm
On 23/5/2009 at 21:37.05, chengho said:
time to heal the wound , Nizar to concede defeat like Algore did after Supreme Cort decision on RECOUNT in 2000 USA presidential election…..
Without doubt, in the 12th General Election, the people of Perak has given their mandate to Pakatan Rakyat to administer the state of Perak without needing a recount of votes.
So, why should Perak MB Nizar concede & admit defeat when the Pangkor ADUN can’t even prove that UMNO’s BN has the people’s mandate to govern in Perak?
No doubt the pride of UMNO’s BN has been wounded by its election defeat in Perak, but instead of conceding and admitting defeat itself, it has to engineer a power-grab, and now it is likely not even time can heal its wound…
#20 by ShiokGuy on Sunday, 24 May 2009 - 1:46 am
Since we move no way in politically at this moment, restricted by police and justice. What next is People + Money = REAL Power
Boycotting Now..
http://shiokguy.blogspot.com/2009/05/boycotting-petroleum-company.html
I need your hlep! Anyone who can give me a break down of ownership of the petroleum companies
Shiok Guy
#21 by TomThumb on Sunday, 24 May 2009 - 6:35 pm
“The hydra-headed monster …”
not again! i thot we exterminated this monster long time ago.
#22 by TomThumb on Sunday, 24 May 2009 - 6:42 pm
\For Najib’s own good in the next general election, he should be bold enough to admit that he had committed a colossal error of judgment in orchestrating the illegal power grab in Perak and agree to dissolve the Perak State Assembly.\
power grab. orchestra. dissolve assembly. anything new??
#23 by House Victim on Monday, 25 May 2009 - 11:46 pm
Should a written judgment be given before an order can be imposed to lift the previous order?
HAD COURT OF APPEAL FOLLOWED THE PROPER PROCEDURES?
IF NOT, SHOULD SUCH ORAL DECISION BE CONSIDERED AS NULL AND VOID?
Since no written judgment provided with points of law, there is no way for Nizar to appeal further or in time. Or, simply, Nilar should seek a review on Points of law.
What kind of Court of Appeal, is it?
No wonder SHAH ALAM HIGH COURT can issued order without Judge decision!!
A part of Malaysian Judiciary Culture?