(Speech at the DAP Teluk Intan Public Ceramah/Consultation with DAP MPs, State Excos and State Assembly members at Teluk Intan Municipal Hall on Friday, 18th April 2008 at 9 pm)
When the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi announced on Thursday night the payment of unspecified “goodwill ex gratia payments” to the six wronged judges in the 1988 judicial crisis, Tun Salleh Abas, Tan Sri Azmi Kamaruddin, Tan Sri Wan Hamzah Mohamed Salleh, Datuk George Seah and the late Tan Sri Eusoffe Abdoolcader and Tan Sri Wan Suleiman Pawanteh, he skirted the “rights and wrongs” and the “legality and morality” of the Mother of Judicial Crisis which plunged the country into two decades of judicial darkness.
The victims of the 1988 Mother of Judicial Crisis and the ensuing two decades of judicial darkness, with three of the four chief justices during the period, Tun Hamid Omar, Tun Eusoffe Chin and Tun Ahmad Fairuz compounding the travesties of justice by the judicial system, were not just the six wronged judges in 1988 but also included innocent, high-minded, idealistic and patriotic Malaysians who want the best for the country. In fact, a whole generation of Malaysians were victims of the 20 years of judicial darkness!
Will the Prime Minister extend goodwill ex gratia payments to the other victims of the two decades of judicial darkness like former Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng and former High Court judge Datuk Syed Ahmad Idid Syed Abdullah Idid (the first whistleblower from the judiciary with his 112 allegations of corruption, abuses of power and misconduct against 12 judges in 1996) as well as to the 106 Internal Security Act (ISA) detainees in the 1987 Operation Lalang?
The goodwill ex gratia payment to the six wronged judges are welcome though belated but they are grossly inadequate in clearing the name and reputation of the six and in providing a full and proper closure to the 1988 Mother of Judicial Crisis and the ensuing two decades of judicial darkness under three Chief Justices.
The statement today by Deputy Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak that the ex gratia payment for the six former judges in the 1988 judicial crisis is not a form of apology to them but merely “our way of addressing some of the personal considerations and some of the personal experiences, hardships that they have gone through” has raised questions about the real worth and meaning of the ex gratia payment.
The payment of goodwill ex gratia payment without revisiting the 1988 Judicial Crisis on its rights and wrongs is already unsatisfactory enough but it becomes quite unacceptable when its whole basis is stemmed from pity or compassionate grounds to address “some personal experiences and hardships” suffered by the six wronged judges!
Najib is in fact directly contradicting Abdullah’s statement that “the contributions, pain and loss” of the six wronged judges cannot be equated with mere currency by implying that these wrongs and injustices could be dealt with solely in monetary terms.
This is why I maintain what is imperative to start a new chapter in Malaysian judiciary to turn our back on the 20 years of judicial darkness is to have a Judicial “Truth and Reconciliation” Commission to find out the lessons to be learnt from the 1988 Mother of Judicial Crisis and the series of one judicial scandal and crisis after another which rocked Malaysia in the past 20 years, not out of vindictiveness or vengeance, but to prevent any such recurrence in the future – focusing also on why the various national stakeholders, the judiciary, Parliament, political parties, mass media, civil society failed the critical test to defend the cardinal Constitutional principles of the doctrine of separation of powers and an independent, impartial and competent judiciary for two decades.

#1 by joehancl on Sunday, 20 April 2008 - 5:15 am
I say, for politicians no money, sorry, for others maybe. There has never been one true blue democratic politician in the world who served although they profess to do so. They have always wanted to govern and govern with power. Paying money as compensation to politicians is amounting to buying a coat where you are asked to pay for the buttons after an agreed price.
#2 by Godfather on Sunday, 20 April 2008 - 7:41 am
The ex-gratia payment was for a person’s suffering – being out of a job, being ridiculed, being incarcerated. It basically demonstrated that there was a wrong committed, but no one will be held responsible for that wrong.
Half the present cabinet was around during 1988, and also during Ops Lallang. The minutes of the cabinet meetings during these infamous incidents probably showed that the cabinet voted unanimously for the actions attributed to Mahathir. Badawi and Najib would never want to open these cans of worms.
#3 by David Chin on Sunday, 20 April 2008 - 7:53 am
Come on, our Deputy PM is a wise guy.He is cool and steady in this time of juncture.By declaring his statement, he is trying to please TDM and draw a line with PM indirectly. Now, it seems, PM overule TDM previous verdict and our wise DPM is sort of acting cool and safe.In order to safeguard his post in UMNO and convince the Rakyat, our PM may porbably come up more and more announcements which will give hitback to TDM’s policy.Since the UMNO party election is soon coming, this is PM last try.In contradiction, DPM has different mind in securing not only his supporters but TDM’s supporters as well.So, his statement may seem to PM- Kita memang tidak mahu meminta maaf( Tak ada muka la), betul kata 2nd man saya, saya tiday minta maaf.To TDM, he may feel-ni, gang saya memang jaga hati saya, apa yang saya buat dulu, memang betul.takkan pula kerajayaan sekrg nak minta maaf.Maksudnya saya salah ke.?????
#4 by Bigjoe on Sunday, 20 April 2008 - 9:39 am
The whole point of an ex-gratia payment in lieu of a full apology is there is no admission of guilt that can be used as a basis for any other case. Sure its a cop-out, but do we really think suddently this PM has changed his stripes completely?
The issue to me is this: IF the goal of this and subsequent administration is to build a world class judiciary, can it avoid paying for the consequences of the injustices and damages done forever?
There is such a thing as a statute of limitation in law but NOT when it comes to non-financial damages. A world class judiciary cannot avoid looking at the consequences and damages even 50 or 100 years after the incidence so long as locus standi can be proven. So even if aggrieved party such as Sdr. Lim may not be around one day, so long as his sons and grandchildren keep asking for damages, sooner or later a world class court have to hear them.
This to me is the biggest danger of the NEP, its clearly unconstitutional now if you are a strict constitutionalist as it violates Article 8. If its not removed, someday when we do have a decent court system, big group(s) of Indians and Chinese will put together the mother of all class-action suits that our government cannot afford.
Sdr. Lim suggestion is correct but its about paying for the consequences of wrong under Dr. M now rather than later where it could be even worst.
#5 by Godfather on Sunday, 20 April 2008 - 9:43 am
World class judiciary ? More like a world class con job.
#6 by ktteokt on Sunday, 20 April 2008 - 10:15 am
It makes me wonder what the purpose of hanging up the four large banners in front of the Courts Complex in Jalan Duta with the words “BUAT KERJA” really mean. Does it mean only now the Court staff will start to work? Have they been sleeping all these while? Or does it mean they are only going to work seriously from now on? Any one of these reasons will only prove the people housed within this complex as being “incompetent” prior to the March 8 political tsunami. This amounts to a self-confession of incompetency from the top-most judges, registrars, judicial commissioners, magistrates, court staff right up to office boys.
#7 by HJ Angus on Sunday, 20 April 2008 - 10:57 am
It is helpful to remind ourselves that our nation is called Malaysia and not UTOPIA where everything works to perfection.
I am sure that the justice demanded by many here will happen if/when the Opposition rules but that is still a work in progress.
Now there is also talk for an independent ACA but I suggest we should remind them of the IPCMC first.
http://malaysiawatch3.blogspot.com/2008/04/independent-aca-would-be-great-but-lets.html
#8 by ktteokt on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 7:44 am
The ex-gratia payment is one slap on the face of AAB who dares to turn around and tell the rakyat, “It’s okay, it’s not painful!”
#9 by seage on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 8:40 am
It is amusing to read some of the comments around here crying “foul play” or “unfair” when the government used the tax payers monies to pay to these 6 judges or for that instance any other so-called mega project (more like mega ‘korek’). The fact is, the Rakyat makes mistakes too and should bear the outcome of their mistakes.
The “Mother-of -all-mistakes” is to give your vote to BN and continuing to do so for the pass few GEs (Hopefully non of you for GE12 and more so GE13). Your votes becomes the government! It is fortunate that plenty changed their stand after much enlightenment through the rich and advance technology available to us today i.e. internet. I am guilty for believing in BN for the pass few GEs but am glad that I no longer trust in them. I am paying for my previous folly and still am now…until PR finally took over as the fed gov (fingers crossed).
No doubt Ex-gratia is the lousiest form of remedy, it is something that you can expect from the current gov.
Ex Gratia payment = RM50m
Dinner for the event = RM100k
Remedial action to the judicial system = Priceless
B.Ann is too blind to see that only things that no price can be attached to is priceless!
While tax payers are still being penalised for their wrong decision, lets hope that such a predicament will end in GE13! To have PR as the fed gov… priceless!
#10 by lakilompat on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 5:10 pm
They are treating the judges like beggars, just give the money without apologizing their past mistakes.
#11 by ktteokt on Monday, 21 April 2008 - 8:39 pm
Perhaps AAB is so generous, he may decide to offer the other side of his face to be slapped!!!!
#12 by lakilompat on Tuesday, 22 April 2008 - 9:04 am
I think AAB is a brave man not even Tun Dr. Mahathir can compare, he is not afraid of his “face” as much as Tun Dr. Mahathir.