In the latest worldwide press freedom index released by Paris-based watchdog Reporters Without Borders (RSF), Malaysia scored two “worsts” — the sharpest plunge of 32 spots from 92 to 124 placing, which is also Malaysia’s worst ranking in the RSF annual worldwide press freedom ranking since it was started in 2002.
In the past six years, Malaysia had been ranked poorly in RSF’s annual worldwide press freedom index –
RSF Worldwide Press Freedom Index (Malaysia)
2002 - 110 (out of 139 countries)
2003 - 104 (166)
2004 - 122 (167)
2005 - 113 (167)
2006 - 92 (168)
2007 - 124 (169)
Last year, when Malaysia jumped 21 spots to 92nd ranking from the previous year’s 113rd position, the New Straits Times crowed:
“This is the best ranking that the country has achieved since the global media watchdog first introduced the Index in 2002, when we came in 110th. In fact, this is the first time the country has scored higher than all the other Asean countries. Last year, we were fourth, and the year before were fifth.”
The New Straits Times today did not report the 2007 RSF worldwide press freedom index released yesterday and Malaysia’s worst ever ranking and plunge.
This year, Malaysia cannot make the same claim of scoring higher than all the other Asean countries, as we are behind Cambodia (85) and Indonesia (100) while in the Asia-Pacific region, we are behind Taiwan (32), Japan (37), South Korea (39), Hong Kong (61), Timor-Leste (94), Bhutan (116) and India (120).
Malaysia is one of five of the 169 countries which had suffered the worst plunge as compared to last year’s RSF worldwide press freedom index, dropping by 32 places.
Malaysia’s drop and placing for this year’s RSF 2007 worldwide press freedom index would have been worse if the shocking development that the Prime Minister does not want to hear the truth from the media and the public had been taken fully into account.
Can Malaysians expect a response from the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi himself to the shocking plunge and placing of Malaysia in the RSF 2007 worldwide press freedom index in view of his earlier pledge to show greater respect for press freedom as compared to the previous administration?
Malaysia’s worst placing in the RSF 2007 worldwide press freedom index joins a lost list of indicators that all is not right with Malaysia on the occasion of our 50th Merdeka anniversary — that while we should be proud of our national achievements, we have greater reason to be concerned about our many national failings.

#1 by cheeyong on Friday, 19 October 2007 - 2:40 pm
Take out BN doesnt mean take them out in totality. Take them out in some areas lah. Hey RealWorld, I remember reading somewhere, you said Pak Lah govt can win 91% again? Or I remembered wrongly? Now turun to 70%+?
#2 by ngahc on Friday, 19 October 2007 - 2:45 pm
We have too many issues that cannot debate publicly. Race issue is sensitive, religion is sensitive, inter-faith discussion is sensitive, NEP is sensitive, Islamic state debate is sensitive, Astor could not live broadcast on UMNO speech etc. How to have press freedom with so many sensitive issues?
#3 by RealWorld on Friday, 19 October 2007 - 2:50 pm
cheeyong, I said 91% mandate (as a reminder) not can win again with 91% mandate la. Apa la lu. Furthermore, have a few more of you lot in Parliament also good what! Ipoh Timur must be there la, know what I mean.
#4 by cheeyong on Friday, 19 October 2007 - 3:17 pm
Ipoh Timur now haunted lah…..thanks to EC…….haunted by 3k plus of postal voters….if you know what I mean.
#5 by RealWorld on Friday, 19 October 2007 - 9:26 pm
Like I said earlier, it is not gonna be easy.
The blue wave is coming.
How come the petition to the King is sort of like losing momentum?
#6 by alaneth on Friday, 19 October 2007 - 10:54 pm
The govt has controlled the newspapers!
Now it is going to control cyberspace.
They can control eveything. We cannot even voice out our opinion which is ’sensitive’. What nonsense is this. With over ‘protectionism’ even in the press, are they afraid we will leak out all their inefficiencies?
Berani kerana Benar, TAKUT kerana SALAH!!! – That’s why the govt is controlling the press sooo strictly now!
A good govt with good governance will not be afraid for press freedom.
What are they TAKUT of?
#7 by Jeffrey on Saturday, 20 October 2007 - 9:43 am
According to report The Star 20th page 11, our Information Minister said that Malaysians and other Asians should ignore the Press Freedom ratings by Reporters Without Borders because they are based on Western Values of press freedom mainly driven by market and money.
Zam lauded Lee Kuan Yew for fighting western values of press freedom and winning against London’s Financial Times recently. Zam said: “For me, the only language understood by the Western Media is when the pockets are hitâ€Â. By taking legal action and winning the case, he said Lee had proven to the world that the Western media valued money more than press freedom. Zam said Malaysians and Asians should not be worried about the drop of rankings of press freedom in Malaysia as it did not reflect the truth of press freedom in the country. (By his inverse measurement of things, he must think Singapore’s placing in 141 spot of Freedom Rating is better than Malaysia’s 124 spot to give cause for us to strive beat and overtake our Southern Neighbour’s).
It is a welcome relief to hear Zam waxing lyrical about Lee Kuan Yew when it serves his agenda to discredit Press Freedom ratings by Reporters Without Borders. He has not always been an admirer of LKY unless he serves to make Zam’s points.
On other occasions in a three-day working visit of Xinhua News Agency on 29th September 2006 he told newsmen that Lee Kuan Yew “had ulterior motives in accusing Malaysia of marginalising the Chinese community when he himself had killed the Chinese culture in his own country†– that “he wanted to scare the Chinese, to make them feel that the wealth that they have amassed can never be safe in the region”. Zam added, “Today, Malaysia has more Chinese schools than Singapore and the newspaper with the biggest circulation in the country is a Chinese language newspaper. Lee Kuan Yew, on the other hand, has systematically killed Chinese culture by disallowing many Chinese practices. He also closed down Nanyang University and Ngee Ann College”. Zam said Lee must be congratulated for changing the Chinese identity in the island state such that it had become unrecognisable. He called on Chinese newspapers in Malaysia not to be taken in by Lee’s statement to the extent of playing up Chinese chauvinism and endangering Malaysia’s racial harmony.
See link – http://powerpresent.blogspot.com/2006_09_24_archive.html
But Zam conceded to LKY being smarter than Tun Dr Mahathir when the latter attacked PM’s leadership. He said that former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad would have fared better if he had remained in the Cabinet as a mentor minister like Singapore’s former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew; that it was too late now as “he has missed the boat.†Zam said Dr Mahathir should have emulated Lee, who chose to remain within the government’s administration after serving as Singapore’s first prime minister for 31 years. “Lee Kuan Yew is smarter than Tun (Dr Mahathir) for he chose to remain as a mentor minister to the government (in 2004) after stepping down as prime minister. See link: http://www.malaysia-today.net/Blog-n/2006/09/zam-kuan-yew-smarter-than-mahathir.htm
#8 by AhPek on Sunday, 21 October 2007 - 1:37 am
Wow,Jeffrey, what a masterly display by this mamak!1 He sure knows how to use his fork tongue to advance his agenda whenever he sees fit.
But rest assured Harry Lee would not be smug about your lauding him for he can smell you from afar.As for Mahathir he has nothing to do except squeeze his b —s.
#9 by AhPek on Tuesday, 23 October 2007 - 8:54 pm
Should read “But be rest assured Harry Lee would not be so smug about Mamak’s lauding him for he can smell him from afar.”.
#10 by ktteokt on Wednesday, 24 October 2007 - 7:55 am
They are high-handed and if any newspaper in Malaysia does not conform to their requirements, they even resort to buying over the whole establishment. This was what happened to China Press when MCA bought it over just to throw out its chief editor. And despite appeals by the Chinese community, it proceeded with the purchase and suffered massive losses before it finally gave up.