— Tariq Ramadan
The Malaysian Insider
Jul 26, 2012
JULY 26 — Malaysia is a country unlike any other: full of promise and fragility. Its history, cultural and religious diversity make it a rich, compelling and surprising land. Chinese, Indian, Malay and, in a broader sense, Indonesian cultures live side by side, while Buddhism, Christianity and Islam all partake of its multi-layered heritage.
Moreover, Malaysia possesses a first-rate economic and geostrategic potential. In the coming years, it can be expected to assume increasingly greater regional and international importance alongside its neighbour, Indonesia — two emerging countries that have often been neglected to the advantage of China and India, which, we are told, represent the only two Asiatic powers.
Today, as the centre of gravity of the new world economic order shifts eastward, the two countries will play significant and critical roles. Malaysia will be a force to reckon with.
But substantial difficulties and obstacles remain to be overcome. Nothing is, or will be, easy. With every passing day, Malaysia reveals the many facets of the challenges facing it and of its doubts. Sixty per cent of the population is Muslim; Islam has emerged as a permanent reference in political debate. Between the ruling party (Umno), which has held power for more than 50 years, and the coalition of opposition parties, conflicting slogans, symbols and controversies arising from the Islamic reference are a fact of life.
There is talk of an Islamic state, of the Sharia, of an Islamic criminal code, of reform, of change. The Arab uprisings and the Islamist victories have already blazed the trail. The Malaysians look on intently, analyse and hope for a better future with less corruption, true freedom, democratic transparency and free media. The road ahead is long and fraught with obstacles.
The country’s Hindu, Buddhist, Christian or atheist citizens often feel that they are captives in a debate that marginalises or exploits them. Like the mirror image of many Muslim citizens in the West, they may be perfectly respectful of the constitution, of the laws and prerogatives of the civil state, but it is as if they are slightly excluded from the shared narrative upon which the Malaysia nation is founded. It has proved difficult for them to achieve the fully equal status that would establish their sense of belonging to a pluralist society.
It is striking to note the same dynamic of social, cultural and religious fragmentation that we find in the pluralist societies of the West (but here, for non-Muslim religious minorities). Moreover, there exists a similar immigration problem, primarily of Indonesian origin, that feeds political tensions (including a frequently hostile policy towards the very immigrants the country needs).
A populist rhetoric has surfaced and is attempting to exploit these tensions (religion, culture, immigration, etc): the politics of emotion and of identity threatens Malaysia’s social cohesion. The fault-lines are visible, especially on the eve of anticipated elections.
Development has not been without costs. For more than a generation, the country has attempted to reconcile American-style modernism with respect for tradition. The contrast between the capital, Kuala Lumpur, and other cities is striking. Here, looming skyscrapers surround the celebrated twin towers that challenge America’s tallest. Political strategy has often consisted of “Islamising” modernism, capitalism, even consumerism — a strange mixture indeed.
Then, just around a corner, on a visit to the state of Perlis, a sudden glimpse of a creative spirit that seeks to unite tradition, aesthetics and ethics at the heart of the modern world. There, a superb structure built on supporting piers, known as the “floating mosque,” reflects the extraordinary maritime landscape. Fifty per cent of its electricity consumption is generated by wind turbines and, when completed, solar panels will account for its remaining energy needs: a “green” mosque beneath whose dome Islamic scriptural references are inscribed in the five national languages, to signify that Islam is not the property of one language and one culture.
This mosque is ultimately far more “modern” than all the blind mimicry of American models. Our task, after all, is to consider the ethical principles and the technical capacity available to us in our day, while not for an instant forgetting the ethical principles that underlie diversity and the environment itself. Our task is to provide modernity with a soul, to breathe life into spiritual and humanist creativity. What a pleasure to pray in such a mosque: one senses the encounter of intelligence and creative imagination.
From Perlis, far from the skyscrapers of Kuala Lumpur, flows the intuition that the “floating mosque” may well be the symbol of Muslims’ greatest contribution to an era in search of meaning: to express its specificity in universal terms, in full respect of pluralism and to respond in full awareness and with all necessary expertise, to the challenges of our time. — Gulf News
* Tariq Ramadan is professor of Contemporary Islamic Studies in the Faculty of Oriental Studies at Oxford University and a visiting professor at the Faculty of Islamic Studies in Qatar. He is the author of “Islam and the Arab Awakening”.
#1 by yhsiew on Thursday, 26 July 2012 - 6:42 pm
It is a pity that Malaysian pluralism has been exploited by errant politicians through playing the race card and religion card to serve their selfish ends.
#2 by monsterball on Thursday, 26 July 2012 - 8:04 pm
Malaysia was one of the very few countries in the world we can call it paradise and a gift from God.
Look at it now, so ordinary and poorer that those who were poorer than us before.
For the past 35 years….Mahathir has brought Malaysia backwards…not forwards.
Our country is well developed under massive corruptions…..until it now become illogically over developed for benefits to the people at all.
Good examples are the Twin Towers and the 2 Scorpene submarines….for what? for show and racked off billions Malaysians money.
And so many more projects that keep rolling and turning and hope Malaysians cannot see how they steal and rob.
#3 by bennylohstocks on Thursday, 26 July 2012 - 10:42 pm
THE REAL MERDEKA DEAL
#4 by dagen wanna "ABU" on Friday, 27 July 2012 - 10:23 am
///Its history, cultural and religious diversity make it a rich, compelling and surprising land. Chinese, Indian, Malay and, in a broader sense, Indonesian cultures live side by side, while Buddhism, Christianity and Islam all partake of its multi-layered heritage.///
From here emerged the one and only truly supreme race and religion of the universe – the great umnoputra and islam jenis-umno.
All hail umno.
ALL HAIL UMNO!!!
#5 by PoliticoKat on Saturday, 28 July 2012 - 11:22 pm
Malaysia’s potential strengths are its weakness.
If we had been a dirt poor nation with only one resource like Singapore, we would be like…well… Singapore.
Ironic is it not? That dot, our sister nation, our mirror has shown what Malaysia could have been just by the strength of one Seaport.
Malaysia has 4 such ports. We have petroleum, tin, rubber (once), palm oil, timber, gold, rare earth metal, thorium (one the biggest known deposits). We have riches galore and all of it wasted. Thanks UM_NO. Your ketuanan of 50yrs and Malaysian are still poor.
#6 by good coolie on Sunday, 29 July 2012 - 9:36 pm
PAS cannot (it seems) understand why Non-muslims object to Hudud. One reason is that Hudud is part of Islamic Law, whereas the Malaysian nation is founded on secular law (the Constitution). Under Islamic Law, non-muslims are, by law, subordinate citizens. No non-muslim would vote for Islamic law for that reason. And as for the promise that hudud would be implemented on Muslims only, PAS should take notice that that would militate against Islamic Law. Can PAS show instances of hudud (e.g. for robbery) being applied only to Muslims?
Let PAS implement noble Islamic principles when PAS is part of a new government. Maybe they can later convince non-muslims, and the vast majority of muslims themselves, to accept Hudud.