1. How can HE be a lawyer when he is confused even with the Terms he used in the questioning?
2. He does not even realized that he is questioning an Expert based on scientific evidence and analysis but trying to put words into the mouths of the expert!
3. He wants to conclude a Forensic founding to be based on Majority rather than evidence or scientifc analysis.
4. The proceeding shows that he is poor in science or logic but trying to flip-flop with quote of context!!—>Neither professional in legal proceeding, nor, had prepared well in understanding the science and terminology around the case.
a) to be recognised so as to be able to practice is different from being qualified to testify, The lawyer is recognised in Malaysia but Apparently not qualified even for the proceeding!!
b) Should reconstruction of the case (putting together what could possibly had happened) be the job of the Police than the Forensic Expert?
c) If Unconsciouness before falling can be concluded, what else is needed to conclude Homocide?
d) Consciousness is not a factor on the speed or duration of a free falling body. It is the weight!!

A typical example of how Malaysian lawyers could twist around facts, waste the time of the court as well as other people involved.

Is English proficiency a must for Malaysian lawyer?

1. Any Coroner Act or similar that stipulates the Qualification of a Coroner such that Azmil Muntapha Abas, being a Deputy Registrar of the Court, can be appointed as the Coroner in this case?
In UK, it will be a barrister or solicitor or a medical doctor with at least 5 years of post-qualifying experience, a pathologist or at least with background that understand forensic.

2. The case was once being mis-classified as “Sudden Death” under 329 e) of CPC and not 329 d) as “that the body of a dead person has been found, and it is not known how he came by death”.
Had this been sorted out?
The latter requires the CAUSE OF DEATH “include not only the apparent cause of death as ascertainable by inspection or post-mortem examination of the body of the deceased, but also all matters necessary to enable an opinion to be formed as to the manner in which the deceased came by his death and as whether his death resulted in any way from, or was accelerated by any unlawful act or omission on the part of any other person” have to be investigated.
The Pathology Report as well as the Police investigation Report around the “Cause of Death” are essential to the Inquest!!

3. Did the Coroner or the Laweyrs laid out the fundamental Issues to be sorted out in this Inquest so that it will be pin-pointed instead of allowing this lawyer to take the court in a merry-go-round?

What had seen so far does not convince anyone that the inquest will be held with the best possible but full of BIAS!!