“The Attorney-General Tan Sri Gani Patail was quoted as saying that if the document was genuine, action could be taken against the editor of the website under the Official Secrets Act.”

The word is ‘should’ and not ‘could’.

Anybody caught breaking the law should face its consequences. A paranoid schizophrenic and a pedophile exposing himself to school children would have to be arrested before he can do more damage. What is the difference between him and someone who divulges information which comes under the purview of an Act like the OSA? Both break the law.

Anybody??

Selective prosecution may end up freeing the pedophile.

It is called selective prosecution. Too much to expect a nincompoop to understand.

Today it could be over something the BN government does not want you to know. The next time it could be over a matter which is detrimental to the security of the country which everybody can agree and identify with and which is non-partisan. Don’t over tax that brain of yours.

The United States government classifies information and to disclose information labeled ‘classified’ would expose whoever discloses it to criminal sanctions.

“It would appear” is a polite way of saying you know. We understate so as not to sound haughty. Something you will not understand, Kamput. So don’t try.

If information is considered privileged, legality cannot attach to it despite its disclosure.

You may have confessed to your wife the fact that you murdered somebody, but such information between husband and wife is privileged at common law. Your wife may have told the police but they cannot use it in court. It will require Parliament to introduce the necessary statute to allow its admission into evidence. In the U.K. exceptions have been introduced via statute for sexual offences against inter alia children.

“This is why I said yesterday that the best Hari Raya present Najib can give the country is to declassify all government official documents, including Cabinet minutes and papers relating to PKFZ scandal to demonstrate his commitment to accountability, integrity and good governance.” Kit

Any reason why the thief should disclose the location of his loot?

With paranoid schizophrenia, you’re less likely to be affected by mood problems or problems with thinking, concentration and attention. Instead, you’re most affected by what are known as positive symptoms.

Positive symptoms

Positive symptoms are symptoms that indicate the presence of unusual thoughts and perceptions that often involve a loss of contact with reality. Delusions and hallucinations are considered positive symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia.

Delusions.

In paranoid schizophrenia, delusions are often focused on the perception that you’re being singled out for harm. Your brain misinterprets experiences and you hold on to these false beliefs despite evidence to the contrary. For instance, you may believe that the government is monitoring every move you make or that a co-worker is poisoning your lunch. You may also have delusions of grandeur — the belief that you can fly, that you’re famous or that you have a relationship with a famous person, for example. Delusions can result in aggression or violence if you believe you must act in self-defense against those who want to harm you.

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/paranoid-schizophrenia/DS00862/DSECTION=symptoms

*My advice and that of Jeffrey’s and the advice of many others here is for you to get urgent medical treatment for your condition.

Do feel free to join the club. I’m sure there are more than one.

Thanks a lot. I’m flattered.

By the way the thread here is about impending government action against breaches of the Official Secrets Act. Let’s hear what you have to say.

1. #32 by limkamput on September 14th, 2009 07:32

“ … luckily there are only few stupid asses like you around. Otherwise the world may be still in stone age.”

#41 by limkamput on September 14th, 2009 20:36

A real psychopath – you just go ahead believing what you want to believe, for that is what a psychopath does. There are smart psychopath and stupid psychopath, you belong to the former.
Why why why, did you cause you pain in your posterior? Turn around, you may see that it was wannabe or monsterball.

#31 by limkamput on September 14th, 2009 07:24

Yes, look carefully btw your legs, you may notice that you have nothing, not to mention whether you have foreskin or otherwise. Please don’t pour your frustration on me if you are in between. It is not my fault that you are that way.

#5 by limkamput on September 15th, 2009 17:58

I pick my targets. I notice both of you are now very careful with your comments. That is good, because you fellows are fearful of me. I can easily point out where you fellows have gone wrong because of my vast experience and knowledge. For example, Jeffrey’s comment on PKFZ was half baked. He does not know the real issue and was just commenting based on text book knowledge. As for Jaswant ball, he only knows Pariot Act, ISA, Islam and the state are not separable. NO way lah you fellows want to talk real substance with me. I challenge both of you to comment on substantive matters in this blog and you shall see my rebuttal.

#28 by limkamput on September 13th, 2009 16:27

Jeffrey, please don’t think too highly of yourself. I may be self centred, frank and direct (for this is what cyberspace is all about), but I have never indulged in pretension and showiness. But i think everybody knows what are you trying to prove by using words and writing stuff perhaps only you understand.

#35 by limkamput on September 13th, 2009 20:40

did u go to church this morning? did you press your pants before going? did you confess your sins?

#41 by limkamput on September 13th, 2009 23:30

Wannabe, write short simple English like mine, that is the hallmark of good English. No pretension and showiness please.

A regular contributor to this blog has put it succinctly:

“He uses arguments like a torch light to selectively aim at discrediting postings of those whom he wants to selectively discredit (for only the sake of discrediting only) to satisfy the cravings of a demented/vengeful mind instead of to illuminate the issues raised for answers.

Discussion of issues is but a mere cloak to camouflage this subterranean motive to revile as a pretext that he has improved from “name calling” to another platform of so called civilised discussion. Although tactics are superficially changed, his fundamental objective is the same, and the result of it – to disrupt the forum here – remains.

Do not expect him to change anymore than leopards to change their spots.”