This entry was posted on Thursday, 16 October 2008, 11:13 am and is filed under Parliament. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Fusion theme by digitalnature | powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS) ^
#1 by dawsheng on Thursday, 16 October 2008 - 11:58 am
OMG, so many crisis!
#2 by kftang on Thursday, 16 October 2008 - 12:49 pm
If it is true that the AG was involved in fabricating evidence in a case involving DSAI 10 years ago, then the only honourable and legitimate thing to do is to tender his RESIGNATION to the government. There’s no question to it if we are to hold to justice and neutrality!
#3 by Samuel Goh Kim Eng on Thursday, 16 October 2008 - 1:03 pm
We all desire to live where there’s proper law and order
Why then the need to crawl before the claw for disorder
In notorious cases with evidences tampered out of order
When we should advocate and advance presence of perfect order
(C) Samuel Goh Kim Eng – 161008
http://MotivationInMotion.blogspot.com
Thurs. 16th Oct. 2008.
#4 by HJ Angus on Thursday, 16 October 2008 - 1:21 pm
If such a case can be proved, resigning is not good enough. He should be properly tried and sentenced.
No one knows what other cases were fixed in like manner.
#5 by monsterball on Thursday, 16 October 2008 - 1:46 pm
Our so call AG is not an AG at all.
[deleted]
Remember Anwar’s black eye?
That’s UMNO style of choosing key public servants.
Lingam’s case..is classic example…the crisis of confidence…picar lobang.
#6 by vincent on Thursday, 16 October 2008 - 2:33 pm
Duduk lah, Batu Pahat.
Duduk !!!!!…………….