Who is more dangerous and subversive to the Malaysian nation-building process – ISIS member Mohd Rafi Udin warning Bukit Aman plice personnel they will have “no peace” or a state mufti spouting “kafir harbi” edict implying that non-Muslims Malaysians can be killed regardless of rule of law?


Who is more dangerous and subversive to the Malaysian nation-building process – ISIS member Mohd Rafi Udin warning Bukit Aman plice personnel they will have “no peace” or a state mufti spouting “kafir harbi” edict implying that non-Muslims Malaysians can be killed regardless of rule of law?

Who is more dangerous and subversive to the Malaysian nation-building process – ISIS member Mohd Rafi Udin from Negri Sembilan warning that there would be “no peace” for police personnel in the Bukit Aman headquarters, and urging IS supporters in Malaysia to employ whatever means necessary to kill non-believers – “Kill them wherever you meet them…if you have a car, hit them…Use your weapon and knives to stab them in the chest” – or a state mufti spouting “kafir harbi” edict implying that DAP and non-Muslims can be killed regardless of the rule of law?
I think it is the latter who pose a greater threat to the integrity and success of the Malaysian nation-building process than the former, for there is a Special Branch Counter-Terrorism Division whose special responsibility is to be vigilant and prepared for such ISIS threats, but Malaysia seemed to be completely defenceless to ISIS-minded religious officials preaching doctrines no different from ISIS.

Pahang mufti Abdul Rahman Osman yesterday insisted that he would neither retract his statement nor apologise to DAP over his earlier remarks labelling DAP as ‘kafir harbi’.

I am still waiting for Abdul Rahman’s response to my speech at the Gelang Patah kopitiam ceramah at Taman Impian Emas yesterday, where I asked him to repent or be honest and courageous enough to state specifically whether I am “kafir harbi” who should be killed or slain.

I also asked Abdul Rahman to state when I became “kafir harbi”, whether it was:

— when I stood up in Parliament in 1978 to defend PAS to oppose the UMNO-controlled Barisan Nasional government’s declaration of state of emergency in Kelantan to topple to PAS state government; or

— when in 1985 I deplored the government handling of the tragic Memali incident which killed 18 people and called for a Royal Commission of Inquiry; or

— when in 1998 my son, Lim Guan Eng went to jail for defending the honour and dignity of an underaged Malay girl, losing his position as MP for Kota Melaka, his parliamentary pension as well disenfranchised and deprived of right to vote or to stand for elective office for five years from release from Kajang Prison in August 1999; or

— when in 2000 I denounced the Federal Government for hijacking the five per cent oil royalty of Terengganu because PAS had won the Terengganu State Government in the 1999 general election and Hadi Awang had become the state’s Mentri Besar?

The state mufti’s incendiary and seditious “kafir harbi” statement is the most serious and dangerous attack on the basis of the Malaysian Constitution and the Malaysian nation-building process, which is why the Cabinet tomorrow must address this issue or all the Ministers, including the new ones, would have abdicated their national duties and responsibilities.

Print Friendly

  1. #1 by SuperString on Tuesday, 28 June 2016 - 11:11 am

    Step aside ISIS, learn from state mufti how to use “kafir harbi” to generate “no peace” for police personnel in the Bukit Aman by creating hatred in the population.

  2. #2 by boh-liao on Tuesday, 28 June 2016 - 11:19 am

    What about DAP’s former icon/prized catch, d blardi racist behaving like a racial anti-national terrorist?
    https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/346716

  3. #3 by Justice Ipsofacto on Tuesday, 28 June 2016 - 1:05 pm

    When you have a low life scum like this mufti provoking genocide and a government who does not bat an eyelid, I say that we have a failed state.

  4. #4 by good coolie on Sunday, 3 July 2016 - 7:42 pm

    That is the trouble with indiscriminately using technical terms that are relevant only to a different Time and Age. I would advise the mufti not to attempt to re-mould Malaysian society so as to make it look like the violent and intolerant societies (Muslim and Non-Muslim) that existed a thousand years ago, all just to revivify terms like “kafir”/pagan/ “kafir-harbi”/dhimmi (the last one is equally pernicious). These terms have no application to Malaysia, and I hope they will never ever be used in Malaysia outside of a strictly technical and religious context.

    Our mufti may be religiously educated, but has no sense of the letter and spirit of the Federal Constitution. I hope, also, that this is the last time we hear such nonsense being uttered by supposedly educated people. Personally, I am for letting things be, so long as he is advised strongly and in no uncertain terms regarding his errant ways.

You must be logged in to post a comment.