Four issues of the 11th Sarawak state general election

I want to discuss four issues of the 11th Sarawak state general election.

The first issue is Sarawak Chief Minister after the May 7 Polling Day.

This question is as good as decided on Nomination Day on April 25, because there is no doubt whatsoever that the Sarawak Chief Minister of Sarawak after the May 7 Polling Day will be Adenan Satem and nobody else.

Only the mentally weak or deficient would think that Adenan would not the Sarawak Chief Minister for the next five years.

In Siburan yesterday, the Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak said Adenan should be given five more years as Sarawak Chief Minister and it is not fair if Adenan is only given two years.

I fully agree with Najib and there is no doubt whatsoever that Adenan would be given five more years as Chief Minister of Sarawak.

The second issue is whether there will be a strong and effective Opposition in the Sarawak State Assembly to ensure that Adenan will keep to his promises to serve the people of Sarawak, ensure that Sarawak recover the autonomy rights and powers from Putraja, and most important of all, ensure that Adenan would not abuse his powers.

DAP fully supports Sarawak state autonomy but we cannot agree with any abuse of power, and there can e no doubt that barring DAP and PKR leaders from coming to Sarawak during the state general election to carry out “legitimate political activities”, which is guaranteed in the Malaysian Constitution and the Immigration Act, is an abuse of power.

This should be a salutary reminder of the need to have a strong and effective opposition in the Sarawak State Assembly to provide the necessary checks-and-balance against abuses of power, bearing in mind the famous axiom of Lord Acton that “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power tends to corrupt absolutely”.

The ideal situation is to deny Adenan two-thirds majority in the State Assembly, which will require a total of 28 out of a total of 82 seats. This will not easy to realise – but it may be achievable if the DAP wins 20 to 22 State Assembly seats and PKR wins from six to eight State Assembly seats.

The third issue is the effect of the Sarawak state general elections on Najib’s tenure as Prime Minister of Malaysia.

In the past 52 years, no Prime Minister of Malaysia is campaigning as intensively as Najib in the 11th Sarawak state general election. He is not only the first Prime Minister to be present on Nomination Day for Sarawak state general election, but is campaigning as hard Adenan in the Sarawak general election.


Thd answer is simple. The Sarawak general election result will be used as a barometer of the popularity of Najib as Prime Minister, whether it could be used to counter the growing national and international campain that he should step down as Prime Minster because of his twin RM50 billion 1MDB and RM42 billion “donation” mega scandals.

The voters of Sarawak should be fully aware of this reality, and decide whether they want their vote on May 7 to be used by Najib as a vote for endorsement and confidence of his premiership of Malaysia.

The fourth issue is whether the 2016 eleventh Sarawak state general election could pave the way for a new Sarawak state government in the 12th Sarawak state general election.

DAP has fielded 31 State Assembly candidates – 14 Chinese, 16 Dayak (four Bidayuh, three Orang Ulu and nine Iban) and one Malay.

If the DAP can defend the 12 state assembly seats won in the last general election and make a breakthrough among the 19 new constituencies, showing that Kuching, Sibu, Maradong, Sarikei, Bintulu and Miri have the support of other areas like Tasik Biru, Mambong, Serian, Simanggang, Pakan, Murum and Mulu for politicl change and meanuingful development, then the Sarawak DAP will be able to plan to work with other like-minded Sarawakians to aim to capture the Sarawak state government in the 12th Sarawak state general election in 2021.

(Media Conference Statement in Sarikei on Friday, April 29, 2016 at 3 pm)

Print Friendly

  1. #1 by Justice Ipsofacto on Friday, 29 April 2016 - 5:38 pm

    Denying adenan 2/3 majority is a realistic goal. No way pakatan could deny adenan of victory.

  2. #2 by drngsc on Friday, 29 April 2016 - 5:46 pm

    May I humbly suggest a 5th issue that should be highlighted in this 11th Sarawak state election.Corruption and crime does not pay. It is internationally known that “Peh Moh” the predecessor of Adenan is rich beyond his means. Some of the evidence came out in the trial of his son’s divorce, and also expose by Sarawak Report. “Peh Moh’s” crimes is almost like Najis 1 MDB crime. Criminals must face justice. “Peh Moh” has stolen from the people of Sarawak. He steps down to have Adenan look like an angel. But Adenan has included 6 tycoons in his team Adenan. What do tycoons do should they get elected. What do monkeys do when they are allowed to guard the bananas? So team Adenan is set, if elected to continue where “Peh Moh” has left off. BN is just changing shirts from “Peh Moh” to Adenan. We know what is going to happen. Otherwise he would not have brought in 6 tycoons. I feel that corruption and the team of Adenan should be highlighted.

  3. #3 by Bigjoe on Saturday, 30 April 2016 - 5:49 am

    One big issue is why does BN Peninsula leaders all sound like sleazebags and slimeballs especially Najib? Seriously, their mannerism and style is so obviously untrustworthy – bribery and threats, feels sneaky with hidden agendas. They sound like used car salesmen and medicine peddlers on Chow kit.

    Najib especially, his style are arguments full of holes, long winded poor arguments that feels fake more like a bad salesman selling useless household goods to illiterate housewives..

  4. #4 by Bigjoe on Saturday, 30 April 2016 - 2:09 pm

    Actually Zainuddin Maidin and Hadi’s recent actions raise a big issue for Sarawak. What happens if Adenan is given a big mandate and then Najib made a pact with PAS to win the GE – a pact that is certain to end Sarawak’s way of life?

You must be logged in to post a comment.