Bersih 3.0: UMNO needs a game change


— Dahlia Martin
The Malaysian Insider
May 01, 2012

MAY 1 — Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak’s popularity took a hit following a harsh crackdown on demonstrators at July’s 2011 Bersih rally. Looking to salvage his image as a reformer, Najib immediately set up a Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) to look into the issue of electoral reform.

But if he was hoping this move alone would appease critics and aid his political brand, he appears to have been gravely mistaken: the bar has since been raised, and to meet it, Najib must up the reformist ante and learn to sell policies more effectively to an increasingly sceptical electorate.

Saturday saw the Malaysian Bersih movement hold its third and biggest rally yet for electoral reform: some estimates have the number of attendees at 300,000 for the Kuala Lumpur event. Bersih “solidarity rallies” also took place in eighty-five other locations across the world, adding to the momentum already mustered from the two previous rallies.

But what had for several hours been a peaceful protest quickly took a violent turn when a small group of protesters appeared to breach the barbed wire and barricades set up by police to keep the protestors out of Kuala Lumpur’s iconic Independence Square (Dataran Merdeka).

Tear gas and water cannons were fired at demonstrators. South Australian Senator Nick Xenophon, who was in the country as an international observer, was one of those tear gassed. Several journalists reported having their equipment destroyed as they tried to film some of the chaos and violence, with one Al-Jazeera correspondent having to file a report using Skype.

But images of groups of policemen attacking demonstrators have found their way onto social networking sites, where they have been readily shared amongst Malaysian users. Some 512 people were arrested by the close of the day.

Gloves came off quickly in the ensuing blame game, with rally organisers insisting the violence only started after the tear gas was used. Politicians from the Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition, which has ruled Malaysia for over five decades, lined up to point the finger at Bersih and demonstrators.

The Minister for Home Affairs, Hishammuddin Hussein, retweeted one tweet likening some of the participants to “thugs”, and said the police had behaved professionally. Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin likened the situation to a “riot”, and Barisan Nasional (BN) and United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) youth leader Khairy Jamaluddin blamed the violence on the presence of opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim.

But many Malaysians are wearing none of it, especially with audio visual evidence in cyberspace to the contrary, and since the international observers invited by Anwar Ibrahim to observe the rally have also rejected the charges. Cynicism towards the “old guard” is increasing, especially amongst young urban voters who have grown impatient at the mainstream media bias and widespread marginalisation they have known all their lives.

BN needs a game change. Or some time out. — The New Mandala

  1. #1 by yhsiew on Tuesday, 1 May 2012 - 1:35 pm

    The Minister for Home Affairs, Hishammuddin Hussein, should stop lying that the police had behaved professionally. If the police had behaved professionally, how come they destroyed equipment used by the journalists?

  2. #2 by monsterball on Tuesday, 1 May 2012 - 1:55 pm

    It has always been the same pattern.
    First use tear gas..water cannons…then select a team to look into complaints….that will produce no good news or results…for People to appreciate.
    It’s provocations….producing no good results for the Govt…..then play the good guy role to show concern.
    We do have a low class hypocrite PM.

  3. #3 by boh-liao on Tuesday, 1 May 2012 - 2:25 pm

    Expose all d lies 2 rural folks, use all means 2 educate rural folks 2 REJECT UmnoB/BN!

  4. #4 by Albert Choong on Tuesday, 1 May 2012 - 3:55 pm

    Hi Hisham S, you talked like a simpleton! Even before all the versions of Bersih happened, UMNO b government and all their pr machines had condemned Bersih organizers, especially Ms Ambiga, calling her a traitor to the nation. Just because Pakatan Rakyat subscribed to the missions of Bersih, it has lost its neutrality! UMNO b and all their political parties were invited to join Bersih for fair and clean elections, but declined for obvious reason.
    Minister Hisab said it is standard procedure to confiscate and smash the cameras and memory cards of all media people at such events as Bersih 3.0, but IGP said that there is no such SOP or SOB in the Police Work in Progress! Don’t be confused!

    ..please stop spinning and twisting the incidents, especially you were not there in the thick of the actions! I was there.
    And they say the rest is history …… It will be the end of BNed b soon!

  5. #5 by balance88 on Tuesday, 1 May 2012 - 6:10 pm

    Its very clear that these were people planted by the govt to create trouble. I was not there, but from what I saw on the tube, people were already dispersing and heading home after instructions to disperse was given. Thereafter, the police were fire water canons indiscrimnately, as if just waiting for that 1 moment in time.

  6. #6 by monsterball on Tuesday, 1 May 2012 - 10:42 pm

    It is a fact!!
    Every Bersih event…spells no good news for Najib.
    So simple…Bersih is CLEAN…Najib is DIRTY.
    Can’t wait for BERSIH 4 to come.

  7. #7 by dagen wanna "ABU" on Tuesday, 1 May 2012 - 11:30 pm

    Jib jib lagi best.
    Ros ros lagi cantik!

  8. #8 by Winston on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 - 12:35 pm

    But if he was hoping this move alone would appease critics and aid his political brand, he appears to have been gravely mistaken: the bar has since been raised, and to meet it, Najib must up the reformist ante and learn to sell policies more effectively to an increasingly sceptical electorate. – end of quote

    Nobody wants him to up the reformist ante and learn to sell policies any more.
    Nobody wants to buy snake oil anymore!
    Nobody trusts him anymore!
    What can be promised or changed today can be reverted to the status quo after he has your votes in hand.
    And if it’s a two-thirds majority, that’s even better!
    It’s time for change, why should we risks our future?
    Haven’t we risks too much over the past five and a half decades?

You must be logged in to post a comment.