Is it true that Umno has allowed the situation of Malay dominance to be so badly eroded that the community is facing a bleak and hopeless future?
The Ketuanan party is being overly modest if it refuses to take any credit for the Malays’ measurable success. In which case, we should all be content to attribute the advancement of Malays and Malaysia merely to takdir and the grace of Allah, and quite willing to discount human agency and Umno diligence.
But let’s see.
Bring back the civil service staff list
Until the early 1970s, the Malaysian government used to produce a federal civil service staff list annually that contained the details of key personnel heading the various ministries and departments of the federal authorities and agencies, and their positions in the service.
In most if not all states, there was also a similar staff list of officers serving in key management and administrative positions at the state and local levels.
This staff list served a number of purposes. It enabled the public and the people running the government at the highest level to keep track of which officer was in command of which agency as well as to get an overview of the total structure of government and its key personnel. It also enabled officials in service to keep in touch with their fellow officers, and to track each other’s career movement over time.
The staff list was a published document available at a small price to anyone. Although it was a practice that came to the country as a result of British colonial administration, it can be considered to be a good practice as it helped put names and details on an otherwise faceless, anonymous and often unaccountable bureaucracy, especially at its higher reaches.
That practice of a published and publicly accessible consolidated staff list was abandoned possibly because of the growth in the civil service and the increase in the number of senior positions which would make the publication a bulky one.
There may have been other reasons – possibly political. Perhaps the civil service leaders of that time and era such as Ramon Navaratnam can help explain the real reason.
With e-everything now …
Whatever the reason for discontinuing with the practice, the age of the Internet now provides the Malaysian government an opportunity to respond to calls for transparency and accountability of the civil service by producing an electronic list of its key personnel.
This e-list can be done cheaply, quickly and painlessly through an integration of the existing staff lists of all government agencies and ministries, and even extending to the GLCs and GLICs.
Such a measure is especially important to undertake because there has recently been concerns raised by the vocal former prime minister that Malays are being marginalized, and that the Chinese (and now, foreign immigrants) are taking over the country.
These concerns, echoed by Perkasa, and some of the mainstream Malay media, have confused many Malaysians, especially Malays, on what is the true situation today.
Besides responding to the communal hysteria being whipped up by Dr Mahathir Mohamad and his supporters, the electronic senior staff list is useful in the pursuit of greater transparency and accountability in the civil service – a sector that is paid for by all taxpayers.
Moreover, disclosure of who are the key personnel in the local, state and federal levels of the civil service will provide us with a factual basis for gauging the truth or otherwise of the public statements on the so-called Malay loss of power – an allegation that is gaining momentum as the next general elections draws nearer.
It is Dr Mahathir who gives the ballpark figure that “30 percent” power is what Malays will be reduced to holding if they are disunited.
He injects more venom into the throbbing vein of Malay insecurity with his acid-laced claim that they will lose out on the good jobs. Adopting a physician’s bedside manner, he says in the most syrupy of tones: “Tak apa lah. Buruk sangatkah menjadi buruh kasar dan pemandu kereta?” (Never mind lah. Is it all that bad to be a hard labourer and driver?)
Dr Mahathir’s chip on the shoulder the size of a Pontiac Catalina was already visible in the late 1950s when, with apparent deliberation, he chose to hire a Chinese man to drive him around Alor Setar in his gas-guzzling car.
Fifty years down the road, the country must once more exorcise his May 13 phantoms lest he derails Malaysia and sends us crashing again.
So let’s look at some empirical data of who is in control.
People really running the country
Public perception is that Malays dominate the police and armed forces. This idea is indeed correct and the police and military high command is indeed truly thoroughly controlled by Malays. See the two lists of office holders we’re reproducing as sourced from the Mindef, Home Ministry and Polis DiRaja websites.
In a later article, we will be taking a look at another popular perception that public universities are dominated by Malays. Meanwhile, what is the perception of the outside world as to which race is the face of 1Malaysia?
From the list below compiled by CPI, we can see that the ambassadors in plum postings like London, Paris and Berlin are Malays, and most notably Jamaludin Jarjis in Washington DC. Two Chinese were posted to Cuba and Kazakstan respectively, and Indians dispatched to Lebanon and Nepal. Nobody wants the Zimbabwe job.
A quick glance at the 103 names including high commissioners, consuls and one or two temporary heads of missions as sourced from the Wisma Putra website reveals a scant sprinkling of Chinese and Indian officials in an otherwise 85 percent Malay-dominated list.
Even the Malaysian ambassador in Beijing and the consuls-general in Shanghai and Kunming are Malay. Needless to say, almost if not all the overseas support staff in the diplomatic corps are Malay too.
On closer examination, among the non-Muslim names – Blanche Olbery, the Malaysian high commissioner in Papua New Guinea is the wife of a former deputy minister M. Kayveas, whereas the high commissioner in Pretoria, Kennedy Jawan (a Sarawak Iban) seems to be working harder than his Muslim-bumiputera counterparts as he is also concurrently overseeing five other African countries – Botswana, Lesotho, Madagascar, Mozambique and Swaziland.
A lot more work needs to be done in analysing the staff list and other key data related to the ethnic, regional and gender composition of the civil service; and the implications for 1Malaysia.
Hopefully the many hundreds of academicians and researchers in the field of public administration and political science can be persuaded to undertake this important work. It requires only simple empirical research on the civil service to answer the burning question of who runs the country.
Where have the ‘nons’ gone?
Slightly more complex research will be required to explain why there are so few non-Malays at the top rungs of the civil service, and likely even the middle rungs.
Is it because non-Malay civil servants are so incapable or that they are genetically engineered only to be successful in the private sector?
Is it because they lack the spirit of self-sacrifice and idealism to serve the country? Is it because of the way in which the intake operates?
Is there a ‘kulit-fication’ ceiling that holds non-Malays back in the way that a glass ceiling has traditionally held back women in the higher management ranks in many countries?
Is subservience to Malay dominance the price that more generations of non-Malay youth have to pay should they wish to join the service?
It should not be too difficult for the cabinet to make accessible a tiny portion of the huge pot of R&D funds contained in the 10th Malaysia Plan to help finance the research to answer the questions posed above.
CPI’s potential contribution
In the meantime, as part of our potential national service contribution to the country, CPI will be happy to establish and maintain this list of senior federal and state staff if the various agencies and ministries can provide access to their data bank. (Presently even some ministry web pages require authorized access to view).
We will also be happy to advise on the qualitative and quantitative methodologies and different sampling techniques available for Malaysian researchers wishing to undertake work on the other burning question: Why are there so few non-Malays in senior positions in the civil service?



#1 by monsterball on Thursday, 8 July 2010 - 6:17 pm
“it’s very simple….When a policy doesn’t seem to favor them…that doesn’t mean it’s unjust”….said cintanegara.
UMNO B is not only unjust …unfair and undemocratic…applying double standards…but are also true robbers and thieves …taking hundreds of billions to fatten the UMNO B kitty bank..to bribe and buy votes.
In between the crooked moves….it is usually PMs from UMNO B that show how to steal the biggest …with their billions RM projects…for the 10% COMMISSION.
Cintanegara need not tell us what Najib is saying or doing that may sound nice to all Malaysians..as if to tell all Malaysians….to forget the past….and lets look forward under Najib.
This is the typical and ONLY way UMNO B ambil bodek guys…such as one .. like cintanegara can say to justify all corruptions….forget that.. and lets start all over again.
cintanegara is a pure UMNO B racist trying for years to win votes for Najib in LKS blog…with his low low class out-dated childish explanations.
He should tell all that to school children…..yet thousands approaching adult hood know he is a racist tongue twister…so typical of UMNO B members.
Looks like Godfather is ignoring him…as he dare not declare himself….Malaysian first… race second.
Me…pure Malaysian …. and proud of my race roots…Chinese.
Cintanegara call his reply…..from an intellectual?
Sound more like a double headed snake talking.
“lo no need to come out money. gua come out money. Very expensive …you know?”
hi cintanegara who said that?
Who is that gua’s money ?
See ..lo think all money belong to your grandfathers?
gua knows… lo think exactly like your Master….correct?
hi…cintanegara…we dO not support DAP only.
We support change of government..if ever there is anyone standing against BN..we will vote for that candidate..got it?
#2 by monsterball on Thursday, 8 July 2010 - 6:22 pm
oooop Godfather responded…and you can expect cintanegara will not answer all his questions…because he has no answers at all.
cintanegara just want to promote how good UMNO B and Najib are.
#3 by tak tahan on Thursday, 8 July 2010 - 7:18 pm
Hai cintaNEP,
Stick NEP sticker with tongkat logo on ur face and shout to the entire world.Maybe the whole world will come to ur rescue and aid you to tomb(since womb,i guess)
#4 by tuahpekkong on Thursday, 8 July 2010 - 10:38 pm
The process of ‘kulitfication’ in Govt. departments accelerated in the 80s and judging from the facts provided by Dr. Lim, this process appears to be complete by now. Even in public Universities, the academic staffs tend to be dominated by one race, resulting in disastrous drop in our academic standards. I had ( not have ) great admiration for Dr. Mahathir for his gut to stand up to western powers and his ability to speak for hours without having to refer to a prepared text. He has raised quite a few controversial issues in his blog like ‘kaki dalam kasut’, the granting of citizenship to non-Malays and more recently, the possibility of Malays losing power to the non-Malays ( esp. the Chinese ) if they remain disunited. Don’t know what kind of preposterous suggestions he is going to come up with next? Maybe to divide the economic cake based on racial composition!
Cintanegara, it is true that there is only one Malay minister in the Singapore cabinet but there are 4 ethnic Indian ministers ( including a DPM ) . Don’t tell me that the Indians and the Chinese there gang up to ostracize the Malays. Also, as you drive into Singapore, you are greeted by numerous Malay immigration and customs officers. How many non-Malay officers can you find working at the J Bahru CIQ?
#5 by limkamput on Thursday, 8 July 2010 - 11:31 pm
Cinta my ass, why worry about whether or not a Malay can become the PM of that tiny dot? The reality is Indians are Finance Minister and Chairman of Monetary. What does that tell you? The beauty of that tiny dot is that they have always been frank and honest with that they say and do. Here we say we are 1Malaysia and all the sh!t, but the reality is the non Malay can’t even hold a sensitive position in the Home Affairs Ministry.
#6 by tak tahan on Thursday, 8 July 2010 - 11:44 pm
Malaysia terus tolong bumis if not malay tak boleh,memang tak BOLEH!PLEASE HELP WITH NEP FOR MALAY TO CARI CARI MAKAN LAH.FOR GOD,ALLAH n AMITABAH SAKE!ESPECIALLY FOR TONGKAT CINTANEP!
#7 by ktteokt on Friday, 9 July 2010 - 12:35 am
This senile Mamak must be thinking he is in Singapore and is sitting in the chair where Lee Kuan Yew is! In Singapore, there is a SENIOR MINISTER but nobody appointed this Mamak to be one in MALAYSIA!
#8 by HARGA diri on Friday, 9 July 2010 - 6:36 am
Support and power are the important issues and not the race or not that you do not know how to do anything. People are not stupid. They keep quiet because the country still runs and almost everyone is still very happy. The list of names will not tell you anything. So what if you know who the boss is. In a very big organization, there is a boss behind every boss. And while there are bosses around, there are other small flies who are seen as important strategies to many other people. Office politics, in short. If one wants to be the superpower race, then one is no different from the people whom one criticises. Probably in truth, one regrets being stuck as one is and wish that one is of that supepower race. Since one cannot do anything about it, the next best thing is to make oneself superpowerful enough just like the other race one is so jealous and envious and proud of.
#9 by habis on Friday, 9 July 2010 - 9:29 am
It is pointless to further debate with our Intellect Cintanegara for the more he talks the more rubbish will come out from this mudhead. It is totally a waste of our precious time when one is enjoying drumsticks for the past decades and for him/her to forgo it would it not be depriving of him/her of his/her huge appetite for More?So long as one refuse to see and accept the Reality of Clearcut issue facing our beloved country it is pointless to debate further.
#10 by steven chan on Friday, 9 July 2010 - 9:58 am
PPl like cintanegara are f******blind to say our education system is good when we are churning local graduates like lawyers who can hardly write a simple english letter and our universities are not recognised overseas. He and the king toad Ali can only croak for a wheelchair and what intellect is he talking about? Obviously he is more an INTERNAL-LACK!
#11 by donplaypuks on Friday, 9 July 2010 - 12:16 pm
YB
I am also taking the battle to Dr.M click here
or http://donplaypuks.blogspot.com/2010/07/i-accuse-drmahathir-mohamad-jaccuse.html
or http://donplaypuks.blogspot.com/
It’s time we stopped racism from being excused and promoted by our ex-PM.
dpp
we are all of 1 race, the Human Race
dpp
we are all of 1 race, the Human Race
#12 by Loh on Friday, 9 July 2010 - 3:38 pm
///It is Dr Mahathir who gives the ballpark figure that “30 percent” power is what Malays will be reduced to holding if they are disunited.///
It depends one who one means by Malay. If Malay is to refer to those who were what the forefathers wanted to help as envisaged under article 153; that would have excluded the mamk-type of Malays and those who came in through Project M in Sabah, then true Malays have actually numbered fewer than the so-called Malays or NEWMalays based on the definition given in article 160 of the Constitution. If Mamakthir is accepted as Malay, then Malays have accepted that they have lost power to somebody who claimed to be Malay. Should Malays care who Malay really are. If they do, then they should distinguish themselves from at least the mamak type. If they accept the hodgepodge of Muslims as Malays then they should not expect that special assistance should be provided to the never ending new entries to become beneficiaries.
Affirmative actions are meant to correct the situation prevailing at the time when those corrective actions were taken. Obviously only those who have been born to experience the ‘hardship’ would be entitled, and not those who arrive in life later. Hence assistance under article 153 should only be provided to those who were born before Independent day in 1957.
The framer of the Malayan constitution erred in two counts. They accepted race as a criterion for assistance rather than means test. They did not realise that one an advantage has been unfairly given, like poison, that could not be removed, and the poison acts to its full potential.
#13 by Loh on Friday, 9 July 2010 - 9:47 pm
///It is Dr Mahathir who gives the ballpark figure that “30 percent” power is what Malays will be reduced to holding if they are disunited.///
In all democratic countries where governments are elected by the people seldom do the elected presidents or ruling parties ever received more than 60 % of the votes cast.
The elected presidents and governments do not take it upon themselves to serve only those who voted for them. The electorates are divided and they vote the parties the manifestos of which they prefer. Government policies do not necessarily benefit those who voted for the government or against those who oppose them. Further as the personal environments of the voters change over time the impact of government policies on them varies over time. No one person can be said to be indebted to the ruling parties and indeed the persons who run for national elections are there to serve the people and the nation.
Though Malaysian government is elected through the ballot boxes, the UMNO-led government does not treat all citizens fairly and without discrimination. Though there could be discriminations of persons based on race or religion in some developed countries, except in Malaysia no country in the world has discrimination included in government policies and their implementation. Institutional discrimination exists only in Malaysia.
Malaysian constitution provided for reservation of opportunities to the ‘lesser developed community’ for 15 years from 1957 and subject to review. Unfortunately the government seized the excuse of May 13 and introduced the 20-year time bound NEP which has ended up as not only racially discriminatory to non-Malays, but provided a cover for politicians to legally misappropriate public funds. As government policies favour persons classified as ‘Malays’, Malays are more inclined to vote for the ruling government. That encourages the ruling government to formulate over time more racially discriminatory policies against the minority, and the vicious circle continues. The situation is compounded when race-based political parties form the Malaysian central government. The ensured vote bank emboldened Mamakthir to hijack the poverty alleviation NEP to become a policy to enrich Malays of his choice. The sons of Mamakthir are billionaires. Some Malays do realize that NEP provided cover for UMNOputras to steal and they helped created the 308 election result in 2008. Unfortunately some Malays still consider that they benefit more than non-Malays without ever realising that their share in the use of national resource would increase without the leakages allowed through NEP. There are still other Malays who consider that Ketuanan Melayu was worth pursuing at any cost, and these are the same persons who threaten a repeat of May 13.
The fact that Mamakthir talks about political power held by a certain race based most probably on the number of persons of that race elected in the sitting government implies that he considered implementing racist and racial-discriminatory policies as the right of the ruling government. Mamakthir does not consider it his responsibility to the nation for having been appointed Prime Minister. It is unfortunate that a person of that mindset helmed the nation for 22 years. The polarization by race in the country started soon after his quarrel with Tunku in 1969, and that polarization has caused Malaysia to be a failed state when he left in 2003.
If it is the intention of the government to create a united country, it has to show that the government serves the interest of the people, irrespective of race. If government policies are fair and good for the people, that same policies need not be against the interest of any particular community. Mamakthir claimed that no one community could be 100% satisfied with government policies, and that each community would be less than 100% satisfies as though one community’s gain is other’s loss, and their total satisfaction would then add up to 100. Chua Soi Lek borrowed that same argument, like a fool.
Government policies can be agreeable to most people, if they serve their interests. The tax rates affect the people’s purse, and prefer naturally prefer it to be lower rather than lower. As for income tax rates, different persons are affected differently and they are not classified by race.
Even if some government policies are not accepted by the people of different communities, the government should be mindful whether the dissatisfaction was based on need, or was it desire. Clearly needs might be satiable, but not desire. With the campaign by Mamakthir and Perkasa some Malays developed the desire to see other communities suffer, at no benefits to them ever. What else was the motive of Mamakthir to talk about percentage control of political power by race?