Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan has committed gross insurbodination for the second time when he threatened to call police off the streets and not to enforce the law in retaliation against the firestorm of public outrage at the trigger-happy police killing of 14-year old Form III student Aminulrasyid Hamzah some 100 metres from his Shah Alam house in the early hours of Monday.
Star online today under the headline “IGP hits out at critics over shooting of teenager” reported:
KUALA LUMPUR: Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan has hit out at those criticising the force over the death of 15-year-old Aminulrasyid Amzah, saying he could call his men off the streets if that was what the people wanted.
“If you do not want the police to enforce the law, then say so,” he said.
“I can tell my men to not take any action, including conduct inspections on vehicles or arrest Mat Rempit who ride without licences,” he told reporters after launching a blood donation drive at the National Blood Bank in conjunction with the 203rd Police Day celebrations here Thursday.
He was responding to statements by various groups over the death of Aminulrasyid, who was shot dead when he allegedly tried to reverse the car he was driving into policemen who had stopped the vehicle in Section 11, Shah Alam.
This is a most disgraceful statement from the IGP as it tantamounts to an open and public insurbodination against the Malaysian people who pay for his salary.
This is not the first time as Musa was involved in the public challenge of the previous Prime Minister threatening a police revolt if the proposal of the Dzaiddin Police Royal Commission to set up an Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) to create an efficient, incorruptible, professional and world-class police service was implemented.
All over the world, developed nations are graduating to the concept of democratic policing subjecting the police forces to principles of public responsibility and accountability but this is clearly very alien to Musa.
Musa has overstayed his welcome as IGP. Important sectors of society, including a parliamentary roundtable, had been opposed to the extension of his contract as IGP and their reservations and objections have now been vindicated with the threat by Musa to call police off the streets and not to enforce the law.
Shouldn’t he first resign as IGP?
Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein should declare whether he had given the “green-light” to Musa to make such an outrageous statement and threat and what action he proposes to take to discipline Musa.
Musa’s threats today have transgressed acceptable and tolerable limits and is a great disservice to the majority of police personnel who are disciplined, conscientious and hardworking.
The country cannot wait until September when Musa’s tenure expires. Malaysians need a new IGP who can inspire public confidence in the professionalism of the police force to fight crime and restore to Malaysians their two fundamental rights to be free from crime and the fear of crime.

#1 by SENGLANG on Friday, 30 April 2010 - 3:59 pm
Can you imagine IGP use threat against the people?
Was this guy worth to be IGP the head who suppose to put peace on the people but he himself using threat against the people?
It is worst than a ganster
#2 by SENGLANG on Friday, 30 April 2010 - 4:01 pm
Nobody understand why he is still there despite the explosive disclosure in MT about his mischief. Can someone explain?
#3 by emck on Friday, 30 April 2010 - 6:05 pm
How much did our unemployed millionaire, sorry he now maybe billionaire Khairy J shared?
#4 by monsterball on Saturday, 1 May 2010 - 1:17 am
SENGLANG….He is still there…….because Najib wants him there …as long as possible.
He is Najib’s most loyal and trusted bodyguard…no easy to find another good replacement.
You see UMNO BARU is so corrupted….Najib must look into the long lists of UMNO BARU corrupted lawyers and police officers…to appoint few as top leaders ….where these people also have no choices…but to listen to Najib and Mahathir..or else..big bog problems for him and families….all maybe exposed and go to jail for corruptions by the corrupted leaders who holds the power of .to manage the country.
Now you know..the country is governed by a band of robbers and thieves.
#5 by boh-liao on Saturday, 1 May 2010 - 4:38 am
D current AG n IGP r twin pillars of d dark forces
Both played key roles under MMK 2 bring down AI, n they were duly rewarded
They r untouchables – as they know d dark secrets of UmnoB n BN politicians (ex, current, n future), including murder, C4, sex orgies, black eyes, corruption, drinking n gambling habits, illegal transfer of funds, true n falsified sodomies
They seem 2 decide which cases can b prosecuted n which can b thrown out
R they above d law? Go figure out
#6 by boh-liao on Saturday, 1 May 2010 - 4:53 am
IGP must b very used 2 threatening, balckmailing, n bribing ppl
U no like it, I get MY men off the streets
U want MY men 2 protect u, pay lah n shut up on how MY men carry out their duties
Me n MY men n I control them all. Get it, dummies
What’s so great abt BN in power? BN in power, Y? Aaaah, d magical postal votes dat make a lot of difference in many marginal constituencies. Votes fr mata-mata n soldiers.
Who is d king maker? Get it, dummies
#7 by jus legitimum on Saturday, 1 May 2010 - 2:55 pm
This idiot must resign and should be replaced by someone who is really capable.However the police force based on past records very rarely have had a truly good IGP.Maybe we can only get a good IGP when Putrajaya is under PR.
#8 by on cheng on Saturday, 1 May 2010 - 5:26 pm
How nice, if the head of inland revenue, or head of customs/excise, or head of any govt money collecting body, say if you don’t want or don’t like my staffs to collect taxes/fees, then I stopped them from doing so.
#9 by on cheng on Saturday, 1 May 2010 - 5:33 pm
Or the chief of prison, tell the convicts say if you don’t like the way my men caned the convicts, then I stopped them from caning convicts.
or the chief justice say, if you don’t like the ways my judges convicted the accuseds, then I stopped them from convicting anybody.
or the head of a govt hospital say, if you don’t like the ways my staffs treated the patients, then I stopped them from treating any patient.
then what would the country become???
#10 by good coolie on Saturday, 1 May 2010 - 10:58 pm
I am reminded of something I read long ago: “Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?”
WHO WILL WATCH THE WATCHMAN HIMSELF?