So now you go and wash your mouth with somebody’s soap. Next time buy your own.

OrangRojak,
You may be overestimating the capability of this AG. If you ever know the story about him that this AG was very keen to win in a case which he served as the Prosecuting Officer who charged the Opposition Leader of Sabah, namely Pairin Kitingan, for committing corruption, then you will probably changed your perception on this AG.

You might find that this AG used to have the zeal to want to eradicate corruption when he was young serving as a Senior DPP officer but it is strange that he is reluctant to show his such zeal now after he has sat in the seat of the AG, which is said to be the most powerful man in the legal circle of Malaysia.

To be frank, since the time when this man was designated as the heir-apparent of the former of AG, many prominent and experienced Senior DPP officers who worked in the AG’s Chamber as this man’s right-hand men had already chosen to resign or retire early because those righteous men could no longer stand working with an immediate boss who had political motive in commencing a prosecution against Anwar Ibrahim in 1998. Therefore, it is not a surprised for us to find that the current AG does not know too much about the development of many current events in relation to the judicial cases of the United Kingdom because he is really short-handed in terms of having a knowledgeable and brilliant aide such as the one called Francis Ng Aik Guan, whom he used to have many years ago.

I mean talking to oneself on his own blog – a blog nobody visits – is SICK.

And now with that pull-down screen, he says he is sorry there are too many visitors! And so it is now by invitation only! It has got to be voices in his head telling him who he is, how important he is, and what he should do.

http://limkamput-nincompoop.blogspot.com/

Lim kam Put, tell us in what way and why specifically and exactly what Jaswant commented is “garbage talk” that “has no meaning and consequence, talk that doesn’t even deserve to be here. The most appropriate place would be at loud mouth’s kopitiam”???

Give us your reasons.

Don’t say things and criticize just for the sake of criticizing, and insulting for the sake of insulting, without rationale and with only prejudice, venom and animosity towards the person of the poster/messenger (with no relevance to the merits of his message) – that’s easiest to do, and it is subversive of the orderly discussion pursued by everyone else in this blog!

We have to be careful in suggesting whether AG heard of it. The Hutton Inquiry was a British judicial inquiry chaired by Lord Hutton, appointed by the United Kingdom Labour government with the terms of reference “…urgently to conduct an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death of Dr David Kelly”.

A judicial enquiry of such nature publicly held is also a public enquiry and a public enquiry is not exactly a Royal Commission of the type either in the UK or here pursuant to our Commissions of Enquiry Act 1950.

For one thing you’d notice that RCI has more than one arbiter (commissioner) in adjudicating public issues, and I believe that this Hutton Enquiry chaired by only James Brian Edward Hutton, Baron Hutton appointed by Blair Govt for what many allegedly to be a ‘white wash’ enquiry. It is easier for govt to ‘control’ outcome through appointment one present or ex judge. What happens if govt says since you want it we would give you (joking) a Eusoff Chin Enquiry as equivalent to British Hutton Enquiry ???

In what way is such a public judicial enquiry like Hutton different from an inquest except that the latter is presided by a low cog judicial magistrate whereas a public enquiry by a high cog judge (chosen by govt)? They’re not going to have a NH Chan Enquiry if you get my drift.

Even a Court in which Teoh’s family sues govt (MACC) is arguably better than a public/judicial enquiry of the type like Hutton Enquiry presided by a judge nominated by
govt! At least, a RCI will involve al least another tier (The King) (to be consulted) to appoint, albeit on cabinet’s advice, a couple of commissioners whereas a public enquiry like Hutton’s, the govt may not be obliged to consult anyone…

For the record, when Lord Hutton delivered his report, it white washed and favoured and cleared Blair’s government and no-one in the BBC.

“Much of Britain’s press has lashed out at the judge who cleared the UK government of any wrongdoing over the suicide of an Iraqi weapons expert, accusing Lord Hutton of a “whitewash” and questioning whether justice was really served. The long-awaited verdict, delivered by Hutton on Wednesday, attracted “widespread incredulity,” Thursday’s edition of the right-wing Daily Mail said”. See CNN report – http://edition.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/01/29/hutton.press/

Beware what we suggest or ask for!

And if someone at the AG’s supposed level of legal competence is confused or unaware of the difference in meanings between the words “duplicitous” and “duplicate” then it is also quite possible that the AG may have heard of the Hutton Inquiry but the penny on it may not quite have dropped or sunk in yet.

It’s only a far-fetched theory of mine I hasten to add and so I could of course be way off the mark here given that the AG we are referring to here is none other than AGP.

“Imagine Power To The People” John Lennon.

In the 30-minute meeting at his office in Putrajaya, Najib told the family that no stone will be left unturned in finding out the real cause of Teoh’s death.MORE
‘Action will definitely be taken’
Finding a solution for child’s surname

Well, these people employ hordes of consultants and advisors with our tax money whenever they like. So even if he has never heard of it, his consultants and advisors will tell him.

Now I would have thought Malaysia’s leaders would have had some parochial interest in this story. Or is Iraq not Malaysia’s parish? Are they ‘the other lot’? I get confused.

Interestingly, this is still a current event – see:

dr-david-kelly.blogspot.com

Malaysia isn’t the only country where things happen that you would rather didn’t. I personally think democracy in the UK took a bit of a hiding over the last 20 years, while lots of us were making enough money to not really care if we were circling the political drain.

OrangRojak :He probably has heard of it. I doubt he’ll be perturbed by your question – he’ll be thinking “what kind of whitewash he want now?”.

Don’t be too sure, may be he has never heard it before. This is bolehland mah.

Jaswant :The police wants to rule out murder. They cannot. They want to say it is suicide. They cannot. They cannot settle on ‘misadventure’ and since they cannot blame it on any alien from some spaceship, it has to be ‘an open verdict’. Coded language for ‘no further action’.
How convenient.

This is garbage talk, talk that has no meaning and consequence, talk that doesn’t even deserve to be here. The most appropriate place would be at loud mouth’s kopitiam.

To accuse him of not following the best practices is not fair because he simply does not know such a practice exists !

In Malaysia, no body cares and no body will be held accountable !! This is the culture after years of rule by Mahathir who the Utusans claim to be the pride of Malays and to attack him is tantamount to attacking the Malays !

Well, I don’t believe Gani ever intended to establish the truth… and so is Najib. Gani has a job to do, i.e. to protect his political masters… after all, he owes his political master this cosy job which is not based on merit. Najib’s job, on the other hand, is to get the present government out of the s.hit. But in the process, both sink into the s.hit and now stink like s.hit.