Teoh Beng Hock’s first death in MACC custody defining test for MACC and Najib’s commitment to accountability, transparency and rule of law


The first death in Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) custody, Teoh Beng Hock, political secretary to DAP Selangor State Exco and Seri Kembangan Assemblyman, Ean Yong Hian Wah, is the defining test for the MACC as to its independence and professionalism as well as for Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s commitment to accountability, transparency and the rule of law.

The heartless, cruel and insensitive statement by the Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz on Teoh’s death has aggravated the outrage of ordinary Malaysians regardless of race and religion demanding full accountability and transparency as to how an idealistic political activist who is to register his civil marriage the next day could take his own life after oppressive overnight questioning allegedly from 6 pm to 4 am by the MACC as a witness and not as an accused!

Nazri said he was informed by the MACC that Teoh was released earlier yesterday morning, and he should have gone home instead and asked: “How would we know that he would jump out of the building” (PDF)?

He said Pakatan Rakyat should not blame MACC for Teoh’s death.

My three responses are:

  • Firstly, how did Nazri know that Teoh “jumped out” of the 14th floor of the building?
  • Secondly, it is not just Pakatan Rakyat but the overwhelming majority of Malaysians who blame MACC for Teoh’s death for the simple reason that Teoh was in the custody and premises of MACC when he plunged to his death from the 14th storey MACC office, and after being subjected to an unusual and oppressive overnight interrogation by MACC from 6 pm to 4 am when he was not a suspect but only a witness;
  • Thirdly, if MACC is not to be blamed for Teoh’s death, is the blame to be directed to Nazri as the Minister responsible for MACC or to Prime Minister Najib himself?

As I told the Selangor MACC Director Ja’afar bin Mahad this morning, unless MACC can come out with a convincing and satisfactory explanation for Teoh’s death, MACC’s present story disclaiming responsibility does not sell and public perception throughout the country is that this is the first case of MACC custody death, which will do irreparable damage to what is already a very poor image of MACC after six months of operation.

I am very disappointed by the meeting at MACC Shah Alam headquarters this morning between Pakatan Rakyat leaders, namely Parliamentary Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, Penang Chief Minister, Lim Guan Eng, Selangor Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim and myself with Ja’afar.

Ja’afar said he was instructed not to say anything as Teoh’s death is under police investigations.

It is most regrettable that MACC Deputy Commissioner Datuk Abu Kassim Mohammad was not present at the meeting in Shah Alam although I had fixed the appointment with him yesterday over phone. This is blatant irresponsibility coming from the No. 2 in MACC.

Parliament had set up the MACC to wipe out the corrupt and not to murder any Malaysian – and the onus is on MACC to prove that it has not deviated from the parliamentary and national objectives of the MACC to spearhead the war against corruption instead of its declaring war against the Pakatan Rakyat as the catspaw of UMNO/Barisan Nasional.

When the MACC Bill was introduced in Parliament last December, Abu Kassim said that under the new legislation, five bodies will closely watch over the MACC to ensure its transparency and integrity.

These five bodies are: Anti-Corruption Advisory Board; Special Committee on Corruption; Operations Review Panel; Corruption Prevention and Consultative Panel; and a Complaints Committee.

Abu Kassim publicly declared at the time that with these five scrutinizing bodies, the MACC would not be accused of being the “lapdog” of the government as its predecessor the Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) had been accused in the past.

But this has proved to be a empty rhetoric, as half a year after its establishment, MACC has proven to be even worse than ACA in being the “lapdog” of the Barisan Nasional government especially in the blatant manner it has declared war on the Pakatan Rakyat, particularly in Selangor!

The five MACC scrutinizing bodies, particularly the Anti-Corruption Advisory Board and Special Committee on Corruption should just disband if they are totally impotent to check the MACC deviations and abuses of power so early in its establishment.

Najib has just completed his First Hundred Days with a redound in his popularity rating, but he is heading for the doldrums if he condones any cover-up in the first death in MACC custody in the case of Teoh.

The first thing Najib should do on his return from his trip overseas for the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) meeting is to announce the setting up of a Royal Commission of Inquiry to conduct a full public inquiry to get to the bottom of Teoh’s extraordinary plunge to death from the 14th floor-MACC Building in Shah Alam yesterday.

Print Friendly

  1. #1 by boh-liao on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 12:25 am

    First death in MACC custody will always be followed by 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and so on. U bet.
    Expecting this to be the first and last, you must be kidding me.

  2. #2 by SpeakUp on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 12:27 am

    Guys … we need to sing Queen’s Another One Bites the Dust:

    http://mt.m2day.org/2008/content/view/24498/84/

  3. #3 by yhsiew on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 12:28 am

    Nazri said he was informed by the MACC that Teoh was released earlier yesterday morning, and he should have gone home………
    ==============================================

    If Teoh was really released from MACC custody, how come he never phoned home to tell his parents or siblings that he had been released?

    When a person had spent so many hours at MACC, it would only be natural that he phoned home to report that he was safe, the moment he was released from custody.

  4. #4 by mybangsamalaysia on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 12:42 am

    MACC + PDRM = Oh My God!!!!

  5. #5 by LG on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 9:57 am

    Nothing less than a Royal Commission inquiry can satisfy us. Why police investigation when it is double standard. Nazri also double standard by concluding that Teoh “jumped out” when the investigation is still in progress. BN/UMNO we really hated you to the uttermost.

  6. #6 by limkamput on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 10:03 am

    Where is Jeffrey? He is probably getting instructions from his paymaster on how to respond to the latest.

  7. #7 by Onlooker Politics on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 10:04 am

    Nazri should not try to protect the MACC blindly without gathering adequate evidences first.
    There is at least one good reason which will give justification to Barisan Nasional for agreeing upon the establishment of a Royal Commission for commencing a public inquiry into Teoh Beng Hock’s mysterious death case. The reason is simple: Just assume that the MACC has been penetrated by Al-Queda for the purpose of creating some chaotic and panicky situations in several countries at the meantime so that Al-Queda can easily take profit by closing off the open positions which Al-Queda holds by forward selling of certain financial instruments such as Stock Market Index Option Futures, Ringgit Currency Futures, Commodity Futures and etc. Closing off of the open forward selling contracts can be done by buying back the relevant financial instrument when the price of the relevant financial instrument drastically drops after a big chaotic and panicky situation happens out-of-a-sudden which badly affects the political stability and thus causes big plunges in the money market and capital market.
    Nazri of Barisan Nasional should see thing from different aspects and should not be always blinded by his stupid loyalty to Umno! There is a need for Nazri to recommend setting up of a Royal Commission for making inquiry into Teoh’s mysterious death case during the custody of MACC.

  8. #8 by sean on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 10:31 am

    I guess the whole nation was conned by Umno aferall…even parliament was fooled.Umno gave MACC so much power and for all i know MACC is just an extention of PDRM to do what PDRM cannot do just to satisfy their filthy master call bn.

  9. #9 by blablowbla on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 10:40 am

    i can foresee teoh’s situation was very tense,he must have been very busy arranging his wedding registration and the invitation to his wedding dinner,but so happen that the evil MACC is selecting this time to interrogate all DAP’s excos,he must have asked the evil MACC to let him settle his personal issues first,after that he could be interrogated anytime,but these requests was turned down,he felt very upset,he was having arguments with evil MACC officers,then the latter got angry and thrown him out of window!
    if you watch CSI,you will know how to analyse the crime scene,just like horatio did!

  10. #10 by ALLAN THAM on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 10:53 am

    let police investigate said dpm and pm also wants a through investigation while the soft a poon want to take charge and oversee the investigation.

    well all the cats crying over the dead mouse now. sound nice and look nice.

    but. but. why all this while these cats can prevent this thing to happen has done nothing? that was most interesting.

    rest assure when the tears dried and the dust settled business go on as usual and wait for another dead to repeat the same process again and again.

    for the chief who lost his son will sure know the pain of losing young closed one. may he contribute more positively toward the sickness of this country when he retired soon???

  11. #11 by negarawan on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 10:58 am

    A nice extract from KP Goh’s blog:

    Why was a witness being held for questioning for ten hours and only released at 3.45am? What kind of case is it and what is the urgency of the case in question that the witness had to be deprived of sleep and forcibly kept awake till 3.45am? Was the nation deemed to be in grave danger had the witness in question been sent home at a respectable time and asked to report again for questioning the next morning? The nation could endure long years of waiting over so many other much longer pending cases involving so much more public money and have much greater weight in public interest but this particular case could not wait for the next morning when the witness in question would have been fresher and better rested? What kind of interrogation was he subjected to on the fateful night without end? Why was it that a witness had to be isolated from his lawyer and forced to be in the sole company of officers with no other neutral person/s present? Because he was in the sole company of officers who were interrogating him, how would his side of the story be ever told? And how would, why should the officers in question be trusted when they tell the nation what actually transpired during that fateful night the witness lost his life? There were no other witness/es present so how would these officers in question clear their own involvement or clear their own names in this sad story?

  12. #12 by OrangRojak on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 11:06 am

    Not sure about SpeakUp’s soundtrack choice… how’s this:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrUVVGKnqIc

    Is there anybody working for his network provider who can erm … you know … with Teoh’s handphone data? Last cell registration would do. If not make it available, then make a secure copy of the data somewhere, so that it doesn’t go missing.

  13. #13 by lew1328 on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 11:23 am

    Greetings! Kit

    Although this is a sad moment for all of us, but we can have this lesson to mirror or message out what are the leaders quality in the near future and prevention in repeat the same incident.

  14. #14 by ALLAN THAM on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 11:26 am

    PR must act forcefully and demand for a change in MACC manner of conducting their selective investigations.

  15. #15 by OrangRojak on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 11:34 am

    Just a thought: wouldn’t it be easier to just compel all those in receipt of public funds to publish their detailed accounts? It has to be called the public sector for a reason… Perhaps the public could examine the accounts and decide for themselves what is corruption and what is not.

    One thing I’m not clear on: is there a clear test for corruption? At what point does a back-scratching arrangement become formally corrupt?

  16. #16 by ALLAN THAM on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 11:40 am

    the richest selangor dentist is quick to defense MACC and say nice about them. that was understandable as he was thousand time more than suitable to be the MACC’s target then this poor champ. so nice words will sure please MACC to lost sight on this dentist.

    am sure LHDN also can not do anything about this richest dentist.

  17. #17 by Onlooker Politics on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 11:45 am

    “Is there anybody working for his network provider who can erm … you know … with Teoh’s handphone data?” (OrangRojak)

    OrangRojak,
    I think your suggestion will be the first step which the Police Investigation Officer will take in the investigation process.

    However, I guess the investigation officer will never be able to find any useful information if Teoh Beng Hock’s handphone had been turned off and kept by the MACC staff in charge of the MACC locker. If the MACC did cause the death of Teoh but its top officers chose to deny that Teoh’s mysterious death had gotten anything to do with the MACC, then most likely all records showing the time of release of Teoh Been Hock would also be adulterated.

    If we are able to find the whereabout of Teoh’s wallet, car key or house key in the death scene, then it will be equally good to prove that the MACC had already set Teoh free at the time of Teoh’s death.

  18. #18 by Onlooker Politics on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 11:49 am

    If Teoh Beng Hock had been released by the MACC before his death, then there should be a car key or house key in his pocket if not some pocket money. Does the Police Investigation Officer find any one of those personal belongings of Teoh in his pocket?

  19. #19 by AhPek on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 12:02 pm

    But then again, Onlooker Politics, this could be easily arranged for these things to be in his pocket since nobody is allowed to get anywhere near Teoh’s body for quite awhile,not even his brother!

  20. #20 by OrangRojak on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 12:13 pm

    And one more on the subject of access to data in the public sector. How long does the MACC take away IT equipment for? Making all government office data public might short-circuit this aspect of the MACC’s work. An alternative would be to force all public sector staff to use a fully-hosted system for their work – so that no data at all is held on their own PCs.

    That wouldn’t prevent the co-called enforcement agencies from concentrating their efforts on individuals, but might weaken their excuse for doing it.

    Onlooker – would Teoh’s belongings have been taken away from him if he was not arrested?

    One last thing occurs to me: what are the family’s wishes as regards Teoh? I understand families don’t always want to investigate the reasons behind a death. Could we be being insensitive by discussing it?

  21. #21 by Callum on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 12:37 pm

    This is certainly a testing ground for Najib. If the investigation concluded that the police is only charge on 1 or 2 small flies and case closed, then Najib will lose his integrity ENTIRELY. We do not want to see it landed an open ended case such as Lingam tape, PKFZ, Berwaja, Bank Bumiputra and many many more. Malaysia politics will become the laughing stock to the world !!

    I strongly believe most of the people from the public are demanding for the true picture of who is the man who behind the scene. The process of interrogation on Teo is absolutely abnormal, brutals and inhumantarian act.

  22. #22 by ekompute on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 12:40 pm

    Nazri is as brainless as ever. Assuming that Teoh did jump out of the 14th floor, rather than the possibility of being pushed down to make it look like suicide, the logical question to ask is why did he do so? Did MACC made him temporarily deranged through their inhumane interrogation? This has to be investigated very very thoroughly as all fingers must point at MACC as the most likely cause of what happened. Bear in mind that Teoh was getting married the next day. As far Nazri, I always wonder how a man with his character can be offered any position of responsibility in government. His continued presence in government is a poor reflection of Najib’s ability to pick the right people to govern the country. (Personally, I have absolutely no respect for Abdullah Badawi at all. He proved himself to be a junk, 100% pure junk, so I won’t comment on him for letting Nazri be his one-time defacto Law Minister.) What has Islam to say to all these, I wonder.

  23. #23 by ekompute on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 12:44 pm

    Callum says: “Malaysia politics will become the laughing stock to the world !!”

    Errrr… will become? I thought it has always been a laughing stock to the world. Read: http://malaysian-politics.dummipedia.org/Malaysian_Politics_%E2%80%94_Malaysian_Politicians_Say_the_Darndest_Things

  24. #24 by Callum on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 1:05 pm

    ekompute, Dr Mahathrir ever commented, Nazri is the JUNK MINISTER. From this incident, it is well describes he behaviours. A TRUE JUNK MINSTER !!

    Over to Teo’s case, I believe there are bunch of big crooks behind the scene who manupulated the case. It is certainly politicized, someone is giving such instructions to do this, if not, MACC will not carry out such brutal act.

    My intuition tells me, Khir Toyo is one of the suspect who manupulating the scene.

  25. #25 by frankyapp on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 1:46 pm

    The MACC should be held responsible for the tragic death of Teoh Beng Hock. Teoh was its witness .He was grilled for about 10 hours until the wee hours of dawn,then let him free. MACC should have sent him home but chose not,why ? Next moment,he fell from the 14th,fl.of the MACC building.Could these two incidents not related ? I think not. For Nazri to say “Teoh just jump off the building “is inhumane. Nazri also gave me the impression that he was there and witnessed Teoh just simply jump by himself from the 14th of the MACC building.I hope he will go to any nearest police station now and make his statement,perhaps as first witness .I remember ISA was used to protect the safety of a newspaper reporter but how come the authority this time didn’t use ISA to protect Teoh as he’s an important witness of the MACC ?. MY,the minister of Education said the government must remain consistent and not flig/flog of its policy while commenting on the PPSMI. So how come,it’s not consistent in Teah’s case. Hence MY,you flig/flog again in a matter of less than a week.

  26. #26 by ekompute on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 1:49 pm

    Who were the eye-witnesses who saw Teoh jumping out of the building? All MACC people? Any people who speaks the truth or can be trusted to speak the truth? LKS asked: “… how did Nazri know that Teoh “jumped out” of the 14th floor of the building?” Well, I don’t think anyone bothers what Nazri says. He is known for talking for the sake of talking… and without brains, as we all know. And when does MACC responsibility for Teoh ends? After he leaves their interrogating office or after he leaves their premises?

  27. #27 by Onlooker Politics on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 3:30 pm

    “Onlooker – would Teoh’s belongings have been taken away from him if he was not arrested?” (OrangRojak)

    OrangRojak,
    By the inference from the information being disclosed by the other detainee who was detained at the meantime as Teoh Beng Hock, it seemed that the MACC interrogation on Teoh was never a friendly discussion. As a normal detention procedure in Malaysia, all the removable personal belongings of a detainee would be recorded and the record had to be signed by the detainee before the removable personal belongings were taken away by an MACC staff for safekeeping at a locker. Before the removable personal belongings had been given back to the detainee, the detainee was required to sign the “taken back” confirmation on the record. If the MACC officers did not follow this procedure, then the detention might be conducted in an illegal manner. If the detention had been conducted in an illegal manner, then the MACC staff involved could be prosecuted for operating a private lockup and committing the crime of illegal torture on the detainee. The officers who had carried out a detention on someone without following the designated proper procedure of the MACC should not be given the legal immunity.

  28. #28 by Onlooker Politics on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 3:36 pm

    “I understand families don’t always want to investigate the reasons behind a death. Could we be being insensitive by discussing it?” (OrangRojak)

    OrangRojak,
    Why don’t you take time to attend Teoh Beng Hock’s funeral? Perhaps his fiancee or his parents will give you the accurate answer!

  29. #29 by robert chonng on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 4:33 pm

    On behalf of the family of the late Mr. Teoh Beng Hock I would like to curse the ancestors dead or alive and all their descendants born and unborn staring from thge Bastard MACC chief and to all his team.
    On behalf the family of the late Mr. Kugan I would like to curse the Bastard IGP and all his police officers esp those at the USJ police station.
    Beware all you Bastards, the curse has already started on Koh Hong Sun. Mr. LKS I hope you print my message as it is written. I feel very strongly about it.

  30. #30 by OrangRojak on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 5:08 pm

    Why don’t you take time to attend Teoh Beng Hock’s funeral?
    I avoid funerals as much as I can Onlooker. I wasn’t trying to be controversial with the ‘insensitive’ question. I know of one Malaysian family who didn’t want a loved one’s sudden death investigated by strangers. I was asking out of politeness. If I came to your house, I would ask before eating all your chocolate. I would probably start eating, then ask – like in this case, but I would still ask.

    In the interests of getting straight facts, could someone post an URL for Google Maps or similar showing the place Teoh’s body was found, and (if possible) the location of the MACC offices? I had a look at Google Maps, but I couldn’t be sure I was looking at the right building, and there seemed to be a lot of clouds on the images of the area.

    Malaysia Star has the pathologist report?
    http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/7/18/nation/20090718155423&sec=nation

  31. #31 by OrangRojak on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 5:18 pm

    Hmm just posted a comment with an URL in, and it isn’t showing, neither is it shown as ‘in moderation’, but when I tried reposting (in case I made a mistake) I read “you’ve already said that!”

    When Tan says Teoh was in the ‘pantry’ at 6am, what does he mean by ‘pantry’? It can’t be what I understand to be a pantry, as that conjures up a very odd image.

  32. #32 by OrangRojak on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 5:30 pm

    Interesting… The Star and Malaysian Insider both have stories about the initial pathologist findings. Interesting to see who the state government were planning to engage as their pathologist – I was only recently reading about her.

    You see Onlooker? The state spokesperson was ‘respecting the family’s wishes’ – that’s what I was really asking about (my longer answer has disappeared).

    I wonder if the pathologists were able to confirm that the injuries sustained were consistent with a fall from the 14th floor, and were they sustained where the body was found?

  33. #33 by lopez on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 5:42 pm

    Remand the suspects immediately before too late.

    , if there is still ?law and order ?around…whatever it means.

    it makes one to believe GE 13 will be TSUNAMI

  34. #34 by Jeffrey on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 5:45 pm

    ///Where is Jeffrey? He is probably getting instructions from his paymaster on how to respond to the latest/// – LimKaput.

    Oh yes according to my paymaster, he advises me to be particularly alert of those in this blog who caught between delusions of adequacy and deep seated feelings of inadequacy would otherwise seek to compensate that contradiction by seeking vicarious attention by ruse of provoking a reaction from me. I said Ok. Noted.

  35. #35 by lopez on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 5:47 pm

    It is very strong that our hero has stand his ground and gallantly his stance for Malaysia ‘s future.

  36. #36 by sean on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 5:57 pm

    YB Lim

    Selangor state government should enggage Dr.Porntip Rojanasunand a Thai forensic pathologist and human rights activist from Bangkok for forensic expertise and all the way to post mortem.Trust me….with her there….Macc and Pdrm as well as master bn will be shivering day and night.She is an expert and is well known and highly respected.Even some of the the corrupted Thai Police forces are unable to touch her and wouldn’t want to face her at all due to her professionalism in her work and dedication.What say you Selangor Government.Someone Independant from outside instead.This is what malaysia need in time to come.

  37. #37 by lopez on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 6:02 pm

    it is time , to find out how the personnel of macc are selected and who made the nominations.

    these blokes must have some common denominator….to be selected and may even have a further unwritten agenda

  38. #38 by Onlooker Politics on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 6:10 pm

    “You see Onlooker? The state spokesperson was ‘respecting the family’s wishes’ – that’s what I was really asking about (my longer answer has disappeared).” (OrangRojak)

    OrangRojak,
    You have to learn to understand that it is normally not the Chinese Philosophy which will insist that the survivors of a victim who died in injustice must seek justice. The Chinese Philosophy encourages the weak and helpless people to endure in the pains and sufferings when they are in adversity. Vengeance should not belong to a person but it should belong to God. The onus of an individual person is to take good care of his/her family.

    As the soon-to-be-born baby is going to be the NEW HOPE for Teoh’s family, it is all too normal for Teoh’s family members to want to stay away for further trouble in order to save their life for the sake of the anticipated baby.

  39. #39 by Onlooker Politics on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 6:22 pm

    Sorry, a slide of pen!

    As the soon-to-be-born baby is going to be the NEW HOPE for Teoh’s family, it is all too normal for Teoh’s family members to want to stay away FROM further trouble in order to save their life for the sake of the anticipated baby.

  40. #40 by Onlooker Politics on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 6:59 pm

    “I know of one Malaysian family who didn’t want a loved one’s sudden death investigated by strangers. I was asking out of politeness.” (OrangRojak)

    OrangRojak,
    From the newspaper report, I could see that Teoh’s family members were burning some incense at the death scene. So I presume that Teoh’s family believe in the Chinese Traditional Belief, which suggests that the corpse of a deceased should be handled respitefully and should not be given further wounds with the post-mortem operations, lest an unhappy spirit of the deceased will cause bad fortune falling on the survivors.

    Because of this traditional belief, many Chinese people will give much more priority to the soul tranquility of the deceased than to the urgency of finding the truth!

  41. #41 by limkamput on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 8:37 pm

    //Kassim got no religion!!! He or she is a communist!!!// i_love_Malaysia

    don’t insult the communist. Kasim is a sob. If you don’t know what is sob, i will state it in full for you. Let me know

  42. #42 by siapatau on Saturday, 18 July 2009 - 10:20 pm

    Pathotologist jangan banyak sangat paktoh. Seluruh dunia tahu mangsa mati akibat jatuh dari ketinggian.

    Dimana kebijaksaan anda? Tengok lah banyak sikit siri CSI.

  43. #43 by Woof on Sunday, 19 July 2009 - 8:31 am

    It was an accident. Learn to deal with it. Somebody went too far.

  44. #44 by limkamput on Sunday, 19 July 2009 - 8:47 am

    Woof, i normally don’t wish ill on others, but in this occasion, I am going to make an exception. I wish that someday, you or your love ones will face the same situation and at that time you will see me writing to you that it is an accident, learn to deal it, you bloody assh*le. How about it? Good right?

  45. #45 by Callum on Sunday, 19 July 2009 - 11:02 am

    I fully support limamput statement. If one day this happen to Woof family, I would love to see him say “it is an accident, learn to deal it”. The wound and flesh are not on his body, he could not feel it. You are fxxxing cold blooded idiot. Just like one of those idiot minster Nazri. If you are a strong devoted muslim or buddhist or christian, will you behave this way ?

  46. #46 by lopez on Sunday, 19 July 2009 - 12:12 pm

    woof can smell the cow butt, he ever comes too close he can taste the kick himself.

    the feelings of the community has been hurt….what are you a.. dog of some sort….you dont have relatives?
    dont you clean your ancestors grave ..comes ching meng.

  47. #47 by House Victim on Tuesday, 21 July 2009 - 12:54 am

    1. Firstly, how did Nazri know that Teoh “jumped out” of the 14th floor of the building?
    —————————————
    http://mmail.com.my/content/8390-death-teoh-beng-hock-qa-federal-macc-director-investigations-datuk-mohd-shukri-abdul
    Q&A to MACC Head:

    Q: From which floor? From where?
    A: We don’t know. The police are investigating. We are not sure if it was from the 14th floor or if he went downstairs. We are not sure.

    2.
    Q:Is this building monitored through CCTV?
    A: As far as I know there are no CCTV cameras in our office.
    http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/7/20/nation/4353692&sec=nation
    Monday July 20, 2009

    Documents and CCTV recordings seized at office of Selangor MACC

    3.
    Q: How many officers were present when the deceased was questioned?
    A: One.
    ———————————-
    WHY MACC OR POLICE CAN BE BULLY?
    because there is no CCTV and at least a second officer when questioning ANYONE!!

Comments are closed.