PAC is responsible to the Parliament, therefore, as mentioned above, PAC should sort out what had been asked by the MP and Summon OTK to prepare answer to a list of questions. Meaning OTK should come with a Written Report (with relevant documents) and explain during the sessions. It should not be a Mouth to Nose Talk!! This also ensure what had been asked by the MP will not be missed out.

DOES PARLIAMENT OR PAC HAS A PROPER HEARING PROCEDURES?

Dear friends,
This article below is just side shows to justify guilt of the illegal leaders since 1976 after the double 6 tragedy in Sabah. Almost every illegal socalled leaders had a hand in this ill gotten gain in what is found in Petronas. I have dwelled in this in Police Reports and my twin milestone High Court cases on the GE 2004 and GE 2008, and yet nothing is done about this massive day light robbery allowed by the Federal Constitution which happens to be the god of the nation but a changing god all the times according to the whims and fancies of the illegal leaders since 1981. Almost all the General Elections (Parliament and States) had been rigged and confirmed in GE 2004 and GE 2008 beyond doubt. So all illegal leaders are only good to swindle the national resources and wealth in what is now today a profligacy of RM30 trillions and it is worsening by the day although economic scenario is also worsening with deficits increasing, FDI declined and the assets of Bank Negara M’sia disappearing fast especially in the last twelve months after another daylight robbery of US$50 billions as alleged during the 5th PM as guaranteed by BNM.
The proofs are all there as I had posted several times including those 27 Police Reports of Joshua Kong.

Joshua Kong

Dr M raises questions how RM253.b from Petronas was spent
http://mt.m2day.org/2008/content/view/23888/84/
Friday, 03 July 2009 16:38
Written by Lam Jian Wyn, The Edge

Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad has raised questions over how the RM253.6 billion, which the federal government had received from Petroliam Nasional Bhd (Petronas) over the past six years, were spent.

The fourth Malaysian Prime Minister said in his blog chedet.co.cc on July 3 that the national oil company had been paying out in dividends since 1976 and that year, the government received RM300 million.

The amount increased to RM2 billion in 1981. By 2003, it paid RM15.6 billion to the Federal Government. The total from 1981 to 2003 was RM168.8 billion in 22 years.

“From then onwards it increased from RM19 billion in 2004 to RM67.8 billion in 2009. The total for six years is RM253.6 billion.

“I am sure the Government had spent the money wisely. It would be interesting to know what the RM253.6 billion was spent on,” he said.

Dr Mahathir stepped down as PM in 2003 and his deputy, Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi took over as PM until early 2009.

Dr Mahathir remarks were related to a June 25 announcement by Petronas that it had paid RM30 billion in dividends to the federal government for the financial year ended March 31, 2009. This was despite a 14% decline in net profit to RM52.5 billion due to lower crude oil prices and higher operating costs.

The RM30-billion payout included a special dividend of RM6 billion which was declared in the last calendar year. In FY08, Petronas paid out RM24 billion.

Apart from the dividends, Petronas also paid RM29.4 billion taxes, RM6.2 billion royalties and RM2.2 billion export duties in FY09. In total, Petronas contributed RM67.8 billion to the federal government, compared with RM56.8 billion in FY08.

pw:nation’s viewed

Now this is mega dumb in action. Only the dumb can get answer without question, my goodness, master dumb, mega dumb, dumb dumb, dumbo, big ass dumb.

Customs Director-General Datuk Abdul Rahman Abdul Hamid appeared before the PSCI to explain alleged questionable practices involving in the auctioning of confiscated luxury cars in July 2006 – but wasn’t it on voluntary basis???

The basic question, the answer to which we’re not clear, is whether non attendance or refusal to attend PSCI is punishable as contempt of parliament!

What’s the real position on this? We remember Nazri had objected to the PSCI calling the then Director-General of Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) Datuk Seri Zulkipli Mat Noor to appear before the Select Committee PSCI.

Then the NRD also refused to appear before the PSCI – a move which Nazri had also supported.

Is Tiong really punishable for contempt of parliament if he refuses to attend? Will it make a difference if Minister in charge of parliament gives him the Ok not to attend? NRD and ACA personnel are not parliamentarians. Tiong is. Does this difference of status make it different for Tiong?

As in Chua SL who “showed all” including his warts in the video?

All the time, the “tell all” refers to the present and the future, don’t worry about the past. This is a half-past six minister.