Comments on: Would Ong propose in Cabinet tomorrow that two former MCA Transport Ministers, Ling Liong Sik and Chan Kong Choy be prosecuted for abuses of power in unlawfully issuing four Letters of Support?

By: monsterball

monsterball — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:08:24 +0000

Thanks Frankyapp.
Dumbo can keep dreaming and twisting.
When UMNO can force Malaysians to accept an unelected PM…what is the big deal of a DPM?
In actual fact…the whole ministry is unconstitutional and illegal….as it was chosen by an unelected PM.
Najib wants to prove he is People’s PM?…very easy..call for a snap 13th GE..and stand 10 feet tall…..for the verdict..just as Dollah did..with 92% supporting him.
As for me..vast majority Malaysians have no legitimate PM.
It is UMNO members PM!!
Keep putting out suide shows.’
Lets see how long they can last…keep fooling people.
For sure….democracy is dead.

By: TomThumb

TomThumb — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:28:57 +0000

“Did you and all of us voters at that time voted Najib for prime minister?” frankyapp

under the parliamentary system, whoever commands the confidence of the majority within his party gets to be PM if his party wins the mandate of the people. and his deputy becomes DPM. the latter is according to convention.

voters who vote umno-bn do not necessarilly also support the person heading the party nor his deputy to be pm and dpm. this is because there is no direct elections for the two top posts – as you find in come presidential systems.

there’s nothing requiring the deputy to the party leader who resigns mid-term, both in law and convention to seek confirmation through a motion passed in parliament. our pm is never elected by the electorate to be pm but instead becomes pm by him being leader of his own party that wins the mandate. if he wants to demonstrate his popularity along bipartisan lines it is his choice. but he is not required to do it – both by law and convention. opposition is just having a field day in pointing to the fact that he has engineered his way up and lacks popularity support even within his own ranks. but that doesn’t make it wrong. it is an internal matter and has everything to do with the party constitution.

you don’t go into someone’s house and tell the head of the household how to run their own house.

everybody knows that.

By: House Victim

House Victim — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 06:11:13 +0000

Please don’t forget that they have billion of Taxpayer’s money to get thousand of lawyers and/or even Judges to do the show before anyone can see if they have balls!!

By: boh-liao

boh-liao — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 05:43:41 +0000

Go after LLS n CKC?
How can one?
If can, then can or not also go after MMK one?

By: ktteokt

ktteokt — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 05:35:54 +0000

Tiong – the RUNNING DOG of all RUNNING DOGS!

By: ktteokt

ktteokt — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 05:34:24 +0000

If Tiong wants to sue LKS over this tiny issue, then the people of Malaysia can bring an action to sue Tiong for his “escape” with the whole group of BN MPs during the 916 time. Just what warranted that stupid study trip to Taiwan at that crucial time? Why not any other time? Why the rush? What have they learnt? Study trip to study what? Have they at least learnt to “zhong fan shu” (plant sweet potatoes)?

By: frankyapp

frankyapp — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 05:26:39 +0000

TomThumb,you are seeing the tree and missing the forest.Monsterball is correct when he says Najib is the unelected prime minister. Every voters knew that the president of UMNO should Umno/Bn won the 12 GE would be made the prime minister. Umno/Bn won and AAB as president at that time became PM.Where was Najib,oh yeap a DP only.Did you and all of us voters at that time voted Najib for prime minister ?. Surely no,hence Monsterball is absolutely correct,I repeat.

By: Godfather

Godfather — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:40:13 +0000

These people don’t have the balls to go up to the witness stand.

By: mendela

mendela — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:31:51 +0000

I would contribute RM 5000 defence fund should Kit get sue by the running dogs.

By: Godfather

Godfather — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:14:31 +0000

The more they bark, the closer you are to their sore point. The rakyat must be informed of the seriousness of this crime.

By: Taxidriver

Taxidriver — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:48:58 +0000

mendela says:

” I would bet anyone RM100 tat running dog Tiong has got no balls to sue ”

Dear mendela,

Did’nt you know tat eunuchs don’t have those things? UMNO took ‘em away and made soup with them. Very delicious wor!

By: YK Leong

YK Leong — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:32:02 +0000

We must get ready a “DEFENCE FUND” for our brother Kit Siang, in the event Bong Kang and Bintulu Tai Koh are going to sue brother Kit Siang.

By: mendela

mendela — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:31:00 +0000

What GF said was right. Let’s make the running dog Tiong to sue Kit!

Let’s expose all the running dogs’ wrongdoings in court!

I would bet anyone RM 100 tat running dog Tiong has got no balls to sue!

By: TomThumb

TomThumb — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:20:32 +0000

“In 100 days as the unelected PM…Najib have proven..his is the worst and the last of UMNO.” monsterball

there’s no election for prime minister in malaysia. the same would happen in the case of dap. even retards know that.

By: Godfather

Godfather — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:00:55 +0000

Kit:

I understand that Tiong challenged you yesterday to repeat your allegations outside Parliament. Can you give that BN running dog a chance to sue you ? Tiong’s company KDSB barked furiously at PwC and at PKA with threats to sue, but up to today, there is nothing coming out of them. All sandiwara, so it would be good if you can hold a press conference outside Parliament and invite the running dogs to sue.

By: the reds

the reds — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:39:26 +0000

OTK only knows to do rubbish talks. Is he aware that his talks are always unconstructive and useless? He claimed that Uncle Lim is rescuing his fading political career! What a nonsense! I think this statement is more appropriate to apply on him alone! This again proves that he is misleading public!

We have heard enough of his slogan “Courage to Change”. What has he changed? Transport Minister ===> AirShow Minister?

By: ENDANGERED HORNBILL

ENDANGERED HORNBILL — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:47:59 +0000

OTK to begin prosecution of LLS, CKC?

It’s like asking the dog to bite the hands of its master! No way.

BTW, wasn’t it LLS who said fish rot begins from its head. Now, who is the big fish?

By: monsterball

monsterball — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:06:15 +0000

Just completed listening to the 7 videos.
The 4 letters are so clear,,, MCA committed outright criminal acts…right in front of Mahathir and Treasury.
Strange …that usual talkative..mamak is so quiet.
He was the PM…and RM4 billion …he should know.
Anyway…LKS have exposed all….and lets see what will be the final decision of Najib.
Right now…it is musical chairs combined with the twist….round and round they go again..up and down again….pass the buck..is the way to hope Malaysians will forget ad focus on “1 Malaysia”
In 100 days as the unelected PM…Najib have proven..his is the worst and the last of UMNO.
“RAHMAN” is completed and finished and it takes the last one to show what UMNO really is.
Need to sleep now.

By: johnnypok

johnnypok — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:59:14 +0000

New PM looks older but no wiser. He owes the people of Perak a thousand apologies. His view and remarks on the proposed unity government reflect his embattled mind. His facial outlook is like “black cloud over the sky”. The ghost of Altantuya must he haunting him. Will he last another 6 months?

By: House Victim

House Victim — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:46:44 +0000

1. Can a Chronological Events of the Parliament meetings be listed out to tell the Public if the Project had actually be approved?
2. If so, what had actually been approved including the Budget?
3. Things cannot be so wrong with only TWO MOT ministers. And, should Parliament be in the position to act on MOT instead of ONE LKS?
4. I believe MOT has NO POWER in any form to issue such a letter. Therefore, it should be FRAUDULENT and NOT Abuse of Power!! It is strictly Criminal, isn’t it?
5. Please refer to which Law or Act that they had “abused” their Power?

From Port Authority Act:
—————————-
Functions of the authority
(2A) The authority with the approval of the Minister and the
concurrence of the Minister of Finance, may—
(a) enter into any arrangement for sharing profits, union of
interests, cooperation or joint adventure with any person
or body of persons; or
(b) establish or promote the establishment and expansion of
companies under the Companies Act 1965 [Act 125].

Government may provide the authority with working capital
6. The authority may be provided with such sums for its working
capital as the Dewan Rakyat may determine; and any sums so
provided shall be subject to such terms and conditions as the
Minister of Finance may specify.

(DID PARLIAMENT APPROVED THE AMOUNT ON THE SOFT LOAN?)

Power to borrow money
8A. The authority may, from time to time with the approval of
the Minister of Finance, borrow, by way of overdraft or otherwise,
such sums as it may require for meeting its obligations and discharging its functions under this Act and may secure the repayment of any sum borrowed by way of a mortgage or charge, legal or equitable, of any property vested in the authority, or of any revenue received by the authority under this Act.
——————————-

Even IF the amount had been approved, and,
IF Letters of Guarantee be from MOT, (which is not the case here)
I believe it is totally out of RULES to raise of those billion of fund via Private Companies!!
===================================

The following stipulation is VERY QUESTIONABLE!!
51. (3) Any dispute arising between the Authority and the
Administration as to the payment of any loan charges under this
section shall be referred to the Minister of Finance whose decision
thereon shall be final.

PLEASE PRESENT THE CASE WELL WITH ALL CAUSE & AFFECTS! I assume:
———————————————————–
1. The Project needs to be provided with ALL Details before any Budget approved by the Parliament be valid. Same goes for any variations. Especially expansion.
2. All payment (as mentioned by someone in this Blog) that they must be with certified received of the job with the necessary CF, etc..
3. The Cabinet should only have power within the scope and details of the budgets approved by the Parliament. They are not provided with a blank check from the Parliament just by Topic of a Project.
4. Same goes for the MOF & MOT.

Most probably, it HAS BEEN A MUCH OVERRIDING OF AUTHORITIES by the Ministers than that was actually being approved by the Parliament.
=================================================
THE KEY POINT IS
DOES THE PARLIAMENT UNDERSTAND WHAT HAD THEY APPROVED? OR, BASICALLY NOT MUCH CONTENT BEING APPROVED THAN A TOPIC WITH A LUMP SUM!!! – which I believe it only a kind of Preliminary OK!!