Pakatan Rakyat facing first crisis of confidence since its formation after the March 8 political tsunami last year


Pakatan Rakyat is facing its first crisis of confidence among members, supporters and well-wishers since its formation after the March 8 political tsunami last year.

I had made a short comment to reporters on the theme of the speech of the PAS President, Datuk Seri Hadi Awang after the opening ceremony of the 55th PAS Muktamar in Stadium Melawati, Shah Alam on Friday.

I said that the theme Hadi had chosen for his opening speech, “Islam Memimpin Perubahan”, would be a great challenge for PAS to become a national party capable of representing the rights and interests of all citizens in plural Malaysia at a historic moment in the nation’s history undergoing unprecedented political change.

Some of the speeches of PAS leaders and resolutions at the 55th PAS Muktamar like the focus on Umno-PAS “unity talks” and the call for the ban of Sisters-in-Islam have however an opposite effect, creating a crisis of confidence in the Pakatan Rakyat among members, supporters and well-wishers.

UMNO Youth leader, Khairy Jamaluddin and other UMNO leaders are trying to press home the advantage of using the Umno-PAS “unity talks” to split Pakatan Rakyat and undermine public confidence in Pakatan Rakyat.

This is a test of the wisdom and capability of DAP, PKR and PAS leaders to measure up to the expectations of the people as expressed in the March general election last year to advance the cause of Pakatan Rakyat.

Print Friendly

  1. #1 by Onlooker Politics on Tuesday, 9 June 2009 - 10:54 pm

    “As Jeffrey has rightly pointed out, both factions within the PAS share the same ultimate goal of establishing an Islamic theocracy in Malaysia. The only difference lies in approach – whereas the cleric faction thinks that the best way is through Malay unity, the Erdorgan faction thinks that it is through PR.

    PR supporters can only hope that the Erdorgan faction does not change its mind after taking into account those considerations suggested by Jeffrey and myself in an earlir posting.” (Lee Wang Yen)

    While Dr. Lee Wang Yen’s assumption that “both factions within the PAS share the same ultimate goal of establishing an Islamic theocracy in Malaysia” may hold true, there is no sign indicating that the Erdorgan faction will change its mind in the near future in order to come up with a compromise with the cleric faction for acceding to the formation of a UMNO-PAS Unity Government.

    Not every God-fearing political leader, whether he is from PAS or from MCA, will want to give a serious consideration to the proposal of UMNO-PAS Unity Government. The reasons are as follow:
    1) Some God-fearing political leaders from PAS, such as Nik Aziz and Husam Musa, may be forward-looking and they may just want to focus their attention on preaching Islam to the non-Muslims. They will reject the proposal of forming a UMNO-PAS Unity Government if such a proposal is solely based on racism, which will not be justifiable by the Islamic doctrine. They will probably hold the viewpoint that the acceptance of rationale for doing something simply based on racism will eventually make them fail God. This is because racism helps nothing much to bring more non-believers to come to know the beauty of Islam and make them wanting to convert to Islam.

    2) If the cleric faction of PAS just wants to form a Unity Government with UMNO due to racism, then some conscientious leaders of MCA may reject the inclusion of PAS as a member in the coalition of Barisan Nasional. If Najib eventually insists on the acceptance of the membership application of PAS into the Barisan Nasional, then a New Barisan Nasional with only 1/2 MCA will appear. The other one half of MCA will most likely be disintegrated and join either PKR or DAP. That MCA’s partial disintegration will finally help Pakatan Rakyat to win much more seats in the 13th General Election.

  2. #2 by frankyapp on Tuesday, 9 June 2009 - 11:11 pm

    Hi Jeffrey,You know pretty well that we are not dicussing about honourable men and women.When crooks,criminals,gamblers,drinkers hypocrites and the likes are sleeping together,don’t you think they will not have sex ?. Surely all the PAS and Umno guys and gals are not impotence,right Jeffrey !

  3. #3 by Jeffrey on Tuesday, 9 June 2009 - 11:34 pm

    Frank, “celibacy control” is just putting “sleeping together” on a very high moral platform/pedestal just so in order to provide a hypocritical cover for the gratification of the basic instinct, without others knowing or criticising such a gratification since they are conned to thinking its for a higher mystical expression of using Yin to rejuvenate Yang. :)

  4. #4 by luking on Wednesday, 10 June 2009 - 12:09 am

    YB.LKS,we are very disappointed with PAS esp.wth awang and nas guy.my friends had always maintained PAS can never be trusted,and now i m beginning to be convinced.telling u,my family f 4 give our votes to pas not because we trust pas,but no choice but to give pkr a chance.but with those arrogant pas around,we won.t hesitate to vote otherwise or don’t vote the next ge.PAS says bn played them out but we feel that we r being played out by PAS in a bigger way.In fact,they are telling us,we don’t need non malays votes now.we r now a national party.we can always go back to umno to form a unity govnt.

  5. #5 by Onlooker Politics on Wednesday, 10 June 2009 - 2:15 am

    YB Kit,

    This test of confidence among the members of Pakatan Rakyat clearly shows that BN has already launched a plot of hatred seed planting through the massive onslaught attempt by the mainstream media in order to play a double crossing game with PR.

    If PR leaders continue to show impatient and intolerance among themselves against one member and another, sooner or later the noble dream and aspiration of Pakatan Rakyat to champion the small men of Malaysia for purpose of overthrowing the BN government and taking over the mandate from BN to form the next Federal Government by the 13th General Election will just be reduced into an impossibility and be turned into a laughing stock of the enemy of PR.

    I plea that all PR members do exercise a reasonable degree of self-restraint and self-contain in order to lay path for a cool-off period for everyone in the PR now! A biblical story tells us that King Saul became the King when he had gotten the mandate from God. However, when King Saul defied God by refusing to obey the instruction of God by his carrying out a purposeful annihilation of a people (the Gibeonites) that was supposed to receive protection from God, God later changed His mind. God finally made King Saul’s enemies come back and then King Saul was forced to commit suicide when he had been suffocated by his enemies.

    I believe that PR will be given the mandate by God to take over the duty of forming the Federal Government from BN by the 13th General Election. Let’s obey God and not let God be let down by some disobedient people like Hadi Awang.

    In Bible, there are dozens of Scriptural instances in which whole families bear the guilt of sins committed by their head. Achan is an example. And let’s not forget Adam!

    Take another example, generational sin is usually cited by many as the reasons of the wrath of God, regarding the justification for the death of the sons of King Saul.

    A writer, Jaime, found that the consequence of disobedience to God may also be found in the words of the Gibeonites:

    ‘QUOTE
    2 Samuel 21:5-6

    5 They answered the king, “As for the man who destroyed us and plotted against us so that we have been decimated and have no place anywhere in Israel,

    6 let seven of his male descendants be given to us to be killed and exposed before the LORD at Gibeah of Saul—the Lord ‘s chosen one.”
    So the king said, “I will give them to you.”

    It is great evil to carry out a purposeful annihilation of a people that is supposed to receive protection from God. True, the Gibeonites created a ruse so that they would be spared. But the ruse was because of their fear of Israel, and the God of Israel. They had great fear and faith that God would destroy them, but they could also be spared if they could just have an oath saying just that from God’s chosen nation. It took a lot of humility and wisdom for the Gibeonites to do it, because they could have chosen to be like the other accursed tribes in using the power of its military force to fight Israel.

    Such fear of Israel’s God was still in the hearts of their descendants. They honored King Saul as God’s chosen one, though he did them a very great wrong. It was a breaking of a pledge. They humbly knew their limitations as foreigners in Israel (v. 4). They could not put anyone to death, nor could they ask for monetary/material compensation from Saul’s family. Hence, it is not surprising that King David asked what their request was. All they asked was justice be done.

    The pain of one’s own bloodline being destroyed to near-extinction by God’s own people cannot be equalled, even more so if there was sincere faith that God would protect that bloodline. Perhaps when we get into how the Gibeonites might have felt as they saw their own loved ones being slaughtered, we can understand that their faith in God and His people being tarnished by the massacre, is one possible reason why God took it a serious offense for King Saul to carry out their annihilation.

    The lack of mention of what Saul did to Gibeonite bloodline can very well be a strong warning from God that all is not forgotten by Him, even if many things are not recorded as significant by men. The famine shows that it was King David’s responsibility to do something about the great injustice forgotten by his own people, and that forgetfulness alone does not exempt anyone in Israel from receiving God’s chastisement.

    Was it justified that Saul’s sons were killed? Why not just forgive and forget, and let bygones be bygones? The problem I find is this: like the attitude of Achan’s family about his sin, Saul’s own family did not think much of what he did to the Gibeonites as something so heinous. For if any of them did care about what happened, something should have already been done to exalt God’s justice and grace, especially since He did have His laws that provided protection for the foreigners welcomed among the Israelites.

    But the massacre was actually forgotten. This uncaring attitude by Saul’s own family towards the Gibeonites stands in stark contrast to the attitude of Joshua and the Israelites towards the same people. Joshua and his brethren actually feared to break an oath to spare them, because they made the oath in God’s name. I think that the integrity of Joshua to honor God’s name in such an important pledge, just further compounded Saul’s sin, and the sin of his own family. For callously destroying what God has graciously spared, Saul and his family must pay. I would say that is the same kind of justice God had inflicted on Babylon and her children, as payment for her arrogance to seek the destruction of Israel.

    By Jaime’

    The above comment by Jaime has given us a revelation about the will of God. I believe that the will of God reveals to us that God wants to spare and protect Pakatan Rakyat just like God wanted to protect the Gibeonites from going extinction on earth! Anyone who attempts to destroy Pakatan Rakyat will certainly see some kind of justice to be inflicted upon him/her, as payment for his/her arrogance to seek the destruction of Pakatan Rakyat!

  6. #6 by Lee Wang Yen on Wednesday, 10 June 2009 - 5:15 am

    The number of Chinese majority constituencies in Malaysia is very limited. Also, many of the MCA seats are mixed constituencies.

    Thus, even if half of MCA gets into PR, it is unlikely to significantly increase PR’s seats in the next general election. The malay and Muslim bumiputra front still has a very good chance of obtaining 2/3 majority seats in the parliament come that election.

  7. #7 by nurul_in on Wednesday, 10 June 2009 - 1:16 pm

    As a normal human being, we do mistakes. When we do mistakes, then comes sorry and forgiveness. As a normal human being also, are we going to be arrogant for not forgive others? Leader also is not perfect. My point is DS Hadi may be wrong, may be his opinion is a mistake, whatever. But, have we the grass-root level ever thought to listen to what he is thinking and we can correct him if we think he is wrong.

    I was there during Muktamar PAS in Shah Alam. I saw YB Kit also sitting in between YB Wan Azizah and MB Selangor. I listened to Hadi’s speech. I know there will be another bomb will be landed to Pakatan Rakyat. Many PAS leaders pointed out their opinions and majority of them OPPOSED the proposal of UG. The UG proposal is never ever being agreed by PAS grass-root level including myself.

    I quote some speech from PAS leaders (translated to English):

    Shah Alam, YB Ir Khalid Samad – “It is rather to talk about unity in Pakatan Rakyat rather to talk about unity with UMNO, our enemy”

    Dewan Pemuda PAS Pusat – Sdr Zulkifli – “If PAS leaders want to see cracked (perpecahan) within PAS, just go ahead with the proposal”

    Ust Nasruddin Hassan at-Tantawi – “I object the proposal of UG, but we never reject any UMNO members to see the beauty of Islam.”

    Just 2 cents from me. Trust me, we PAS supporter do not support the proposal. If our leader do something wrong, it’s our right to correct him for our own organization, not just blaming. I do hope all the commenters, please forgive Ust Hadi. Mustapha Ali, one of PAS leader has already made his point clear, please read this URL.

    http://www.harakahdaily.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=021238&Itemid=85

    -Nurul-

  8. #8 by Loh on Wednesday, 10 June 2009 - 2:12 pm

    UMNO has behaved as thought the country belongs only to Malay. With or without PAS included in BN or as part of UMNO, the policy of Ketuanan Melayu will not change. UMNO has gone from bad to worse, and they will not change.

    PAS is now under the Presidency of a person who has combined the worse of racism and religious fanaticism. It would be good if he will bring all his followers over to UMNO, so that the balance in PAS, whether remaining as half a party, or joining PKR would still get non-Malays’ support.

    UMNO will do gerrymandering whenever there is a chance to draw up new election boundaries. UMNO has shown that it did not require to obtain 2/3 majority of its own to rule as it pleases. With UMNO’s record, whether decorated with multiracial presentation or not, only fools among non-Malays will ever vote BN. DAP had no choice but to take enemies’ enemies as friends until they prove to be direct enemies. Even so, they cannot be a larger enemy than UMNO.

    MCA is in dilemma. If it leaves BN, then it cannot claim to be a historical ally with the governing party. Gerakan claimed that they got into the government to rectify government excess. But in the process, Gerakan was modified to be a weaker form of MCA. Gerakan has lasted this long because UMNO was cunning to give them Penang to act on behalf of UMNO. With Penang remains in Pakatan, Gerakan will not survive the next election. Wisdom of hindsight has perfect vision. Gerakan should have remained in the opposition after May 13. The history of the federation would have been different.

    PAS was a splinter group of UMNO. Those who are opposed to the BN policies of all the bad-isms have no choice but to vote for PAS when they are in the opposition. PAS is the lesser of two evil because UMNO has squandered the goodwill and it has to be removed from governing before it will ever change.

  9. #9 by Lee Wang Yen on Wednesday, 10 June 2009 - 3:08 pm

    Gerrymandering is the key trick. Prior to 8 March 2008, UMNO gerrymandered to increase mixed seats. In those days, mixed seats were told to be unwinnable by the position, given that most Malays wouldn’t vote for DAP and most Chinese wouldn’t vote for PAS. But this came to an end on 8/3. BN lost a large number of mixed seats.

    The current situation is such that PAS is the key determinant of whether this trick works. If PAS stays in PR and co-operate with PKR and DAP, no amount of gerrymandering can save UMNO-BN. If they gerrymander to substantially increase the mixed constituencies, PR (largely through PKR) will win. If they gerrymander to substantially increase the Malay seats, PR (largely through PAS) will win. But if PAS jumps ship to BN, the trick will work – increasing the Malay seats will ensure an UMNO-PAS dominance in Malaysian politics.

  10. #10 by Lee Wang Yen on Wednesday, 10 June 2009 - 3:09 pm

    oops… were THOUGHT to be unwinnable…’
    sorry

Comments are closed.