it is also lost on this posterior orifice that maybe the writer wants to proudly qualify himself as not just a Malay but one who succeeded on his own in the way he has taken pains to point out the flaws in the system…and distinguish himself from all those other Malays who are simply abusing the system for their own selfish gains.

it is quite unlikely that the writer would bite the hand that fed him if he himself had benefited from the system.

chengho wallows in the mud of confusion that he swishes around with his little curly tail…just enough to stir up the faeces he lies in

who else could make a suggestion such as this except a malay student studying on tax payer money?

Applicant who studies in a local college or a local university of acceptable academic standards such as Inti College, Taylor’s College, Sunway College, Southern College, New Era College, TARC or UTAR shall be given priority to student who studies in a foreign country in the selection of study loan winner.

Even if the ethnic origin of the individual who wrote this letter was concealed, the last sentence in the second paragraph of this letter will still reveal it…

(a) For social restructuring (bluntly put, less bright students that qualifies due to racial reasons) can have access to loans and aids. this is meant for social re-engineering. Period.

(b) Then allocate scholarships for the best and brightest, base on meritocracy where race or family income level is not a criteria. these scholarship holders can then be identified to serve a bond after graduation to ensure tax payers’ money can have its return in place.

We surely have more than enough funds for this. if we can afford to burn our money like in PKFTZ almightiest scandal, then surely we can buy 1 submarine less also to finance the deserving Malaysians and lessen the burden.

Malaysians have daft policies that arrest the opportunities and potential of the best and brightest on the pretext of social re-engineering. The policy makers and implementers lack sufficient grey matter to have both objectives being satisfied simultaneously while complicating simple things. Perhaps too much of divide and rule clouded their capacity to arrive at optimum allocation decisions.

Helloooooo….this has been going on for 30 years under the corrupt BN government, and will continue to be the motto until this government is toppled at the polls.

This is the direct result of decades of bad leadeship and gross mismanagement of our country…..we tended to the weak and dependable but gave no support to the strong and independent to get stronger.

I only spent something like RM5,000 for the tuition/courses fee of the complete ACCA courses in 1974-1979.

Now how much do each student need?

What kind of product do we have? How many years do some of them complete the course?

This the what i call Selfish Hideous Illegal Trap SHIT for the public fund as wasted. Some even call this SMART which is Sure Make All Rotten Through as the expense of the poor people in Malaysia.

English for Unity, Knowledge & Prosperity
http://www.bonology.com/2009/06/english-for-all.html

My friend who studies in a UK university told me that the number of Malaysian students in his university ranks #2 in the foreign student list, where the top spot is China. He told me that most of the Malaysian students are sponsored by Malaysian government. Well, it looks to me that Malaysia is a rich country. Or, our local universities standard is so poor that the government also has no trust on them and has to spend millions every year to send students studying in oversea.

I think the business management courses, law courses, accountancy courses, etc. in Malaysia are very good already, and therefore, government should not sponsor students to do Bachelor degree in oversea. However, it is still worth to sponsor student to do courses like engineering, medical, pharmacy, etc.