No more “May 13″ spectre – now its “May 7″ spectre!


Thousands of Malaysians from all races and religions are gathered here tonight on the 40th anniversary of the traumatic May 13 riots in 1969 to send out a clear and unmistakable message – that after the March 8 “political tsunami” last year, Malaysians have put the 40-year spectre of “May 13” behind them as the new haunting image is the “May 7” Day of Infamy of the Perak Speaker V. Sivakumar physically dragged out of the Assembly.

This is an image which has instilled such fear in the Barisan Nasional that it has banned television stations from playing video footages of the “May 7” Day of Infamy in the Perak State Assembly – which will be as effective as the book-burning orgies of tyrants of olden ages.

Barisan Nasional leaders do not seem to realize that while they can ban television stations and mainstream media from reproducing the horrifying images of the Perak Speaker being physically dragged out of the Assembly, in Speaker robes and Speaker chair, there is no way to wipe out the pictures from the minds of Malaysians, for the pictures and video footages can be played in every home and in fact are already viewed and disseminated worldwide through the Internet.

The spectre of May 13, recycled in every general election in the past 40 years to intimidate and blackmail voters to cast their votes for the Barisan Nasional, had been used to stunt the healthy growth of Malaysian nation building and demoracy, as it had been used to:

  • Perpetuate Umno/Barisan Nasional divide-and-rule of the ethnic groups in the country;
  • Consolidate Umno rule and hegemony in Barisan Nasional and the country, turning all the other Barisan Nasional component parties into subservient subordinates;
  • Crack down on human rights and fundamental liberties;
  • Spawn the culture of corruption and power abuse;
  • Transform Malaysia from a nation of meritocracy to one of mediocrity with the emigration of two million of the best and brightest Malaysians to foreign shores;
  • Frustrate Malaysia’s destiny from becoming a developed high-income state ahead of other nations, losing out to one economy after another, whether Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan or Hong Kong and in peril of losing to others like Thailand and Vietnam.

As a result, Malaysia is taking on the contours of a failed state like Zimbabwe, Sudan and Somali in Africa, particularly after the May 6 Day of Infamy, when the police and goons violated the sanctity of the Perak State Assembly to bodily drag out the lawful and legitimate Perak Speaker V. Sivakumar from the Assembly.

Despite Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s new slogan of “1Malaysia”, it is the Pakatan Rakyat comprising DAP, PKR and PAS which is more Malaysian and legitimate than the Barisan Nasional, which is why the Barisan Nasional is mortally afraid to do what is right to resolve the Perak crisis – dissolution of the Perak State Assembly to return the mandate to Perakians to elect the state government of their choice.

Today is not only the 40th anniversary of the May 13 riots of 1969, it is also the 40th Day of Najib’s premiership.

What has Najib achieved in the first 40 days of his premiership? His slogan of “1Malaysia. People First. Performance Now” is fast degenerating into a cruel joke.

His various initiatives for reform and other promises of change have failed to enable him to overcome the crisis of credibility, integrity and legitimacy he immediately faced as Prime Minister of Malaysia.

The only credit he might be able to claim in his first 40 days as Prime Minister is the discovery of the political wonder-boy, the “3-in-1 Mandela. Gandhi. King” usurper Perak Mentri Besar, Datuk Zambry Abdul Kadir!

The Perak crisis had been a traumatic time for Perakians and Malaysians – particularly the unethnical, undemocratic, illegal and unconstitutional power grab in February and the May 7 Day of Infamy at the Perak State Assembly.

After the May 7 Day of Infamy, it would have been quite impossible for anyone to produce another scenario to plunge public confidence in Umno and Barisan Nasional to a new low, but this was what happened in the past two days.

Malaysians were never so hopeful for decades about the judiciary than on Monday, 11th May, when the Kuala Lumpur High Court produced a new star in the judicial firmament with the landmark judgment by Justice Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahim to uphold the law and the constitution declaring that Datuk Seri Mohd Nizar Jamaluddin is the lawful Mentri Besar of Perak.

These hopes were cruelly crushed in less than 21 hours when Zambry’s appeal and application for a “stay of execution” was fasttracked and granted by a single-judge Court of Appeal the next morning.

However, when Nizar applied to discharge Zambry’s “stay” today, the hearing fixed is Monday, 18th May 2009.

Questions that are immediately asked are:

  1. Why the Court of Appeal could fast-track to hear Zambry’s application for “stay” in two hours and grant it in another hour; while it is snail-pace in needing five days to hear Nizar’s application to discharge Zambry’s “stay”; and
  2. Whether Malaysians can expect justice in cases involving top Umno leaders when there is an Umno Chief Justice, Tan Sri Zaki Azmi?

There is not only the question of the “stay” granted by the single-judge Court of Appeal, but also how Zambry could operate as Perak Mentri Besar.

This is because the “stay” granted to Zambry by the single-judge Court of Appeal “stayed” Nizar from returning to his lawful office as Mentri Besar, but did not overturn the High Court decision that Zambry is usurper Mentri Besar and could be no licence for him to re-usurp the office of Mentri Besar.

Zambry has cast Perak into a constitutional limbo where there is no Mentri Besar – as Nizar is prevented from carrying out his lawful duties by the “stay” order, while an illegal and illegitimate Zambry cannot under any stretch of imagination be allowed to usurp the MB’s office!

Let the spectre of May 13 haunting and stunting the growth of Malaysia and democracy be put firmly behind all Malaysians, so that we can unite our strength and energies to exorcise the spectre of May 7 which is preventing the birth of a New Democracy and a New Malaysia.

(Speech at the public forum “From May 13 to 1Malaysia – The Future of Malaysian Nation Building” at the Petaling Jaya Civic Centre on Wednesday, 13th May 2009)

Print Friendly

  1. #1 by limkamput on Thursday, 14 May 2009 - 10:00 pm

    Ong Ka Chuan as ambassador to China, and Jamaluddin Jarjis as ambassador to the US – with full ministerial status. Wow ! Maybe Semi Value will get to be ambassador to New Delhi now… godfather

    So how many ministers do we have now?

    TomThumb is Undergrad2.

  2. #2 by monsterball on Thursday, 14 May 2009 - 10:01 pm

    UMNO is shameless and utterly sickening racialist politicians.
    If these munafik muslims dare to dress up with false titles and steal our money….what else will they not dare to do?
    UMNO PMs slogans are totally insincere.

  3. #3 by limkamput on Thursday, 14 May 2009 - 10:28 pm

    It shows one thing, it is just so difficult to remove an incumbent government in a third world country.

    It is not about law, constitution, judiciary and judges. It is about raw power, animal instinct, and cannibalism. Upbringing, education and religions all do make an iota of difference – just look at Shih Hwang Ti to Mugabe. Human being must be compelled to do good, period.

  4. #4 by OrangRojak on Thursday, 14 May 2009 - 10:35 pm

    Saw you’d posted the latest videos, but a bit disappointed, I thought it was going to be Nizar’s speech.

    Only kidding ;-)

    If it’s worth anything, I thought you all looked like the sort of people who could credibly shake hands with superpower leaders, for free. I can’t imagine what the current crop of so-called leaders of Malaysia would have to pay to get their handshake photo-opportunities.

    I don’t agree with any of the people who say “Nizar too inexperienced”. How experienced was Ronald Reagan, or Dubya FFS? And Nizar will be the same age at GE13 as Najib is now, even if you might put them further apart based on appearances alone. I think Nizar PM and dropping the voting age to 18 would be a winning combo.

  5. #5 by vsp on Thursday, 14 May 2009 - 10:38 pm

    Like he said, he is our Martin Luther King in Malaysia and I think he deserves the title. He will keep fighting even though he knows that the public does not like him. ––– kassim amat

    ——-

    As I told you a few months back, your brain is between your legs. Your recent comments confirmed how intelligently challenged you are.

    How can you say that Zombie is Martin Luther King when 3/4 of Perakians hated his guts? You, yourself, say that the public does not like him. And furthermore, your great hero Mahathir has confirmed that BN will lose the state if a by-election is to be held. Does that aligned with the picture you are painting showing that the people has changed their support to the BN?

    [deleted]

    Now, coming back to Zombie. Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King and Obama would be insulted to be associated with such a nefarious character. These people that Zombie is trying to fake are honourable icons. They don’t steal a state government and lie through their teeth, but they suffered much to make society better.

    Zombie is a big-mouth braggart. He got Perak on a silver platter from Najib’s misadventure. Next he disposed of Siva, the legitimate speaker through the good offices of the police goons and the imbecile state officials. Also the Sultan pampered him by giving him a big bauble to pin on his chest for not contributing anything to the state. After a big slap from the High Court, he used the Appeal Court to fast-track his stay application to frustrate the High Court decision.

    Mathama Gandhi and Martin Luther King would be rolling in their graves for such a pretender and impostor to despoil their good names.

    What’s next? Elevated himself to the status of Prophet Muhammad or Jesus Christ? With such silly adulation from imbeciles such as Kassim amat and fellow nuts like chengdol and the likes, Zombie will finally decide to declare himself on an equal footing with God.

  6. #6 by sean on Thursday, 14 May 2009 - 10:46 pm

    Wow……..Tun Dr.M…we really needs to take our hats off for this chap.I never like him though…..but nevertheless we shall try to respect him for his shrewdness and also he is what i call a “Sly”.
    Remember the cartoon “Thundercat”?
    So, why I call him a sly(very smart indeed)?
    Simple…..lah….
    He says if Perak goes for snap election then Bn will be thrashed and screwed.He is right though.But indirectly he is “daring” Najib to go for it since Dr M already made public the consequences if Bn were to go for an election in the state of Perak.This really leaves Najib with little choice to save face.
    Who will be the loser if Bn goes for a snap election and also who will be a loser if there isn’t any snap election? The answer is of course Najib.
    You see…………if Najib goes to Perak and loses….then Najib position in Umno will be shaky.And if he is shaky……then chances of Murkhriz(gosh..i can never spell this chap name correctly..my apologies to him)going higher up in the hierachy is of course much better.But with Najib being strong….what chance does Murkhriz have anyway since Hishamuddin is around the corner.
    But some will argue that Najib should not encourage a snap election there since he got more to lose than the opposite.Well…like i said earlier..either way he losses.And what THE SLY Dr,M did was to just get najib push to a corner..and i guess he successfully did it already.

  7. #7 by cherasusie on Thursday, 14 May 2009 - 10:50 pm

    may be should report to MACC regarding zamri and the appeal judge. too fishy

  8. #8 by TomThumb on Thursday, 14 May 2009 - 10:51 pm

    ” …. intelligently challenged you are.” vsp

    The term is ‘mentally challenged’ – stupid

  9. #9 by TomThumb on Thursday, 14 May 2009 - 10:56 pm

    [deleted]

    I thought this blog is a respectable blog [deleted] Clearly I’m wrong.

  10. #10 by OrangRojak on Thursday, 14 May 2009 - 11:12 pm

    TomThumb Says: I thought this blog is a respectable blog
    Oh how wrong you were! LKS’s articles are pretty good, but after the ‘Responses’ caption, it all goes downhill pretty fast, most days. That’s the problem with freedom of speech – it’s a bit like the big outlet pipes on Port Dickson’s beaches, not all output is to your taste or even fit for consumption!

  11. #11 by distantmalay on Friday, 15 May 2009 - 12:28 am

    “It is clear that people in Perak has changed their support to BN after the three State Assemblymen followed the will of their people and switched their party.” (Kasim Amat)

    hello, 3 persons do not represent the entire perak electorate.
    if they followed the will of the people, then they shouldn’t switch sides, because it was the people’s will that pakatan was elected in the first place.

    can someone represent kasim amat without getting prior consent from kasim amat ?

    Dr.M already said, snap polls is a forgone conclusion because pakatan will win.

  12. #12 by TomThumb on Friday, 15 May 2009 - 12:56 am

    Orang Rojak,

    Among all these young upstarts who can barely write English, you stick out like a sore thumb! To them freedom of speech means to bad mouth anybody who disagrees with them.

  13. #13 by OrangRojak on Friday, 15 May 2009 - 1:03 am

    I see Mahathir pointed out that the voters already chose hopping candidates, so they are really getting exactly what they voted for! Is it really impossible for the voters to claim that the ballot slip is a contract and the kataks are in breach of contract? I would assume (like the UK MPs who are currently going back to their constituents to ask them if they’re still wanted after stealing all that expense money) that there is an obligation of some kind on the elected person to do what their voters expect. Did the kataks consult their constituents before hopping? Is there no opportunity for a ‘no confidence’ action by voters?

    Did any of the kataks have manifestos or pre-election pledges? I still think an attempt should be made by a (or several) Jelapang (for example) voter to sue for breach of contract, if only to exhaust the possibility. It would be useful for voters to know, in the worst case, that the affiliation expressed on the ballot slip is only valid until the vote is cast. If that really is the case, then perhaps the Election Commission could entertain a proposal to remove party affiliation from the ballot slip, as it could be seen as misleading for voters.

    Just think, all this pain could have been avoided if there had been no party affiliation expressed on the ballot slip. The State Government could have been selected by a simple show of hands. Perak could have had a vote of no-confidence every week in such circumstances! Victory speeches could have been very short: “Thank you DAP, and thank you Jelapang! Now … up yours, suckers!”

    Am I alone in wishing for a more concrete standard for the inclusion of party affiliation on ballot slips?

  14. #14 by distantmalay on Friday, 15 May 2009 - 1:41 am

    agreeing to hold talks is probably a BN tactic, to get pakatan to commit to something before a court of appeal verdict that is unfavourable to BN, becomes a reality.

    probably it is meant to split opinions in pakatan, which is clearly not happening.

    it is best to wait for the outcome of the court of appeal before agreeing to anything. i think.

  15. #15 by sotong on Friday, 15 May 2009 - 7:31 am

    If Zambry and BN have any self respect and dignity and are not cowards……an election must be held immediately.

    A hero? First one must show a true mark of a man by not being a coward!!

  16. #16 by boh-liao on Friday, 15 May 2009 - 9:45 am

    Locter Zombie and his gang
    had won a Pyrrhic victory
    They thought they won the battle
    but they will eventually lose the war

    For someone who is locter
    pity can’t see the forest for the trees
    He no see n no faham
    Sometimes people
    Lose the battle to win the war

    The long march has begun

  17. #17 by i_love_malaysia on Friday, 15 May 2009 - 10:48 am

    YB,

    Suggest to make May 13th every year as Day Of Reconciliation to foster reconciliation between different racial groups in Malaysia!!!
    Make it a day to remember the incident to remind ourselves that such things should not happen again in the future!!! Tell our children and our children’s children about this!!!

    On that day, each person shall hug a person (of the same sex) from another racial group (best 3 or more but mimimum one)!!!
    We want to do it by action but we need the support from everyone!!!

  18. #18 by i_love_malaysia on Friday, 15 May 2009 - 10:59 am

    We want to make May 13 (513) as a day of love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control!!! Not a day to be fearful of one another because of different race!!!

  19. #19 by i_love_malaysia on Friday, 15 May 2009 - 11:34 am

    Kasim Amat,

    Zambry might think that he is on equal footing with the Greats, I think Najis should be afraid of him as he will sooner or later want to take over from Najis by any means as he is a person who can justify the end with any means!!! Sama serupa Najis!!! Perak is too small a state for Zambry, he wants to take over the world by any means!!!

  20. #20 by amidar on Friday, 15 May 2009 - 3:29 pm

    Suddenly cross my mind after reading your article whether there will ever be another general election after march 8. Seems to me BN will always try to maintain power no matter what. Lets hope MAGERAN will never be revived just because they wanted to avoid handing the reigne over to the winning party.

  21. #21 by monsterball on Saturday, 16 May 2009 - 5:50 am

    hahahahaha ..TomThumb commented Orang Rojak bad English..out came a log message from Orang Rojak in excellent English..and LKS must have enough of his nonsense….deleting his response.
    Thumb sucking Tom will not go away..that’s for sure.

Comments are closed.