Datuk Zambry Abdul Kadir has likened himself to Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela, causing all-round derision, outrage and revulsion.
If Zambry dreams of being a Gandhi, he would not want to be an illegitimate and unlawlful Mentri Besar even for a second.
He would not lay claim to be the Perak Mentri Besar as after the Nizar vs Zambry judgment of Justice Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahim yesterday, he is doubly illegitimate as the Perak Mentri Besar.
Zambry went against everything Gandhi stood for in announcing that he would again “gate-crash” the Perak State Secretariat building tomorrow to illegitimately re-occupy the office of Mentri Besar!
Zambry was defaming the memory of Gandhi in suggesting that the great Indian moralist would have approved Zambry for being a doubly illegitimate MB.
The most astounding single-judge Court of Appeal decision to grant stay of the Abdul Aziz declaration does not in any way salvage Zambry’s position as a doubly illegitimate MB.
Abdul Aziz declared Zambry as an unlawful and illegitimate MB and Nizar the lawful and legitimate MB.
The stay given by a single judge of the Court of Appeal “stayed” Nizar from taking back his lawful and legitimate office as Perak Mentri, but it did not overturn the High Court decision and could not be taken to mean that Zambry can continue to be illegal and illegitimate Perak MB.
This will be against public policy and national interest. Perak government is in total limbo, without a Mentri Besar, as Nizar, the lawful and legitimate MB has been “stayed” from exercising his powers and responsibilities, while Zambry, the unlawful and illegitimate MB, could not be deemed to be licenced by the Court of Appeal to continue to act illegally.
Allowing someone whom the Court has declared to be an unlawful and illegitimate MB to continue in office would have completely horrified Gandhi – and Zambry likens himself to Gandhi!
The lawyers I spoke to in the past few hours are shocked at the Court of Appeal single-judge “stay” decision.
Pakatan Rakyat lawyers will set aside the Court of Appeal single-judge “stay” decision in an urgent application tomorrow.
Zambry and his usurper Exco should not re-occupy the SUK offices to avoid another sorry spectacle of having to vacate them after a few hours.
#1 by KeenWatcher_01 on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 6:50 pm
Everyone got it wrong! What Zambry meant is that he was totally the opposite of both Mandela and Ghandi. Got that?
#2 by pwcheng on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 6:57 pm
This mamak Gandhi and Nelson mana ada is a just a thick skin no shame politician who do not even know he has smeared the good name of our beloved Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela.
Shame on you Zamry, the Humpty Dumpty.
#3 by Onlooker Politics on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 6:58 pm
“Zambry and his usurper Exco should not re-occupy the SUK offices to avoid another sorry spectacle of having to vacate them after a few hours.” (Zambry)
Dr. Zambry should be matured enough to avoid playing monkey game again in SUK offices. If he is the true believer of the rule of law, then he should stay away from acting as an unlawful and illegitimate Menteri Besar until the higher court has reversed the Kuala Lumpur High Court’s judgement.
Let us learn to accept the situation of no MB for Perak for the time being in order to pay respect to the decisions made by the Kuala Lumpur High Court and the Court of Appeal until a judicial review has been fully completed and the final judgement dropped by the Court of Appeal.
#4 by polarrev on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 7:17 pm
That Zambry guy and his boos are absolute cowards. If they think they are just, why afraid of an election and let the people to choose the gov? What a shame!
#5 by grace on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 7:18 pm
Zamry Nelson Mendela or Ghandi??
Please la! Zamri, you are not fit or qualified to wash both of these two greats’ feet! Make my toes laugh!!!
But I can liken you and yur bunch of mobsters to MAT REMPIT or HIGHWAY ROBBERS!!! After robbing the victims’ money, you claim to be yours. TAK MALU!!!
Actually people of Perak do not like you at all!!!
#6 by rahmanwang on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 7:21 pm
What kind of utter rubbish.
Zambry is not even qualified to [deleted]
How can he be potrayed as Gandhi or Mandela?
Nizar is the Man.
He has patience and the people’s mandate.
#7 by gofortruth on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 7:22 pm
“Najib: No snap elections in Perak
May 12, 09 5:56pm
breaking news
The prime minister once again ruled out on calling for a snap state election in the state, stating that such a thing was the prerogative of the sultan.” – Malaysiakini
http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/104162
“Najib lets Zambry decide what to do in Perak
By Asrul Hadi Abdullah Sani
KUALA LUMPUR, May 12 – Datuk Seri Najib Razak appeared to distance himself from the Perak constitutional crisis, pointing out that it was up to Datuk Zambry Abdul Kadir to decide Barisan Nasional’s (BN) next move.”- Malaysianinsider
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/26244-najib-says-zambry-to-decide-what-to-do-in-perak
————————-
Now what? Najib’s Tai Chi????
#8 by DAP man on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 7:31 pm
Glad to hear that PR will file an appeal tomorrow. Let’s see if the court will give a lightning decision as it did today.
I am not a lawyer but logic tells me that the rightful MB as declared by the court will hold office until the appeal is disposed of. There is no way for the unlawful MB to assume this post.
[deleted]
#9 by All For The Road on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 7:33 pm
What a joke! It must be the international joke of the year. Usurper MB Zambry likened himself to Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela. He has the cheek to say it in the first place. He is not even 1% close to their reputation of international image and standing.
The Perak political stalemate has now turned into a circus. This afternoon the Court of Appeal had granted a stay of execution to Zambry on High Court Justice Abdul Aziz’s declaration that Pakatan Nizar is the legitimate Perak MB. One moment MB and the next not MB? Who is now legally the Perak MB?
Latest news has it that Najib is adamant and reluctant to a dissolution of the Perak State Assembly paving the way for fresh state elections. The BN is obviously scared to face the Perak voters again for a fresh mandate because this time around, BN would lose big and suffer a heavier defeat to the Pakatan.
#10 by zipppp on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 7:49 pm
Wow ini macam pun boleh!!!!!!
After they rob you they said sorry ,than rob you again in a few hours than said sorry again . Wow Malaysia boleh,UMNO boleh
Mat Rempit pun Bolih,Mat toyo pun Boleh.
#11 by ALLAN THAM on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 7:56 pm
This is the real joke and this guy is losing his head by comparing himself with the greatest of the world. A real joke no less no more.
Dia pandai berangan-angan di tepi pantai laut Pangkor.
#12 by DAP man on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 7:57 pm
High Court declaration: ” It is a universal fact that the earth revolves round the sun”.
“The constitution of the earth says the sun cannot revolve round the earth.”
Court of Appeal (single judge): ” The High Court declaration that the earth revolves round the sun not vice verse is hereby stayed with immediate effect.”
So does this mean the earth must immediately stop its obit and the sun begins its movement round the earth.
But that’s what the …Appeal judge is saying.
#13 by grace on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 7:59 pm
Mr Lim,
Is Sivakumar still thr legal Speaker?
If Ganesan proclaim himself to be the legal one, it is the greatest shame that BN can bring to Malaysia.
Look at the way tose mobsters dragged Siva out. It reminded me of MAFIA’s action. They look exactly like that. After he was dragged out, this pro Hee yit Fong hastily proclaimed Ganesan as speaker. Worst than Botak Chin.
So to me Siva is still the speaker
#14 by DAP man on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 8:00 pm
Zambry, which UMNO leader is even fit to kiss Ghandhi’s feet?
You liars, cheats, murderers, evil beings are not fit to approach 1 km from Ghadhi.
#15 by zipppp on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 8:00 pm
Zambry
You are not even fit to wash my feetlah.Go back to your little island.
You are a disgrace to the Perak and Malaysian.
#16 by Loh on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 8:01 pm
///Datuk Zambry Abdul Kadir has likened himself to Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela, causing all-round derision, outrage and revulsion.///–Kit
He still remembers his Indian root. But he cannot be both Indian and NEP beneficiary.
#17 by boh-liao on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 8:10 pm
Very nice, very shiok
School kids in Malaysia
Watching politicians main main
One group in
One group out
One moment many papa tell children
papa kena sacked, unemployed
Next moment many papa tell children
papa got job back
All within less than 24 hours
In out in out in out …..
Macam ini
sure Guinness World Records one
better than Zimbabwe punya
Perak famous leh
Excellent for tourism
Visit Perak Year 2009 & 2010
Conduct tour of Democracy Tree
Also visit chamber where
Speaker kena angkat keluar
Visit spots where blackshirt haram
Then eat Ipoh kai fun
Zambie thanked god for the court of appeal’s decision
Now god also involved
Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela too
But Gandhi and Mandela
Not scare elections and by-elections
Zombie, who wants to be King, knows aaah?
#18 by ktteokt on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 8:14 pm
Just because his outlook is black, that does not make Zambry at par with Gandhi or Mandela! He still has a long, long way to go! Just another typical example of UMNO thinking, trying to outdo the natural process of EVOLUTION!
#19 by ekin on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 8:17 pm
zambry likened himself as Ghandi and Mandela in terms of his skin colour, not as in their legends…
#20 by sheriff singh on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 8:22 pm
The courts are fast becoming a circus, a playground of the politicians.
Something must be done fast to prevent this institution from falling into the abyss.
#21 by sheriff singh on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 8:28 pm
Don’t forget too he said he’s like Obama.
This guy is one of a kind.
How about Mugabe?
#22 by Loh on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 8:31 pm
Justice Abdul Aziz rejected the request by Zambry’s lawyer for a ‘stay’ of the judgement and he directed that a written request be made with case laws to justify the request. That was about 4 PM yesterday.
When the single judge of Court of Appeal Justice Ramli Ali heard the case at 11.30 AM this morning, was he presented with a written request and case laws for consideration, as deemed relevant by Justice Abdul Aziz? It is most likely that Zambry’s lawyers had not presented any case laws to support the request. When Justice Ramli Ali granted the ‘stay’, was it done because it was his turn to make a decision and even though there was not time enough to conduct thorough deliberation within the two hours when he was at the court?
It might have been human to grant a stay of execution of a condemned prisoner in haste because life and death is not reversible, and besides the prisoner cannot do any harm. In the ‘stay’ decision, it cannot be expected that the person declared illegal MB could automatically becomes legal because the appeal court did not pronounce it to that effect. But government servants believe that they belong to BN, and they would take order from Zambry despite his illegitimate hold to the office. Yet the ‘stay’ order gives the impression that no actions could be derived from the judgement, and hence the legal MB is prevented from conducting his official functions.
We learned about the basis to judge good and bad judges. We are now shown how the Court of Appeal could be flexible in conducting its official business when a lone judge was able to overturn the decision of the High court, and it might remain stayed for years when the court chooses to be too busy to revisit this case. Indeed Zambry might continue to act as if he was MB of Perak and the court of Appeal cannot be pushed to hear the appeal.
#23 by grace on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 8:51 pm
Loh, your reasoning is very good.
You must understasnd that we cannot talk sense into those UMNO and BN’s numbskulls. They only apply laws when they suit their purpose.
Today’s stay of execution is a good example.
When you question the legality of Ganesan’s speakership, they quote Article 72.
But the federal court completely ignored it even though Former Justice Chan gave a very good writeout on it!!!
Bet what the result would be from court of Appeal???
#24 by sheriff singh on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 8:55 pm
Same concept as 1Malaysia. 1Judge.
#25 by a2a on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 8:56 pm
This mama is an enermy of all democracy Malaysian.
This Mama is an enermy of all democracy Perakian.
THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT IS A SHAME AND DISHONOR.
They can lead you no good in life except tech you and your children how to steal and rob illegally.
Voice your wills loud for PERAK RE-ELECTION, tear down the wall of these bunch of pirates/robbers.
STANDUP AND FIGHT. DON’T GIVE UP PKR AND PERAKIAN THE GOD AND JUSTICE IS ON YOUR SIDE.
#26 by a2a on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 8:56 pm
This mama is an enermy of all democracy Malaysian.
This Mama is an enermy of all democracy Perakian.
THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT IS A SHAME AND DISHONOR.
They can lead you no good in life except tech you and your children how to steal and rob illegally.
Voice your wills loud for PERAK RE-ELECTION, tear down the wall of these bunch of pirates/robbers.
STANDUP AND FIGHT. DON’T GIVE UP, PKR AND PERAKIAN THE GOD AND JUSTICE IS ON YOUR SIDE.
#27 by Onlooker Politics on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 8:58 pm
A stay order from the Court of Appeal does not automatically turn an unlawful and illegitimate Menteri Besar into a lawful and legitimate one!
Dr. Zambry is a learned person and he should understand well about such a logical reasoning and should not resort to “bratty kid” type of reasoning in order to justify his taking over the power of Menteri Besar of Perak from MB Nizar.
It is going to be no end to the political dispute in Perak if Dr. Zambry chooses to continue behaving like a bratty kid!
#28 by jt84 on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 9:07 pm
When Zambry likened himself to the great leaders of the PEOPLE like Gandhi and Mandela, he is insulting Gandhi and Mandela. Gandhi and Mandela were oppressed by the rule of tyranny and the greed of power, and their leadership is upheld and supported by the people.
Zambry has obviously become a disgraceful coward when he shys away from a state-wide elections which will return the people of their right. Secondly, Zambry leadership is only upheld with the support of three extra state assemblymen who have not only betrayed their constituents but also facing corruption charges and another who is despised by a majority of Malaysians.
Zambry is far too arrogant to redeem himself from not only that he needs to apologize to the people of India and South Africa but also to the family of Gandhi and Nelson Mandela. He has caused a great disgrace to the country!
BN’s continue grip on Perak through undemocratic and unconstituitional means a greater backfire one day as the sentiment for justice and democracy multiplies by every seconds. Pakatan Rakyat should and must continue to defend the people’s right of selecting their own government till the Perak State Assembly is dissolved whether by the Sultan or automatically in March 2013.
Therefore I urge the people of Malaysia and Pakatan Rakyat leaders to stand strong in the face of tyranny with Malaysia being two steps away from becoming into Myanmar and Zimbabwe.
As PM Najib, continue to do what you’re good at, dont change!…soon we, Malaysia will have the very first Nobel Laurette for Peace (Nobel Peace Prize) which will be granted to our very beloved Mentri Besar of the Rakyat Mohd. Nizar Jamaluddin.
#29 by Godfather on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 9:08 pm
Gandhi and Mandela never took a single cent of the people’s money. In fact they gave everything they had for the people. UMNO steals from the people, and they have the temerity to compare themselves to these great men….
#30 by yhsiew on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 9:23 pm
Allowing someone whom the Court has declared to be an unlawful and illegitimate MB to continue in office would have completely horrified Gandhi – and Zambry likens himself to Gandhi!
====================================================
I bet a thick-skin Zambry and his usurper Exco will re-occupy the SUK offices tomorrow or sometime this week, and the partisan police will welcome them back into the offices.
#31 by citizenwatch on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 9:23 pm
The onus is on Zambry to prove he is the legitimate MB. Nizar should have been allowed to continue with status quo as MB. Didn’t the single judge feel naked that he didn’t have his peers with him in the court?
#32 by yhsiew on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 9:31 pm
Didn’t the single judge feel naked that he didn’t have his peers with him in the court? (citizenwatch)
====================================================
Maybe the pro-BN judge deliberately grasped the opportunity to announce his favored decision while his peers were away.
#33 by negarawan on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 9:39 pm
The Indian community of Malaysia and the world should protest vehemently the sacrilegious statement of Zambry equating himself to the great Mahatma Gandhi. This is a total insult to the Indian community, amny of whom regard Mahatma Gandhi not only as a great leader but also a Saint. Zambry is unfit even to kiss Mahatma Gandhi’s feet.
#34 by catharsis on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 9:41 pm
………………………….Dr Zambry said however that it was lucky for him that his struggles had not caused him physical harm or loss of freedom………………………
This guy is really sick in the head
#35 by ALLAN THAM on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 9:41 pm
His claim shown his ignorant who is Mahatma Gandhi and who is Nelson Mandela. A joker a real joker, his comparison has brought shame internationally. How on earth this joker from Pangkor equal him self and the two great men on earth of human history.
He is not even qualify to empty Nelson’s urine pot.
As to Mahatma Gandhi, no human history has so far produce a man that can claim to be of his equal.
It is a joke and it is also sad a Malaysian claim he is equal to Mahatma Gandhi. He has losing his mind and he is almost insane after the high court judgment yesterday.
#36 by HJ Angus on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 9:42 pm
Well we all know that nothing happened after the Lingam tapes fiasco to get rid of tainted judges just like nothing happened after UMNO’s money politics findings.
Is it not stange that an appeal can be heard by just one judge? It does give a good impression as far as the decision is concerned. I expect an appeal court to have at least 3 judges of varying seniority or do judges have a steep learning curve like the JC in Ipoh?
Enough time and effort has been spent in the courts and the impasse is just as when they started. It is time to go to the court of public opinion – that is calling for state elections.
http://malaysiawatch4.blogspot.com/2009/05/malaysiakini-and-following-law-into.html
#37 by Loh on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 9:49 pm
///breaking news updated 8.05pm The PM once again ruled out on calling for a snap state election in the state, stating that such a thing was the prerogative of the sultan.///– Malaysiakini
Najib was certainly telling the truth with that statement, but did he tell the whole truth?
The Sultan cannot dissolve the state assembly without a request being made by the MB; since both are of doubtful status, he needs them all. Hence, though the Sultan is provided with the authority, that prerogative has to be exercised in pursuance to the constitution. In truth, the Sultan could have dissolved the state assembly at the request of MB Nizar in early February. The Sultan could still have done it on request again by MB Nizar if Najib did not allow Zambry to seek a stay of the decision by the High court yesterday. If Najib was willing to face a general election in Perak, he could have easily ordered Zambry to submit a request for the resolution of the state assembly in Perak, and that together with the standing invitation by MB Nizar would be the neat way to solve the Perak crisis.
Najib was not the PM in February when the question of dissolving the state assembly in Perak was mooted by MB Nizar. Najib should have said then that it was the prerogative of the Sultan to decide on subsequent actions. But Najib sought to influence the Sultanto have BN candidate appointed MB. Najib mentioned two days ago that he had no problems seeking an audience with the Sultan of Perak anytime. He now says that the matter was for the Sultan’s prerogative decision, and that would only mean that he would not request an audience with the Sultan. As PM now, is Najib too big to seek an audience with the Sultan? Najib can certainly send his boy Zambry to do the leg work if he wanted the matter resolved through the clear cut manner of a fresh election. But Najib prefers to use the UMNO-led government institutions, the police and the civil services to ensure continued illegal occupation of the seat of power in Perak.
Najib could have declared it as his wish to bully Pakatan. That would be better than presenting himself of a hypocrite behaving as if he was in total subservient to the Sultan while telling half-truth.
#38 by negarawan on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 9:52 pm
HJ Angus, the main problem now is the key person supposed to make the call on the assembly dissolution is politically aligned to UMNO. This is the only explanation for the hurried and legally-flawed appointment, and for turning a deaf ear to the cries and calls from the rakyat for a dissolution.
#39 by sheriff singh on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 9:55 pm
“Abdul Gani supported the motion, saying that Perak’s political problem must be resolved by the highest court in the country as soon as possible because it would affect the entire country.” The Nut Graph.
The highest court in the country. Why? Well, you know….strange things happen there.
#40 by AhPek on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 10:03 pm
A stay of execution granted to Zambry by the Court Of Appeal simply means that a court order is given for a temporary suspension of the High Court judgement from execution but Zambry may take it to mean granting him the license to act as an legitimate MB which would surely result in a fight back from the PR side.The dispute is likely to go on to the detriment of the people of Perak.The only other possible fallout from this episode is that this fracas has the makings of a saga worthy of a script for a Bollywood show to entertain the world.
#41 by Rocky on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 10:06 pm
dey when Hindraf used gandhi pics and his sayings, you guys said racist la and terrorist. Now zambry is using Gandhi and Mandela. Do you think any of this man who have allowed anyone under their leadership drag out a man let a speaker of the house like what happen in Perak by BN. Please la. We bloody malaysian are not stupid, we know who Gandhi and Mandela are and what they did in their life time. if Zambry was in their shoes, there would have been a war in India and he would not even end up in jail in SA cos the white govt of SA would disregard Zambry cos he would not have the support of people cos his claimed majority is made out of thin air like in Perak cos there is no rakyat supporting him like mandela who has the rakyat’s support.
Zambry if you know meaning of democracy you would know that going back to the people and getting a mandate is the right thing to do which both Gandhi and Mandela would do which is what Nizar wants to do. Mandela and gandhi were never afraid of their citizens unlike you who dare not go back for an election to obtain a new mandate.
Nizar has earned my respect, this man will go far and if Pr takes over the federal govt, he is a DPM material. A malay leader that all malaysians will support and are supporting. Nizar isa towering Malay and one with integrity.
#42 by lee wee tak_ on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 10:20 pm
it compounds the situation when a judge, a professional who deals in fairness and consistency, creates another problem without giving a solution; or rather creating problem to a solution.
such great haste in the light of other abominable delay in relation to other cases provide strong evidence for lack of fairness and sense in the judge’s decision.
what’s the judge’s name? given the gravity of the appeal, should it not be more than 1 judge to preside and decisions carefully considered before being granted?
the higher court seems to act less admirably compared to its subordinate one
notice throughout this sorry episode, Zaki the CJ & Nazri the Law Minister are strangely subdued
#43 by SpeakUp on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 10:32 pm
I think LKS may be most mistaken, has he seen the order for the stay? He cannot say that the stay only affects Nizar taking over as MB but does not cover the High Court’s decision that Zambly is unlawful. I think its most incorrect to make such a statement until the order is sighted.
Also, has LKS seen the order made by the High Court? Its not even been extracted yet for sure. Takes a couple of days even if you were to rush it.
#44 by safeworld on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 10:39 pm
Let me quote what I seen in Gandhi Smriti, the place of Mahatma Gandhi’s Martyrdom, the great man said “For my material needs village is my world, but for my spiritual needs the whole world is my village”.
See how a great man’s wisdom who embrace the whole world to seek for great ideals.
Dear all, please think beyond square, be the world citizen than earn respect from all!
#45 by siamo on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 10:44 pm
Before it was Zambry against Perakians and Malaysians. Now, Zambry has got the whole world up in arms against him for abusing the memory of Ghandi and Mandela. This shows how politically savvy this person is. It is another negative for BN and another positive for PR to be voted in.
First, let’s examine what Ghandi stands for. Non-violence, equality and democracy. What does Zambry stands for. One, dragging the speaker out of the Assembly Hall. So, he believe in violence. Two, use of police in the Perak Assembly to intimidate the people. Refusing to go back to the people for mandate, but says, that “he needs to go back to the people”–excellent double talking. Even refusing to go the Assembly for a vote of confidence.
And, Mandela fought hard against apartheid. Zambry is fighting to maintain apartheid with the special rights.
Up to now, there is still this question in my mind. Why was BN so afraid, so reluctant to put the matter to a vote of no-confidence in the state assembly?
Is it because they do not have full confidence that the defectors will vote in their favour? Or, as the case now develops, they were actually not afraid or reluctant? It is a deliberate strategy to let the situation develop to this point to allow the BN government to show their colors, with all the brute force, police and all, with the intention of intimidating the people not to say or do anything that is not in favour of the BN?
So, the BN never learned from the bitter loss of March 2008. There are using more brute force and intimidation that had resulted in their defeat.
#46 by siamo on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 10:58 pm
I think this continuing imbriglio is good for PR in the long term. It continues to generate bad feelings for the BN!
#47 by vsp on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 11:01 pm
The important thing is to respect each other. We have to respect the rights of the opposition and the opposition has to respect the rights of the government,” Najib stressed.
————
Wrong, wrong, wrong Najib! You have to respect the people because the power comes from the people. You only shouted about your rights but the way you bulldozed your way into power is a disgrace and a mockery of your stand.
So you say you have the majority support? Then let the people decide whether they want to punish PK and to confirm your assertion. Going back to the people is the most cost-effective way out of the mess that was created by you.
Why do you have to make the sultan into a moron, the police into a mafia organization and the courts into a prostitution den? As if you don’t have enough skeletons in your closet, you are still gung-ho to collect more. Enough is enough, Najib. If you are still very stupid to understand and to cut your losses, you will lose your pants and nobody will be sorry for you.
#48 by eglonet on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 - 11:46 pm
njis doing more mistake…every step he take…he taking wrong step…he make it difficult…whole world now knew that that najis scared to election…bn scared to election…please rakyat not stupid …that is lucky for mahathir….that time peole never wake up…mathis survive and use his dirty tactic..but now rakyat allready wake up so..please najib dun play ur drama anymore..stop everything…let people to judge…donmake urself st***
#49 by sheilakrishnan on Wednesday, 13 May 2009 - 12:00 am
Dear Mr Lim Kiat Siang,
A humble suggestion – is it possible for you to print a million badges saying TUANKU – POHON BUBARKAN DUN PERAK and distribute to the people of Perak to wear at all times. This was what NUBE Members did to get their 30% pay rise.
Perhaps if the views of the public were more visible to the Ruler…
Regards
#50 by ekans on Wednesday, 13 May 2009 - 12:05 am
For many years, Mahatma Gandhi had practised the philosophy of non-violent civil disobedience in his struggle for India’s independence from British rule.
Nelson Mandela had spent a significant amount of his life behind bars in his struggle against the racist white supremacist ideology of apartheid in South Africa.
Can the Pangkor ADUN prove that he has also suffered the same hardships and made the same sacrifices as Gandhi and Mandela to justify his claim of being likened to those two great men?
He and his motley crew of UMNO’s BN ADUNs plus ‘independent but BN friendly’ double-crossing defectors can’t even prove that the ‘virtual reality’ Perak state government they claim to be running has the mandate of the people of Perak via the ballot box in the first place.
His party tried to ‘character assassinate’ his adversary with allegations that Nizar is a traitor, stooge, puppet & other negative stuff but eventually Nizar became the victor in the Bukit Gantang elections, leaving the Pangkor ADUN with a slap in the face.
Of course, the Pangkor ADUN still wants to hold on to the power-grab through the back doors and back lanes, enlisting the help of ‘supposedly independent but BN friendly’ members of the judiciary…