With the Abdullah premiership nearing its end and the daily countdown for Datuk Seri Najib Razak to take over as the sixth Prime Minister in the first week of April, Malaysian politics is also getting uglier by the day – where “foul is fair and fair is foul”!
The shameful, shocking and outrageous violation of Parliament’s sanctity yesterday, where Selangor UMNO Youth leaders mobbed DAP National Chairman and MP for Bukit Gelugor, Karpal Singh in the precincts of Parliament, obstructing and menacing Karpal in the discharge of his parliamentary duties, as well as manhandling Pakatan Rakyat MPs Lim Lip Eng (DAP – Segambut), Fong Kui Lun (DAP – Bukit Bintang), Chong Chieng Jen (Bandar Kuching) and N. Gobalakrishnan (PKR – Padang Serai) who had gone to the aid of Karpal to protect him, is a blot in the 51-year history of Parliament marking a new low in Malaysian politics.
What was doubly shameful, shocking and outrageous was that the administration and security of Parliament were fully aware of the criminal intent of the Selangor UMNO Youth mob to commit the crime of parliamentary contempt under the Houses of Parliament (Privileges and Powers) Act 1952 in “assaulting, obstructing or insulting any member coming to or going from the House or on account of his conduct in the House or endeavouring to compel any member by force, insult, or menace to declare himself in favour of or against any proposition or matter pending or expected to be brought before the House” [Section 9 (e)], but they did not lift any finger to protect the safety and security of MPs in the parliamentary precincts from the Selangor UMNO Youth mob although they could alert MPs and the media to the crime of parliamentary contempt being committed against Karpal.
What was trebly shameful, shocking and outrageous was the failure of Parliament to take immediate action to summarily punish by fine and/or imprisonment as provided by the Houses of Parliament (Privileges and Powers) Act 1952 to protect parliamentary powers and privileges with regard to freedom of speech, debate and parliamentary proceedings to send a powerful message that such subversion of the parliamentary process, violation of the sanctity of Parliament and the privileges and security of MPs is completely unacceptable and must be visited with the swiftest and most severe penalty!
For this reason, I will not take part in the proceedings of the Committee of Privileges although I was named a member of the Committee in the motion passed by Parliament yesterday.
At a time when Malaysians, regardless of race, religion or political affiliation, should unite to face the worst global economic crisis in 80 years, it is a matter of grave concern that Najib’s pre-100 Days as the next Prime Minister is being marked by the dirtiest, most unethical and divisive politics in the nation’s history.
I fully sympathise with the sentiments of a businessman who has taken a full-page advertisement in a major daily newspaper asking warring political parties to call a truce and focus on the shaky economy and jobs.
But where is the basis for such a political moratorium when the greatest priority and pride of the Prime Minister-in-waiting is not how to unite Malaysians to shepherd the country through the worst global economic crisis in 80 years, but to orchestrate the “Greatest Political Robbery” in Malaysian politics with the illegal, immoral, unethical, undemocratic and unconstitutional power grab in Perak creating the scandal of two Perak Mentris Besar with far-reaching consequences to integrity, democracy, national unity or competitiveness whether in the state or country.
The illegal, unethical, immoral, undemocratic and unconstitutional power grab in Perak, orchestrated personally by Najib, has also seen Malaysian politics plunging to a new low with independent institutions dragooned to play Umno and Barisan Nasional politics instead of upholding the rule of law, illustrated by the violation of the privileges and immunities of the Perak State Assemby Speaker, V. Sivakumar by both the police and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) which abused their powers by subjecting the Speaker to hours of interrogation.
Even the MACC Chief Commissioner, Datuk Seri Ahmad Said Hamdan and the Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan have openly “played politics”, when the former announced that there was strong evidence that the Pakatan Rakyat Selangor Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim was guilty of abuse of power and therefore corruption in the “car and cows” allegation and the latter said that the police had completed investigations into the 97 police reports lodged against Karpal and have recommended that Karpal be charged under the Sedition Act 1948 – when the final decision has to be made by the Attorney-General!
Yesterday, the Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department and Perak UMNO Deputy Chairman Datuk Seri Dr. Ahmad Zahid Hamidi threw discretion and propriety to the winds when he upped the ante in Karpal’s case, stating that the credibility of the Attorney-General would begin to be questioned by the public if Karpal is not prosecuted for sedition.
Zahid is acting most irresponsibly as a Cabinet Minister in applying public pressure to force the Attorney-General to prosecute Karpal, when the law is very clear that Karpal had committed no crime.
As Dr. Shad Faruqi, Professor of Law at UiTM had said in his article “Legal turmoil over Perak defections”:
Treason: Opinions are being expressed that to defy the Sultan and to threaten to go to court for defence of one’s legal rights amount to treason and a ground for deprivation of citizenship. There are fundamental misunderstandings here.
From day one of Merdeka, the King and the Sultans were open to civil suit for their official actions. They were only immune personally. In 1993 even the personal immunity was taken away.
In sum it is not a violation of the Constitution to resort to the courts to seek an authoritative opinion on one’s rights and duties. Where else does one go, what else does one do, if one has a claim?
Can Najib explain why his pre-100 days as the sixth Prime Minister is marred by the ugliest, dirtiest, most unethical and divisive politics ever in the nation’s history, to the extent that “Foul is fair, fair is foul” when he should be uniting Malaysians to better face the worst global economic crisis in 80 years?

#1 by Jeffrey on Saturday, 28 February 2009 - 5:48 am
I understand that the reason you gave for refusing to take part in the proceedings of the Committee of Privileges was the “ trebly shameful, shocking and outrageous” failure of Parliament to take immediate action to summarily punish Serdang Umno Youth chief Ungku Mat Salleh and Gombak Umno Youth chief Megat Zulkarnain Omardin by fine and/or imprisonment as provided by the Houses of Parliament (Privileges and Powers) Act 1952.
I also understand that your urging Parliament to take immediate action is in tandem and based on Karpal’s application to Dewan Rakyat Speaker Tan Sri Pandikar Amin Mulia to issue warrants of arrest under Standing Order 26(1)(P) for the two.
However the Speaker had disagreed and ruled that Standing Order 80A (to form the Committee of Privileges) was the more proper procedure since he had already received notice from Mohamed Nazri on the matter, and the Speaker had further added, “As Speaker I have thought of this and I have to take firm action on what happened. My decision is final. The ruling asked for under Standing Order 26(1)(P) does not apply. This is because I cannot issue an arrest warrant on a person who has not been tried,” he said. (Source – Bernama report 27th Feb).
Can you basically disagree with Speaker Pandikar’s ruling and use it as a basis to protest/refuse to serve on the Committee of Privileges considering two factors:-
· Others like R. Sivarasa from PKR -Subang and Datuk Kamarudin Jaffar from PAS-Tumpat named may be serving the Committee of Privileges with DAP (within Pakatan Rakyat) only not being represented by you recusing yourself; and
· isn’t it a common position taken of late by Pakatan Rakyat that Speaker has wide powers to make rulings that have to be respected which is why Perak State Assembly’s Speaker V Sivakumar’s decision to suspend Zamri is regular and lawful???
If Perak State Assembly Speaker V Sivakumar has liberty to rule on Zamri’s suspension, more the reason so would the Dewan Rakyat Speaker Tan Sri Pandikar have the same if not greater liberty to rule on Committee of Privileges under Standing Order 80A being the correct and preferred course over the immediate arrest/punishment of the UMNO Youth duo under Standing Order 26(1)(P) lobbied by Karpal and you.
So assuming Speaker Pandikar’s ruling were correct, then what other legitimate reason is there for you not to serve on Committee of Privileges without being accused of not respecting Parliament? :)
#2 by mendela on Saturday, 28 February 2009 - 6:52 am
passerby, very well said.
Just to add:
Rossie the C4 fat lady = celaka
Toyo the power crazy botoxed idiot = celaka
Ali Rustam the stupid airhead king of racists = celaka
The shameless 40% of all UMNO members who are corrupted = celaka
#3 by NOT DUMB MALAYSIAN on Saturday, 28 February 2009 - 7:03 am
[deleted]
#4 by HJ Angus on Saturday, 28 February 2009 - 8:03 am
Hisham is reverting to his true self ; someone who craves power as something due to him on account of his heritage.
But I don’t think his forefathers of proud of his behaviour defending the mob in Parliament – insult or no insult.
#5 by HJ Angus on Saturday, 28 February 2009 - 8:06 am
I don’t think provoking people with suggestings of arson and C4 helps in this discussion.
It could just trigger some crazy people to do just that. Suggest admin should delete such incendiary comments or at least admonish such people.
#6 by Bigjoe on Saturday, 28 February 2009 - 8:38 am
So here the latest excuse of this:
1) They did not touch Karpal
2) How would Karpal like it if they call him celaka Singh?
On 1) IF the concept of attempted assault, which is criminal, escapes these people, does their opinion of anything really count? Again, it only proves Karpal point they are really damned (celaka).
On 2) Sticks and stones may break Karpal’s bone but words especially unfounded ones will slide off him…Karpal’s point really was if his labelling was unfounded, it should not have matter to them..You can see how Karpal is smiling as their reference to this is just sliding off and makes absolutely no sense to anyone else but their too-long twisted minds…
#7 by Jeffrey on Saturday, 28 February 2009 - 9:48 am
Not having “touched” Karpal & wheel chair is pathetic excuse by Selangor UMNO Youth leaders.
The duo organised something on last Thursday that they never knew the implications and consequences. Now knowing a bit more, they said it was an Opposition MP who started the ruckus by pushing them.
That’s of course poor excuse.
The gathering itself of 22 itself was an illegal assembly in the supposedly sancrosanct precints of Parliament, supposedly the bastion of whatever left of democarcy in the country!
Behaviour of the mob was squarely within offence in section 9(e) of Houses of Parliament (Privileges and Powers) Act 1952 : “assaulting, obstructing, or insulting any member coming to or going from the House or on account of his conduct in the House or endeavouring to compel any member by force, insult, or menace to declare himself in favour of or against any proposition or matter pending or expected to be brought before the House” – operative words “obstructing”.
The group of 22 by their presence obstructing Karpal from going to Dewan Rakyat presented a clear threat and intimidation.
Even component party MCA hit at this “kind of behaviour or mob rule” as “destroying country’s image” – MCA Information & Communication Bureau Chairman Lee vWei Kiat N14 of The Star, 28th Feb.
It was serious enough for Minister from PM’s Dept Nazri to table a motion for a 8 man investigation team to recommend appropriate action.
The two Selangor UMNO Youth leaders are on their own.
Minister, Hishammuddin Hussein should know that theirs is a lost cause. His excusing of their behaviour by criticisms of Karpal (see todays NST) forgets that nothing justifies this kind of mob behaviour on the door steps of Parliament.
#8 by Godfather on Saturday, 28 February 2009 - 10:24 am
Kerismuddin can’t even get close to the respect that the people have had for his father and grandfather. There is no statesmanship in this guy. Sad, isn’t it ?
#9 by passerby on Saturday, 28 February 2009 - 10:35 am
Kerismuddin will be remembered as the man holding the keris threatening the chinese. He is a celaka no doubt!
#10 by taiking on Saturday, 28 February 2009 - 10:59 am
Tuan McBullys are real experts in dragging everything and everyone (and lembus too) into politics so long as they reckon doing so would either advance their cause or derail their opponent’s cause. Poor Daniel Li of HK ICAC too was dragged into the scene by them. Come on what can he say when asked for his opinion on the new anti-corruption Act and what else can he say when he was asked again recently on the four corrupt idiots charged under the mcaa? We may be mere Hamba deBullys but we are not stupid!
And look. Karpal is wheelchair bound. Dont they know this? He is no more than three and half feet tall for goodness sake. And he is one fella who does not reply to adverse responses with words like “I deny” or “I have been misquoted” or “I have been misinterprated” or “I have been misunderstood” or “My remarks have been quoted out of context” etc. etc. And and he will not run away and go in hiding.
The point is there is really no necessity to mount a mob confrontation with the man just like those mat rempits who encircle their victims with a large number of motorcycles and who then terrify their victims into submission by their unruly and violent behaviour. The world of ICT is fast pace and fast moving. The world of umno and umnoputras is just as fast pace and fast moving. Tuan McBully is a name which I think could not now quite adequately describe them. A modification is needed and I now call them Tuan Rempit McBully or T.R. McBully.
Then again arent they all products of umno’s (-)meritocracy system? Yeah. Arent they?
#11 by Onlooker Politics on Saturday, 28 February 2009 - 11:24 am
“Kerismuddin can’t even get close to the respect that the people have had for his father and grandfather.” (Godfather)
Very accurate comment on Kerismuddin. If anybody wants to get a double confirmation on the truth of this comment, then please go visit an Orang Asli village in Johor called Kampung Sungai Peroh. (It is located next to Sembrong River on the way from Kahang to Kampung Peta of Taman Negara Endau-Rompin.) The Orang Asli there would tell you how they had been cheated with their votes in the 2004 General Election. The Orang Asli villagers were promised with a 6 kilometres tar road in front of the village but only 16 metres tar road had been delivered at the living compound of the Batin (tribal head). The Batin was very angry about this fraud because it was meant to disgrace the Batin and was an attempt to defame him for “makan duit” in order to cut down his influence among his tribal people.
However, the Orang Asli villagers knew that who was the true culprit behind this plot and they would never pay true respect from the bottom of their heart to Kerismuddin, even though they might continue to receive financial aids from the JHEOA!
#12 by Onlooker Politics on Saturday, 28 February 2009 - 11:41 am
If Kerismuddin’s credibility in his promise to the people of his constituency is also questionable, how do we expect him to be able to utter any words which will appear to be fair to both Mr Karpal and the Umno Youth Amok?
#13 by One4All4One on Saturday, 28 February 2009 - 12:23 pm
I have many malay friends. I can say that many of them with whom I talk about anything and everything under the sun, agree with karpal’s outburst against the insolent umno youth and deserve to be labeled as celaka.
They knew karpal did not aim his disgust at the malays at large. In fact I find my malay friends to be likeable, modest, understanding and very open minded indeed.
Their demeanour does not in any manner resemble those projected by the bunch of arrogant umno bigots/ umno youths.
So one can deduce that the malays in general are good natured and friendly people, unlike that bunch of self-serving, arrogant, opportunistic, spineless, cunning, treacherous, conniving, selfish, dishonest umno/umno youths.
Like karpal said, we should not have time for those juvenile politicians. Perhaps he sould have added ‘delinquent’ to juvenile.
#14 by Onlooker Politics on Saturday, 28 February 2009 - 12:24 pm
Kerismuddin’s father was the promoter of “Rukun Tetangga” (Neighbourhood Principles), whereas Kerismuddin himself is the promoter of “Rukun Tertumbok” (Boxing Principles).
Surely there wouldn’t be any slight similarities between the father and the son, not to mention his respectable grandfather who believed in only One Malaysian Race for all peoples of Malaysia! It is really a big shame on Kerismuddin!
#15 by Onlooker Politics on Saturday, 28 February 2009 - 1:06 pm
Referring to Raja Nazrin Shah’s calls for the rule of law to be upheld (Malaysian Insider, Feb 27 2009), I believe most Malaysian people who believe in the system of Constitutional Monarchy with Parliamentary Democracy modelled after the Westminster’s style will agree with him.
However, it is sad for us to find that majority of the Malaysian people are only literate to read “Hikayat Hang Tuah” (The Story of Hang Tuah). Most of them don’t know how to read a common English newspaper like New Strait Times or The Star. How do we expect these common people to understand what has been written in our Federal Constitution or the State Constitution?
We do not practice a set of straight forward, clearly interpreted Continental Laws. Most our laws are common laws being derived from case laws. If there is any Constitutional Crisis, the Judiary Branch of the Government should quickly step in to intervene. The hearing of the case of Nizar versus Zambry should be carried out quickly. Justice delay is justice denied. In event of happening of a Constitutional Crisis, the judicial review shall be the only solution for all parties concerned.
The Judiciary Branch as represented by the Federal Court shall be made SUPREME over the Executive Branch and the Legislature Branch of the government. This is the essence of the Concept of Separation of Powers among the government branches.
#16 by ALtPJK on Saturday, 28 February 2009 - 2:34 pm
It is NOW meaningless to make temporal reference to AAB’s remaining days as PM when discussing events in Malaysia. Rather, it should be more pertinent to relate events to the period leading up to wannabe’s ascension to the coveted position.
Barring any sting in the tail over the next few weeks, AAB had been and will continue to be of no consequence. It is the anticipation and implications of wannabe’s presiding at the helm that a vast majority of right thinking Malaysians have grave concerns about. We can also bank on the assumption that wannabe too is well aware of this himself and would take the necessary measures to bolster both his position and public perception.
It would not be surprising then to witness events, both desperate as well as bizzare, taking place in bolehland. Do we need anyone to hint to us of any conspired effort by various groups to create the currrent milieu of intrigue and subterfuge?
You would recall that on more than one occasion last year effective curfews had been imposed around Parliament House (PH) to prevent public (for beneficial purpose or otherwise) from being in or near the premise. Wasn’t the public banned from PH sometime in May 2008? Wasn’t DSAI at one time prevented from being within 5km radius of PH? If it was effective then why NOT this time?
Why was the administration and security of PH very effective in barricading and herding journalists last year and yet turned completely oblivious to the fracas?
YB LKS, you have on many occasions raised this issue of mockery of Parliament but in days of desperation, mockery is definitely not high on their worry list. This cannot be better and more aptly demonstrated than the recent hosting by Malaysian of the 54th Commonwealth Parliamentary Conference on “Expanding the role of Parliament in global society” on August 1 – 10, 2008 DESPITE the role of Malaysian MPs are being diminished when they cannot even move an amendment to the Motion of Thanks for Royal Address.
It would be a ground-breaking event if Parliament could wield its powers via provisions of Houses of Parliament (Privileges and Powers) Act 1952 to take necessary action on Keris Champion and his boys for such violation of the sanctity of Parliament. Or do Keris Champion and his boys have Special Rights?
#17 by ENDANGERED HORNBILL on Saturday, 28 February 2009 - 11:24 pm
I have never cared tuppence for Kerismuddin’s character or brains; it’s so paltry I would be ashamed to engage him.
Sorry Keris, you are just way too dim-witted to be in the shadows of your illustrious father & grandfather. As to hoping to be DPM when yr cousin, Najib creeps intot he PM seat, weelll..that would be real bad news for a blind Malaysia.
#18 by anna brella on Sunday, 1 March 2009 - 12:21 am
If Hishammuddin Hussein is perceived to be allegedly dim-witted or even prone to making serious errors of judgement (justifiably perhaps due to the bizarrely well honed and openly demonstrated ability within UMNO Youth members to shoot their own foot better than anyone else) then what’s he doing in that government function where he now is?
What other relevant expertise/skill does he possess which would qualify him for that important leading educative role-model position?
“Imagine Power To The People” John Lennon.
#19 by ktteokt on Sunday, 1 March 2009 - 7:46 pm
The Tun just wants the best of both worlds! First he removes the sultan’s immunity to legal suits, now he asks his son to accuse Karpal of “derhaka”, making him look so divine and so loyal to the sultan! Hippocrite!
#20 by Onlooker Politics on Sunday, 1 March 2009 - 7:57 pm
“What other relevant expertise/skill does he possess which would qualify him for that important leading educative role-model position?” (anna brella)
Hishammuddin Hussein is the World Renown No. 1 CELAKA Champion (besides his academic qualification as a lawyer by profession and his official capacity as an Educational Minister) who would teach the Malaysian people to interpret the Special Court clauses of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia in accordance with “Hikayat Hang Tuah” (The Story of Hang Tuah – a book of Ancient Malay Feudalistic Controversies) but not in accordance with the Constitutionality of the Law. For instance, Hishammuddin wrongfully accused Karpal Singh for committing treason and sedition when Karpal Singh only voiced out his professional opinion about the viability of filing a lawsuit against the Perak Sultan in order to seek judicial review on the constitutionality of His Royal Highness’s decison to dismiss Nizar from the post of the Menteri Besar of Perak.
#21 by ekans on Sunday, 1 March 2009 - 7:57 pm
The Orang Asli community of Kampung Sungai Peroh are bumiputeras, too. So, how can a bumiputera politician, who also claims to be defending bumiputera rights, go back on his election promise to these Orang Asli?
But, of course, he’s actually an umnoputra, bent on only helping other umnoputras…
#22 by anna brella on Monday, 2 March 2009 - 12:05 am
Onlooker Politics: Thank you for taking the time to answer my open question here.
I am however, very surprised to learn from the answer that Hishammuddin Hussein has a law qualification under his belt.
How does that (qualification/learning) square up with his alleged misunderstanding/misinterpretation of clear-cut and obvious constitutional law principles when constitutional/public law is, I believe, a compulsory subject that all law students need to take and pass at the intermediate stage before progressing to sitting their finals and obtaining a full legal qualification?
Or could that fundamental misunderstanding of basic legal principles be a result of a politician ignoring/overriding the legal understanding that he must possess as a qualified lawyer?
“Imagine Power To The People” John Lennon.