The Prime Minister-in-waiting, Datuk Seri Najib Razak, who has taken over as Perak UMNO and Barisan Nasional leader, should stop the attempt at the illegal and unconstitutional grab for power in Perak and respect the constitutional process and the mandate of the people of Perak.
The Perak Pakatan Rakyat Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin yesterday had an audience with the Sultan of Perak, Sultan Azlan Shah to seek the dissolution of the Perak State Assembly and to hold state election, as returning the mandate to the voters is the most honourable and democratic manner to resolve the political crisis in Perak.
In his book “Constitutional Monarchy, Rule of Law and Good Governance” (2004), the former Lord President wrote:
“Under normal circumstances, it is taken for granted that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong would not withhold his consent to a request for dissolution of parliament. His role is purely formal.”
He also pointed out that no sultan or agung had withheld consent to dissolve legislative body, except in Kelantan in 1977.
While the Sultan’s decision on the Mentri Besar’s request for dissolution of the Perak State Assembly is awaited, it is most improper and unconstitutional for Najib to attempt an illegal and unconstitutional grab for power in Perak state to frustrate the will and wishes of the people of Perak in the March general election last year.
This is because the Pakatan Rakyat state government in Perak continues as a legitimate, effective and functioning one, even if the Mentri Besar’s request for dissolution of the State Assembly is denied by the Sultan, and it is premature for Najib to talk about forming a new Barisan Nasional state government in Perak.
Article 16(6) of the Perak State Constitution provides for the dissolution of the State Assembly with the consent of the Sultan or the mentri besar’s resignation if the mentri besar ceases to enjoy the confidence of the majority of the state assembly.
However, the determination of whether the Mentri Besar has lost the confidence of the majority of the state assembly could only be done by a vote of no confidence in the State Assembly, and not by a claim by Najib outside the State Assembly, especially when it is based on dubious and highly disputable grounds.
This is because Najib’s claim that the Barisan Nasional has the necessary numbers in the State Assembly to form the government has still to be proved by way of a motion in the State Assembly.
Although Najib has engineered the defection of three Pakatan Rakyat state assembly persons, the Speaker of the Perak State Assembly had declared their seats vacant and their claims to continue as State Assembly representatives are not recognised by the Speaker in the Assembly.
Excluding the three defectors, there is at most a 28-28 tie between the Pakatan Rakyat and Barisan Nasional in the Perak State Assembly.
Until the Barisan Nasional can succeed in getting a vote of no confidence passed in the State Assembly, the Pakatan Rakyat Mentri Besar and state government should not be hindered from carrying out their tasks as the legitimate, effective and functioning state government.
I call on Najib to cease and desist from any attempt at illegal and unconstitutional grab of power in Perak State government in utter disregard of the constitutional process and the mandate of the people of Perak as this will be a very ominous start for the Najib premiership which is to begin next month when Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi steps down as the fifth Prime Minister of Malaysia.

#1 by johneye on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 11:53 am
I think this is freaking bullshit. There should be a damn law to prevent frogs from jumping right in the first place. Don’t you think the whole system is just a big insult to the voters? We vote for an individual, giving them certain amount of power, and now the fate of the whole state hangs around these few individuals. Since we voted them in, I’d say, we have the say whether they can jump, quit or do anything else.
IT IS NOT THEIR DECISION TO QUIT OR TO JUMP!
Secondly, all the state election crap is just plain waste of time and downright stupid. Why? Because it won’t solve anything. Let’s say there’s a fresh state election and PR wins big. Few months down the road, what happens if half of the frogs start jumping again? Another state elections? Come on guys, what a piece of horse crap.
You politicians should seriously grow up and start thinking of / creating solutions based on the people and the democray system, not taking over states and fresh elections, etc.
#2 by i_love_malaysia on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 11:56 am
Najis never play by the rules, he set his own rules and yet he dont follow his own rules, so there’s no rules for him at all!!! But if you dont follow his rules, C4 will be waiting for you at any cost, anywhere, anytime, anyhow!!! He had learnt much of these from his gurus in UMNO Nazis!!!
#3 by wanderer on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 12:03 pm
This is the true face of the PM in waiting. Rule this country as a “FROG HUNTER” and Dirty money.
The nation is facing the worst Global Financial crisis and as a Finance Minister, he is galloping the country to project his tainted image…instead of safeguarding employment for the rakyat. This man has only one thing in mind, to boost his deflated ego and “Self comes first before the Nation”
Do we need such a man to become the PM?
#4 by StevePCH on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 12:03 pm
Najib returning with 4 thrash ADUNs …. not a good sign.
It shows that I have to removes those photos afterall.
What good is a Defection Government ? Just look at SABAH, I really do not think that it’s any better than it was after 1994. Illegal Immigrants , unemployment etc.
Looks like we Perakian have to move out from Perak.
Perak was not really developing under BN and with Federal intervention of PR govt. , I don’t really care at all now that it’s hopeless.
I had fought with my wife for wanting to deliver our second child in KL, now I think I am glad. She does not have to face this dilemma.
#5 by Hishamuddin on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 12:04 pm
I think it is right that the Sultan of Perak will to hear view from both side before deciding, otherwise he is seems to be favouring one side.
I doubt the Sultan of Perak can be bought by money unlike the State Assemblymen and woman.
The BN state Assemblyman are purely UMNO people and only one MCA man. U call this multinational and racial state Goverment. Also more than 50% of the Perak Rakyat voted against BN in the last March election.
I am sure the Sultan being a down to earth and rakyat loving Sultan will make a wise decision.
#6 by Cinapek on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 12:08 pm
After being bashed nice and proper in the Permatang Pauh and KT byelections, both of which he headed, Najib was desperate to redeem himself before the UMNO elections next month to show the UMNO members he can deliver. Otherwise Pak Lah will have a very good reason to stay on as PM.
Hence he went to great lengths to engineer this coup. It matters little to him that the methods used was unethical or the people he used were of dubious characters. He just wanted to win. But in doing so, he has lost sight of the forest for the trees. He may win Perak but he has done irreparable damage to the image of UMNO and the BN, not that they were not bad enough already. He is gambling that he has a few years to repair that image before the next GE. But people do not forget or forgive easily. Stooping to such low tactics tells a lot about a man’s character. And you can rest assure that the voting public will remember this in the next GE.
Lest the MCA, Gerakan or MIC wants to gloat about this “victory” just remember that if the BN takes over Perak there will be only two Chinese assemblymen and no Indians. Perak, with its large non Muslim population will not feel comfortable with this. There will be a backlash if these non Muslim BN parties seem to overtly support the takeover. There will be little or no check and balance on UMNO’s power in Perak and that could be its undoing.
2013 is not far away. With a looming global financial crisis and the Finance Minister still distracted by petty politicking, we can expect some very volatile politics in the coming years. Maybe we do not need to wait for 2013 even.
#7 by wanderer on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 12:12 pm
Mr Smith;
You are damn right, it is all UMNO affair. If this new Perak gomen came to light, 50% Chinese population in Perak will be only represented by 2 assemblymen and none for the Indians. This foolish and unprincipled ex-DAP woman with her despicable act has destroyed the hope of Chinese electorates.
#8 by mohammadharrisjalil on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 12:12 pm
# ALLAN THAM Says:
Today at 09: 53.32 (2 hours ago)
This morning one of my friend just drop in my office. He was so sad and I ask him what happen. He told me he was so sad not because he lost his money during CNY but he was sad on what happen in Perak. He was not from Perak he from BAtu K L.
So as we see it all Malaysian are with PR. BN is hopeless now.
OMG… same like here… everybody was so sad and upset and some of them got very in bad mood… and all of them are not from Perak!
#9 by mother of three on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 12:15 pm
PR leaders should take this incident as a good lesson and they should not repeat the same mistake done by BN to Perak State.If you really believe and respect people’s power then you should not encourage all these hopping activites.We “rakyat” against this hopping idea as it is immoral,injustice and cheating the voters who line up in the hot sun and rain in order to elect you guys to represent us.Respect people’s power and take over the country thru election.This is suppose to be a democracy country I guess so……
PR teach BN the frog hopping theory and in return BN demonstrate how exactly frog will hop in practical.Now,we realized that it is totally immoral and betrayal to people’s power.Thank you BN for opening our eyes and PR might end up paying a very high price for this lesson.Yet to know and just hope for the best.
#10 by I Malaysian on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 12:18 pm
The latest news:
After Najib’s press conference while ago saying that the Sultan wanted him to prove the BN support with the presence all assemblymen before him, now the palace has given summoned both Najib and Menteri Besar Nizar together. They are on the way to palace now!
#11 by monsterball on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 12:19 pm
This is a sick country because of a sick ..dominating…ever bullying..cunning and corrupted to the core.. government.
The devil’s best student will be UMNO’s PM in March.
He has no shame..being PM…not elected.
He even fool around with the Koran….to be so disrespectful to Allah.
He is no Muslim.
#12 by StevePCH on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 12:24 pm
I think the HRH accepted the 4 thrash as his next govt. Wise ? don’t know.
Recalling Nizar is really a bad sign. Nizar has done a great job the last 10 months.
Thanks you !!!!
It think the next MB will be Zahid H , personally I think of him to be very racist. Last election, I was hoping he would lose in Bagan Datoh. Let’s see how he mess up this time with his words and actions.
#13 by i_love_malaysia on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 12:28 pm
Perak Sultan needs to do just one thing, to dissolve or not to dissolve and what will happen for each action. SWOT analysis might be good for him to use at present time!!!
Strengths – PR has done much more for Perak than BN done for the past years. PR is gaining strengths & BN is going down hills
Weaknesses – BN has much more than PR
Opportunities – BN wont change or develope the state, PR Yes
Threats – Monarch system will collapse under BN because of corruptions. Monarch system will be intact under PR!!!
Sultan has got only one choice left!!! Dissolve the assembly and a fresh elections being called and let PR wins big!!!
#14 by computation on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 12:29 pm
i predict that when the chips are really
down you will find azlan shah and his son
to be disappointments. i hope i’m wrong.
i really do.
#15 by computation on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 12:33 pm
“Under normal circumstances, it is taken for granted that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong would not withhold his consent to a request for dissolution of parliament. His role is purely formal.”
so what is not normal this time.
the decision should already have been made
to dissolve long time ago. what a let down.
former lord president learned? i doubt it.
i hope i’m wrong. i really do.
#16 by computation on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 12:35 pm
the people of malaysia are going to be
screwed again.
#17 by yhsiew on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 12:42 pm
ntv7 SMS poll conducted yesterday showed that 96% of the participants rejected this kind of “sandiwara” game of power grabbing.
It is clear that the rakyat want genuine democracy that speaks of substance and credibility.
#18 by boh-liao on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 12:43 pm
PR cannot expect jumping of MPs and state assemblymen to occur ‘one way street’.
There are different varieties of frogs and toads.
Remember: I jump, you jump, he jumps, and she jumps – who knows which directions do they jump?
The states and country now are almost on auto-pilot.
Who is running the nation?
So much money is flowing to crooks, when the money should be used to lift the nation out of the worst recession and to benefit rakyat.
Everyday we hear negative news and ridiculously funny news. And we hear people missing and then popping out from nowhere.
What kind of nation are we in now?
#19 by grace on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 12:44 pm
Shameless, no pride,and sheer stupid to sell ine’s principle!!!
#20 by OrangRojak on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 12:48 pm
His role is purely formal.
But I imagine, for the sake of his monarchacity, that his assistance in political matters is not a mere formality. What value does his role have, if a politician can just drive up to the gates and shout “Oi! I wan dissolve gomen! Can or not?”, and get an instant nod or shake of the head? The last thing a monarch needs to do is give their people the impression that they’re flipping a coin to decide on matters, or worse still, that they’re doing what they’re told, and their role really is worthless.
I think an instant decision would have only weakened the monarch’s position and played into the hands of people whose heads are already on fire. Perhaps he’s heeding Alexander Pope’s warning:
#21 by k1980 on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 12:54 pm
Will the British Queen dissolve Parliament and call for new elections if enough Labour MPs defected to the Conservatives so that Gordon Brown is toppled as PM?
#22 by One4All4One on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 12:54 pm
That Najib could so hastily lay claim to forming the state government under such dubious and incredible situation does not reflect well on his character and morality.
How could a premier-in-waiting stoop so low and displaying the mentality and caliber of one which is even below mediocrity?
One shudders at the thought of him helming the nation in such trying times. How could he be fair and firm and uphold the integrity and fair-mindedness expected of a national leader? His attributes and demeanor are counter to norms and precedents.
In any country, a leader must adopt the stance of being a leader to ALL her citizens, regardless of political party or ideology. There is no such thing that opposing parties or individuals are not under the protection and care of the administration in so far as national interests are concerned. Such prejudicial and discriminatory positioning is not one of a national leader.
What about his cronies and bridesmaids? What can we expect of them? Malaysians must prepare themselves for the unexpected and unthinkable, and more “sandiwara” ala najib and company.
Certainly, the attempt to display unbridled, unwarranted and disputable power and authority would only invite, as the affable Ku Li wrote in the Malaysianinsider, public scorn.
#23 by Jeffrey on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 1:02 pm
computation, you know the answer, don’t you? Many evaluate issues based on hope, not on the logic of the objectiv situation. Thus thus have to come to the river then only to discover there is no bridge!
Any one who faces reality will recognise that for an enterprise and coup de tat of such a bold and dramatic nature – now already splashed all over media as a fiat accompli – there is just no way Najib would not have planned carefully, well in advance, sewing all possible loose ends, and pre-empting and clearing all possible impediments and obstacles, whether legal or human, to reach the objective without a hitch! Come on, get real.
Once he has done this (taking over Perak successfully) there’s no stopping him proceeding next to Kedah and so forth…BN has plenty of resources and it is only Anwar who wanted to challenge it in this defection game that BN has better advantage, As I said before Anwar violated the first rule of engagement of Sun Tzu’s Art of War – fighting in a territory and within parameters more favourable to the opposite side than himself. What Najib has shown in playing this game is to do it stealthily and not alert the opposite side – which may otherwise take counter measures – whereas in the case of Anwar it is all talk and talk and warning the opposite side of what he intended to do with no action!
And then some more Najib can turn around and claim that this defection game is “self defence” because if he does not do it, even though such a game is foul, Anwar will do it, as it repeatedly claim last year.
Anwar has just provided Najib a perfect excuse to that which BN has the advantage. And when Anwar & PR want to condemn Najib/Bn for this tactic, there is no moral cause behind such a condemnation because it is Anwar & PR which first advocated this strategy to procure the fall of federal govt after the 308 General election. Thus the second rule of engagement by Sun Tzu has been violated – losing and forfeiting one’s own moral cause to condemn another’s dirty tactic and losing moral suasion to rally others to fight your cause. One just can’t seek justice/rectification of wrong when one comes to battle with dirty/soiled hands.
As I said before everything is unequal in terms of playing field betwen PR and BN, with everything (whether money or levers of power favouring the incumbent BN) except the one thing – moral capital and righteousness of cause that history has proven could defeat even armies & despots: eg what has Mahatma Gandhi or Nelson Mendela got to fight the overwhelming success if noty moral capital and example that could inspire & galvanise the power of the people to their side?
However if one wants to have a quick fix, and when the referee in the game is not looking, hit the opposite side at the b@lls thinking that that will advance one’s cause faster, what can I say?
#24 by penang308 on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 1:05 pm
Luckily Najis no longer Minister of Defence, if not he would used the ARM FORCE to over throw the Perak PR government!!!!
Now, he is the Minister of Finance so obviously, he is using MONEY to OVER THROW the Perak Government!!!! Plain simple!
RM50Million shared among the 5 persons(4 ADUN and 1 broker), can you guys imagine how much each of them is GETTING?
For the B**CH from Jelapang, I don’t think she will be returning to Jelapang anymore, She will be moved to KL to enjoy her HARAM fortune.
HIDUP PAKATAN RAKYAT, LONG LIVE TO THE PERAK STATE GOVERNMENT! Lets pray HRH use his GOOD JUDGEMENT to reject NAJIS’s MONEY COUP and call for a fresh election to settle the matter once and for all!
#25 by ReformMalaysia on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 1:10 pm
If the HRH Sultan do not give his consent for the State assembly to be dissolved and allow Barisan Nasional to form the new government in Perak, state instability and uncertainties will remain.
* The new composition the state assembly will be:28 PR, 28 BN+ 3 defectors.
-Out of the three defectors, 2 of them would be charged in court for corruption- if they are convicted(fined more than RM2000) or jailed, there seats would become vacant. If the vacant seats are to be won by PR, new composition will be PR =28+2, BN=28+1………
so Perak have to change the government once more!
Or will the two defectors from PR would enjoy immunity from Law as now there are allies of BN? -
The best step to be taken by Sultan is to dissolve the assembly and let the people make their decision.
The better still is the Parliament is to be solved too!
#26 by ReformMalaysia on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 1:13 pm
opps–typing error
Or will the two defectors from PR would enjoy immunity from Law as now there are allies of BN? -
#27 by leongwk15 on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 1:20 pm
Dear Uncle Lim,
It is a very sad era for the Malaysia politics. I am not writing in any favour of BN or neither PR.
Whatever or whoever jump across, money is spend. Do you really think any YB resign from their party is due to indifferent principle with their party leaders??? No, this is all because about money. And all this money spend to buy over the YB…. is the rakyat money. These YB should concerntrate to serve the people and not jumping around just because of Money!!!!!
Law should be made to force/limit/keep the choosen YB by the rakyat to serve the people. If the YB resign from the party, then a by-election should be done, the YB will not be allow to contest for 2 terms.
If not, I would like to contest for a state assembly seat. Once choosen, then I can start talking money with all politic parties who has interest of buying over.
All politic parties should push for this law to approve to safeguard political stability as well as sincere and YB is choosen to do the job.
Very soon, Malaysia polictic parties will turn into a English Primeir League where any club can buy over players to play for their clubs.
If the law is not implemented and politic parties in Malaysia don’t set rules and respect each other, we as rakyat should stage protest and demand the king to take back the power to run the country.
Leong WK
Perakians
#28 by taikohtai on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 1:20 pm
Now we can tell the real men/women from the boys/girls. Yes, we have principled politicians who do not even shy away from wrongful imprisonment on grounds of principles and we have weak Aduns who easily get lured by a fistful of dollars.
Why bother to win a mere battle at the prospect? But some politicians are so short sighted that they can’t even tell right from wrong.
Yes, the dark force is strong and there are many Darth Warders. Not many of us can be Luke Skywalkers but in the end, Good shall ALWAYS triumph over evil.
May the good force be with you all!
#29 by penang308 on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 1:23 pm
Btw, can u guys imagine an \OUTSIDER\ from Pahang go to the PALACE in PERAK and tell the SULTAN who should be governing the PERAK STATE!
DAULAT TUANKU!
#30 by veddy.lum74 on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 1:25 pm
she worked in gomen for umteenth years,she had been brainwashed!she may be a chinese but inside she is a ‘bumi’,double-faced bitch!
i heard she is going to get in trouble……………………………….
i will be the first 1 to clap…………..
#31 by penang308 on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 1:28 pm
veddy. lum74,
If I have the chance, I will be the 1st one to throw my SHOE at her!
#32 by whitecoffee on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 1:30 pm
So the UMNO members in Perak are good for nothing. They need a Pahang guy to show them how to do things, like a mafia????
#33 by k1980 on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 1:34 pm
penang308, you want to throw your SHOE at her but please wait till I have thrown my C4 grenade at her!
#34 by computation on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 1:39 pm
i think we are mostly agreed.
we would like to throw a whole lot
of things at that repulsive female.
#35 by Kelvenho on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 1:40 pm
I hope the people of Perak will demonstrate peacefully to request the
Sultan of Perak to consent the dissolution of the Perak State
Assembly. All the best to the people of Perak.
#36 by ALLAN THAM on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 1:40 pm
DPM pictured with all smiling faces except one she who was look very sad and worry. Deep inside her was struggling. After the dust settled she will faced with the whacking of the voters from Jelapang.
She has commit a political suicide and her political life is as good as finish and numbered.
Well many people not only those from Perak, all over Malaysia, are upset the tactic used by BN. KULI has commended that BN will have to face with the public whacking in the next GE. BN will become increase unpopular with this move.
BN should not concentrate to taking over the Perak state. The move was untimely as the, say, if come true, BN did form Perak Goven, it is even weaker than the one by PR.
With the four frogs around the image was bad not only for Perak people all Malaysian are getting very angry and upset.
I was very surprise a friend of mine who was not in polictic who was not from Perak was so sad as seem he has lost everything just because not other than the BN claiming power in PERAK. I believe PERAKIANS are more upset than any other. This upset will turn in full force in the next GE.
All is not lost anyway by PR. PR will be stronger and more popular in time to come.
#37 by PSM on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 1:41 pm
HRH the Sultan of Perak & his son are both highly respected for their intelligence & for the “correctness” of thier actions.
HRH the Sultan of Perak will make the right decision (Insya ALLAH)!
#38 by Hishamuddin on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 1:45 pm
If that B@@@# ever step into Jelapan again, she will hear from my show
#39 by yhsiew on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 1:57 pm
Chinese Malaysiakini reported that at 1.35pm, the Sultan of Perak asked MB nizar to resign but he refused.
#40 by max2811 on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 2:03 pm
HRH Sultan of Perak must dissolve the state assembly. Democracy must prevail, not money politics.
DAP must clean its house. Have better quality candidates. Leaders must not be too arrogant.This is the second time Ngeh has hurt the feelings of members.
#41 by ctc537 on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 2:04 pm
Malayia is so unlike other Western democratic countries where a one-eat majority is enough to ensure the winning party to be in power for one full term. Many of our politicians have no integrity. There will be no political stability in the country unless the ruling party has a more than two-third majority in the Dewan Rakyat. I read book by MM Lee Kuan Yew that during the political confrontation between he and the Alliance party leaders in the Mid 60s the then Deputy PM Tun Abdul Razak wanted to bribe Dr. Goh Keng Swee with an offer of five thousand acres of rubber plantation in order to frustrate the determination of the PAP. If Dr. God Keng Swee were not a man of integrity, Singapore would not have become such a prosperous and an independent country that we all know today That’s why MM Lee is forever grateful to Dr. Goh Keng Swee.
It’ vitally important for PR to have leaders of integrity, or there will be perpetual political instability.
If Perakians want to progress then the voters must identity and get rid of politicians who play political games at the expense of their future well-being.
#42 by computation on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 2:08 pm
i was flabbergasted to learn that
the filthy female who sold the people
of malaysia out was a former clerk.
how can you have such lowly educated
people leading malaysia in this modern age?
technology is changing so fast. how can these
people who are just clerks undrstand all these?
how can they contribute to modernizing the country?
i think malaysian politics is dominated by unintelligent
people who are merely able to “appear sincere” to
the dumb electorate. yes. the electorate is dumb.
even as a child i could tell who was sincere or not.
as i have said never trust someone who appears
to be trying to be sincere. if they are sincere
there is no need to try.
#43 by Hishamuddin on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 2:08 pm
More than 50 % of the Perak Rakyat voted for the opposition. More that 90% of the BN wakil rakyat is from UMNO.
Perak have more than 50 % non Malays population.
Yes, the prince and Sultan can talk nice about being fair and justice for all.
Long Live the Rakyat
#44 by boh-liao on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 2:11 pm
If you are running a fun fair in Perak, you can now set up a ‘hentam katak’ store with images of the jumping state assemblymen and woman pasted in front, say 6 feet in front of a bench. Put some old shoes or scandals, ooops, sorry, sandals, on the bench. Viola, you have a business. RM3 for three throws. Hit the nose of one of the images with a shoe or sandal, a customer wins a prize.
Mari, mari, let the fun begin! Hentam katak!
#45 by kanthanboy on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 2:14 pm
Hee is the Judas Iscariot of the Chinese race. Will she end up in the same fate as Judas?
#46 by computation on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 2:14 pm
“Yes, the prince and Sultan can talk nice about being fair and
justice for all.” Hishamuddin
yes like i said. i am of the opinion that
the “royalty” in malaysia just talk. they make
stirring speeches every now and then.
to impress the people that “they care”.
but as i said when the chips are down
i am of the opinion that they would fail badly.
if i am wrong on this count i will admit so.
and i hope i am wrong. because the situation
is serious. if bn gets away with this,
it will be a signal that no one can stop this nonsense
by bn.
#47 by wanderer on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 2:16 pm
Today, a new chapter of Malaysian History is written. The BIG TREE once give the protection to the rakyat has fallen!
Who can the rakyat turn too?
God bless the rakyat and nothing will save Bohonland!
#48 by computation on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 2:17 pm
“Hee is the Judas Iscariot of the Chinese race. Will she end up in
the same fate as Judas?” kanthanboy
if i had a mother like her i would be filled with shame.
i would sever all ties with her immediately.
#49 by yhsiew on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 2:21 pm
computation Says:
Today at 14: 08.17 (1 minute ago)
………as i have said never trust someone who appears
to be trying to be sincere.
====================================================
Cunning fox can disguise itself as a harmless lamb.
#50 by boh-liao on Thursday, 5 February 2009 - 2:23 pm
If what ctc537 alleged about Tun Abdul Razak was true, then NR is making his late father proud.
To computation, what to do. Would you stand for election? People say politics is dirty and leave it to others to participate. When a candidate get elected to be a YB, people don’t ask from where did they originate. A clerk? A railway gate keeper? A teacher? A keeper of ISA detainees?
All of us sit back and watch the drama unfolds (first in Perak, next in who knows which state? Penang?).