Horror flight on board MH161


by Radhika Iyer-O’Sullivan
Jan 20, 09 3:55pm
Malaysiakini

I am a Malaysian currently residing and working in Dubai. On Dec 25, 2008, I flew with Malaysian Airlines flight MH161 to Kuala Lumpur to visit my parents. I was in seat 36H (an aisle seat) and the seat next to me, 36K (window seat) was vacant. The flight stopped over at Karachi for an hour.

In Karachi, more passengers boarded the plane. One male passenger boarded, showed his boarding pass to a stewardess and she pointed to seat beside me (36K). The man looked at me and said, ‘She’s a Hindu, I cannot sit beside her.’ The stewardess responded, ‘So what? What’s wrong with Hindu?’ The man then began to yell and shout that he would not sit next to a Hindu.

The crew insisted that he had to because there were no other seats available because the plane was full. Then this passenger sat down but began to verbally abuse my faith and the crew members. I sat in my seat but was physically cringing away from him. The flight supervisor was summoned and until then the man was still seated next to me. Imagine my shock, horror and fear in being next to a hostile, abusive person.

One steward did stand next to me but did not offer any help and I did not feel safe or reassured. I reached out and told that steward that I did not feel safe anymore. I said this to him softly in English and he told me to sit and wait. He then walked off and a female crew member took his place. All this time I was under the impression that this hostile passenger beside me was a Pakistani.

I then told the stewardess in Malay that this man should not be seated beside me after what he had said about me. There were other Malaysian passengers sitting in the same area and all of them heard me. She smiled and merely nodded.

Finally, the flight supervisor, ‘SB’, approached the passenger and after an angry exchange, the passenger said, ‘Move her then!’ and SB replied, ‘Yes, we will move her’. More angry words were exchanged and it was revealed that the passenger was actually a Malaysian. When this news was revealed, the passenger actually stood up with his fists up, ready to be physically violent. I was then hauled out of my seat and taken to the back of the plane. I was kept in the kitchen.

By this time I had gone into shock and was crying uncontrollably. I was shaking with rage because I was in a position where there was nothing I could do to defend myself. No one else seemed to be doing anything too.

I could not see what was happening from the rear of the plane but I did see uniformed security personnel approaching my original seat. I could not hear or make out what was happening as there was a group of people standing around my original seat. Eventually, the group left and it was announced that the plane would be taking off.

All this time I was in the kitchen, shaking and crying. All that was done for me was crew members taking turns to ask me if I was okay and offering me Coke and water! The plane began to taxi and I was then taken to another seat (42H). As I sat down, I asked the steward, ‘Is he off the plane?’ and the answer was, ‘No.’ I was appalled.

After the plane took off, the flight supervisor, SB, came and sat beside me. He explained to me that they could not put him off the plane because he was a deportee and if they had insisted on putting him off, then the plane would not have been cleared for take off. I was still crying at this point. I asked, ‘Why am I in a different seat? He should be!’ but my question was not answered.

The plane was not full. There were eight seats vacant in the rear, four on the right aisle and four seats on the left. Seat 42H, where I was put, was one of those vacant seats in the rear. If the MAS crew knew there was a deportee boarding, should they not have made arrangements to place him at the rear of the plane? What kind of airline policy allows a deportee to sit beside a female passenger travelling alone?

I spent the next five and a half hours on the flight in tears. I was not able to sleep because I knew that a hostile passenger was only six rows down from me. I was not afraid but in rage. My friends who are reading this would know the kind of person I am. I have always stood up for my rights and for the rights of people whom I love. I would not usually tolerate such abuse and I would not have hesitated in defending myself.

What stopped me was knowing that I was on a plane, in a confined space and that there were other passengers around me too, women and children. The abusive passenger was not removed from the plane and when we landed at KLIA, he disembarked like a normal passenger and was not escorted or arrested. I also disembarked knowing that I was now in the same terminal, on my own, as this hostile passenger.

I am very disappointed with the way MAS dealt with the incident. That passenger should have been taken to the rear of the plane and restrained. I was the victim of the incident yet I lost my chosen seat that I had paid for. Apart from offers of water, Coke and some verbal reassurances, the crew did not do anything else for me.

I have contacted other major airlines and this is how they would have dealt with the matter: I would have been moved to Business/First Class and I would have been escorted into the terminal until I safely exited the airport. MAS did not do anything for me. First of all, they jeopardised my safety and well-being by forcing the passenger to sit beside me knowing that he was hostile towards me and then they did nothing else to keep me safe.

I was in the same cabin as that passenger, wondering if he was going to walk by or pass me. I spent the entire five and a half hours in tears because I could not stand up for my rights and also because I had to keep my own rage pent-up.

Once I landed, I rang my husband in Dubai and related the events to him. He took immediate steps to contact MAS but to no avail. I stayed for one week in Malaysia and every single day, I tried to call their Customer Complaints Department. All I got was a voice mail. I left numerous messages but no one called me back. No one contacted my husband in Dubai. It is only after he put it up on the MAS blog that we have received some kind of response. Fourteen days after the incident, someone from MAS called me to offer an apology.

My husband also received an email from someone who has offered me 25 percent discount on a return flight from KL to Dubai and actually referred to that abusive passenger as a ‘fellow customer’! She also clearly stated that measures taken were to prevent that passenger from getting angrier. So in other words, they do admit that.

These are the questions I posed to MAS:

Why force a passenger who is racially abusive and hostile to my appearance and faith to sit beside me? There were other seats available at the rear as I discovered later.This was not a passenger who was merely fussing about his seat, this was a passenger who was potentially a threat to another passenger.

Why did the flight supervisor immediately give in to his demands and agree to move me? I was not the passenger causing trouble.

Upon retrospect, I think I was lied to. I do not think the passenger was a deportee. It was a lie told to me to keep him on the plane and keep me quiet. If a lie was told, that means that the crew took measures to protect the hostile passenger and themselves but not me, the victim. If so, then the MAS crew perpetuated the racism and discrimination initiated by the passenger.

If this is the case, then the entire crew participated in jeopardising my safety and appropriate action should be taken against them. If the passenger was truly a deportee or an INA (inadmissible because of visa) then the plane captain should have documents about him. If a deportee or INA caused trouble on a flight, the captain should have been informed immediately.

Why was the captain not informed and if he was, why did he not come to see me? I have been informed that KLIA security had been called but there was no one waiting when the plane landed. The abusive passenger disembarked like any other normal passenger. Why was he not nabbed or restrained? Why did not the crew ensure my safety in the terminal too?

I am demanding a formal, written apology from Malaysian Airlines. I want a truthful, reasonable explanation for all the five points I have listed above. I want some compensation for what I suffered. So far, I have only received an e-mail informing that the matter is under investigation.

Print Friendly

  1. #1 by I Malaysian on Saturday, 24 January 2009 - 4:31 pm

    It’s shocking. We may have people here and there who dislike and abuse one another. But having someone sitting next to you on a plane to abuse and intimidate you is something unacceptable. I’m perplexed how MAS could let a deportee harassing and abusing a fare paying passenger throughout a journey.
    I would suggest Radhika to sue MAS for failing to protect her and for all the mental anguish and intimidation she had to endure throughout her journey.

  2. #2 by undergrad2 on Saturday, 24 January 2009 - 10:13 pm

    Don’t we all love to bash MAS?? At least to make up for all the wrong done by the government?

    In this case hasn’t MAS taken all reasonable steps to ensure nothing untoward could happen to a passenger who was understandably embarrassed or even humiliated and angry, hurt by the comments of a passenger who had shown a belligerent attitude at the crew?

    You need to sift through and separate the emotions from the facts. Only the facts matter when we search to find if there is basis for a law suit. An honest lawyer would advise this complainant to accept whatever offers of sympathy etc to make up for the inconvenience suffered by her. There is no sense in sending good money after bad money. I’m assuming of course that the lawyer expects to be paid his fees. The complainant should find out to see if her lawyer is confident of winning the case by proposing that he would get his fees and a fraction of the compensation (by way of agreement) from the defendant only if he wins his case.

    To MAS, it is a self-inflicted ‘injury’ and the crew who said, “So what if she’s a Hindu” should know better especially when the passenger was a deportee. This flight attendant appears arrogant and insensitive – not insensitive to the passenger who refused to take his seat, but to the passenger he would be sitting next to. To that extent MAS has to accept blame.

    The airline’s policy of how it treats deportees on its flights needs to be scrutinized and re-examined for flaws. Airlines have little control over such non-fee or fare paying passengers in the sense it cannot refuse them and when you have ‘criminal aliens’ being booted out of a foreign country, it requires special handling. I’m not surprised if MAS staff is not trained to handle deportees – especially very angry ones. In the post 9/11 world the crew needs to be trained to handle such passengers.

  3. #3 by undergrad2 on Saturday, 24 January 2009 - 10:57 pm

    “From an immigration standpoint, if a passenger fails to provide adequate documents, they can be turned away by the arrival country, and airlines are still to treat the person as a passenger. As such, he was not assigned to a separate seating area.” Manager Customer Response, MAS.

    That is not hard to understand.

    This visitor was declared inadmissible by the immigration of that country. For a person to be a deportee, he would have first to be admitted, given a lawyer, appears for his case in court and have a deportation order issued by the immigration judge. The handling of deportees would be different. Here the visitor was declared inadmissible. A visitor in that position is the sole responsibility of the airline without more. He is not the responsibility of the airport security of the country he is seeking admission into.

    However, when the passenger concerned, forced to return to the place of his last embarkation, is a belligerent one, don’t you think your staff could have done more – like swapping seats with another willing passenger if there were no vacant seats available? Couldn’t he be seated temporarily on a seat reserved for the crew until one is available – and when he is finally seated properly a close watch be kept on him?

  4. #4 by undergrad2 on Saturday, 24 January 2009 - 11:10 pm

    Deportable or inadmissible does not matter. What matters is here is an unhappy and angry passenger.

    He could have been angry for a multitude of reasons at both crew and passenger. What do you do??

  5. #5 by alaneth on Sunday, 25 January 2009 - 12:20 am

    I would say the MAS crew has done it’s best to resolve the problem & make everyone on board as comfortable as they can in their effort do. I bet it is hard to ever find another airline that can provide the same quality as MAS cabin crew. Facts does not lie. Being the Best Cabin Crew voted by Skytrax, an international benchmark, the whole world bows to Malaysian Hospitality.

    In my view, besides the extremist passenger, I also blame the ground staff in KLIA. During check-in, why do they give a boarding pass to someone who does not meet the travel requirements to enter Pakistan?

  6. #6 by fatboyslim on Sunday, 25 January 2009 - 5:57 am

    MAS = Mana Ada Sistem?
    SATS = Sistem Ada Tapi Salah!

  7. #7 by undergrad2 on Sunday, 25 January 2009 - 9:26 pm

    “In my view, besides the extremist passenger, I also blame the ground staff in KLIA. During check-in, why do they give a boarding pass to someone who does not meet the travel requirements to enter Pakistan”

    Let’s not be too quick to point the finger – like a certain sour grape we know.

    They do check if you have a valid travel document like a passport not about to expire within six months. Malaysians don’t need visas to enter some countries.

    If you have an international passport meeting the biometric needs of the post 9/11 world, and a visa to enter the United States, it does not mean the U.S. Customs and Immigration will let you in. If their records show you left on an earlier visit to the U.S. on an expired visa or were known to have violated the condition of that visa, then you join the ranks of the inadmissible and you’re banned from entering the country for the next ten years.

    We are told that this passenger was categorized as ‘inadmissible’ and did not have the right to enter the country and would have to go back to where he came from. If he was not declared ‘inadmissible’ then he would be ‘deportable’ i.e. he would be allowed to enter, would be given a lawyer and served with a notice to appear in court on a later date. We call this the right of due process.

  8. #8 by cheong on Monday, 26 January 2009 - 2:52 pm

    so sorry to hear of your such bad experience with our very own ‘Malaysian Hospitality’. Guess MAS only reserve hospitality to foreigners and we locals are treated like dirt. Btw Radhika, I am your ex-colleague in Pusat Matrikulasi Kuala Pilah, Ong. I am in the same staff room with Nirmala, Shikhin……

  9. #9 by ameera on Monday, 26 January 2009 - 8:56 pm

    this is from a personal experience just to compare the difference in policy between MAS and thai airways in handling unruly passengers.i was travelling alone last year to bkk and i sat next to a pakistani passenger who looked drunk.he was travelling with his buddies who were seated in front of us and they were discussing about alcoholic drinks served in flight.after the flight took off and as they were serving food, he started to caress my thighs.i was shocked and screamed.the crew came immediately to my aid and after explaining what just transpired, the crew reprimanded the unruly passenger and told him that no alcoholic drinks would be served to him.i was moved to business class.
    when we landed i noticed that police officers were waiting to escort him.
    maybe MAS should review their standard operating procedures when dealing with unruly passengers.u should remove the possible threat and not to punish the victim instead.

  10. #10 by alhafar on Tuesday, 27 January 2009 - 12:33 am

    I only wonder what would have happened if it had been the reverse situation, that the passenger abused was Muslim. Perhaps it has become commonplace that religious discrimination has been institutionalised and drummed into our people as acceptable as long as it is the other religions that are abused. I was at a computer shop last month and i was horrified when a Malay customer told the proprietor that he was happy to find a Muslim computer shop, as he didnt want to give his money to “those other…” and that was when, perhaps, the boss signalled that I was sitting just beside him and presumably non muslim. That was a lesson indeed on the kind of society the current administration has created. I would have lodged a police report instantly against the abusive passanger and MAS upon arrival, and sent carbon copies to all the media. That is the only way to put a stop to this nonsense.

  11. #11 by shamshul anuar on Thursday, 29 January 2009 - 12:10 am

    Dear Radhika,

    My suggestion is to email to Idris Jala about this. If this nonsense ever to take place, then it must stop. Anyway, this is the first time I heard such tragedy . MAS is known for its hospitality . Rather unfortunate for you to suffer this insult. I am sure that MAS will do the necessary.

    AS forAlenath, for decades UMNO had been chided , termed as “sinful” by PAS for accepting alliance with Chinese and Indians. And you would not believe this. One PAS member, in his sermon in Tamanm Kosas Ah Zahra surau , several years ago condemned Dr Khir ( when he was then MB of Selangor) for having Sunday instead of Friday as public holiday. The termed used is “munafiq” , a very heavy charged for Muslims.

    I questioned the person for saying rubbish. PAS changes its principles on slightest wimp. THey distributed “risalah’ in surau in Pasir Panjang, calling Malays not to vote for Dr Vasan in Pasir Panjang. When they won, they emraced non Muslims.

    And this is the party that DAP is courting now.

  12. #12 by shakarul on Saturday, 7 March 2009 - 4:04 am

    There is nothing wrong about the man sat beside Radhika, PAS, Taliban, Al-Qaeda, whatever Jihad groups, Husam Musa, Zulkifli Hassan or any true Muslim. What they have acted are what they are taught to fulfill in Qur’an.

    Throughout my life as a Non-Muslim citizen for 54 years in Malaysia, I have never encountered a Non-Muslim friend of mine who told me that he/she has ever read the Qur’an before. So go by my experience and the fact that I have at least 2 thousands Non-Muslim friends, I would accurately presume that not even 0.05% of the Non-Muslim population in this country have ever read Qur’an before. This is really cynical as there are more than sixteen millions Muslims in this country whose thinking and ways of livings are closely influenced and governed by Qur’an.

    The total population of Non-Muslim in this country is about 35%. It is amazing to know that 99.99% of them do not realize how the Muslims think about them. I think this phenomena not only occurs in Malaysia but its prevalence applies to the rest of the world. Whenever there is issue related Islam surfaces, most Non-Muslims would often come out with a query or rather a puzzle: “Why such thing happened?”. Well, if one would have read the Qur’an in depth, then he/she will know why.

    I think it is utmost beneficial for all Non-Muslims being a minority group in this country to take the effort to read and understand the contents of Qur’an. Probably only in this way, a Non-Muslim will know how Muslims would think about or treat him/her in our society of multi-cultures and religions.

    In order to instill some interest, just read the 3 following verses extracted from Qur’an, you might get a starter hint why you should start reading and understanding Qur’an:-

    Surah Ali-’Imran

    151. We will cast terror into the hearts of the unbelievers since they ascribe divinity side by side with Allah to other beings (which they worship) for whom no sanction has been revealed by Allah. And (for that reason) Fire shall be their final home; and wretched indeed is the dwelling place of the evil-doers.

    Surah At-Taubah

    5. Then, when the sacred months are over, slay the idolaters wherever you find them, take them captive, besiege them, lie in ambush everywhere for them. But if they repent (of their disbelief) and perform the prayer and pay the almstax, let them go their way (do not disturb them). For Allah is Most Forgiving, Most Merciful.

    123. O believer! Make war on the infidels who dwell around you. Let them find firmness (and perseverance) in you. And know that Allah is with those who are conscious of Him (by rendering them His aid).

    Finally, one can buy a translated version of Qur’an in English language titled as “Tafsir Ar-Rahman – Interpretation of the meaning of the Qur’an” published by the Department of Islamic Development Malaysia from MPH or any prominent bookshops for a price of RM58.

1 3 4 5

Comments are closed.